Ultra-processed foods tied to 124,000 premature deaths over 2 years in U.S., study finds
ST. PAUL, Minn., April 28 (UPI) -- A study released Monday links a total of more than 124,000 preventable, premature deaths in the United States over two years to adverse health affects from consuming ultra-processed foods.
The study's Brazilian authors also analyzed data on ultra-processed food consumption from seven other countries, concluding that premature deaths tied to unhealthy diets are a growing global phenomenon calling for coordinated international action.
In addition to the nearly 125,000 premature U.S. deaths for 2017 and 2018, the study, published in the American Journal of Preventative Medicine, also estimated that more than 25,000 Brazilians died prematurely during those years because of poor health outcomes tied to ultra-processed foods.
The researchers' statistical model also showed more than 17,000 such deaths in Britain during 2018 and 2019 and another 17,000 in Mexico during a single year, 2016.
Similarly, Canada had more than 7,700 premature deaths attributed to ultra-processed foods in 2016, the authors estimated, while Australia recorded 3,277 in 2016, Colombia had 2,813 in 2015 and Chile tallied 1,874 in 2010.
Ultra-processed foods, or UPFs, generally are defined as those that include mass-produced ingredients that can't be made at home, such as preservatives, emulsifiers and sweeteners. They often contain added fats, starches, sugars, salts and hydrogenated oils extracted from other foods.
Sugary drinks, sweets and chocolates, pizzas, hamburgers, chicken nuggets and other highly popular food items are defined as UPFs under the NOVA food classification system. High consumption of these foods has been associated with many different diseases, including cardiovascular disease, obesity, diabetes, some types of cancer and depression.
By 2018, UPFs already made up more than half of the total dietary energy consumed in high-income countries such as the United States, Canada and Britain, and between one-fifth and one-third of total dietary energy in middle-income countries such as Brazil, Mexico and Chile, according to a University of São Paulo study.
The topic is receiving renewed attention due to the agenda of U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who is focusing on the perceived dangers of UPFs during his "Make American Healthy Again" tour this month.
To calculate their numbers, the study's authors developed a comparative risk assessment looking at dietary share of UPFs and all-cause mortality in each country.
They then employed a statistical model to estimate the percentage of all premature preventable deaths due to the consumption of UPFs, tapping studies from many countries and the landmark Global Burden of Disease report of 2021, according to lead author Eduardo A.F. Nilson, a nutrition researcher at the University of São Paulo.
They determined the percentage of UPF-attributable premature deaths vary from 4% in countries with lower UPF consumption to almost 14% in countries with the highest UPF consumption such as the United States and Britain.
Nilson told UPI that while it wasn't much of a surprise the United States has the highest percentage of UPF-associated premature deaths, he noted the trajectory of U.S. deaths has stabilized in recent years while they continue to rise in low- and middle-income nations such as Brazil, Chile and Colombia.
"Our findings on the attributable deaths to UPF in low- and middle-income countries shows that UPFs are replacing traditional fresh and minimally processed foods ,and that this may increase deaths from non-communicable diseases associated with unhealthy dietary patterns," Nilson said in emailed comments.
"These countries are already facing accelerated nutritional and epidemiological transitions and the replacement of traditional diets by UPFs is increasing especially among low income families, reinforcing the challenges of the double burden of malnutrition."
Global food systems have made UPFs more available and affordable in all countries, triggering changes in diets all over the world as well as new heath problems that "demand policy responses by national governments" the Brazilian researcher said.
UPF consumption "represents a global priority, and it requires more than consumer education because food choices are determined by many factors beyond consumers, mostly related to the food environment," Nilson said.
"Food choices are influenced by price, availability, information and other factors and education by itself is insufficient to ensure healthy diets. Therefore, we need to make healthy dietary behaviors easier and more accessible and affordable."
