Here's what your morning routine really says about you
In a new poll of 2,000 U.S. adults, it was revealed that mornings can be easily thrown off for people if they forget to make fresh coffee or tea (38%), don't brush their teeth (34%), skip drinking water (28%), don't shower after getting out of bed (25%) or don't exercise (22%).
Half can tell how their day is going to go based on how alert or tired they feel after waking up, and 49% said their morning plays a 'major' role in dictating how the rest of their day goes — especially for millennials, 57% of whom said their mornings influence the quality of their day.
4 In a new poll of 2,000 U.S. adults, it was revealed that mornings can be easily thrown off for people if they forget to make fresh coffee or tea.
Graphicroyalty – stock.adobe.com
In fact, 37% of respondents reported they can tell if their day is going to be good or bad just within 10 minutes of waking up.
Commissioned by Naturepedic and conducted by Talker Research, the study found it takes the average person 25 minutes to feel fully awake after sleeping.
Generationally, baby boomers take the least amount of time to wake up (just 19 minutes), and millennials take the longest — a full 10 minutes more than their boomer peers.
Universally, morning routines take about a half hour, regardless of age or gender.
4 In fact, 37% of respondents reported they can tell if their day is going to be good or bad just within 10 minutes of waking up.
Yakobchuk Olena – stock.adobe.com
For respondents, typical morning routines usually consist of brushing their teeth (65%), drinking water (60%), making fresh coffee and tea (51%), clearing their eyes (48%), scrolling through missed notifications (40%) and stretching (38%).
Two-thirds (62%) believe they could likely identify if a bad day was caused by having a bad start to their morning. Gen Zers are especially in-tune with this identification, as 73% believe they can tell when they're about to have a bad day.
And to improve their morning, all that would be needed is an early breakfast (49%), getting fresh air (46%) or drinking just as much water as coffee or tea (42%).
When looking at the data from a gender comparison, men were most likely to eat an early breakfast (53%) in order to improve their day. Women, meanwhile, were inclined to improve their day with fresh air in the morning (46%).
The study found having a good day is also cyclical: 68% credit having a good day to having a good night of sleep. And 70% said having a good night of sleep leads to a good day.
4 When looking at the data from a gender comparison, men were most likely to eat an early breakfast (53%) in order to improve their day.
Rido – stock.adobe.com
'It's clear that 'waking up on the right side of the bed' is more than just a turn of phrase,' commented Arin Schultz, chief growth officer at Naturepedic. 'How we spend those first few minutes of the morning is critical to make sure the rest of our day follows the right path.'
According to the survey, the average person gets six hours of sleep per night, but the 'perfect' night of sleep would allow them to have one extra hour.
Nearly three in four (72%) believe their day would be better if they got the 'perfect' amount of sleep.
Every morning, the NY POSTcast offers a deep dive into the headlines with the Post's signature mix of politics, business, pop culture, true crime and everything in between. Subscribe here!
Gen Zers are the biggest believers of this idea, as four in five of them think having the 'perfect' amount of sleep can lead to a better day.
The contributors believe what can help them get the 'perfect' amount of sleep includes watching TV in bed (44%), reading (28%), drinking a glass of water (27%), putting fresh sheets on the bed (19%) and scrolling through social media (17%).
For 87%, sleep isn't always completely restful. They reported feeling occasional stiffness or pain after waking up. Forty-three percent said back pain was their biggest morning irritant, followed by joint pain (37%) and neck pain (30%). Back pain was highest amongst aging Gen Xers (50%), while stiffness was the biggest issue baby boomers face after waking up (53%).
4 According to the survey, the average person gets six hours of sleep per night, but the 'perfect' night of sleep would allow them to have one extra hour.
JenkoAtaman – stock.adobe.com
Forty-six percent of them believe feeling stiffness or pain can have a negative impact on their day.
'Getting fresh air or drinking a glass of water in the morning can definitely help good mornings turn to good days, but sleep also plays a vital role,' continued Arin. 'Getting good quality sleep and following your natural circadian rhythm helps ensure your body is physically ready for the next day.'
