Britain is showing feckless France how to stop the boats
What sets this example, and the convictions, apart from the norm is where the gang were smuggling the people to and from: from Britain, to France.
The migrants were north African and were said to prefer France, as it was more familiar to them. I offer my apologies on behalf of the British people if we weren't making them feel sufficiently at home here, after their arrival on tourist visas which they then overstayed.
Last year, 93 migrants were arrested for crossing illegally from the UK to France. So it's certainly unusual. Indeed, the spokesman for the National Crime Agency (NCA), which investigated the gang, has a good line in drollery, describing the case as 'an anomaly' and a departure from the usual model of smuggling migrants from Calais into the UK. You don't say.
But here's the thing about the case. It was indeed an example of excellent work by the NCA. It's far from unusual in that respect. The NCA intercepted the migrants before they were able to cross the border and arrested those responsible. Imagine, however, if it had been the other way round. Imagine if it had been a gang smuggling people from France to Britain.
That is, of course, an idiotic sentence to write because no one has to imagine it. It happens almost every day, and in increasingly record numbers. And what do the French police do? More often than not, they stand and watch, refusing to intervene when they see boats packed with migrants.
Earlier this month some gendarmes waded into the shallow water off a beach near Boulogne and slashed an inflatable small boat with knives. But they have been at pains to point out this was a one-off, rather than an obvious new tactic, adopted solely because the boat – packed with people – was wallowing dangerously in the waves.
The contrast seems stark. Two years ago we agreed to pay the French £480m for additional border patrols and surveillance equipment. Much good it has done. Almost 20,000 people arrived in the UK in the first half of this year in small boats – up 48 per cent on the first six months of 2024. Last week Keir Starmer and Emanuel Macron trumpeted their new 'one in, one out' agreement – but it first has to be approved by the EU, then by the French courts, and even then may have negligible impact. When it comes to people smuggling, it seems only one side of the Channel actually gives a damn.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
17 minutes ago
- Reuters
EU's von der Leyen hopes to 'advance and rebalance' China ties at summit
BEIJING, July 24 (Reuters) - European Union Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and European Council President Antonio Costa met China's President Xi Jinping in Beijing on Thursday, kicking off a tense summit likely to be dominated by trade frictions and Ukraine. Both European leaders will raise issues including the trade imbalance, market access and rare earths during meetings with Chinese President Xi Jinping and Premier Li Qiang. Shortly before the summit, von der Leyen struck a more conciliatory tone, writing that it was an opportunity to "both advance and rebalance our relationship" in an X post on Thursday morning. "I'm convinced there can be a mutually beneficial cooperation," von der Leyen wrote. The weeks leading up to the summit were dominated by tit-for-tat trade disputes and hawkish rhetoric from European officials. State news agency Xinhua also appeared to downplay Beijing's rivalry with the 27-member bloc in a morning commentary, saying China is a "critical partner" to Europe with a range of shared interests. "As the international landscape grows increasingly fraught, the anniversary offers a timely reminder: China is a critical partner to Europe, not a systemic rival," Xinhua wrote, pointing out common interests including trade, climate, and global governance. "These areas of common ground should not be eclipsed by isolated points of friction," it said. The EU defines China as a "partner, competitor and systemic rival", which frames its strategic approach to China policy. Other issues, including electric vehicles and Chinese industrial overcapacity, will also be raised by European leaders at the summit marking the 50th anniversary of diplomatic relations between the EU and China. Expectations for the summit are low after weeks of escalating tensions and wrangling over the format of the summit, which was abruptly shortened from two days to one at Beijing's request. "Like all major economic players, China and the EU do not agree on everything. But disagreement does not equal confrontation," Xinhua said, adding that the relationship needs more trust. The EU is likely to seal a trade deal with the United States that would result in a broad 15% tariff on EU exports to the U.S. after intense negotiations, avoiding a harsher 30% levy threatened by U.S. President Donald Trump.
Sky News
an hour ago
- Sky News
Welfare versus warfare: Sir Keir Starmer's unresolved question - and why the PM's pinned his hopes on economic growth
Welfare versus warfare: for decades, it's a question to which successive prime ministers have responded with one answer. After the end of the Cold War, leaders across the West banked the so-called "peace dividend" that came with the end of this conflict between Washington and Moscow. Instead of funding their armies, they invested in the welfare state and public services instead. But now the tussle over this question is something that the current prime minister is grappling with, and it is shaping up to be one of the biggest challenges for Sir Keir Starmer since he got the job last year. As Clement Attlee became the Labour prime minister credited with creating the welfare state after the end of the Second World War, so it now falls on the shoulders of the current Labour leader to create the warfare state as Europe re-arms. 3:15 Be it Donald Tusk, the Polish prime minister, arguing last year that Europe had moved from the post-war era to the pre-war era; or European Commission chief Ursula von der Leyen calling on the EU to urgently re-arm Ukraine so it is a "steel porcupine" against Russian invaders; there is a consensus that the UK and Europe are on - to quote Sir Keir - a "war footing" and must spend more on defence. To that end the prime minister has committed to increase UK defence spending to 2.5 per cent of GDP by 2027, raiding the overseas development aid budget to do so, and has also committed, alongside other NATO allies, to spend 5 per cent of GDP on defence by 2035. 1:05 That is a huge leap in funding and a profound shift from what have been the priorities for government spending - the NHS, welfare, education - in recent decades. The Institute for Fiscal Studies' Carl Emmerson said the increase, in today's terms, would be like adding approximately £30bn to the 2027 target of spending around £75bn on core defence. Sir Keir has been clear-eyed about the decision, arguing that the first duty of any prime minister is to keep his people safe. But the pledge has raised the obvious questions about how those choices are funded, and whether other public services will face cuts at a time when the UK's economic growth is sluggish and public finances are under pressure. This, then, is one of his biggest challenges: can he make sure Britain looks after itself in a fragile world, while also sticking to his promises to deliver for the country? It is on this that the prime minister has come unstuck over the summer, as he was forced to back down over proposed welfare cuts to the tune of £5bn at the end of this term, in the face of a huge backbench rebellion. Many of his MPs want warfare and welfare. 