He added: "This means implementing fiscal and regulatory policies, including subsidies to fresh and minimally processed foods, taxation of UPFs -- as is already done for sugar-sweetened beverages in some countries -- improving front-of-pack food labelling, regulating food marketing and regulating food sales in settings such as schools, workplaces and hospitals, for example."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Boston Globe
an hour ago
- Boston Globe
‘People inside Moderna are afraid': As the anti-vaccine climate intensifies, a big local firm has much to lose
Since then, the veteran pharmaceutical executive has applied for about 40 biopharma jobs in Massachusetts. He has gotten only half a dozen interviews and no job offers. Advertisement 'Am I worried? Yes,' said the 64-year-old Somerville resident. 'I think it's entirely possible that I might not land another job.' Morrow's concerns are hardly unfounded. The recent downturn in biotech has Moderna vaulted to the forefront of biotech during the pandemic, becoming a major pillar of the region's economy, but Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s skepticism of vaccines, and mRNA in particular, has cost the company dearly. Advertisement Late last month, the On Monday, The move marked a reversal of what he had promised a key Republican senator during his confirmation hearings, when Kennedy had pledged to maintain the panel. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. during a swearing-in ceremony in the Oval Office on April 18. ERIC LEE/NYT Morrow, who has worked in the pharma industry for about 30 years, including 17 years at GlaxoSmithKline, said anti-vaccine activists have been 'remarkably effective' at distorting the truth about cutting-edge science, including how safe and effective mRNA shots are. 'It makes it harder for anyone who wants to do science to get a job,' he said. Morrow said he was let go in a third round of layoffs in 2024 and estimated that at least 100 Moderna employees lost jobs in Massachusetts last year. Those layoffs were never publicly disclosed, he said. Moderna acknowledged laying off about 50 digital employees in February this year, but has not disclosed layoffs in other departments. A Moderna spokesperson, Christopher Ridley, said the company had no comment about layoffs. Even before President Trump took office, Massachusetts' biopharma hub had been in a prolonged slump because of high interest rates, investors pulling back from risky biotech stocks, and a steep decline in private financing. Advertisement For the first time in more thana decade, total employment in the state's life sciences sector stayed flat in 2024, according to a report by the Massachusetts Biotechnology Education Foundation. The workforce had 143,142 employees last year, an increase of only 0.02 percent over 2023, the report said. From 2013 to 2023, industry jobs grew at an average annual rate of 6.7 percent. Sunny Schwartz, chief executive of the foundation, said massive hiring during the pandemic made a 'correction' almost inevitable. The uncertainty created by the presidential election likely contributed to the stagnant growth. 'The life sciences industry, like any industry, is conservative in their hiring and probably wanted to see what would happen,' she said. At least 60 drug companies in Massachusetts made layoffs or closed in the past 12 months, according to Dan Gold, president of Fairway Consulting Group, a life sciences recruiting firm. He estimated that at least 1,000 employees lost their jobs. Biogen, the homegrown biotech that has been a mainstay of Kendall Square, has made several rounds of Biogen's headquarters in Cambridge. John Tlumacki/Globe Staff 'I've been a biotech entrepreneur for 20 years, and I haven't seen a worse downturn,' said David Lucchino, the former chief executive of Frequency Therapeutics, now defunct, and a former chair of the Massachusetts Biotechnology Council, an industry trade group. Advertisement Robert Langer, the prolific inventor and biomedical engineering professor at MIT who helped co-found Frequency and Moderna, agreed. He said the slump is the longest-lasting he has seen in his half-century as an entrepreneur. The impact on the real estate market has been devastating. The biotech cluster based in Greater Boston is grappling with a record 16.3 million square feet of unleased lab space, according to the real estate firm Colliers. Nearly Despite some noteworthy successes this year — including Nothing has been whipsawed more than Moderna, which grew to become the second-biggest biopharma employer in Massachusetts, behind Takeda. Before the pandemic, the company had no approved products. Then, in 2020, it won billions of dollars in federal contracts to rapidly develop a COVID vaccine as part of Operation Warp Speed during Trump's first administration. Moderna's mRNA vaccine was cleared by the FDA in December 2020. The Advertisement 'It's been a long fall from grace,' said Tyler Van Buren, an