China's yuan slips to 2-year low versus peers after Trump-Xi call leaves issues unresolved
SHANGHAI (Reuters) - China's yuan slipped against the dollar while falling to a near two-year low versus its major trading partners on Friday, as U.S. President Donald Trump and Chinese leader Xi Jinping held a much-anticipated call but left key issues that have stoked tensions between the world's two largest economies unresolved.
During the more than one-hour-long call, Xi told Trump to back down from trade measures that have roiled the global economy and warned him against threatening steps on Taiwan, according to a Chinese government summary.
"Although the likelihood of a U.S.-China deal increases with more high-level dialogues, investors remain skeptical that both sides are merely buying time to address some pressing issues," said Gary Ng, senior economist at Natixis.
Trump said on social media that the talks focused primarily on trade led to "a very positive conclusion," announcing further lower-level U.S.-China discussions and that "there should no longer be any questions respecting the complexity of Rare Earth products."
"The call does not offer much comfort in cutting tariffs, but only touching on access of critical materials and tech export control," Ng said. "Therefore, there is no certainty of what kind of deal will be made, and it may only be a partial one given the wide range of issues between the U.S. and China."
As of 0830 GMT, the onshore yuan ended its domestic trading session at 7.1847 per dollar, down 0.08% from the previous night.
Its offshore counterpart traded at 7.1852 around 0830 GMT.
"The talk itself should lift market sentiment, but Trump's erratic policies make it hard to convince investors," said a trader at a foreign bank.
Wang Zhuo, partner at Zhuozhu Investment in Shanghai, said "Trump's fickleness has made such talks less and less meaningful to the market", but added that direct communications were helpful for removing some misunderstandings.
Trade talks between Washington and Beijing had stalled after a meeting in Geneva last month, where both sides agreed to temporarily roll back most of the tariffs imposed on each other's goods since April. Trump has accused China of violating the bilateral deal.
Prior to the market opening, the People's Bank of China (PBOC) set the midpoint rate at 7.1845 per dollar, its strongest since May 26 and 90 pips firmer than a Reuters' estimate of 7.1935. The spot yuan is allowed to trade 2% either side of the fixed midpoint each day.
Based on Friday's official guidance fix, the CFETS yuan index, a gauge that measures the yuan's weighted value versus 25 currencies of trading partners, fell to 95.58 and is down 5.8% year-to-date, according to Reuters calculations based on official data.
The spot yuan has, however, strengthened 1.6% versus the dollar during the same period.
While Beijing has said it does not deliberately seek a weaker currency, the currency's passive decline versus its peers comes at a time of heightened Sino-U.S. tensions for an economy struggling with deflationary pressures and weak domestic demand.
Investors will shift their attention to a string of Chinese economic data releases next week, including inflation and trade data on Monday, as investors are keen to gauge the health of the broader economy under Trump's tariffs.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNBC
an hour ago
- CNBC
Bank of America bets on ‘outsized price movements' in Australia's bond market as investors rotate away from the U.S.
As international investors pivot out of the U.S., another part of the world — and its bond market in particular — is gaining attention, according to Bank of America. The analysts pointed to Australia's bond market as potential beneficiary of the dollar losing its safe haven status. Dedollarization Market volatility under U.S. President Donald Trump's presidency has led some investors to diversify to other markets in 2025. Trump's controversial trade policies sparked a "Sell America" trade earlier this year that raised questions about dedollarization as investors cashed out of U.S. Treasurys, Wall Street stocks and the greenback. The U.S. dollar index , which measures the greenback against a basket of major rivals, is down 9% so far this year. .DXY YTD mountain Price of the U.S. dollar index so far this year. In a note on Wednesday, FX strategists at Bank of America forecast significant price moves ahead for Australian sovereign debt, in part because of the dedollarization trend. They suggested the country's fixed income market could see an inflow of capital as U.S.-focused positions were reassessed — but noted that even a modest rotation out of U.S. dollar-denominated assets had the potential to "overwhelm AUD fixed-income and [lead to] outsized price movements." In its most recent Global Fund Managers Survey, published last week, Bank of America found that fund managers were the most underweight on the U.S. dollar then they have ever been in 20 years. One in five of the 222 fund managers — who collectively manage assets worth $587 billion — polled this month said they saw a short U.S. dollar position as the most crowded trade. "High-frequency data" suggests foreign and official demand for the Australian dollar may be "intensifying," BofA's Oliver Levingston, Adarsh Sinha and Janice Xue said in a Wednesday note. 