Carney confirms possibility of lumber quotas in trade deal with the United States
HAMILTON — Prime Minister Mark Carney says any future trade deal with the United States could include 'some element of managed trade,' including quotas, on softwood lumber exports.
Carney's comments come after B.C. Premier David Eby told Bloomberg News that the federal government has been speaking with the provinces about quotas to resolve the softwood lumber dispute.
The prime minister says he's been in close contact with Eby about the softwood file, adding that resolving the conflict is a 'top priority' as the United States prepares to double various duties to 34.45 per cent.
Canada and the United States have been without a softwood lumber agreement since 2015, and Eby has previously said that resolving the dispute could 'build momentum' for a larger, more comprehensive trade deal.
U.S. President Donald Trump's latest threat is to impose 35 per cent tariffs by Aug. 1 on Canadian goods currently not compliant with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement.
Carney says he agrees with Eby's idea of resolving the softwood lumber dispute as part of a larger trade deal, but notes that both issues are unfolding along different times lines.
With files from David Baxter
This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 16, 2025.
The Canadian Press
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Montreal Gazette
21 minutes ago
- Montreal Gazette
Opinion: Provinces must align on health care, not just trade
Op Eds We can borrow a line from Charles Dickens to describe our current state of politics in this country: 'It was the best of times, it was the worst of times.' The 'worst of times' describes the international trade turmoil caused by Donald Trump's fluctuating tariffs and erratic deal-making, with significant implications for our economy. What is less frequently discussed is 'the best of times' impact — the unity the U.S. president's actions has created among premiers and the federal government. Pan-Canadian trade barriers are falling, and interprovincial project ideas abound. This is good news for Canada, even as a possible trade deal with the United States presumably wends closer. As patient-partners in health research, and part of a non-profit organization that helps cancer patients receive essential treatments, we ask: If we can find equal footing among the provinces and territories on trade, why not on health care? Why can't we streamline access to medically necessary treatment for patients across the country who are badly in need of them? For many, this is a matter of life or death. At the moment, provincial and territorial governments make their own decisions about what drugs to reimburse for eligible people and under what conditions. There are many instances across the country where governments don't reimburse people for essential medications at all, leaving patients to find the money on their own. This includes cancer treatments. Sometimes this means people must go without necessary drugs or necessary food. This is the 'choice' our so-often-called 'patchwork quilt' of coverage sometimes provides. The federal government also has its own drug plans for groups under its jurisdiction — and recently, for contraceptives and diabetes medication through the 2024 Pharmacare Act (in provinces that have finalized their agreements with the federal government). Now that we have decided to become Team Canada on trade, there is no reason not to extend this to drug access. During his election campaign, Prime Minister Mark Carney talked about 'Canada Strong,' his plan to unite, secure, protect and build Canada, including comprehensive measures to build and protect our health care system. He talked about adding doctors, building hospitals and delivering better mental health services. He said we would build a stronger health care system. A stronger health care system includes ensuring that people in Canada have equal access to medically necessary services, and that the coverage is portable across the country. These are among the five key principles underpinning the Canada Health Act. Provinces are already on board for getting people medically necessary treatments. Last month, Ontario Premier Doug Ford, who heads the Council of the Federation, comprising all provincial and territorial premiers, said one of their aims is to accelerate getting life saving medications to people who need them. So if every level of government supports the need for medically necessary services — and drug treatments should surely fit into that category — why are we not tearing down the barriers to our patchwork quilt of public drug reimbursement plans? Where you live in the country should not determine whether or not you receive essential medications. Access to health care in Canada — including life-saving medications — should be seamless across provincial and territorial borders. It is not only the right thing to do for patients, but it is also a boon to the economy — getting people healthy and contributing to our society in any way they can. So we ask Carney and the Council of the Federation: If we can find practical solutions to remove trade barriers that are bad for our economy, why can't we find a practical solution to the barrier of unequal access to medically necessary treatments across this country, too?