TOP SEVEN THINGS TO DO IN THE MORNING TO BOOST YOUR DAY
Eat breakfast early in the day – 49%
Get fresh air – 46%
Drink just as much water as coffee/tea – 42%
Stretch – 35%
Take a lukewarm/cool shower – 27%
Exercise before going to work – 24%
Spend less than 10 minutes on your phone – 21%
Survey methodology:
Talker Research surveyed 2,000 general population Americans; the survey was commissioned by Naturepedic and administered and conducted online by Talker Research between May 16 and May 22, 2025.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Atlantic
24 minutes ago
- Atlantic
The Biggest Anti-Abortion Victory Since ‘Dobbs'
This is an edition of The Atlantic Daily, a newsletter that guides you through the biggest stories of the day, helps you discover new ideas, and recommends the best in culture. Sign up for it here. Amid all the news coverage of the GOP's spending-bill extravaganza—the late-night deficit debates, the strategy sessions, the hallway blanket-wearing —one piece of the package has received comparatively little attention: a provision that would block abortion clinics from receiving Medicaid funds for any of the non-abortion services they provide. During the past three years, abortion restrictions have mostly taken effect mostly in red and purple states—where legislatures have voted to enact them. But if this proposed provision passes, clinics all over the country will be affected. It would 'have a pretty devastating impact on a lot of providers,' Mary Ziegler, a legal scholar and an Atlantic contributor, told me. Some would probably close, and others would have to limit the number of patients they serve. It's 'a really big deal,' she said, with perhaps the most significant consequences for abortion access since the passage of the 1976 Hyde Amendment, which bans federal funds for abortions in most cases. All of this is complicated—which helps explain the dearth of attention to the matter. But funding for independent abortion providers works like this: Clinics receive money from a variety of sources, including local donations, insurance payments, and Medicaid reimbursements. (Yes, the Planned Parenthood Federation of America receives millions in contributions every year, but most of those funds are earmarked for advocacy, Ziegler told me.) A big percentage of Planned Parenthood's patient pool relies on Medicaid. In keeping with the Hyde Amendment, providers are not reimbursed for abortions, but they do receive federal payments for other services, such as breast-cancer screenings, Pap smears, and STI testing. This new legislation would make Planned Parenthood and other clinics ineligible for any kind of Medicaid reimbursement, Ziegler said. If clinics are not paid for these services, then, in many cases, they won't be able to provide them. Maybe some clinics would be able to find funds from state legislatures or local donors to fill in the gaps, but many wouldn't. An initial version of the bill passed by the House would have blocked Medicaid funding for 10 years, but the current version, which passed the Senate earlier today, would prohibit that funding for just one year after the law's passage. (That's right—we'll all be back here again soon.) The cuts represent a pretty clear departure from President Donald Trump's 'leave it to the states' approach to abortion policy. They'd affect clinics everywhere, not just in places where Americans have grown accustomed to hearing about abortion restrictions. Most Planned Parenthood clinics at risk of closure under the bill are in states where abortion is legal, the organization says. That's partly because more blue states have recently expanded Medicaid. Up to one-third of patients at Planned Parenthood of Northern New England, for example, are on Medicaid, and reimbursement totals in the millions of dollars, PPNNE CEO Nicole Clegg told me. 'We'll work with our state leaders' and increase local fundraising efforts, she said. But it will be difficult to make up the difference. The bill's passage is part of an abortion one-two punch: Last week, the Supreme Court made it easier for states to deny Medicaid funding to Planned Parenthood. 'This is tremendous progress on achieving a decades-long goal that has proved elusive in the past,' Marjorie Dannenfelser, the president of Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America, told me in a statement about the SCOTUS decision and the GOP bill. 'This proves what we've said all along: Congress can cut Planned Parenthood's funding—and they just did,' Kristan Hawkins, the president of Students for Life of America, wrote on X about the bill. 'The moral obligation is clear: If we can do it for 1 year, we must do it for good.' The events of this week also represent a slight strategy change. Reporters like me who have long covered the anti-abortion movement anticipated that, under the second Trump presidency, activists would shift their efforts in a different direction: attempting to outlaw abortion via the 1873 Comstock Act. Many who follow this debate agree that they probably still will. But so far, Trump 'hasn't really been doing a lot of what the anti-abortion movement has wanted,' Ziegler said. She wonders whether it was 'a self-conscious decision to go where they thought Republicans already were'—to work toward withholding funding, which is probably politically safer for the GOP than pursuing a relatively unpopular outright abortion ban. Next stop: the House of Representatives. Lawmakers there took up the bill today and want to make it law by Friday. But defenders of abortion access are keeping an eye out. As always, with a razor-thin Republican majority, anything could happen. A big, bad, very ugly bill Jonathan Chait: Congressional Republicans didn't have to do this. A classic childhood pastime is fading. Today's News President Donald Trump visited ' Alligator Alcatraz,' a makeshift migrant-detention center in the Florida Everglades, and said that he wants to see more detention centers in 'many states.' Trump wrote in a social-media post that the Department of Government Efficiency might need to reexamine government subsidies for Elon Musk's businesses. Zohran Mamdani officially won New York City's Democratic mayoral primary by 12 points. Evening Read The Birth-Rate Crisis Isn't as Bad as You've Heard—It's Worse By Marc Novicoff First, the bad news: Global fertility is falling fast. The aging populations of rich countries are relying on ever fewer workers to support their economy, dooming those younger generations to a future of higher taxes, higher debt, or later retirement—or all three … By about 2084, according to the gold-standard United Nations 'World Population Prospects,' the global population will officially begin its decline. Rich countries will all have become like Japan, stagnant and aging. And the rest of the world will have become old before it ever got the chance to become rich. Sorry, did I say 'bad news'? That was actually the good news, based on estimates that turned out to be far too rosy. More From The Atlantic Watch. F1 (out now in theaters) threads the nitty-gritty details of Formula One racing into a traditional underdog drama, David Sims writes. Read. Soft Core, by Brittany Newell, is a noirish novel set in the world of strip clubs and BDSM dungeons that ventures beyond titillation and into the daily grind, Lily Burana writes.