analyst at TD Cowen, a financial research and advisory firm. To a large extent, he said, Moderna was 'a victim of circumstance.' The company was built 'to save the world, and the world stopped wanting or needing the COVID vaccine,' Van Buren added. He also faults Moderna for failing to diversify its pipeline by developing other scientific platforms besides mRNA, in contrast to the German biotech BioNTech, which partnered with Pfizer on its COVID vaccine. Although the first Trump administration touted Moderna's COVID shot as a remarkable achievement, Health Secretary Kennedy has said certain vaccines for respiratory diseases, including mRNA shots, have 'never worked.' Reached for comment by the Globe, Moderna said Monday that 'mRNA vaccines funded by Operation Warp Speed were essential to ending the COVID-19 pandemic, preventing an estimated 20 million deaths worldwide, including more than 1 million in the United States. The efficacy and safety profile has been confirmed in over a billion people worldwide.' A view of Moderna's Cambridge headquarters. David L. Ryan/Globe Staff Moderna's share price, which peaked at $484 in 2021, is now trading at about $28, roughly what it was before the pandemic. Its workforce at the end of last year, however, was roughly seven times what it was before the pandemic, with 5,800 employees. Moderna's chief executive, Stéphane Bancel, said in January that the company will reduce its costs by $1 billion this year. Van Buren said there is 'zero doubt in my mind' that the company will make hundreds of layoffs in the next two years, in part because the political climate toward mRNA vaccines has become so hostile. Advertisement Another scientist at Moderna who was laid off in December said 'multiple hundreds of workers' were let go in Massachusetts since the third quarter of 2023, and that the company has never made it public. 'It's been really opaque,' said the former employee, who insisted on anonymity because he didn't want to jeopardize his severance package. 'I think what [Moderna's leaders] owe to Massachusetts is to be transparent about what they are doing." A third employee, Nathan Devaud, 24, said he was laid off from a job in technical development at Moderna's Norwood facility in late February along with about 80 other people. He had worked at the company for six months while a co-op at Northeastern University, where he earned a bachelor's degree in chemical engineering and biochemistry a year ago, and then for nine months as a full-time employee. He said he has applied for about 25 jobs but hasn't been able to get an interview. 'It's hard to find a job on LinkedIn that doesn't have over a hundred applicants,' he said. Morrow, for his part, said he talks to his former Moderna colleagues, and they're worried. 'People inside Moderna are afraid right now,' he said. 'They're afraid of what's going to come next. To be laid off in this environment makes it that much more stressful.' Jonathan Saltzman can be reached at
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Why Trump turned against ‘gold standard' mRNA vaccines
President Trump's administration has slammed the brakes on development of messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines, which proved their lifesaving potential during the COVID-19 pandemic but have come under increasing scrutiny among skeptics of mainstream science. The vaccines marked a breakthrough in medical technology, drastically reducing the timeline for development of targeted vaccines and even showing promise in cancer research. Trump called mRNA the 'gold standard' when he rolled out the first COVID-19 vaccines. But now they are under assault by Trump's Health and Human Services (HHS) secretary, longtime anti-vaccine advocate Robert F. Kennedy Jr., and his allies in the 'make America healthy again' movement. HHS in late May canceled $766 million awarded to Moderna through the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA) to develop a potential mRNA vaccine for bird flu. HHS spokesperson Andrew Nixon said of the decision, 'This is not simply about efficacy — it's about safety, integrity, and trust.' 'The reality is that mRNA technology remains under-tested, and we are not going to spend taxpayer dollars repeating the mistakes of the last administration, which concealed legitimate safety concerns from the public,' he added. Unlike traditional vaccines that contain fragments or weakened versions of a virus, mRNA vaccines send messenger ribonucleic acid into cells to teach the immune system to recognize proteins connected to virus cells. According to Joseph Varon, president and chief medical officer of the Independent Medical Alliance (IMA), the concerns for mRNA vaccine skeptics are the expedited timeline and conditions in which the COVID-19 vaccine was approved. 'The biggest concern is that this rushed treatment still remains in use, even under an Emergency Use Authorization in some cases. It needs to be sent back through proper studies and vetting,' Varon told The Hill. 