logo
Scientists sound alarm over troubling health risk lurking in children's candy: 'We never stop to think'

Scientists sound alarm over troubling health risk lurking in children's candy: 'We never stop to think'

Yahoo2 days ago

Experts studying the health risks of talc have prompted the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to reevaluate its presence in candy, other foods, and medications.
There is a prevalence of talc in our food and prescriptions in America despite its potential to cause cancer.
As Chemical & Engineering News reported, the FDA convened a nonpartisan panel to discuss the cancer and other health risks of talc.
Manufacturers use talc to prevent moisture absorption and caking on products. Since it's been linked to ovarian cancer, talc has been removed from most cosmetics and body powders.
However, it still remains in chewing gum — that white powder keeping stick gum from sticking to the wrapper — and many commonly prescribed medications like Lipitor and Nexium. During the panel, the doctors and scientists discussed how it's unclear whether some rice and flour makers might be including talc since they would not need to disclose it under current laws, citing how it has been used in these products in other countries.
"Talc is in candy that children eat," said FDA commissioner Marty Makary, a surgeon and professor who generally had bipartisan support in his appointment to the post. "It's in food."
In addition to cancer risks, scientists on the panel also warned of talc's connection to chronic inflammation and expressed concern about talc's often being used as a food processing aid. Foodmakers aren't required to disclose the ingredients in their processing aids, so it's unclear which foods actually contain talc.
Talc has been a known carcinogen for over 40 years. "Yet," Makary said, "we're feeding it to our nation's children. I'm amazed that we scratch our heads asking, why are we seeing GI cancers go up in young people, and we never stop to think about the existing body of scientific evidence that has been there."
Although the U.S. has largely eliminated talc from body products, it still remains a significant issue in what Americans routinely consume.
The FDA found that talc in Johnson & Johnson baby powder was contaminated with asbestos, which led to an $8.9 billion settlement. Talc mining poses a risk for asbestos contamination, according to the FDA, because "both talc and asbestos are naturally occurring minerals that may be found in close proximity in the earth."
Do you worry about having toxic forever chemicals in your home?
Majorly
Sometimes
Not really
I don't know enough about them
Click your choice to see results and speak your mind.
In a Wall Street Journal opinion piece, the editorial board criticized Makary for fueling plaintiff attorneys' lawsuits on food and drug manufacturers with alleged talc claims.
However, the science behind talc's health risks is undeniable. And just as the FDA banned Red 3 food dye while encouraging brands to stop using all other synthetic dyes, the common thread is that there are risks with no nutritional benefits.
Similar to PFAS, or forever chemicals — used in things like packaging and nonstick cookware — talc may make some things "easier" or more convenient in the short term, but if the tradeoff is increased cancer risks, the government needs to play a role in banning or at least regulating safe exposures with penalties to deter violations.
With cases like these, it often takes many scientists' testimonies and organizations to petition before widespread bans are finally approved to make products safer and our environment cleaner.
Panel members urged the FDA to further investigate talc in the American food and drug supply and share findings with the general public. Clinical trials to study the impacts of talc on the human body have been discussed.
The burden is now on the FDA to work with regulators to reconsider talc's widespread use. Fortunately, safer alternatives to talc exist, and there is international momentum also to ban talc in other countries for public health reasons. On that note, one of the panelists was Malcolm Sim, emeritus professor of planetary health at Monash University in Australia, who said he intended to help with uniting the countries' efforts to address talc.
As an individual, you can keep harmful substances out of your body by supporting eco-friendly brands and companies that sell products with plastic-free packaging.
If you are concerned about talc exposure, look for mentions of talc or magnesium silicate on product labels, and choose products that explicitly state they are talc-free when possible. You can also research manufacturers who make products you regularly buy to assess if they have conducted asbestos testing.
Join our free newsletter for weekly updates on the latest innovations improving our lives and shaping our future, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Kentucky health officials warn against use of kratom
Kentucky health officials warn against use of kratom

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Kentucky health officials warn against use of kratom

