Texas athletics department topped $300 million in revenue and operating expenses in 2024
The University of Texas athletics department again has shown its status as a national college sports business leviathan, recording $331.9 million in operating revenues and $325 million in operating expenses during its 2024 fiscal year, according to its new financial report to the NCAA.
The USA TODAY Network obtained the document Monday through an open-records request made in conjunction with its partnership with the Knight-Newhouse College Athletics Database at Syracuse University.
This is the first time since the NCAA began its current reporting system in 2005 that a Division I public school has reported more than $300 million in both revenues and expenses in the same year. It also is the largest single-year spending total, exceeding the $292.3 million that Ohio State reported for fiscal 2024 in a disclosure that occurred earlier on Monday.
However, a separate independent accounting report also obtained Monday through an open-records request showed several caveats to Texas' new figures. The largest of those on the revenue side was what the accountants' report described as a 'large one-time donation to fund the construction of the new Moody Center,' an on-campus arena that opened in spring 2022.
Altogether, Texas reported receiving $133.9 million in contributions during a fiscal year ending Aug. 31, 2024 — nearly $48 million more than it reported receiving in fiscal 2023. The rise in contributions also was attributed to 'a general increase in pledge donations due to increased fundraising efforts, aided by the success of the football team' which went 12-2 during the 2023 season, won the Big 12 championship and played in a College Football Playoff semifinal.
The precise donation amount for the arena was not provided, but the report stated that a $53.6 million increase in Texas' facilities expenses in 2024 was 'due to a $43 million payment on the Moody Center funded' in part through contributions.
Similarly, Oregon reported $391.8 million in revenue for 2020, but that included more than $270 million as a contribution for the renovation of its track and field stadium.
But even with $43 million taken out of Texas' 2024 revenue and expense figures, the totals are $288.9 million in operating revenue and $282 million in operating expense, not including nearly $2.8 million that the athletics department reported transferring to the institution.
And those revenue and expense figures still are among the greatest single-year amounts recorded by a public school. Texas' final report to the NCAA shows that it sponsors 21 teams. Ohio State, for example, reports sponsoring 35 teams.
Texas' figures for 2024 reflect its position over the course of its final year as a member of the Big 12 Conference. And it was due a full share of conference revenue for that year.
The report from Texas' independent accountant shed light on other major differences between the department's 2023 and 2024 figures, and those do reflect the beginning of the Longhorns' affiliation with the Southeastern Conference.
Among the revenue categories, Texas reported $68.8 million from royalties, licensing, advertisements and sponsorships. That represents a $14.1 million increase from 2023. The accountant report said this was due to a change in reporting methodology. 'Historically,' the report said, 'royalties and sponsorship revenue have been reported net of the related expenses. Based upon guidance from the NCAA, the Department now reports these revenues and related expenses on a gross basis as to not underreport earned revenues.'
Connected to this was a $17.7 million increase in overhead and administrative expense that was partially attributed to the methodology change, but also to expenses for an additional home football game and other factors including 'an increase to the operating budget for the new Texas Studios, which replaced the Longhorn Network,' the accountant report said. The Longhorn Network was altered as part Texas' move to the SEC, which included a transfer of the rights to live events to the SEC Network.
Texas' increases in pay to coaches (up by $7.1 million, compared to 2023) and in severance ($1.8 million) were more conventional. The accounting report said those were connected to a raise and amended contract for football head coach Steve Sarkisian that took effect Jan. 1, 2024, and buyouts from coaching changes in baseball and men's swimming. Sarkisian's pay from the school increased from $5.6 million for the 2023 season to $10.6 million for the 2024 season, including a $300,000 one-time payment in April 2024
This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Texas athletics exceeded $300 million in revenue and operating expenses
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Washington Post
17 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Texas beats Texas Tech 10-4 in decisive 3rd game of WCWS to win its 1st national championship
OKLAHOMA CITY — Mia Scott hit a grand slam, Teagan Kavan claimed another win and Texas defeated Texas Tech 10-4 in Game 3 of the Women's College World Series championship series on Friday night to win its first national title. Kavan, a sophomore, allowed no earned runs in all 31 2/3 innings she pitched at the World Series. She went 4-0 with a save in the World Series for the Longhorns (56-12). Texas Tech star pitcher NiJaree Canady, who had thrown every pitch for the Red Raiders through their first five World Series games, was pulled after one inning in Game 3. She gave up five runs on five hits and only threw 25 pitches. Not even support from former Texas Tech football star Patrick Mahomes and his wife, Brittany, who were in attendance, could put the Red Raiders (54-14) over the top. Texas had lost to Oklahoma in the championship series two of the previous three years. Oklahoma was one of the teams Texas beat on its way to the championship. ___ AP sports:
Fox Sports
20 minutes ago
- Fox Sports
House v. NCAA settlement approved, paving way for colleges to pay athletes
A federal judge signed off on arguably the biggest change in the history of college sports on Friday, clearing the way for schools to begin paying their athletes millions of dollars as soon as next month as the multibillion-dollar industry shreds the last vestiges of the amateur model that defined it for more than a century. Nearly five years after Arizona State swimmer Grant House sued the NCAA and its five biggest conferences to lift restrictions on revenue sharing, U.S. Judge Claudia Wilken approved the final proposal that had been hung up on roster limits, just one of many changes ahead amid concerns that thousands of walk-on athletes will lose their chance to play college sports. The sweeping terms of the so-called House settlement include approval for each school to share up to $20.5 million with athletes over the next year and $2.7 billion that will be paid over the next decade to thousands of former players who were barred from that revenue for years. The agreement brings a seismic shift to hundreds of schools that were forced to reckon with the reality that their players are the ones producing the billions in TV and other revenue, mostly through