'There needs to be an established database of vaccine injuries that can be accurately quantified with full transparency, without politics or big money pressure influencing the data,' he added. 'There's a growing body of peer-reviewed studies that indicate the spike proteins are causing havoc in certain recipients.' The IMA, previously known as Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance, launched a campaign in support of Kennedy's nomination to be HHS secretary. The group drew controversy when its founders promoted ivermectin as a 'miracle drug' for COVID-19. Myocarditis, or inflammation of the heart muscle, is of particular concern among mRNA vaccine opponents. An analysis published in 2022 found that myocarditis occurred in about 31.2 cases per 1 million second doses of the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine, or 0.003 percent. Rates of myocarditis are significantly higher among people with COVID-19 infections than immunizations, however. The development of the COVID-19 mRNA vaccine was aided by the Trump administration's Operation Warp Speed, something Trump has boasted about at numerous points. In remarks in December 2020, the same month the first COVID-19 vaccines were deployed, Trump praised Operation Warp Speed's ability to develop a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine at a 'breakneck speed,' adding 'the gold standard vaccine has been done in less than nine months.' Though research on mRNA and its potential uses has been ongoing for decades, use of the vaccines in humans is relatively new. The first mRNA vaccine candidate tested in humans was for rabies in 2013, but it wouldn't be until the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 that this technology would achieve commercial viability and widespread use. To Kennedy, this is too much of a coincidence. In his book 'The Wuhan Cover-Up: And the Terrifying Bioweapons Arms Race,' published in 2023, Kennedy suggests it was more than just happenstance that allowed for the deployment of Moderna's mRNA technology to coincide with the global pandemic. He pointed to a meeting attended by Dr. Anthony Fauci and former BARDA Director Rick Bright in which the officials met with virologists months before the COVID-19 pandemic broke out. The fact that attendees discussed the need for innovation in influenza research and vaccines became a point of conspiracy online. Kennedy noted that Bright called for something 'completely disruptive, that's not beholden to bureaucratic strings and processes,' writing, '[Bright] hinted that only a global crisis — like a pandemic — could induce government and industry to commit the billions of dollars necessary to create a new generation of 'plug-and-play' mRNA vaccines.' In the conversation Kennedy references, Bright was discussing the challenges of making influenza research 'sexy' for Ph.D. and postdoctoral students, surmising that something 'completely disruptive' would be needed to incite excitement in the field. Proponents of the mRNA technology point to its deployment in the COVID-19 pandemic and its role in reducing transmission as evidence of safety and efficacy. 'In the U.S., you know, we have a lot of real-world experience now with huge numbers of doses given. We have been following for significant or serious adverse events for a long time, and the rate of those serious adverse events is on par with what we see for other vaccines,' E. John Wherry, director of the Institute for Immunology and Immune Health at the University of Pennsylvania, said of mRNA vaccines. As Wherry notes, all vaccines have adverse side effects, but their safety compared with the diseases they inoculate against is 'incontrovertible.' And while critics take issue with the speed at which mRNA vaccines are developed, Wherry said this difference is precisely what sets these shots apart from older generations. 'mRNA vaccines have a couple of key benefits or features that really stand out compared to other vaccine platforms. One, they can be generated very, very quickly. So, you can adapt to changes very rapidly. This is much easier with an mRNA vaccine, where the COVID strain or flu strain mutates and changes from year to year,' Wherry said. 'The second is that it's relatively simple. So, we don't have to worry about, you know, impurities in, you know, an egg-grown vaccine or a cell-based grown vaccine synthesizing mRNA. There are very few components that go into it, and it can be synthesized with high purity.' Such mRNA vaccines are also potentially applicable for numerous conditions or even multiple different strains of the same virus, giving it more flexibility than traditional vaccinations. 'So, there are substantial benefits in flexibility, in speed, in simplicity of manufacturing and that probably also affects the cost of goods at the end of the day, which is perhaps a last advantage,' Wherry added. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.


