Ultra-processed foods tied to 124,000 premature deaths over 2 years in U.S., study finds
ST. PAUL, Minn., April 28 (UPI) -- A study released Monday links a total of more than 124,000 preventable, premature deaths in the United States over two years to adverse health affects from consuming ultra-processed foods.
The study's Brazilian authors also analyzed data on ultra-processed food consumption from seven other countries, concluding that premature deaths tied to unhealthy diets are a growing global phenomenon calling for coordinated international action.
In addition to the nearly 125,000 premature U.S. deaths for 2017 and 2018, the study, published in the American Journal of Preventative Medicine, also estimated that more than 25,000 Brazilians died prematurely during those years because of poor health outcomes tied to ultra-processed foods.
The researchers' statistical model also showed more than 17,000 such deaths in Britain during 2018 and 2019 and another 17,000 in Mexico during a single year, 2016.
Similarly, Canada had more than 7,700 premature deaths attributed to ultra-processed foods in 2016, the authors estimated, while Australia recorded 3,277 in 2016, Colombia had 2,813 in 2015 and Chile tallied 1,874 in 2010.
Ultra-processed foods, or UPFs, generally are defined as those that include mass-produced ingredients that can't be made at home, such as preservatives, emulsifiers and sweeteners. They often contain added fats, starches, sugars, salts and hydrogenated oils extracted from other foods.
Sugary drinks, sweets and chocolates, pizzas, hamburgers, chicken nuggets and other highly popular food items are defined as UPFs under the NOVA food classification system. High consumption of these foods has been associated with many different diseases, including cardiovascular disease, obesity, diabetes, some types of cancer and depression.
By 2018, UPFs already made up more than half of the total dietary energy consumed in high-income countries such as the United States, Canada and Britain, and between one-fifth and one-third of total dietary energy in middle-income countries such as Brazil, Mexico and Chile, according to a University of São Paulo study.
The topic is receiving renewed attention due to the agenda of U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who is focusing on the perceived dangers of UPFs during his "Make American Healthy Again" tour this month.
To calculate their numbers, the study's authors developed a comparative risk assessment looking at dietary share of UPFs and all-cause mortality in each country.
They then employed a statistical model to estimate the percentage of all premature preventable deaths due to the consumption of UPFs, tapping studies from many countries and the landmark Global Burden of Disease report of 2021, according to lead author Eduardo A.F. Nilson, a nutrition researcher at the University of São Paulo.
They determined the percentage of UPF-attributable premature deaths vary from 4% in countries with lower UPF consumption to almost 14% in countries with the highest UPF consumption such as the United States and Britain.
Nilson told UPI that while it wasn't much of a surprise the United States has the highest percentage of UPF-associated premature deaths, he noted the trajectory of U.S. deaths has stabilized in recent years while they continue to rise in low- and middle-income nations such as Brazil, Chile and Colombia.
"Our findings on the attributable deaths to UPF in low- and middle-income countries shows that UPFs are replacing traditional fresh and minimally processed foods ,and that this may increase deaths from non-communicable diseases associated with unhealthy dietary patterns," Nilson said in emailed comments.
"These countries are already facing accelerated nutritional and epidemiological transitions and the replacement of traditional diets by UPFs is increasing especially among low income families, reinforcing the challenges of the double burden of malnutrition."
Global food systems have made UPFs more available and affordable in all countries, triggering changes in diets all over the world as well as new heath problems that "demand policy responses by national governments" the Brazilian researcher said.
UPF consumption "represents a global priority, and it requires more than consumer education because food choices are determined by many factors beyond consumers, mostly related to the food environment," Nilson said.
"Food choices are influenced by price, availability, information and other factors and education by itself is insufficient to ensure healthy diets. Therefore, we need to make healthy dietary behaviors easier and more accessible and affordable."
He added: "This means implementing fiscal and regulatory policies, including subsidies to fresh and minimally processed foods, taxation of UPFs -- as is already done for sugar-sweetened beverages in some countries -- improving front-of-pack food labelling, regulating food marketing and regulating food sales in settings such as schools, workplaces and hospitals, for example."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
There is no evidence vaccines cause autism. Study impact of plastics on health.
