
Iran to attend Hiroshima and Nagasaki peace ceremonies
That day, Seadat visited the photo exhibition 'Hiroshima 1945 Special Exhibition 80 Years after Atomic Bombing' at the Tokyo Photographic Art Museum put on by The Asahi Shimbun and other organizations.
He told reporters afterward that he had the opportunity to meet and talk with several atomic bomb survivors in June and July, and that he felt he must attend the ceremonies after seeing the photo exhibition as well.
Seadat then said he would participate in both ceremonies with strong determination.
This year, both cities plan to send notification letters and formal invitations to ambassadors from all countries and regions with diplomatic missions in Japan, which are listed on the Foreign Ministry's website.
This includes Russia and Belarus, which were previously excluded due to the war in Ukraine.
The decision to notify or invite Israel also is the result of the city of Nagasaki refraining from inviting Israel to last year's ceremony because of its continued attacks on Gaza. The move led to the United States and other countries declining to participate in the ceremony, which sparked controversy.
Seadat also mentioned the legislation passed by the Iranian parliament in response to recent U.S. military attacks on Iranian nuclear facilities. The law suspends Iran's cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).
Seadat clarified that the law is intended to be a temporary suspension of cooperation with the IAEA. He also said if there were guarantees that Iran's nuclear facilities would not be attacked by other countries during the IAEA's inspections, the country could resume cooperation with the agency.
Seadat then criticized U.S. President Donald Trump's remark that airstrikes on Iranian nuclear facilities were essentially the same as Hiroshima and Nagasaki in terms of ending a war.
He said the remark was unacceptable, adding that Iran's nuclear program has always been and will always remain peaceful and intended solely for civilian use.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Asahi Shimbun
10 hours ago
- Asahi Shimbun
Former prime minister says politicians must avoid wars
Former Prime Minister Yasuo Fukuda responds in an interview with The Asahi Shimbun. (Koichi Ueda) Despite indoctrination in militaristic education during World War II, Yasuo Fukuda would go on to value the importance of diplomacy when he served as chief Cabinet secretary and then prime minister. In an interview with The Asahi Shimbun, Fukuda, 89, said, 'The role of a politician is to make every effort to not create a situation in which a nation is forced to go to war.' Born in Tokyo in 1936, Fukuda is the oldest son of, Takeo, a wartime Finance Ministry official, who would later become prime minister. Ministry work took the Fukuda family to Nanjing, China, which was then under Japanese control. But the worsening war situation forced the family to return to Tokyo and later move to Gunma Prefecture, the elder Fukuda's ancestral home, because of the intense bombing of the capital. Because of the heavily militaristic nature of the education at the Gunma elementary school Fukuda attended, he recalled becoming very angry when adults told him Japan had lost the war. But other memories of the war have returned to haunt Fukuda. 'One thing I cannot forget is sending off local men to the warfront,' Fukuda said. 'One of my relatives went to war and what I remember about the send-off is how they all seemed to gaze off into the distance.' Fukuda added that as he grew older he began to recall those expressions of those going off to war and think about whether they left while knowing in their hearts that they would never return alive. 'I still recall those moments and am left with an incredibly helpless feeling,' Fukuda said. His father retired from the Finance Ministry after the war and entered politics. Takeo Fukuda as prime minister in 1977 announced what came to be known as the 'Fukuda Doctrine,' which pledged that Japan would not become a military power. Fukuda himself became prime minister in 2007 and along with Chinese President Hu Jintao released a joint statement that called for establishing a strategic and mutually beneficial relationship between their nations. 'Diplomacy is important for not entering into war,' Fukuda said, 'The foundation for diplomacy is a relationship of trust.' But he noted that various moves by China have made it difficult to hold meaningful summits over the past decade. While Fukuda said the confrontation with China over the Senkaku Islands in the East China Sea was the catalyst for the lack of meetings, he added, 'If we only view China as the enemy, it will be very difficult to make any move at all. Japan and China must not forget their special relationship based on a common culture and history.' Eighty years since the end of World War II, only about 1 percent of Diet members were born before Aug. 15, 1945. Fukuda said, 'It is easy to say we must not go to war. But what is important is using one's imagination to make that past history a core part of oneself and think about what it meant for the nation.' After serving as an aide to his father when he was prime minister between 1976 and 1978, Fukuda won his first term in the Lower House in 1990. He served as chief Cabinet secretary for about three and a half years under former Prime Ministers Junichiro Koizumi and Yoshiro Mori. Fukuda became prime minister in September 2007, marking the first time a father and son had served in that position. He would serve in that post for a year before resigning in September 2008.