Atlantic
an hour ago
- Atlantic
Get Ready to Hear a Lot More About Your Mitochondria
Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s warning about mitochondria slipped in between the anti-vaccine junk science and the excoriation of pharmaceutical drugs as 'the No. 3 killer in our country.' He was speaking in 2023 to Joe Rogan, elaborating on the dangers of Wi-Fi—which no high-quality scientific evidence has shown to harm anyone's health—and arguing that it causes disease by somehow opening the blood-brain barrier, and by degrading victims' mitochondria. The mention of mitochondria—the tiny structures that generate energy within our cells—was brief. Two years later, mitochondrial health is poised to become a pillar of the MAHA movement, already showing up in marketing for supplements and on podcasts across the 'manosphere.' Casey Means, President Donald Trump's newest nominee for surgeon general, has singled out the organelle as the main casualty of the modern American health crisis. According to Means (who has an M.D. but no active medical license), most of America's chronic ailments can be traced to mitochondrial dysfunction. Should she be confirmed to the post of surgeon general, the American public can expect to hear a lot more about mitochondria. Among scientists, interest and investment in mitochondria have risen notably in the past five years, Kay Macleod, a University of Chicago researcher who studies mitochondria's role in cancer, told me. Mitochondria, after all, perform a variety of crucial functions in the human body. Beyond powering cells, they can affect gene expression, help certain enzymes function, and modulate cell death, Macleod said. When mitochondria are defective, people do indeed suffer. Vamsi Mootha, a mitochondrial biologist based at Massachusetts General Hospital and the Broad Institute, told me that rare genetic defects (appearing in about one in 4,300 people) can cause the organelles to malfunction, leading to muscle weakness, heart abnormalities, cognitive disability, and liver and kidney problems. Evidence also suggests that defects in mitochondria directly contribute to symptoms of Parkinson's disease, and could be both a cause and an effect of type 2 diabetes. Other conditions' links to mitochondria are blurrier. Researchers see aberrant mitochondria in postmortem biopsies of patients with illnesses such as Alzheimer's, cancer, and fatty-liver disease, Mootha said; whether those damaged mitochondria cause or result from such conditions is not yet clear. But according to Good Energy, the book Means published last year with a top MAHA adviser—her brother, Calley—mitochondrial dysfunction is a veritable plague upon the United States, responsible for both serious illness and everyday malaise. In their view, modern Western diets and lifestyles wreck countless Americans' metabolic health: Every time you drink unfiltered water or a soda, or feel the stress of mounting phone notifications, you hurt your mitochondria, they say, triggering an immune response that in turn triggers inflammation. (Damaged mitochondria really can cause inflammation, Macleod said.) This chain of events, the Meanses claim, can be blamed for virtually every common chronic health condition: migraines, depression, infertility, heart disease, obesity, cancer, and more. (Casey Means did not respond to requests for comment; reached by email, Calley did not respond to my questions about mitochondria, but noted, 'There is significant scientific evidence that healthy food, exercise and sleep have a significant impact on reversing chronic disease.') Good Energy follows a typical wellness playbook: using a mixture of valid and dubious research to pin a slew of common health problems on one overlooked element of health—and advertising a cure. Among the culprits for our mitochondrial ravaging, according to the Meanses, are poor sleep, medications, ultraprocessed foods, seed oils, too many calories, and too few vitamins, as well as chronically staying in comfortable ambient temperatures. The Means siblings therefore recommend eschewing refined sugar in favor of leafy greens, avoiding nicotine and alcohol, frequenting saunas and cold plunges, getting seven to eight hours of uninterrupted sleep a night, and cleansing your life of