Labour revolt on migrant hotels: After shock Epping court ruling, Left-wing councils poised to defy Starmer by seeking to remove asylum seekers too
Town hall leaders across the country said they are already looking to follow Epping Forest District Council and take legal action to prevent small boat arrivals being placed in local hotels.
At least four Labour-run authorities were understood to be studying the ruling and considering their own course, posing a new headache for the Prime Minister.
Kemi Badenoch wrote to all leaders of Tory-led parties on Wednesday night, pledging her support for any legal action they take, while Home Secretary Yvette Cooper was under pressure to rule out using private rental housing as an alternative to hotels.
Home Office minister Dan Jarvis admitted on Wednesday he could not say where displaced migrants will end up following Tuesday's landmark High Court ruling, which ordered the Bell Hotel in Epping to be closed within weeks.
In a letter to Ms Cooper, shadow home secretary Chris Philp said: 'Up and down the country people are furious about the number of illegal migrants being housed in hotels - which rose in the nine months following the election under Labour.
'People are also concerned that you are now moving people from hotels into apartments and other accommodation which is sorely needed by young people here who are struggling under this Labour Government.'
Around 32,000 migrants are currently placed in 210 hotels around the country, at a cost to the taxpayer of nearly £6m a day, with others in the private rental sector including HMOs (house of multiple occupation), which are often used by students and young people.
On Wednesday night, writing to all Conservative controlled councils pledging her support to them fighting hotels in their area, Ms Badenoch accused Labour of 'trying to ram through such asylum hotels without consultation and without proper process.'
'They are treating local residents and local councils with contempt,' she said.
Those councils seeking to emulate Epping, which was granted its injunction on a planning technicality, could coordinate their actions, with at least one already contacting the Essex authority asking for help with its own case.
Paula Basnett, the Labour leader of Wirral Council, confirmed she was refusing to toe the party line and had asked officers to seek 'urgent legal advice' to see if the local authority could oppose government plans for the Holiday Inn Express in Hoylake.
The hotel was embroiled in controversy in 2022 when RNLI volunteers on a training day were kicked out midway through their stay to make room for asylum seekers.
It was a target for recent protests over plans to house single male migrants, rather than families.
Ms Basnett said: 'The situation in Wirral with the continued use of hotels as asylum accommodation is unacceptable.
'Recent legal developments in other parts of the country have shown that councils can successfully challenge the Government's approach. In light of this, I have instructed that urgent legal advice be sought on whether Wirral Council can pursue similar action to protect our communities.
'Wirral has always shown compassion towards those in genuine need.
'But compassion does not mean central government can impose poorly thought-through, short-term solutions that undermine local communities and ignore democratic accountability.'
In Labour-run Tamworth, leader Carol Dean confirmed it was considering challenging the use of a hotel in the town which was the focus for violent disorder during last summer's riots.
She said: 'I understand the strong feelings within our community regarding the use of the Holiday Inn to house those seeking asylum, and I want to reassure residents that we are listening to their concerns and taking them seriously.
'The situation at Epping Forest represents a potentially important legal precedent, and we are carefully assessing what this might mean for our circumstances here in Tamworth.'
And a spokesman for fellow Labour-led authorities in Trafford, Greater Manchester, and Rushmoor, Hampshire, did not rule out taking similar action.
Nigel Farage said Reform UK was exploring the prospect of legal action on the councils where his party have responsibility for planning permission.
Corina Gander, Tory leader of Broxbourne Borough Council in Hertfordshire, said her council chief executive 'was in contact' with officials from Epping Forest to better understand the ruling.
Protesters gather outside the Bell hotel on July 31 to express concern about migrants being housed there
'We are not the right place for asylum hotels, so we are looking at the procedure that we could follow,' she said.
In Lincolnshire, Craig Leyland, the leader of Tory-run East Lindsey District Council, said it stands 'strongly against the use of hotels in our district by the Home Office for those seeking asylum'.
Mr Leyland added: 'I have asked officers to investigate and understand this case and will take appropriate action once we understand if there are any similarities that we can act on.'
And the leader of Tory-run Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council said the authority was looking at legal action, even though it only had the one asylum hotel.
He said: 'The Epping judgement was very encouraging, I think it pleased a lot of people.
