Make foolproof arrangements for NEET exam: Collector
Speaking on the occasion, Collector Rajakumari stated that 1,172 students will be appearing for the NEET exam across various centers in Nandyal town, including the Government Degree College, Government High School near the Bus Stand, Tekke Junior College, and Government Polytechnic College, among others. She emphasized the need to ensure all necessary basic amenities at the exam centres.
The Collector instructed officials to allow students into exam centers from 11:00 a.m. and directed APSPDCL authorities to ensure uninterrupted power supply during the examination. She also asked the District Medical and Health Officer (DMHO) to set up medical camps at the examination centers.
Further, the Municipal Commissioner was directed to ensure proper sanitation and drinking water facilities in and around the exam centers. The District Educational Officer (DEO) was instructed to arrange enough benches for students at all centers.
Additionally, the Collector asked Tahsildars and police officials to impose Section 144 (prohibitory orders) in the vicinity of the exam centers to maintain law and order. Joint Collector C Vishnu Charan, DRO Ramu Naik, Deputy Collectors, and several district officials attended the meeting.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NDTV
2 hours ago
- NDTV
"Moment Of Pride For Tamils": Tamil Nadu BJP Chief On Veep Pick CP Radhakrishnan
Chennai: Tamil Nadu BJP president Nainar Nagendran has described the nomination of Maharashtra Governor CP Radhakrishnan for the Vice Presidential race as a moment of pride for Tamils, while also turning the spotlight on the ruling DMK for its refusal to extend support. In a detailed statement, Mr Nagendran said Mr Radhakrishnan's elevation was "a recognition of Tamil Nadu's contribution to the nation," thanking Prime Minister Narendra Modi and the NDA leadership. "Dr CP Radhakrishnan has always stood for Tamil values while serving the country. His victory will be a proud moment for every Tamil household," Mr Nagendran said. Mr Nagendran also sharpened the political edge, reminding the DMK of its earlier stand on Dr APJ Abdul Kalam's second presidential term, which it had refused to support then. "This is an opportunity for the DMK to correct its historic blunder of not supporting the re-election of our beloved son of the soil, Dr Kalam. By refusing to support another Tamil, the DMK risks once again being on the wrong side of history," he declared. The DMK, while welcoming Mr Radhakrishnan's nomination, has already ruled out support, citing ideological opposition to the BJP. But the BJP sees this as an opening - portraying the DMK as inconsistent on Tamil pride while positioning itself as the party that elevates Tamil leaders to national prominence. Mr Radhakrishnan, a two-time MP from Coimbatore, former Tamil Nadu BJP president, and currently Maharashtra Governor, enjoys cross-party goodwill, including with Tamil Nadu Chief Minister MK Stalin. His nomination, if it sails through, would make him the third Vice President from Tamil Nadu, after Dr Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan and R Venkataraman, who also rose to become Presidents. For the BJP, the symbolism matters. Facing sustained criticism from the DMK over alleged Hindi imposition, NEET, and fund allocation, the party is leveraging Mr Radhakrishnan's candidature to soften its image in the state and project itself as a party of inclusivity. Strategically, Mr Radhakrishnan's roots in the western region - where the BJP has a modest but growing base - add electoral weight. The region is also a stronghold of its ally AIADMK. With the BJP commanding a majority in Parliament, Mr Radhakrishnan's election is assured. But the larger battle, party insiders say, is about reshaping public perception in Tamil Nadu, where the BJP hopes to use this symbolic victory to take the DMK's dominance ahead of the 2026 Assembly polls.
Mint
16 hours ago
- Mint
One Nation, One Election: Does it reflect an Indian way of thinking?