environmental toxins. Some studies indeed suggest that mitochondrial function is linked with sleep and temperature, but they've all been conducted on cell cultures, organoids, or mice. According to Macleod, evidence suggests that diet, too, is likely important. But only one lifestyle intervention— exercise —has been definitively shown to improve mitochondrial health in humans. The Meanses are riding a wave of interest in mitochondrial health in the wellness world. Earlier this year, the longevity influencer Bryan Johnson and the ivermectin enthusiast Mel Gibson both endorsed the dye methylene blue for its power to improve mitochondrial respiration; Kennedy was filmed slipping something that looks a lot like methylene blue into his drink. (Kennedy did not respond to a request for comment; the FDA has approved methylene blue, but only as a treatment for the blood disease methemoglobinemia.) AG1, formerly known as Athletic Greens, formulates its drinkable vitamins for mitochondrial health. Even one laser-light skin treatment promises to 'recharge failing mitochondria.' The enzyme CoQ10 is popular right now as a supplement for mitochondrial function, as is NAD, a molecule involved in mitochondria's production of energy. NAD IV drips are especially beloved by celebrities such as Gwyneth Paltrow, Kendall Jenner, and the Biebers. These supplements are generally thought to be safe, and some preliminary research shows that NAD supplementation could help patients with Parkinson's or other neurodegenerative diseases, and that CoQ10 could benefit people with mitochondrial disorders. Patients whose symptoms are clearly caused or made worse by deficiencies in a specific vitamin, such as thiamine, can benefit from supplementing those vitamins, Mootha said. But little research explores how these supplements might affect healthy adults. In Good Energy, as well as on her website and in podcast appearances, Casey Means promotes a number of supplements for mitochondrial health. She also recommends that people wear continuous glucose monitors—available from her company, Levels Health, for $184 a month—to help prevent overwhelming their mitochondria with too much glucose. (According to Macleod, glucose levels are only 'a very indirect measure' of mitochondrial activity.) As with so many problems that wellness influencers harp on, the supposed solution to this one involves buying products from those exact same people. At best, all of this attention to mitochondria could lead Americans to healthier habits. Much of the advice in Good Energy echoes health recommendations we've all heard for decades; getting regular exercise and plenty of fiber is good guidance, regardless of anyone's reasons for doing so. Switching out unhealthy habits for healthy ones will likely even improve your mitochondrial health, Jaya Ganesh, a mitochondrial-disease expert at Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, told me. After all, 'if you consistently beat your body up with unhealthy habits, everything is going to fall sick,' Ganesh said. But the mitochondrial approach to wellness carries risks, too. For patients with genetically caused mitochondrial disease, lifestyle changes might marginally improve some symptoms, Ganesh said, but attempting to cure such conditions with supplements and a healthy diet alone could be dangerous. Means also calls out medications—including antibiotics, chemotherapy, antiretrovirals, statins, and high-blood-pressure drugs—for interfering with mitochondria. Macleod told me that statins really do affect mitochondria, as do some antibiotics. (The latter makes sense: Mitochondria are thought to have evolved from bacteria more than a billion years ago.) That's no reason, though, to avoid any of these medications if a doctor has determined that you need them. And yet, a whole chapter of Good Energy is dedicated to the idea that readers should mistrust the motives of their doctors, who the authors say profit by keeping Americans sick. The book is less critical of the ways the wellness industry preys on people's fears. Zooming in on mitochondria might offer a reassuringly specific and seemingly scientific explanation of the many real ills of the U.S. population, but ultimately, Means and MAHA are only helping obscure the big picture.