logo
The US-China ‘decoupling' would be a messy divorce

The US-China ‘decoupling' would be a messy divorce

CNN16-04-2025

Even if the writing has been on the wall for years, breaking up is never easy.
China and the US don't often see eye to eye, but for decades, they have broadly agreed that it is better to be trade partners than trade enemies.
That alliance is now hanging by a thread. And the real-world collateral damage is already piling up.
The presidents of the world's two biggest economies don't appear ready to talk turkey. China indicated Wednesday that it would be open to negotiations only if talks are based on 'respect,' and greater 'consistency and reciprocity' from the Trump administration, a person familiar with the matter told my CNN colleagues. (I, for one, am not holding my breath.)
Without some kind of retrenchment, US-China trade is expected to fall by more than 80% — a magnitude 'tantamount to a decoupling,' said Ngozi Okonjo Iweala, the director general of the World Trade Organization, which issued a similarly grim report on global trade Wednesday. (The upshot: Pre-Trump tariffs, global trade was penciled in to grow 2.7% this year. Now, it's expected to shrink 0.2%.)
Here's how Trump's trade war is already rippling through the economy:
US retail sales climbed 1.4% in March — largely driven by cars and auto parts — as Americans try to get ahead of expected price increases.
Boeing, America's top exporter and a major employer, has reportedly been blocked from making deliveries to Chinese airlines.
Beijing recently placed export restrictions on seven types of rare earth minerals — vital components for everything from iPhones to electric vehicles that China has a near-monopoly on.
Nvidia, the US chipmaking leader, said it would take a $5.5 billion hit after Washington ordered the chipmaker to halt sales to China.
Chinese fast-fashion retailer Shein and online marketplace Temu will raise prices next week, according to Reuters.
US stocks tumbled on Wednesday — dragged down by Nvidia's China shut-out, the grim forecast from the WTO, and comments from Fed Chair Jerome Powell, who warned of a 'challenging scenario' in which tariffs lead to a triple whammy of weaker economic growth, higher unemployment and faster inflation, all at the same time.
'There isn't a modern experience for how to think about this,' Powell said at an event hosted by the Economic Club of Chicago on Wednesday.
You might think the 'Art of the Deal' president would be eager to hash out some kind of pact with China. But if Trump has taught the world anything, it's to expect the unexpected.
'There may be another game plan here,' Ed Yardeni, a veteran investor and president of Yardeni Research, told investor Louis Navellier on a podcast this week. 'It's conceivable that he's got no interest in doing a deal with China. It's conceivable that the US has come to the conclusion that China is a geopolitical threat… and what we're trying to do is ruin their economy.'
Some new reporting from Bloomberg is lending weight to that theory.
According to the news outlet, which cited unnamed sources, the Trump administration is 'preparing to pressure nations to curb trade with China.' One option on the table, Bloomberg said, is essentially a monetary sanction in which the US would ask other nations to impose tariffs on certain countries with close ties to China.
Whether a trade deal is the goal or not, 'it's not a pretty thing to watch,' Yardeni said. 'He is trying to use America's economic power to bully other countries… But it's going to be real hard to bully China.'
As many observers have noted, China may be in a stronger position to withstand a tit-for-tat trade war, in part because it maintains an authoritarian grip on every facet of its economy.
But perhaps more importantly, Beijing has learned from its first go-round with Trump in 2017. The country is already going beyond the tit-for-tat measures that characterized the earlier trade feud.
China's halt on Boeing deliveries and its restrictions on rare-earth exports show that the country 'has learned how to weaponize its imports in a new way,' Mary E. Lovely, a senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics, said in an interview.
'China still wants to look like a respectable stakeholder' to trading partners like Australia, the EU and Southeast Asia, where President Xi Jinping visited this week, Lovely notes. 'They want to say, 'The door is open. We're reasonable, we're just combating US aggression.' And they are doing it now with a much bigger set of tools.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Vance on LA unrest: Newsom should ‘look in mirror' and stop blaming Trump
Vance on LA unrest: Newsom should ‘look in mirror' and stop blaming Trump

The Hill

time15 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Vance on LA unrest: Newsom should ‘look in mirror' and stop blaming Trump