Globe and Mail
21 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
Brazil requests consultations at World Trade Organization over Trump's tariffs
RIO DE JANEIRO (AP) — Brazil requested consultations at the World Trade Organization over tariffs imposed by U.S. President Donald Trump against the South American nation that went into effect on Wednesday. Trump has directly tied the 50% tariff on many imported Brazilian goods to the judicial situation of his embattled ally, former President Jair Bolsonaro, who is currently under house arrest. "The United States has flagrantly violated key commitments the country has agreed upon at the WTO, such as the principle of the most favored nation and tariff ceilings negotiated at that organization,' Brazil's foreign ministry said in a statement. The most favored nation principle is a cornerstone of Geneva-based WTO, whose aim is to get countries to respect trade agreements. The principle directs its members to treat each other equally in trade. WTO panels are set if no agreement is reached in disputes between members. 'Brazil's government reiterates its availability for negotiation and hopes these consultations contribute to a solution to the matter,' the Brazilian foreign office said. The U.S. government has not made comments about Brazil's move. Earlier, a Brazilian government official told The Associated Press Brazil understands that the case could drag on and there's no guarantee of success. The official, who wasn't authorized to discuss the matter publicly, spoke on condition of anonymity. Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva has repeatedly said that the trade body needs a revamp to be enabled to mediate in conflicts. Brazil's government estimates that 35.9% of the country's goods shipped to the American market have been affected. That is about 4% of Brazil's total exports. Trump directly tied the 50% tariff on imported Brazilian goods to the judicial situation of his embattled ally, former President Jair Bolsonaro, who is currently under house arrest. Last month, Bolsonaro was ordered to wear an electronic ankle monitor and to obey a curfew while the proceedings are underway. Lula is yet to speak about the move. On Tuesday, the leftist leader said he wouldn't call Trump to talk about trade 'because he doesn't want to' speak about it. Lula said that he might instead 'invite him to attend (November's climate summit) COP in Belem.'
CTV News
21 minutes ago
- CTV News
Toronto's El Mocambo will continue as concert venue: new owner
Our Lady Peace play to a packed crowd as they mark the re-opening of the iconic Toronto music venue The El Mocambo on Saturday, October 30, 2021. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Chris Young A spokesperson for the new owner of the El Mocambo says concerts will continue to be held at the storied Toronto music venue after former owner Michael Wekerle defaulted on nearly $56 million in loans tied to the property. In an interview with CTV News Toronto on Wednesday, the director of operations for the company that bought the 77-year-old club says it will be 'nothing too different' from its current iteration. 'The intent is to do it better. To manage operations with a little bit more rigor,' Neil Kerr said on behalf of Cyrus Madon, a longtime executive at Brookfield Asset Management, whose purchase of the venue's assets was approved by an Ontario court on Tuesday. 'Cyrus, he's pretty passionate about music, it's a passion that he's probably had for 50 years… He and his wife are strong supporters of Canadian musicians and charities. There are certainly going to be some charitable functions that are held at the venue as well. I think it's a very, very positive story.' Kerr did not disclose the purchase price of the property. The sale is expected to close in the coming weeks. Wekerele, who became a household name after his time as a star on CBC's 'Dragons' Den,' bought the El Mocambo in 2014 for $3.8 million and spent $35 million to improve the space. The businessman's passion project officially reopened in 2021 after a to-the-studs renovation and delays brought on by the COVID-19 pandemic. Court documents filed earlier this year showed Wekerle had defaulted on nearly $56 million in loans linked to the space. A spokesperson for the El Mocambo told The Canadian Press that Wekerle is not involved in the deal to sell the property. In a statement to The Canadian Press, Wekerle called the sale of the venue 'very important' to its future. 'I endorsed the purchaser and feel he is like-minded and will preserve the integrity of the El Mo,' he said. The small, two-storey concert venue fell into financial trouble in the 90s and early 2000s after playing host to legendary acts like The Rolling Stones and U2 in the 70s and 80s. After closing and re-opening under a number of owners, it finally shuttered. It's unclear when the venue will reopen under the new ownership. With files from The Canadian Press