Tom's Guide
an hour ago
- Tom's Guide
FBI warns scammers are posing as fraud investigators to steal sensitive healthcare info — what you need to know
Scammers are targeting both patients and health care providers in a new phishing attack designed to steal your sensitive personal and financial data, according to a new alert from the FBI. As reported by BleepingComputer, the federal law enforcement agency recently put out a public service announcement warning that scammers and other cybercriminals are currently impersonating health insurance companies and their respective fraud investigators in an effort to steal customer data. According to the FBI, the scammers behind this new campaign are sending out phishing emails and text messages with the hope that potential victims will disclose their 'protected health information, medical records, personal financial details' or even provide 'reimbursements for fake service overpayments or non-covered services.' Brand impersonation is nothing new for cybercriminals, but by targeting patients directly, they might be able to trick some people into giving up the kind of information that can be used to commit fraud or even medical identity theft. Given that providing sensitive healthcare information via email or text is a clear HIPPA violation in most cases, this is a major red flag that you're not dealing with an actual health insurance company or even their fraud investigators. Still, for the FBI to issue a public service announcement, this means that this isn't the type of threat to take lightly and that some patients and even health care providers have fallen for this phishing attack. To help Americans avoid falling victim to this new phishing scam, the FBI has provided some guidance on the matter in its public service announcement. Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips. For starters, you should always be wary of unsolicited emails, text messages and calls asking for your personal information. Likewise, if you do come across one of these emails or messages, you shouldn't click on any links they contain as they could be malicious. To keep your medical accounts safe from scammers and hackers, you want to use strong and unique passwords for all of them. You never want to reuse a password and if you have trouble coming up with complex passwords for your accounts or remembering them, you might want to consider using one of the best password managers instead. Since phishing messages could contain malware or other viruses, you want to make sure that you're using the best antivirus software on your Windows PC or the best Mac antivirus software on your Apple computer. There's a lot that hackers and scammers can do with sensitive medical information and personal data, so I doubt this is the last time we will see an attack like this. For this reason, you want to make sure that you're extra careful when dealing with any emails or text messages claiming to come from your healthcare provider.
Indianapolis Star
2 hours ago
- Indianapolis Star
Trump's tax bill will gut Medicaid in Indiana
President Trump's Big Beautiful Bill is set to become law. What's being celebrated in Washington as a political victory will hit Indiana as a health care crisis. Marketed as tax and budget reform, the bill guts Medicaid, strips away insurance protections and enacts policy changes that will leave tens of thousands of Hoosiers without coverage. For a state that already ranks near the bottom in public health funding, this is deeply irresponsible. This bill creates unmistakable winners and losers. Wealthier Americans and large employers benefit from extended tax cuts and fewer insurance requirements. States with conservative leadership gain more control over Medicaid, allowing them to cut spending with less federal oversight. Meanwhile, the losses fall squarely on working families, rural communities and people with chronic illness. More from Raja Ramaswamy: Nurses are drowning while Braun ignores Indiana's health care crisis Giving Indiana more control over Medicaid isn't inherently harmful. But in Indiana, where leaders have consistently underfunded public health and pushed for tighter eligibility, that control is likely to mean stricter rules, fewer benefits and more people losing coverage. Indiana's hospitals will absorb roughly $800 million in unpaid care, leading to higher bills, strained clinics and more Hoosiers forced into medical debt. Patients who rely on comprehensive plans may find themselves stuck with stripped-down policies that exclude mental health, maternity care or treatment for serious illness. The people who need care the most are the ones being asked to sacrifice. The bill cuts Medicaid by more than $1 trillion nationwide, according to the Congressional Budget Office. In Indiana, 2.3 million people rely on Medicaid, including children, seniors and low-income workers. New work and paperwork requirements are expected to knock tens of thousands of Hoosiers off the rolls. These are bureaucratic obstacles that force families to choose between treatment and financial stability. Supporters claim the bill will root out fraud and encourage work. But with Indiana ranked 48th in public health funding, we are in no position to absorb cuts of this scale. Medicaid is not a handout. It is a lifeline for working families. This bill severs it, leaving thousands vulnerable to financial and health crises. The Center for American Progress estimates the legislation will add $36 billion in uncompensated care costs nationwide, with Indiana's share at roughly $800 million. Those costs will strain hospitals, raise premiums and burden families already struggling to afford care. This bill is a failure of health policy. Health care is not optional. It is as essential as public education or clean water. Cutting coverage for thousands of Hoosiers does not save money. It shifts the burden onto families who cannot afford to get sick. Trump calls it beautiful. In Indiana, it's nothing but brutal.