2:11 "There's been a real collision in recent weeks between those two policy worlds," explains Jim Murphy, who served both as a welfare minister under Tony Blair and shadow defence secretary under Ed Miliband. "In welfare, how do you provide for the people who genuinely need support and who, without the state's support, couldn't survive? What's the interplay between that and the unconditional strategic need to invest more in defence? "For the government, they either get economic growth or they have a series of eye-watering choices in which there can be no compromise with the defence of the state and everything else faces very serious financial pressures." He added: "No Labour politician comes into politics to cut welfare schools or other budgets. But on the basis that defence is non-negotiable, everything else, unfortunately, may face those cuts." 7:02 While the PM sees this clearly, ask around the cabinet table and ministers will admit that the tough choices society will need to take if they genuinely want to respond to the growing threat from Russia, compounded by the unpredictability of Donald Trump, is yet to fully sink in. There are generations of British citizens that have only ever lived in peace, that do not, like I do, remember the Cold War or the Troubles. There are also millions of Britons struggling with the cost of living and and public satisfaction with key public services is at historic lows. That is why Labour campaigned in the election on the promise of change, to raise living standards and cut NHS waiting lists. Ask the public, and 49 per cent of people recognise defence spending needs to increase. But 53 per cent don't want it to come from other areas of public spending, while 55 per cent are opposed to paying more tax to fund that defence increase. There is also significant political resistance from the Labour Party. Sir Keir's attempts to make savings in the welfare budget have been roundly rejected by his MPs. Instead, his backbenchers are talking about more tax rises to fund public services, or even a broader rethink of Rachel Reeves' fiscal rules. 6:36 Anneliese Dodds, who quit as development minister over cuts to the overseas aid budget, wrote in her resignation letter that she had "expected [cabinet] would collectively discuss our fiscal rules and approach to taxation, as other nations are doing", as part of a wider discussion about the changing threats. In an interview for our Electoral Dysfunction podcast, which will be released later this summer, she expanded on this idea. She said: "I think it's really important to take a step back and think about what's going to be necessary, looking ten, twenty years ahead. It looks like the world is not going to become safer, unfortunately, during that period. It's really important that we increase defence spending. "I think that does mean we've got to really carefully consider those issues about our fiscal rules and about taxation. That isn't easy…nonetheless, I think we will have to face up to some really big issues. "Now is the time when we need to look at what other countries are doing. We need to consider whether we have the right system in place." For the Labour MP, that means potentially re-assessing the fiscal rules and how the fiscal watchdog assesses government spending to perhaps give the government more leeway. She also believes that the government should look again at tax rises. She added: "We do, I believe, need to think about taxation. "Now again, there's no magic wand. There will be implications from any change that would be made. As I said before, we are quite highly taxing working people now, but I think there are ways in which we can look at taxation, not without implications. "But in a world of difficult trade-offs, we've got to take the least worst trade-off for the long term. And that's what I think is gonna be really important." Those trade-offs are going to be discussed more and more into the autumn, ahead of what is looking like an extremely difficult budget for the PM and Ms Reeves. Not only is the chancellor now dealing with a £5bn shortfall in her accounts from the welfare reform reversal, but she is also dealing with higher-than-expected borrowing costs, fuelled by surging debt costs. Plus, the government borrowing £3.5bn more than forecast last month, with June's borrowing coming in at £20.7bn - the second-highest figure since records began in 1993. Some economists are now predicting that the chancellor will have to raise taxes or cut spending by around £20bn in the budget to fill the growing black hole. Jeremy Hunt, former Conservative chancellor and now backbencher, tells me he was "massively disappointed" that Labour blinked on welfare reform. He said: "First of all, it's terrible for people who are currently trapped on welfare, but secondly, because the risk is that the consequence of that, is that we get trapped in a doom loop of every higher taxes and lower growth." 'This group of politicians have everything harder ' Mr Murphy says he has sympathy for the predicament of this Labour government and the task they face. He explained: "We were fortunate [back in the early 2000s] in that the economy was still relatively OK, and we were able to reform welfare and do really difficult reforms. This is another world. "This group of politicians have everything harder than we had. They've got an economy that has been contracting, public services post-Covid in trouble, a restless public, a digital media, an American president who is at best unreliable, a Russian president. "Back then [in the 2000s] it was inconceivable that we would fight a war with Russia. On every measure, this group of politicians have everything harder than we ever had." Over the summer and into the autumn, the drumbeat of tax rises will only get louder, particularly amongst a parliamentary party seemingly unwilling to back spending cuts. But that just delays a problem unresolved, which is how a government begins to spend billions more on defence whilst also trying to maintain a welfare state and rebuild public services. This is why the government is pinning so much hope onto economic growth as it's escape route out of its intractable problem. Because without real economic growth to help pay for public services, the government will have to make a choice - and warfare will win out. What is still very unclear is how Sir Keir manages to take his party and the people with him.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
This monster should be SHOT DEAD: On a day of unfathomable pain, MAUREEN CALLAHAN spots Bryan Kohberger's subtle final insult that's so depraved it's sick
Some people just need killing. Bryan Kohberger is one of them. Instead, thanks to a controversial plea deal, Kohberger was sentenced on Wednesday to four consecutive life terms — one each for the savage murders of college students Ethan Chapin, 20, Kaylee Goncalves, 21, Xana Kernodle, 20, and Madison Mogen, 21 — with no chance for parole.