'Major impact' on pricing "For small fixed-income markets like Australia's, a modest rotation out of USD assets could have a major impact on market pricing," they added. "Dedollarization was a major theme on our trip to the United States and Canada, and we continue to highlight the significant impact small shifts in global fund managers' asset allocations could have on the demand profile for AUD fixed income." So far this year, the yield on Australia's benchmark 10-year government bond has cooled slightly to around 4.24%. On Friday, the yield gained 1 basis point. Bond prices and yields move in opposite directions, and 1 basis equals 0.01%. Comparatively, the yield on the benchmark U.S. 10-year Treasury was last trading at around 4.43% — giving the two assets a spread of 19 basis points. AU10Y US10Y YTD line The chart shows the yield on the Australian 10 year government bond versus the U.S. 10 year Treasury. Bank of America's strategists said they expected that spread to widen further in the coming years, as demand for Australian sovereign debt surged. Noting that the bonds were "highly sensitive to shifts in global reserve manager demand," they forecast that demand would exceed supply by 2027/28. "We recommend going long spreads and see AU 10y bonds trading 75bps rich vs USTs … by end-'26," they wrote. A wider spread of 75 basis points would imply stronger Australian bond prices relative to U.S. Treasurys. 'Peripheral dollar bloc assets' Part of the appeal, according to Levingston, Sinha and Xue, is rising demand for what they referred to as "peripheral dollar bloc assets." Over the past decade, the share of official reserves — that is, assets held by central banks — denominated in Australian dollars has doubled, they said. Another 1-percentage-point gain in global reserve demand would translate to 185% of net supply of Australian sovereign bonds in the current fiscal year, they added. Conversely, demand for U.S. Treasurys — historically seen as a safe investment in times of macroeconomic or geopolitical turmoil — has been shaky this year. In the aftermath of Trump's so-called "liberation day" tariffs announcement, U.S. Treasurys sold off , pushing yields — representative of government borrowing costs — higher, and prices of the bonds lower. "Coupled with tailwinds from Australian superannuation [pension] funds' rapidly growing footprint in AUD fixed-income markets and potential bank deregulation, the demand profile for AUD fixed income looks robust," BofA's Levingston, Sinha and Xue said in their note. "In our view, AUD bonds' high sensitivity to small shifts in global reserve demand for AUD assets has not been priced. On a comparative international basis, AUD term premium looks excessively high."
Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Russia Responds To US Strikes, Will Hold Direct Talks With Iran
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The Russian government on Sunday "strongly condemned" the United States' strikes the day before against three key Iranian nuclear facilities and is preparing to hold direct talks with Iranian officials to address the fallout. Why It Matters Trump on Saturday evening announced what he described as a "very successful attack" against three Iranian nuclear sites at Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan. U.S. officials said the attacks caused severe damage, but questions remain about the full extent of the damage and how much of a setback it is for Iran's nuclear program. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu praised the Trump administration for taking an offensive position in the conflict, which Israeli officials have strongly advocated for since Israel first ignited the war on June 13. The Israelis said the U.S. should strike Iran's nuclear facilities because Tehran was getting close to developing a nuclear weapon. Iran denies the charge, saying its nuclear program is for civilian purposes. Iran vowed to retaliate after Saturday's strikes, accusing the U.S. of crossing "a very big red line" with its decision to pummel the three nuclear sites with 30,000-pound bunker-buster bombs. What To Know "It is already clear that a dangerous escalation has begun, fraught with further undermining of regional and global security," the Russian foreign ministry said in a statement addressing the U.S.'s strikes. "The risk of the conflict spreading in the Middle East, which is already gripped by multiple crises, has increased significantly." Russia also called the strikes "irresponsible" and a "gross violation of international law." Iran and Russia will hold talks in the aftermath of the U.S. strikes and Iran's foreign minister, Abbas Araghchi, said hours after the attacks that he will travel to Moscow while emphasizing Iran's "strategic partnership" with Russia. A top Russian official and close ally of Russian President Vladimir Putin also skewered Trump on social media after he announced the U.S.'s strikes, which hit Iranian nuclear sites at Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan. "The US is now entangled in a new conflict, with prospects of a ground operation looming on the horizon," Dmitry Medvedev, the deputy chairman of Russia's Security Council, wrote in a thread on X (formerly Twitter). Medvedev went on to praise Iran's "political regime," saying it "survived" the strikes and "in all likelihood, has come out even stronger." "Donald Trump, once hailed as 'president of peace,' has now pushed the US into another war," Medvedev wrote, taunting Trump. The vast majority of countries around the world oppose the actions of Israel and the United States." "At this rate, Trump can forget about the Nobel Peace Prize — not even with how rigged it has become," he added. "What a way to kick things off, Mr. President. Congratulations!" Trump, for his part, said on social media after that if Iran retaliated against the U.S., it would "BE MET WITH FORCE FAR GREATER THAN WHAT WAS WITNESSED TONIGHT." This is a breaking news story. Updates to follow.