One of the common themes of regimes in power at the Centre is a drive to standardize or make uniform some important aspects of policy and process throughout India. This drive is not partisan, in the sense that both major national parties have shown their propensity to do this over the decades. One could argue that this drive has gotten stronger in recent years, most likely enabled by digital technology that makes things possible which couldn't have been imagined earlier. This uniformity drive includes some procedures that have been established for many years, such as national examination systems for engineering (JEE for central institutions), medicine (NEET for all medical colleges), civil services (the UPSC exam), CAT (for management), CLAT (for law) and so on. More recently, we have seen the creation of the Aadhaar card system under the Unique Identification Authority of India. Its current form was established in 2016 (by the BJP-led NDA), but it was the brainchild of the Congress-led UPA and began functioning in 2009. This 'voluntary' mechanism is the world's largest biometric database and increasingly feels like a requirement for all practical purposes. Also Read: One nation, one election: Consultation time has begun A recent major national policy that affects all residents was the introduction of the goods and services tax (GST) in 2017. Rolled out under the slogan of 'One Nation, One Tax,' this is an indirect tax that replaced numerous central and state-level indirect taxes (including excise duties and VATs). Something like the GST began under the Rajiv Gandhi government's MODVAT policy in 1986; in 1999, a GST proposal was considered seriously by the A.B. Vajpayee government; the Manmohan Singh government introduced a Constitution Amendment Bill in 2011 to introduce GST, but was resisted by the BJP at that time. After gaining power, the BJP-led NDA passed the GST law and it has since become a fact of life in India. The most recent effort at standardization is what is being called the 'One Nation, One Election' proposal. The intent is to have the Lok Sabha election for central government formation coincide with all Vidhan Sabha elections in the states (and Union territories with elected bodies). The key argument being put forward is similar to the one that undergirded the GST push: efficiency (by saving time, money and bureaucratic resources). Independent India did indeed begin with simultaneous polls, but as state governments started falling before their term-end (either through internal dissension or because they were toppled by the Centre), the Vidhan Sabha calendars lost synchrony. The idea of simultaneous elections has stayed around (even under Congress rule), not necessarily with a catchy name, but this is the first time that this idea has gone as far as this: The Constitution (One Hundred and Twenty-Ninth Amendment) Bill, which was introduced in December 2024 in the Lok Sabha. Also Read: Simplify GST: It's time for a single all-India identification mandate It is not my intent to examine or critique the mechanisms in the bill. Interested readers should look up a meticulous analysis by Milan Vaishnav, Caroline Mallory and Annabel Richter ( They conclude that the efficiency and savings being projected by backers of the bill may not be realistic and that the Constitutional amendment, if passed, 'could create new problems without resolving old ones." My intent is instead to suggest that efficiency and cost savings, virtues as they are in most settings, may not be the most important objectives in all settings—in India perhaps more than anywhere else. What could be more important? In India, a broader perspective suggests that the more important objective may be the maintenance of a delicate balance of social diversity and tradition (even though some 'traditions' may be quite recent). Also Read: Ajit Ranade: A progressive GST is easier to promise than achieve To help us think through the argument, I begin with the brilliant insights of the eminent linguist and poet A. K. Ramanujan. In a 1989 essay called 'Is There an Indian Way of Thinking?' Professor Ramanujan argued that there is indeed one, at least in the sense that it's different from 'Western' rationality, because Indian thought is characterized by context-sensitivity, internal contradictions and a lack of universals. For example, the punishment for a crime like cattle theft was not standardized (even within the same region); it varied by location, time of day, season, the social identity of the owner and of the thief, and so on. This way of thinking explained, for Ramanujan, why his father was both an astronomer and an astrologer. One of the best examples of context-sensitivity is the collection of land laws in India. Land is a 'state subject' under the Indian Constitution precisely because of the wide variance in land rights and their history in various regions for different communities. Most readers of this column are likely to be familiar with India's urban land and property markets and laws, which have some city-to-city variation, but are generally unrestricted. In the rest of the country, its rural and especially tribal regions, there are hundreds of state-specific laws on who can buy land and from whom, who can sell and to whom, what can be sold and how much, what can never be sold, etc. Also Read: Through reels and shorts—how micro-influencers are shaping state elections Does this patchwork of laws and customs lead to the 'highest and best use of land?' From a purely market efficiency perspective, the answer is surely 'no.' But from a political or social economy perspective, the answer is probably 'yes,' not least because the system has proven to be sustainable. The Indian way of doing elections—everything, everywhere, all at once—is a hallmark of the Indian parliamentary system. No other multi-party parliamentary system comes close to India's in size or complexity. Streamlining this massive and complex system is a temptation for sure. Short-term self-interest apart, many modern minds simply abhor this messiness. But, to streamline it may be foolhardy. What could be gained in time and cost (if anything) could pale in comparison with what may be lost: the flexibility and adaptability that make Indian democracy work. The author is a professor of geography, environment and urban studies and director of global studies at Temple University.
Hindustan Times
a day ago
- Hindustan Times
Punjab CM: Cops to get ₹1.2 lakh for 1-kg heroin seizure from next year
The cops performing well in the 'Yudh Nashian Virudh' (anti-drug war) campaign will receive monetary reward, chief minister Bhagwant Mann has said while claiming that the narcotics supply network has been on its last legs. During his Independence Day speech in Faridkot, he said, 'It has been decided that from March 1, 2026, the police personnel recovering 1-kg heroin will get a cash reward of ₹1.2 lakh.' Punjab chief minister Bhagwant Mann (PTI file) Asserting that Pakistan has been the source of the drugs reaching the state, he said the government has demolished houses built using drug money, jailed smugglers and curbed the open sale of drugs. 'Punjab is the first state in the country to have its own anti-drone system which will destroy any flying object coming from the other side of the border. For the first time, an anti-drug syllabus has been introduced in the schools of the state to make students aware of the scourge of drugs,' he added. The CM offered prayers at Tilla Baba Sheikh Farid. Mann highlighted that Punjab has topped the National Achievement Survey 2025 in all subjects for the first time since 2017. 'The government school students are clearing JEE and NEET, and Punjab-origin players captain the national football, basketball, women's cricket and men's hockey teams,' he said. He lauded the academic achievements of girls, pointing out that the Class 8 and Class 10 toppers — Navjot Kaur and Akshnoor Kaur — of 2025 hailed from Faridkot.
