Letters: More doctors likely to flee under CAQ plan
Re: ' Doctors face a whole new game of hardball ' (Allison Hanes, May 9)
Beneath the verbal window dressing, Quebec's latest health legislation does not seem like a plan to extend primary care to every Quebecer — it looks like a plan to ration medical care, given that doctors are a scarce resource in Quebec.
If this plan becomes law, I expect doctors will become even scarcer.
Elaine Bander, Montreal
Airport expansion is a good thing
There has been much anguish about the expansion of Trudeau airport and the loss of such buildings as the Manoir Kanisha pet boarding centre.
Pet facilities and other buildings can be relocated, but an airport may be expanded only onto contiguous property that fits within the efficient layout of runways and support facilities — it cannot be piecemeal across the city.
In the mid-1800s, Emperor Napoleon III created Paris's magnificent boulevards by demolishing narrow streets and buildings that had grown randomly over centuries, to the anguish of many Parisians.
Would anyone now say Paris should revert to its earlier form? The charm, the heart of the city, rests upon these great boulevards.
In the 21st century, a city without a modern, well-designed airport will slowly suffocate.
Montreal must expand its airport; otherwise, it risks becoming a quaint backwater.
David Grogan, Old Montreal
A celebration, not a protest
As organizers of the annual Israel Day Celebration, we would like to thank The Gazette for its interest and coverage of our event. However, we are very disappointed that you gave the presence and message of the few protesters who showed up at our event so much weight.
To begin with, you classified these people as 'counter-protesters' when they were actually the protesters. In order to have a counter protest there has to be a protest to counter. Our event is not a protest — it is a celebration, no different than Canada Day, the Fourth of July or Cinqo de Mayo.
We were having a party (for which we had all the required permits) and they were across the street protesting, chanting and defaming the thousands of people celebrating.
While your reporters took pains to quote their chants, sadly we saw few citations from the thousands who gathered to celebrate.
We should also note this celebration took place on May Day, when major cities around the world contend with general anarchy, physical destruction and violent clashes between police and a hodgepodge of activists that leave a wake of damage and expense to local businesses and governments.
On the other hand, we celebrated on a weekday, with joy and revelry, left our spaces in better shape than they were when we arrived, and left a trail of nothing but smiles and warm greetings.
Michael Druckman, co-chair of the Israel Day Celebration, Montreal
Time to revisit transfer payments?
If Bloc Québécois Leader Yves François Blanchet believes he is in an 'artificial country,' maybe Alberta should send 'artificial transfer payments.'
Anthony Edwin Sura, Calgary
Submitting a letter to the editor
Letters should be sent by email to letters@montrealgazette.com
We prioritize letters that respond to, or are inspired by, articles published by The Gazette.
If you are responding to a specific article, let us know which one.
Letters should be sent uniquely to us. The shorter they are — ideally, fewer than 200 words — the greater the chance of publication.
Timing, clarity, factual accuracy and tone are all important, as is whether the writer has something new to add to the conversation.
We reserve the right to edit and condense all letters. Care is taken to preserve the core of the writer's argument.
Our policy is not to publish anonymous letters, those with pseudonyms or 'open letters' addressed to third parties.
Letters are published with the author's full name and city or neighbourhood/borough of residence. Include a phone number and address to help verify identity; these will not be published.
We will not indicate to you whether your letter will be published. If it has not been published within 10 days or so, it is not likely to be.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Edmonton Journal
10 hours ago
- Edmonton Journal
Rob Breakenridge: Alberta should not squander opportunity to remove own trade barriers
Article content We are now less than a month from what was supposed to be the ushering in of a new era of free trade in Canada. However, that may turn out to be somewhat less than advertised. Prime Minister Mark Carney had previously pledged to dismantle trade barriers within Canada by July 1. Now, the pledge is more modest: Ottawa intends to introduce legislation before Canada Day that will aim to eliminate federal trade barriers.
Calgary Herald
11 hours ago
- Calgary Herald
Breakenridge: Alberta should not squander opportunity to remove own trade barriers
We are now less than a month from what was supposed to be the ushering in of a new era of free trade in Canada. However, that may turn out to be somewhat less than advertised. Article content Article content Prime Minister Mark Carney had previously pledged to dismantle trade barriers within Canada by July 1. Now, the pledge is more modest: Ottawa intends to introduce legislation before Canada Day that will aim to eliminate federal trade barriers. Article content Article content In fairness, there is an inherent limit on federal ambition on this issue. The federal government can address its own trade barriers, but can't force the provinces to do so. The good news is that there's nothing stopping the provinces from taking action. Article content Article content The tariff threat from U.S. President Donald Trump has underscored the urgency of making trade within Canada as free as possible. There should be added incentive for Alberta to make this work and demonstrate the economic value of remaining a part of Canada. Article content Premier Danielle Smith has previously boasted — not without justification — that 'Alberta is the national leader in interprovincial trade.' Article content On the eve of Monday's first ministers' meeting in Saskatoon, for example, Alberta and Ontario announced (as did Ontario and Saskatchewan) a non-binding memorandum of understanding intended to 'improve the free flow of goods and services between the two provinces' and 'simplify requirements for regulated professions.' These are positive steps, to be sure. Article content Article content However, we're still playing catch-up to another province. Article content Article content Earlier this year, Nova Scotia introduced legislation to remove trade barriers and ensure the mutual recognition of goods, services, regulations and credentials across all sectors of the Canadian economy. A new analysis shows just how valuable and beneficial it would be for the rest of the country to follow suit. Article content In a report for the Montreal Economic Institute, University of Calgary economics professor Trevor Tombe looks at the benefits of implementing Nova Scotia-style reforms more broadly, and then quantifies the economic spinoff effect.