LEXINGTON, Ky. (FOX 56) — Kratom is a tropical tree found in Southeast Asia, and it has been around for hundreds of years. Its leaves are sold throughout the United States and can treat things like pain, coughing, anxiety, depression, and even opioid use disorder and withdrawal. 'It is sold in Kentucky. Usually, it will come in either an herbal powder form or in a pill form,' said Program Director for Voices of Hope Lexington, Jimmy Chadwell. Kentucky health officials warn against use of kratom Kentucky judge tells lawmakers child removal process doesn't move quick enough in abuse investigations 1 charged, shelter-in-place ended in Saunders Lane after Boone County shooting investigation In early June, the Kentucky Department for Public Health and the Kentucky Office of Drug Control Policy put out a health alert advising the public not to consume kratom products and products containing 7-hydroxymitragynine, better known as 7-OH. It is a chemical compound found in kratom. The health agencies warned that when 7-OH is concentrated or synthetically made, it can increase the risk of overdose, severe health issues, and death. Chadwell urges those using pure kratom products for their harm-reduction benefits to do so wisely. Kentuckians spend the 3rd highest share of their income on fast food Bill could make federal minimum wage $15: Kentucky among states paying less than that Kentucky sitting near bottom of rankings in environmental protection: Study 'Exercise caution. Moderate the amount you use. Never use it alone. Always have Narcan available. Okay? Because of these kratom and the 7-OH, they work on the opioid receptors. So having Narcan available is really going to save somebody's life,' he told FOX 56. Kratom is not FDA-approved and is illegal in six states. But Chadwell said that Voices of Hope, an organization for people recovering from substance abuse disorders, believes the answer is not more laws; it is more conversation. 'We believe that creating more laws surrounding drugs and drug users will not help the community. Instead, we feel that supporting increases in the availability of education and encouraging harm reduction initiatives when using any substance are the best route to go,' he said. Read more of the latest health and wellness news Health officials also said there are no guarantees that kratom products contain the ingredients the packages claim, have the correct concentrations, or are free from contaminants or other drugs. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Merry Life Launches Global Phase II Trial of TML-6, The First Drug Targeted at Autolysosome pathway for Therapy of Alzheimer's Disease
Merry Life Launches Global Phase II Trial of TML-6, The First Drug Targeted at Autolysosome pathway for Therapy of Alzheimer's Disease

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Merry Life Launches Global Phase II Trial of TML-6, The First Drug Targeted at Autolysosome pathway for Therapy of Alzheimer's Disease

TAINAN, June 12, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- Merry Life Biomedical Company announces the launch of its global Phase II clinical trial for TML-6, a novel oral small molecule drug targeting early-stage Alzheimer's disease (AD). TML-6 combines multiple mechanisms, including anti-oxidative effects (Nrf2 activation), melioration of autophagy function (autolysosomal activation), anti-amyloid accumulation (β-amyloid clearance), and anti-inflammatory effects (through NF-κB inhibition) through autolysosome pathway in neurons and microglia to remove intraneuronal and extracellular amyloid accumulation, representing the first in human multi-target strategy for AD treatment. The Phase I trial showed excellent safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics at 100–200 mg in both healthy and elderly adults. TML-6 will now advance to a Phase II 19 site trial across the United States, Sweden, and Taiwan after FDA approval. This 12-month study will enroll 210 patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or mild dementia. Primary endpoints will include neuropsychological assessments (CDR-SB, iADRS) and blood biomarkers (p-Tau 217, Aβ42/40, NfL, GFAP), supported by brain MRI, amyloid PET scans, and ApoE genotyping. Type C FDA consultation for phase 2 trial design has completed on 13 May 2025, with trial initiation expected in April 2026, conducted by Syneos Health CRO. With its strong preclinical and clinical profile, TML-6 holds promise as both a monotherapy and in combination with anti-amyloid biologics, providing new hope for patients with Alzheimer's disease. About Merry Life Biomedical Company Merry Life Biomedical is a Taiwan-based biotechnology company focused on developing innovative therapies for neurodegenerative and age-related diseases. Leveraging advanced molecular design, pharmacological innovation, formulation optimization and global clinical development, the company is committed to addressing urgent unmet medical needs. Media ContactDr. Ih-Jen SuMerry Life Biomedical Company, +886-910-902-296Email: suihjen0704@ View original content to download multimedia: SOURCE Merry Life Biomedical Company, Ltd. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

RFK Jr. Is Barely Even Pretending Anymore
RFK Jr. Is Barely Even Pretending Anymore