Secretary of Health and Human Services, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., and others have tried to blame vaccines for the increases in autism in the United States and around the world. It has been documented that improvements in diagnosis have certainly increased the numbers. But there is no proof connecting vaccines to the problem. However, people who are struggling to understand why their family member has been diagnosed with the condition grasp at fallacies. Perhaps (it is worth studying) the abundance of plastics in our environment since World War II. Almost all the food we eat is contaminated by contact with some form of plastic. Not only food, but most medications, beauty products and household cleaners come in plastic containers. It is throughout our houses, furniture, electronics and vehicles. Water runs through plastic pipes. Babies drink milk out of plastic bottles and cups. Our clothes contain polyester. We breathe in fumes from plastics. Plastic is virtually impossible to avoid. Right now my fingers are typing this on a plastic keyboard. Where does plastic come from? Most of it is derived from petroleum and natural gas. Our current administration is shutting down research at universities and around the country. The petroleum industry lobbies very hard. Think about it, please. Roberta Mundschau, Waukesha Opinion: We know how to fix the biggest lie about Wisconsin's elections Letters: Ron Johnson has odd view on what saving the country means. He will cave to Trump. Opinion: Ernst said we're all going to die. Can we get decent health care in the meantime? Here are some tips to get your views shared with your friends, family, neighbors and across our state: Please include your name, street address and daytime phone. Generally, we limit letters to 200 words. Cite sources of where you found information or the article that prompted your letter. Be civil and constructive, especially when criticizing. Avoid ad hominem attacks, take issue with a position, not a person. We cannot acknowledge receipt of submissions. We don't publish poetry, anonymous or open letters. Each writer is limited to one published letter every two months. All letters are subject to editing. Write: Letters to the editor, Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, 330 E. Kilbourn Avenue, Suite 500, Milwaukee, WI, 53202. Fax: (414)-223-5444. E-mail: jsedit@ or submit using the form that can be found on the on the bottom of this page. This article originally appeared on Milwaukee Journal Sentinel: Kennedy should study impact of plastics on public health | Letters
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Exclusive-UnitedHealth eyes $1 billion deal to exit Latin America as insurer refocuses on US, sources say
By Tatiana Bautzer and Sabrina Valle NEW YORK (Reuters) -UnitedHealth Group is weighing multiple bids for its Latin American operations, according to two people with direct knowledge of the matter, as the insurer buckles down after a series of unprecedented missteps that include the ouster of its CEO and a reported criminal accounting probe. The largest U.S. health insurer has been trying to exit Latin America since 2022, but the sale of Banmedica has taken on increasing urgency in recent months as the insurer took hits on multiple fronts, according to one of the people. New CEO Steve Hemsley told shareholders last week that he was determined to earn back their trust after an earnings miss and a Wall Street Journal report that the company was under criminal investigation for alleged Medicare fraud. UnitedHealth has said it was not notified by the Department of Justice and that it stands by the integrity of its operations. Hemsley replaced Andrew Witty as CEO, who had been in the post for only a matter of months following the murder of his predecessor, Brian Thompson, in New York in December while on his way to a meeting with investors. The company has four non-binding bids for its Banmedica subsidiary, which operates in Colombia and Chile, for about $1 billion, according to both people, who asked not to be identified because the talks are private. UnitedHealth's shares tumbled 25.5% in May alone and year-to-date are down 40%. UnitedHealth left Brazil in 2023 and Peru in March. It's aiming to get around $1 billion for Banmedica's operations in Colombia and Chile, the people said. The two people said the company expects to set a deadline for binding proposals as soon as July. UnitedHealth received bids from Washington, D.C.-based private equity firm Acon Investments; Sao Paulo-based private equity firm Patria Investments; Texas non-profit health firm Christus Health; and Lima-based healthcare and insurance provider Auna, the people said. Auna is in talks with a financial partner, one of the sources added. Banmedica's annual earnings before income taxes, depreciation and amortization, or EBITDA, is more than $200 million a year. Patria and Christus Health declined to comment. UnitedHealth, Acon and Auna did not respond to requests for comment. FAILED EXPANSION PLANS UnitedHealth bought Banmedica in 2018, with CEO David Scott saying he was "establishing a foundation for growth in South America for the next decades." At the time, UnitedHealth paid around 12 times Banmedica's EBITDA, according to one of the people. Three years later, the insurer decided to leave Latin America as it grappled with losses in its largest operation in the region, Brazil's Amil, which had been acquired a decade earlier. It divested from its Brazilian operations in late 2023. Banmedica is currently profitable, but is considered too small by UnitedHealth. It serves over 2.1 million consumers through its health insurance programs and has around 4 million patient visits annually across its network of 13 hospitals and 143 medical centers. UnitedHealth booked an $8.3 billion loss last year related to the sale of its South American operations - $7.1 billion stemming from the Brazil exit and $1.2 billion from Banmedica. "These losses relate to our strategic exit of South American markets and include significant losses related to foreign currency translation effects," the company said in a February filing. Brazilian investment bank BTG Pactual is advising UnitedHealth on the sale.