Kyodo News
a day ago
- Kyodo News
Iran eyes fair U.S. deal, ongoing enrichment: deputy foreign minister
TEHRAN - Iran's deputy foreign minister said on Saturday that Tehran is prepared to accept certain limitations on its nuclear program in exchange for the lifting of economic sanctions, but ending uranium enrichment entirely is nonnegotiable. "Iran can be flexible on the capacities and limits of enrichment, but cannot agree to stop enrichment under any circumstance because it's essential, and we need to rely on ourselves, not on empty promises," Majid Takht-e Ravanchi told Kyodo News in an interview. "It's simple and clear: if the U.S. insists on zero enrichment, then we have no deal." The remarks come amid a prolonged impasse in U.S.-Iran nuclear talks. U.S. President Donald Trump withdrew Washington from the 2015 nuclear deal in 2018 during his first term, under which Tehran agreed to curb nuclear activities in return for sanctions relief. Trump has repeatedly vowed to prevent Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon. According to Iranian officials, efforts to revive negotiations were derailed in mid-June when Israel carried out air strikes in Iran, killing a nuclear scientist and senior military commanders. On June 22, U.S. Air Force B-2 bombers struck three major Iranian nuclear facilities that were all under International Atomic Energy Agency safeguards. Tehran denounced the attacks as violations of international law aimed at undermining diplomacy. "For talks to continue, Washington must guarantee that it will not attack Iran again if negotiations resume," Ravanchi said. Uranium enrichment remains the core subject of the dispute with the United States, which has demanded an end to the activity. Iran has increased enrichment levels to 60 percent -- short of weapons-grade, but far above the 3.67 percent limit set under the 2015 accord. Ravanchi reiterated that both zero enrichment and curbs on Iran's missile program are "out of the question," though Tehran could agree to temporary limits on its peaceful nuclear activities as part of a "win-win, fair deal." Ravanchi accused Washington of "tricking" Tehran by entering talks while simultaneously participating in military action. "The U.S. needs to clarify whether it is genuinely interested in win-win dialogue or in imposing its will," he said. He added that while compensation for the strikes was not a precondition for future talks, the issue would be raised during negotiations. "The U.S. attacks on Iran's nuclear facilities were illegal and caused serious damage. We have every right to seek compensation." Despite the escalation, Ravanchi said diplomatic channels remain open through intermediaries. "Iran is prepared to engage in dialogue with the U.S.," he said, but warned that renewed American threats would be met with firm defense. Britain, France, and Germany have warned that if no progress is made by the end of August, they will push to reinstate U.N. sanctions lifted under the 2015 deal. Ravanchi dismissed the deadline as "unilateral," but confirmed Tehran's willingness to continue talks with European powers. He stressed that Iran's nuclear program "will remain peaceful" and that Tehran is prepared to cooperate with the U.N. nuclear watchdog to ensure safe and transparent inspections, including at facilities damaged in the recent strikes in accordance with new guidelines to be agreed with the IAEA. Iran has repeatedly said its nuclear activities are for civilian purposes such as energy generation and medical research, while Western powers have long suspected it is seeking the capability to produce nuclear weapons. Japan, a long-time economic partner of Iran, joined other Group of Seven members in backing Israel and criticizing Tehran at the group's June summit in Canada. Ravanchi described the move as "unfair" and a "negative political shift" in bilateral relations.


Japan Today
2 days ago
- Japan Today
Iran says talks with IAEA will be 'technical' and 'complicated' ahead of agency's planned visit
By NASSER KARIMI and KAREEM CHEHAYEB Talks between Iran and the International Atomic Energy Agency will be 'technical' and "complicated," the Islamic Republic's Foreign Ministry said Monday ahead of a visit by the nuclear watchdog for the first time since Tehran cut ties with the organization last month. Relations between the two soured after a 12-day air war was waged by Israel and the U.S in June, which saw key Iranian nuclear facilities bombed. The IAEA board said on June 12 Iran had breached its non-proliferation obligations, a day before Israel's airstrikes over Iran that sparked the war. The IAEA did not immediately issue a statement about the visit by the agency's deputy head, which will not include any planned access to Iranian nuclear sites. Esmail Baghaei, the Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson, told reporters there could be a meeting with Foreign Minister Abbas Aragchi, 'but it is a bit soon to predict what the talks will result since these are technical talks, complicated talks.' Baghaei also criticized the IAEA's 'unique situation' during the June war with Israel. "Peaceful facilities of a country that was under 24-hour monitoring were the target of strikes and the agency refrained from showing a wise and rational reaction and did not condemn it as it was required,' he said. Aragchi had previously said that cooperation with the agency, which will now require approval by Iran's highest security body, the Supreme National Security Council, would be about redefining how both sides cooperate. The decision will likely further limit inspectors' ability to track Tehran's program that had been enriching uranium to near weapons-grade levels. Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian on July 3 ordered the country to suspend its cooperation with the IAEA, after the U.S. bombed three major Iranian nuclear sites as Israel waged an air war with Iran, killing nearly 1,100 people, including many military commanders. Retaliatory Iranian strikes killed 28 in Israel. Iran has had limited IAEA inspections in the past as a pressure tactic in negotiating with the West, and it is unclear how soon talks between Tehran and Washington for a deal over its nuclear program will resume. U.S. intelligence agencies and the IAEA had assessed Iran last had an organized nuclear weapons program in 2003, though Tehran had been enriching uranium up to 60% — a short, technical step away from weapons-grade levels of 90%. © Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.