Chicago Tribune
an hour ago
- Chicago Tribune
President Donald Trump's go-it-alone strategy on Iran risks dividing an already split Congress
WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump's decision to launch a military strike on Iran's nuclear sites without fully consulting the U.S. Congress layered a partisan approach onto a risky action, particularly because the White House briefed top Republican leaders beforehand without doing the same for Democrats. While House Speaker Mike Johnson, Senate Republican leader John Thune and the GOP chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee were all briefed before the action, their counterparts were not. Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer was given a perfunctory heads-up by the White House shortly before the strikes were made public. And House Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries' office received a 'courtesy call' before Trump announced it. The so-called Gang of Eight congressional and intelligence leaders were not notified before the mission, according to two people familiar with the situation and granted anonymity to discuss it. One, Rep. Jim Himes, the top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, said he learned of the strikes on social media, which he said 'is an uncomfortable thing for the ranking member of the Intelligence Committee.' 'Bad enough that we weren't informed,' Himes, of Connecticut, said Sunday on CNN, 'but unconstitutional that we didn't have the opportunity to debate and speak, as the representatives of the people, on what is one of the more consequential foreign policy things that this country has done in a long time.' It's a highly unusual situation that is complicating the difficult politics ahead for the president and his party as the U.S. enters an uncertain national security era with the surprise military attack on the nuclear facilities, an unprecedented incursion in Iran. Trump faces a vote in Congress as soon as this week on a war powers resolution from Sen. Tim Kaine, D-Va., that would 'direct the removal of United States Armed Forces from hostilities against the Islamic Republic of Iran that have not been authorized by Congress.' Another resolution has been introduced by lawmakers from both parties in the U.S. House. And at least one Democrat, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio Cortez, said Trump's actions are 'clearly grounds for impeachment.' At the same time, the Trump administration is expecting Congress to send an additional $350 billion in national security funds as part of the president's big tax breaks bill also heading soon for a vote. Senators are set to be briefed Tuesday behind closed doors on the situation in Iran. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said Sunday that the White House made 'bipartisan courtesy calls' to congressional leadership. She said in a social media post that the White House spoke to Schumer 'before the strike' but that House leader Jeffries 'could not be reached until after, but he was briefed.' While the president has authority as the commander in chief of the U.S. armed forces to order specific military actions, any prolonged war-time footing would traditionally need authorization from Congress. The House and Senate authorized actions in Iraq, Afghanistan and beyond after the Sept. 11, 2001, attack. 'Congress should be consulted,' Kaine said on CBS' 'Face the Nation.' 'We were not.' As soon as Trump announced the actions late Saturday, he won swift support from the GOP leadership in Congress. Johnson, Thune and the Senate Intelligence Committee chairman, Sen. Tom Cotton of Arkansas, were all briefed ahead of time and sent almost simultaneous statements backing the military campaign, as did the House Intelligence Committee chairman, Rep. Rick Crawford, also of Arkansas. But by apparently engaging with only one side of the political aisle, Trump risks saddling his Republican Party with political ownership of the military action against Iran, which may or may not prove popular with Americans. Rather than rally the country to his side, Trump risks cleaving its already deep divisions over his second term agenda. Johnson, who praised Trump's action against Iran as 'the right call,' said the president's targeted strike was within his authority and in line with past presidential actions. 'Leaders in Congress were aware of the urgency of this situation and the Commander-in-Chief evaluated that the imminent danger outweighed the time it would take for Congress to act,' Johnson, R-La., said on social media. Trump himself has shown little patience for political dissent from within his party, even as criticism rolls in from among his most trusted backers. The Iran military campaign threatens to splinter Trump's Make America Great Again movement, which powered his return to the White House. Many Trump supporters aligned with his campaign promises not to involve the United States in overseas actions and instead to be a peace-making president. 'I think I represent part of the coalition that elected Trump,' said Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Ky., on CBS. 'We were tired of endless wars in the Middle East.' Massie and Democratic Rep. Ro Khanna of California have introduced their own war powers resolution in the House, a sign of how close the far left and far right have bonded over their opposition to U.S. campaigns abroad, particularly in the Middle East. The Trump administration insisted Sunday the U.S. is not seeking a war with Iran. 'We're not at war with Iran. We're at war with Iran's nuclear program,' said Vice President JD Vance on NBC's 'Meet the Press.' And Trump swiftly attacked Massie, who is one of the most steadfast non-interventionist GOP lawmakers in Congress — along with Sen. Rand Paul, also of Kentucky — and the president suggested he would turn his Republican Party against the congressman. 'MAGA should drop this pathetic LOSER, Tom Massie, like the plague!' the president said on social media. 'The good news is that we will have a wonderful American Patriot running against him in the Republican Primary, and I'll be out in Kentucky campaigning really hard.'