Axios
4 hours ago
- Axios
How animal welfare became a GOP issue
Animal welfare is becoming part of the Trump health team's agenda, as officials press for changes to drug approvals and product evaluations and portray lab animal testing as a symptom of big-government bloat. Why it matters: The effort is the product of a more than decade-long push to elevate animal welfare issues with the political right that now features congressional oversight hearings and threats to cut off taxpayer funding. Case in point: The Food and Drug Administration is phasing out animal testing requirements for antibody therapies and other drugs and telling companies that use other methods that they may receive streamlined product reviews. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and the leaders of the FDA and National Institutes of Health urged Canadian food inspection officials last month to spare hundreds of ostriches infected with bird flu from a planned cull, saying there would be benefit in studying the birds' immune response. Congressional Republicans like Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) have also held hearings on " taxpayer funded animal abuse" and proposed measures that would close down federally funded labs that use animals. Trump had a mixed record on animal welfare issues in his first term. While he signed a federal law outlawing animal cruelty as well as animal fighting, his administration rolled back protections for certain at-risk animals, reversed rules restricting hunting on public lands and even deleted records of animal welfare violations. The FDA's new non-animal testing strategy could accelerate the process for bringing cures to market and give drug and biotech companies more flexibility — though it relies on some still-unproven alternatives like certain AI models. Between the lines: Among those driving the shift is the White Coat Waste Project, a libertarian-leaning group that is targeting what it calls "wasteful and secretive" taxpayer-funded experiments over its ethical concerns around animal testing. Founder Anthony Bellotti, a former Republican congressional staffer, told Axios the group adapted the playbook for cutting off federal funding for Planned Parenthood. Activists "went after the money source, because if you can fund a problem, you can defund it," Bellotti said. "And I said, 'Holy crap, animal testing is virtually all taxpayer-funded.'" The group has portrayed animal experiments as government waste, pointing to studies that show an 85% failure rate in studies that rely on animal models. The group has published controversial investigations of NIH-funded research, claiming taxpayers funded experiments where beagles were "bitten to death by flies" and that former National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases director Anthony Fauci wasted $1 million on painful experiments on the dogs. NIAID has disputed the findings. Zoom in: The shift in framing animal welfare so it appeals to conservatives, including linking it to causes like states' rights, has taken place over many years, said Republican lobbyist Marty Irby. "I use the term creation care a lot ... we have all these things that we talk about: taking care of people, health care, whatever the case may be. But you know, you can't just push animals to the side." Efforts to address factory farming not only overlap with the Make America Healthy Again movement's interest in food quality but with national security concerns, since one of the biggest pork producers, Smithfield Foods, is owned by a Chinese company, Irby pointed out. There also are attempts to tie animal testing back to conservative suspicion over the pandemic response, including subjecting hamsters, rabbits, monkeys and many other animals to infectious disease experiments without pain management. The issue polls highly among voters on both sides of the aisle, Irby said. The other side: Animal testing remains critical to understanding disease progression and evaluating the safety of drugs, vaccines, food additives and household products. Because they're susceptible to many of the same diseases and have shorter life spans, lab animals provide a window into disease processes across several generations. Experts say the solution in the near time likely will involve a combination of animal and non-animal testing. What's next: Bellotti said plans to phase out animal testing don't go far enough, and he's continuing to push for more lab closures. "There's a lot of rhetoric coming out of the NIH that doesn't match reality," he said. "Without a funding cut for animals and labs, without a timetable and a deadline and a commitment to phasing it out ... it's status quo."