Vice President JD Vance on Tuesday tore into California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) for suggesting the unrest in Los Angeles is a consequence of federal involvement in state and local law enforcement efforts. 'Gavin Newsom says he didn't have a problem until Trump got involved,' Vance wrote in a post on X, attaching two photos that he said were taken before Trump ordered the National Guard to protect border patrol agents in California. One depicted rioters appearing to attack a 'border patrol' van, and another depicted a car set ablaze. The Hill was not able to verify the authenticity of the photos. 'Does this look like 'no problem'?' Vance asked. Vance suggested Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass 'fomented and encouraged the riots,' with the goal of promoting mass migration into the U.S., adding, 'It is their reason for being.' 'If you want to know why illegal aliens flocked to your state, stop accusing Donald Trump. Look in the mirror,' Vance said. 'If you want to know why border patrol fear for their lives over enforcing the law, look in the mirror.' Vance pointed to California's Medicaid expansion last year to low-income undocumented immigrants as an example of a policy that has 'encouraged mass migration into California.' Newsom has since proposed ending new Medicaid enrollment for undocumented adults, but his proposal faces resistance from the state legislature. 'Your policies that protected those migrants from common sense law enforcement. Your policies that offered massive welfare benefits to reward illegal immigrants. Your policies that allowed those illegal migrants (and their sympathizers) to assault our law enforcement. Your policies that allowed Los Angeles to turn into a war zone,' Vance continued. 'You sure as hell had a problem before President Trump came along. The problem is YOU,' Vance added. Vance's post is the latest in a back-and-forth between the administration and Newsom, who has resisted Trump's extraordinary steps to deploy 4,000 National Guard troops to the area and mobilize 700 active-duty marines. Newsom has insisted that the situation was under control before the Trump administration escalated tensions by making a provocative show of force. He accused Trump of 'intentionally causing chaos, terrorizing communities and endangering the principles of our great democracy.' After Trump suggested his border czar arrest Newsom, the California governor responded by saying, 'The President of the United States just called for the arrest of a sitting Governor. This is a day I hoped I would never see in America.' 'I don't care if you're a Democrat or a Republican this is a line we cannot cross as a nation — this is an unmistakable step toward authoritarianism,' Newsom added Monday afternoon. Vance then replied to Newsom, saying, 'Do your job. That's all we're asking.' 'Do YOUR job. We didn't have a problem until Trump got involved. Rescind the order. Return control to California,' Newsom responded, prompting Vance's latest response.

Newsom denies Trump spoke to him before deploying more National Guards
Newsom denies Trump spoke to him before deploying more National Guards

Axios

time17 minutes ago

  • Axios

Newsom denies Trump spoke to him before deploying more National Guards

California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) on Tuesday said President Trump did not speak with him, despite deploying national military personnel to respond to Los Angeles protests. Why it matters: Trump claimed that he had spoken with the governor and criticized his handling of the rallies against Immigration and Customs Enforcement's actions. "There was no call. Not even a voicemail," Newsom said on X. "Americans should be alarmed that a President deploying Marines onto our streets doesn't even know who he's talking to." Driving the news: Trump, speaking to the media on Tuesday, said he last talked with Newsom "a day ago." "Called him up to tell him, got to do a better job," Trump said. "He's doing a bad job, causing a lot of death and a lot of potential death." Reality check: California authorities have not reported any deaths during the protests. A total of 72 people have been arrested over the past weekend, with five police officers being injured, according to local media report on Monday Context: The Marines deployed to LA have not yet responded to immigration protests.

Black Caucus chair says Trump's actions on L.A. are impeachable
Black Caucus chair says Trump's actions on L.A. are impeachable

Axios

time17 minutes ago

  • Axios

Black Caucus chair says Trump's actions on L.A. are impeachable

Congressional Black Caucus chair Yvette Clarke (D-N.Y.) said Tuesday she believes President Trump mobilizing the National Guard and deploying Marines to Los Angeles rises to the level of an impeachable offense. Why it matters: It's a break with House Democrats' general aversion towards impeachment from the head of one of their most powerful groups. The comment comes amid growing animosity between Democrats and the Trump administration over the president's use of law enforcement to carry out a campaign of mass deportations. The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Driving the news: During a press conference, Clarke was asked if Trump's actions to quell protests in L.A. rise to the level of an impeachable offense "I definitely believe it is," she responded, "But we'll cross that bridge when we get to it." Clarke and other Democrats have argued that Trump has violated the U.S. Constitution by mobilizing the National Guard over Newsom's objections. Reality check: Democrats are highly unlikely to pursue an organized impeachment effort against Trump any time soon. Two rank-and-file members, Reps. Shri Thanedar (D-Mich.) and Al Green (D-Texas), have spearheaded their own rogue impeachment initiatives, but most Democrats have dissociated themselves with those efforts. Most Democrats are clear-eyed that impeachment would be doomed to failure with Republicans in control of Congress — and they often note that Trump won in 2024 despite previously being impeached twice. What they're saying: House Democratic Caucus chair Pete Aguilar (D-Calif.) told reporters at a subsequent press conference, "I've said before that ... House Democrats aren't focused on impeachment today."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store