Montreal Gazette
13 hours ago
- Montreal Gazette
Hanes: Bill 40 appeal shows the Legault government has learned nothing
By Whenever a new fracas erupts between the government of Premier François Legault and the anglophone community, Eric Girard, the minister responsible for relations with English-speaking Quebecers, is dispatched to try to patch things up. Recently, he admitted that new directives issued last summer that suggested eligibility certificates for education in English could be used to access health care in English were ' not our finest moment' and that he was 'disappointed' at how the whole saga played out. Previously, Girard acknowledged that tuition hikes for out-of-province students that disproportionately harmed Quebec's English universities had ruffled feathers, and he vowed to smooth things over. When he was appointed to the portfolio in 2022 after the angst surrounding the adoption of Bill 96, Quebec's update of protections for the French language, Girard promised to allay fears and 'do better.' 'When I say we need to do better, I mean we need to improve relations,' he told The Gazette back in the early days of his tenure. But time and again, these prove to be empty promises. Because actions speak louder than words. And even though it was less than a month ago that Girard called for the latest reset, the Legault government has demonstrated the depth of its contempt for the rights of English-speaking Quebecers anew by announcing its intention to appeal the latest ruling on Bill 40 all the way to the Supreme Court of Canada (if the top court agrees to hear it, that is). The attempt to abolish English school boards and replace them with service centres was one of the first bones of contention between the anglophone community and the Legault government after it was first elected in 2018. The Quebec English School Boards Association launched a constitutional challenge of the law immediately after its passage and has since won two resounding victories. Both Quebec Superior Court and the Quebec Court of Appeals have agreed that Bill 40 is a violation of Section 23 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and affirmed the rights of the English-speaking minority to manage and control its own schools. Both courts have categorically said that transforming school boards into service centres like their francophone counterparts, centralizing many of their decision-making powers in the ministry of education, and axing the elected councils of commissioners run counter to those constitutional guarantees. But the Legault government is forging ahead trying to defend the discredited law. At this point, there is no principled reason to drag this out — and no pragmatic imperative, either. Quebec's English school boards obtained an injunction in 2020, keeping them intact for the duration of the legal proceedings. For five years they have continued to operate as they always have, overseen by elected representatives from the community, alongside French service centres. At this point the government's argument that it can't have two different systems for running French and English schools doesn't really hold water. In fact, there is growing concern that francophone service centres, administered by parents drawn from local school governing boards, lack transparency and accountability. And since Bill 40 was adopted five years ago, Education Minister Bernard Drainville has grabbed even more authority from service centres, like the power to appoint their directors general and overturn their decisions. The English school boards have already proven their management and control rights — twice. But the Legault government just won't let it go. Are they gluttons for punishment? Or is this merely a continuation of the pattern of antagonizing the English-speaking community? So often over two mandates in office, the premier or his ministers say one thing and do another. Legault claimed nothing would change for anglophones under Bill 96, yet there has been major upheaval. English colleges now have quotas for francophone and allophone students and new French course requirements, which has left them destabilized. English versions of government and public websites now have warnings about who is allowed to consult the content, which is an insult to intelligence. English court documents and decisions must be accompanied by French translations, which are costly and time-consuming, impeding access to justice. And these are just a few examples. The rights of anglophones are either complete afterthought or collateral damage. A year ago, when new rules on simultaneous translation of court judgments came into effect, a Quebec Court judge on the verge of presiding over an English criminal trial had to convene representatives of the prosecution service and attorney general's office to get basic information on how this was supposed to work. He was essentially told there was no plan and things were still being figured out. For his efforts, he was the subject of a complaint to the judicial council for overstepping his authority. He was later totally exonerated. His decision declaring the new regulations inoperable for English criminal trials is being appealed, however. The list of slights goes on and on. Yet concerns are frequently dismissed as the rantings of 'angryphones' acting like the world's most spoiled minority — until the government gets egg on its face over something truly ludicrous. Whether it's having to intervene on the Go Habs Go fiasco, override a library's decision not to allow an English book club to meet without simultaneous translation or rewriting the confusing health directives, each incident erodes trust. If Girard was at all serious about wanting to rebuild confidence with English-speaking Quebecers, there was one, simple, concrete gesture the government could have made that would have gone a long way and meant a lot in laying the groundwork for a truce: not appealing the Bill 40 ruling to the Supreme Court. Instead, the Legault government couldn't resist fighting a losing battle to the bitter end.