football and basketball. The scope of the changes — some have already begun — is difficult to overstate. The professionalization of college athletics will be seen in the high-stakes and expensive recruitment of stars on their way to the NFL and NBA, and they will be felt by athletes whose schools have decided to pare their programs. The agreement will resonate in nearly every one of the NCAA's 1,100-member schools, boasting nearly 500,000 athletes. The road to a settlement Wilken's ruling comes 11 years after she dealt the first significant blow to the NCAA ideal of amateurism when she ruled in favor of former UCLA basketball player Ed O'Bannon and others who were seeking a way to earn money from the use of their name, image and likeness (NIL) — a term that is now as common in college sports as "March Madness" or "Roll Tide." It was just four years ago that the NCAA cleared the way for NIL money to start flowing, but the changes coming are even bigger. [Related: Top 25 college athletes with highest NIL valuations] Wilken granted preliminary approval to the settlement last October. That sent colleges scurrying to determine not only how they were going to afford the payments, but how to regulate an industry that also allows players to cut deals with third parties so long as they are deemed compliant by a newly formed enforcement group that will be run by auditors at Deloitte. The agreement takes a big chunk of oversight away from the NCAA and puts it in the hands of the four biggest conferences. The ACC, Big Ten, Big 12 and SEC hold most of the power and decision-making heft, especially when it comes to the College Football Playoff, which is the most significant financial driver in the industry and is not under the NCAA umbrella like the March Madness tournaments are. Winners and losers The list of winners and losers is long and, in some cases, hard to tease out. A rough guide of winners would include football and basketball stars at the biggest schools, which will devote much of their bankroll to signing and retaining them. For instance, Michigan quarterback Bryce Underwood's NIL deal is reportedly worth between $10.5 million and $12 million. Losers will be the walk-ons and partial scholarship athletes whose spots are gone. One of the adjustments made at Wilken's behest was to give those athletes a chance to return to the schools that cut them in anticipation of the deal going through. Also in limbo are Olympic sports many of those athletes play and that serve as the main pipeline for a U.S. team that has won the most medals at every Olympics since the downfall of the Soviet Union. All this is a price worth paying, according to the attorneys who crafted the settlement and argue they delivered exactly what they were asked for: an attempt to put more money in the pockets of the players whose sweat and toil keep people watching from the start of football season through March Madness and the College World Series in June. What the settlement does not solve is the threat of further litigation. Though this deal brings some uniformity to the rules, states still have separate laws regarding how NIL can be doled out, which could lead to legal challenges. NCAA President Charlie Baker has been consistent in pushing for federal legislation that would put college sports under one rulebook and, if he has his way, provide some form of antitrust protection to prevent the new model from being disrupted again. The Associated Press contributed to this report. [Want great stories delivered right to your inbox? Create or log in to your FOX Sports account, follow leagues, teams and players to receive a personalized newsletter daily .] recommended Get more from College Football Follow your favorites to get information about games, news and more in this topic
CBS News
21 minutes ago
- CBS News
Judge approves landmark NCAA settlement, clearing way for schools to pay athletes directly
A federal judge signed off on arguably the biggest change in the history of college sports on Friday, clearing the way for schools to begin paying their athletes millions of dollars as soon as next month as the multibillion-dollar industry shreds the last vestiges of the amateur model that defined it for more than a century. Nearly five years after Arizona State swimmer Grant House sued the NCAA and its five biggest conferences to lift restrictions on revenue sharing, U.S. Judge Claudia Wilken approved the final proposal that had been hung up on roster limits, just one of many changes ahead amid concerns that thousands of walk-on athletes will lose their chance to play college sports. The sweeping terms of the so-called House settlement include approval for each school to share up to $20.5 million with athletes over the next year and $2.7 billion that will be paid over the next decade to thousands of former players who were barred from that revenue for years. In a letter penned by NCAA President Charlie Baker following the announcement, Baker wrote that the settlement "opens a pathway to begin stabilizing college sports. This new framework that enables schools to provide direct financial benefits to student-athletes and establishes clear and specific rules to regulate third-party NIL [name, image and likeness] agreements marks a huge step forward for college sports." The agreement brings a seismic shift to hundreds of schools that were forced to reckon with the reality that their players are the ones producing the billions in TV and other revenue, mostly through football and basketball, that keep this machine humming. The scope of the changes — some have already begun — is difficult to overstate. The professionalization of college athletics will be seen in the high-stakes and expensive recruitment of stars on their way to the NFL and NBA, and they will be felt by athletes whose schools have decided to pare their programs. The agreement will resonate in nearly every one of the NCAA's 1,100 member schools boasting nearly 500,000 athletes. Wilken's ruling comes 11 years after she dealt the first significant blow to the NCAA ideal of amateurism when she ruled in favor of former UCLA basketball player Ed O'Bannon and others who were seeking a way to earn money from the use of their name, image and likeness, or NIL — a term that is now as common in college sports as "March Madness" or "Roll Tide." It was just four years ago that the NCAA cleared the way for NIL money to start flowing, but the changes coming are even bigger. Wilken granted preliminary approval to the settlement last October. That sent colleges scurrying to determine not only how they were going to afford the payments, but how to regulate an industry that also allows players to cut deals with third parties so long as they are deemed compliant by a newly formed enforcement group that will be run by auditors at Deloitte. The agreement takes a big chunk of oversight away from the NCAA and puts it in the hands of the four biggest conferences. The ACC, Big Ten, Big 12 and SEC hold most of the power and decision-making heft, especially when it comes to the College Football Playoff, which is the most significant financial driver in the industry and is not under the NCAA umbrella like the March Madness tournaments are.