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

RFK Jr. Is Barely Even Pretending Anymore

The Atlantic Daily, a newsletter that guides you through the biggest stories of the day, helps you discover new ideas, and recommends the best in culture. Sign up for it here. When Robert F. Kennedy Jr. accepted his new position as health secretary, he made a big show of distancing himself from his past life. 'News reports have claimed that I am anti-vaccine or anti-industry,' Kennedy, who has for decades promoted the debunked notion that vaccines cause autism and has baselessly sown doubt over the ability of the U.S. government to vet shots, said at his confirmation hearing in January. 'I am neither. I am pro-safety.' But for all Kennedy's talk, this week, he did exactly what a person would do if they were trying to undermine the scientific consensus on vaccination in the United States. He abruptly dismissed the entire expert committee that advises the CDC on its nationwide vaccine recommendations—and began to fill the roster with like-minded people ready to cast doubt on the benefits of vaccination. Like Kennedy, few of these new appointees to the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practice, or ACIP, have openly embraced the notion that they are anti-vaccine. But among them are individuals who have spoken out against COVID vaccines and policies, claimed vaccine injuries for their own children, and falsely linked COVID shots to deaths—or even baselessly accused those vaccines of 'causing a form of acquired immunity deficiency syndrome.' In January, I wrote that remaking the committee in exactly this way would be an especially harmful blow to Americans' health: Perhaps more than any other body of experts in the U.S., ACIP guides the nation's future preparedness against infectious disease. By appointing a committee that is poised to legitimize more of his own radical views, Kennedy is giving his skewed version of scientific reality the government's imprimatur. Whether he will admit to it or not, he is serving the most core goal of the anti-vaccine movement—eroding access to, and trust in, immunization. In an emailed statement, Health and Human Services Press Secretary Emily G. Hilliard reiterated that 'Secretary Kennedy is not anti-vaccine—he is pro-safety, pro-transparency, and pro-accountability,' and added that his 'evidence-based approach puts accountability and radical transparency first, which will restore trust in our public health system.' (Kennedy, notably, promised Senator Bill Cassidy during his confirmation process that he would maintain ACIP, as Cassidy put it, 'without changes.') Since the 1960s, ACIP has lent government policy on vaccines the clout of scientific evidence. Its mandate is to convene experts across fields such as infectious disease, immunology, pediatrics, vaccinology, and public health to carefully vet the data on immunizations, weigh their risks and benefits, and vote on recommendations that guide the public on how to use them—who should get vaccines, and when. Those guidelines are then passed to the CDC director, who—with only the rarest of exceptions—accepts that advice wholesale. 'These recommendations are what states look to, what providers look to,' Rupali Limaye, an expert in vaccine behavior at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, told me. Medicare, for instance, is required to fully cover the vaccines that ACIP recommends; ACIP also determines which vaccines are covered by the Vaccines for Children Program, which provides free vaccines for children whose families cannot afford them. The experts who serve on ACIP have the opportunity, more than just about any of their scientific peers, to translate their vaccine rhetoric into reality. So far, Kennedy has dismissed the 17 people who were serving on ACIP, and filled eight of the newly open slots. Most of the new nominees have an obvious bone to pick with at least some vaccines, especially COVID shots, and have publicly advocated for limiting their use. Among the new members, for instance, is Robert Malone, a controversial physician who has spoken at anti-vaccine events, where he has denounced COVID vaccines and, without evidence, suggested that they can worsen coronavirus infections. Another appointee is Vicky Pebsworth, who serves on the board of the National Vaccine Information Center, an anti-vaccine nonprofit previously known as Dissatisfied Parents Together. A third, Retsef Levi, a health-care-management expert, called for the administration of COVID vaccines to be halted in 2023, and has questioned the shots' safety, despite a large body of evidence from clinical trials supporting their continued use. Overall, 'this is not a list that would increase confidence in vaccine decisions,' Dorit Reiss, a vaccine-policy expert at UC San Francisco, told me. (None of these new ACIP members returned a request for comment.) The next ACIP meeting is scheduled for the end of this month—and the agenda includes discussion about anthrax vaccines, chikungunya vaccines, COVID-19 vaccines, cytomegalovirus vaccine, the human-papillomavirus vaccine, influenza vaccines, the Lyme-disease vaccine, meningococcal vaccines, pneumococcal vaccines, and RSV vaccines. That's a big slate of topics for a brand-new panel of members, Paul Offit, a pediatrician and a vaccine expert who has previously served on ACIP, told me: Depending on how the meeting is structured, and on the input from CDC scientists, these new committee members could substantially alter the guidelines on several immunizations—perhaps so much so that certain shots could stop being recommended to certain groups of Americans. Based on the composition of the committee so far, Offit predicts that the new ACIP will eventually push the CDC away from full-throated endorsement of many of these vaccines. Even subtle changes in the wording of CDC recommendations—a should swapped for a may—can have big ripple effects, Limaye told me. Insurers, for instance, may be more reluctant to cover vaccines that are not actively endorsed by the CDC; some states—especially those in which vaccines have become a political battleground—may stop mandating those types of shots. If the CDC softens its recommendations, 'we will likely see more partisan divides' in who opts for protection nationwide, Jason Schwartz, a vaccine-policy expert at Yale, told me. Pharmaceutical companies may, in turn, cut down production of vaccines that don't have full CDC backing, perpetuating a cycle of reduced availability and reduced enthusiasm. And primary-care physicians, who look to the CDC's vaccination schedule as an essential reference, may shift the language they use to describe childhood shots, nudging more parents to simply opt out. Historically, medical and public-health associations, such as the American Academy of Pediatrics, have aligned their vaccine recommendations with ACIP's—because those recommendations were all driven by scientific evidence. Now, though, scientific consensus and government position are beginning to diverge: Multiple groups of physicians, scientists, and public-health scholars have issued statements condemning the vaccine decisions of Kennedy and his allies; a number of prominent scientists have now banded together to form a kind of alt-ACIP, dubbing themselves the Vaccine Integrity Project. As the views of fringe vaccine groups become the government's stance, Americans may soon have to choose between following the science and following what their nation's leaders say. Identifying as 'anti-vaccine' has historically been taboo: In a nation where most people remain largely in favor of shots, the term is pejorative, an open acknowledgment that one's views lie outside of the norm. But the more vaccine resistance infiltrates HHS and its advisers, the more what's considered normal may shift toward Kennedy's own views on vaccines; ACIP's reputation for evidence-backed thinking could even gild those views with scientific legitimacy. Assembling one's own team of friendly experts is an especially effective way to sanewash extremism, Reiss told me, and to overturn the system through what appear to be normal channels. If the nation's most prominent group of vaccine advisers bends toward anti-vaccine, the term loses its extremist edge—and the scientists who argue, based on sound data, that vaccines are safe and effective risk being labeled anti-government. Article originally published at The Atlantic

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store