Japan's palace confirms former princess Mako has first baby
TOKYO — Former Japanese princess Mako Komuro has given birth to her first child, palace officials confirmed Friday, though they gave no details, saying she is no longer a royal member.
The Imperial Household Agency said both the mother and child are in good health, but did not disclose the baby's date of birth or gender.
The former princess, 33, is a niece of Emperor Naruhito. She married a former college classmate Kei Komuro, a commoner, and renounced her royal status in 2021 as required by Japan's Imperial House Law. Days after their marriage, the couple moved to New York where her husband works as a lawyer.
Officials said that while the birth involved a former royal, the palace decided to publicly confirm the news after media reports earlier this month on the baby's arrival. They added that they hoped Mako would live in a quiet environment.
Mako's parents, Crown Prince Akishino and his wife Kiko, and younger siblings — Princess Kako and Prince Hisahito — are delighted and wished Mako's family happiness, officials said.
Japanese tabloid magazine Josei Seven recently published images of Mako and Kei Komuro seen walking with a baby stroller in a neighborhood of New York.
Mako and her husband met at Tokyo's International Christian University. They announced in September 2017 their intention to marry the following year, but the wedding was suspended for four years due to a financial dispute involving Kei Komuro's mother.
Due to the controversy, Mako also declined a dowry to which she was entitled for leaving the imperial family.
Mako's loss of royal status comes from the Imperial House Law, which allows only male succession.
The rule leaves only Akishino and his son Hisahito in line to succeed Naruhito. A government panel is discussing a more stable succession system, but conservatives reject female succession and only plan to allow female royals to help perform public duties after marriage.
Written by Mari Yamaguchi, The Associated Press
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CTV News
4 hours ago
- CTV News
U.S. House panel to make Epstein files public after redactions to protect victim identities
This undated trial evidence image obtained December 8, 2021, from the US District Court for the Southern District of New York shows British socialite Ghislaine Maxwell and US financier Jeffrey Epstein. (US District Court for the Southern District of New York via CNN Newsource) The U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform intends to make public some files it subpoenaed related to the Jeffrey Epstein case, though it will first redact them to shield victims' IDs and other sensitive matters, a committee spokesperson said Tuesday. The panel is expected to start receiving materials from the Justice Department on Friday, though it appears the public release will come some time after that. The spokesperson said the committee would work with the Justice Department on the process. 'The Committee intends to make the records public after thorough review to ensure all victims' identification and child sexual abuse material are redacted. The Committee will also consult with the DOJ to ensure any documents released do not negatively impact ongoing criminal cases and investigations,' the spokesperson said. Democrats on the committee complained that Comer was slow walking the release of the material by allowing the Justice Department to miss the Tuesday deadline that had been set by the panel and instead turn over the materials to the committee gradually over time starting Friday. They said DOJ had already been directed by the House subpoena to redact material related to victims' identities and child sexual abuse – questioning the need for further delay to do so. 'Releasing the Epstein files in batches just continues this White House cover-up. The American people will not accept anything short of the full, unredacted Epstein files,' said Rep. Robert Garcia of California, the top Democrat on the panel. 'In a bipartisan vote, the Committee demanded complete compliance with our subpoena. Handpicked, partial productions are wholly insufficient and potentially misleading, especially after Attorney General Bondi bragged about having the entirety of the Epstein files on her desk mere months ago.' Many Republicans have called for more transparency surrounding the case and the release of records related to the matter – and the issue has roiled the House. Speaker Mike Johnson took steps to delay until September a vote of the full House to publicly release the DOJ's Epstein files. The Louisiana Republican has said he supports transparency in the case but wants to give the administration room to handle the matter. House Republicans are on track to be forced to take a major vote over the release of information related to Epstein when they return to DC next month. Earlier on Tuesday, the chair of the powerful House Rules Committee — whose panel has run into drama over Epstein — was staying mum on whether GOP leadership will try to kill that vote altogether. Rules Committee Chairwoman Virginia Foxx told reporters Tuesday that she believes the Epstein issue might be 'resolved' before the House is forced to take that vote, pointing to the ongoing investigation by the Oversight Committee. 'Chairman Comer has mentioned that he's getting the material that he's asked for from the Department of Justice. I'd really like to see this resolved, if possible, before we get back, as much information as possible to come out,' Foxx said.
Globe and Mail
6 hours ago
- Globe and Mail
Why UnitedHealth Stock Dipped Today After Bumping Higher Monday
Key Points One pundit tracking the stock became less bullish on its future. He knocked down his price target by 37%. 10 stocks we like better than UnitedHealth Group › What the stock analysis community giveth, it can also taketh away. That was the dynamic behind the slide of UnitedHealth Group (NYSE: UNH) stock on Tuesday. As in the previous trading session, the big insurer was affected by an analyst's price target move. This time, however, this took the form of a cut rather than a raise. UnitedHealth closed the day down by 1.5% in value, a worse showing than the S&P 500 's (SNPINDEX: ^GSPC) 0.6% decrease. A chop from a bull The analyst behind the slice was Lance Wilkes from Bernstein SocGen Group. Well before the market open Tuesday, Wilkes took a powerful weed whacker to his UnitedHealth fair value assessment, reducing it to $377 per share; formerly, he believed it was worth as much as $594. Despite the rather drastic adjustment, he maintained his recommendation of outperform (buy, in other words). According to reports, Wilkes wrote in his UnitedHealth update that he expects the company's performance to remain weak through this year, and has commensurately reduced his earnings estimate and target P/E. For the former, he cut his per-share profitability for full-year 2026 by 13%, and for the latter to 12.5 from the preceding 18. The analyst also cited sluggish growth in the insurer's key OptumHealth unit as a reason for his price target cut. Warren likes it UnitedHealth has landed on many an investor's radar following news last week that Berkshire Hathaway had plonked down $1.6 billion for a stake in the company. Anytime Warren Buffett 's investment vehicle buys (or sells, for that matter) a pack of stock for its equity portfolio, the target company becomes a lightning rod for investors. Buffett and Berkshire surely see a company that has potential to reach. Others might consider it something of a clunky underperformer that's fairly -- or even overly -- valued these days. Should you invest $1,000 in UnitedHealth Group right now? Before you buy stock in UnitedHealth Group, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and UnitedHealth Group wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $671,466!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,115,633!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,077% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 185% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of August 18, 2025
Toronto Sun
8 hours ago
- Toronto Sun
5 things to know about byelection won by Poilievre in Battle River--Crowfoot
Published Aug 19, 2025 • 3 minute read Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre celebrates his win in the Battle River--Crowfoot byelection in Camrose, Alta., Monday, Aug. 18, 2025. Photo by Jason Franson / THE CANADIAN PRESS OTTAWA — Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre will return to his seat in the House of Commons in September, after winning a byelection in the rural Alberta riding of Battle River–Crowfoot on Monday. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Don't have an account? Create Account Here are five things to know about the byelection. Battle River–Crowfoot is one of the safest Conservative seats in the country. The party has reached 80% in every election but one since 2004. Damien Kurek won with just shy of 83% of the vote in April, and some observers have suggested in recent weeks that Poilievre would need to reach the same threshold to maintain the confidence of the party. Conservative members will hold a secret-ballot vote on Poilievre's leadership at their campaign in late January. 2. Record number of people ran for seat Poilievre was up against 213 candidates, including representatives from all the major political parties, a handful of fringe parties and a whole lot of Independents. Your noon-hour look at what's happening in Toronto and beyond. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. Please try again This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. The vast majority of people who put their names on the ballot were from the Longest Ballot Committee, a group that says it's protesting the first-past-the-post system. The group has targeted a handful of byelections over the last year, and it targeted Poilievre's riding of Carleton during the April election. 3. Elections Canada had to make adjustments Elections Canada chose an unusual workaround: Electors had to write in the name of their selected candidate on a modified ballot. There were lists of all 214 candidates available at polling stations for reference. It says things went smoothly overall. The agency says it hired additional workers to count ballots, started the count earlier in the day (more than 14,000 people voted in advance polls before Monday), and ensured workers were trained to help people fill out the adapted ballots. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Elections Canada says it will publish a post-election report in the coming months with more details about how things went and what it learned. 4. Longest Ballot Committee did not gobble up votes In a 2024 byelection in Toronto–St. Paul's, one of the Longest Ballot candidates named Felix-Antoine Hamel made history when he became the first candidate to receive zero votes in any Canadian election. On Monday, 75 candidates got no votes at all. Another 61 got a single vote each. Still, Poilievre has slammed the Longest Ballot Committee as 'a scam,' pledging that he will introduce legislation to make it more difficult for this kind of disruptive protest to happen in the future, including by putting in place rules to ensure an official agent can only act for one candidate in an election. In Monday's byelection, one man acted as the official agent for all of the protest candidates. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Stephane Perrault, the country's chief electoral officer, wrote to the Liberal government last September after the Longest Ballot Committee took part in a Montreal-area byelection. Perrault asked then democratic institutions minister Dominic LeBlanc to change the candidate nomination process to ensure that voters cannot nominate more than one candidate. The office of government House leader Steven MacKinnon said in a statement that the Liberals are also concerned. 'Our government shares the concerns about the longest ballot initiative and we are currently examining this issue,' a spokesperson said in response to questions Tuesday. 5. Alberta separatism not major issue Several of the candidates in the byelection openly supported the idea of Alberta or Western Canada separating from the rest of the country. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. In a June byelection for a provincial riding that includes some of the same territory, a separatist candidate got just shy of 18% of the vote. Some polls this summer put support for Alberta independence as high as 30% in the province. During a candidates forum in July, a number of people running in Battle River–Crowfoot talked about Ottawa 'taking advantage of Alberta.' Grant Abraham, who ran for the United Party of Canada, said during the forum that he wanted 'a strong and sovereign Alberta and its independence.' He got 773 votes. Read More Toronto Blue Jays NHL World Sunshine Girls Canada