'People might say: you don't have a massive problem with asylum seekers, but the point is we don't want a problem in the future.
'There just isn't the infrastructure here, and we don't want to end up like Epping with lots of asylum hotels.
'Successive governments have let it get out of hand, people have had enough of it. So we are looking at what we can do.'
Richard Biggs, Conservative leader of Reigate and Banstead Borough Council, added: 'We've got the legal team looking at it at the moment, the planning officers are having an input into that obviously, and when I get the report we'll make a decision.'
Other authorities have ruled out legal action, with the leader of Labour-run Newcastle City Council saying she was 'confident' the council could end the use of hotels without going to court.
Karen Kilgour, who sits as an independent, said: 'We recognise that people seeking asylum include families, women, and children, many of whom have faced unimaginable trauma.
'Newcastle has a proud history of offering sanctuary, and we stand ready to play our part - but it must be done in a way that works for our city and supports the dignity and wellbeing of those who come here.'
Brighton and Hove City Council, meanwhile, has said that as a 'proud city of sanctuary' it will continue to welcome and support asylum seekers.
On Wednesday night, former immigration minister Robert Jenrick called on authorities to follow Epping Forest's example and seek a court injunction.
In a video message announcing the creation of a movement called 'Lawyers for Borders', he said: 'Every patriotic council, whether Conservative, Reform, whatever, should follow Epping's lead and seek an injunction.
'And if you are a council or a community group and you need our help, contact my office. If you're a lawyer and you want to join the fight, contact me.'
On Wednesday, security minister Mr Jarvis said the government was 'looking at a range of different contingency options' about what to do with those in asylum hotels, but refused to provide any further details.
He told Times Radio: 'I think the important point to make is that nobody really thinks that hotels are a sustainable location to accommodate asylum seekers.
'That's precisely why the Government has made a commitment that, by the end of this Parliament, we would have phased out the use of them.'
Epping Forest District Council asked a judge to issue an interim injunction stopping migrants from being accommodated at the Bell Hotel after it had been at the centre of protests in recent weeks.
The council argued the owners of the establishment did not have the requisite planning permission for the building to be used as full-time housing.
The demonstrations came after an Ethiopian migrant at the hotel was charged with three sexual assaults, including on a 14-year-old girl, in two days.
He denies the charge and is due to stand trial later this month.
A full hearing will take place at a later date and council leader Chris Whitbread said his authority would 'find the money' to battle any appeal lodged by the Home Office.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
9 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Labour house 50 migrants a week in asylum hotels despite crackdown
The number of asylum seekers in hotels has risen by 2,500 since Labour took office, equivalent to 50 a week, official figures show. Asylum applications by migrants also hit a record high of more than 111,000 during Sir Keir Starmer's first year in office, after a record surge in small-boat crossings. And just four per cent of small-boat migrants have been returned since 2018, with removals falling in the past year, Home Office figures show. The data will pile pressure on the Prime Minister after a week in which the Government's asylum policy was plunged into chaos with a High Court ruling forcing the closure of a migrant hotel in Epping, Essex, at the centre of anti-immigration protests. The court's judgment has led to ministers bracing for further legal challenges from councils across the country and pressure on the Government as to where else they can house asylum seekers. The latest Home Office data, published on Thursday as part of the quarterly immigration statistics, cover Labour's first year in office. They show there were 32,059 asylum seekers in more than 200 hotels by the end of June. This was eight per cent up from 29,585 at the same point a year earlier, when the Conservatives were still in power, but down slightly on the 32,345 figure at the end of March. At this rate of decline of 286 in three months, it would take 113 years to clear all asylum seekers out of hotels. Labour has pledged to end the use of hotels for asylum seekers by the close of the Parliament in 2029. The latest number is still below the peak of 56,042 asylum seekers in some 400 hotels at the end of September 2023 under the Tories. A total of 111,084 people applied for asylum in the UK in the year to June 2025, the highest number for any 12-month period since current records began in 2001. The number is up 14 per cent from 97,107 in the year to June 2024 and nearly double the number in 2021. The previous record for a 12-month period was 109,343 in the year to March 2025. Migrants who arrived in the UK after crossing the English Channel in small boats accounted for 39 per cent of the total number of people claiming asylum in the year to June. However, a further 37 per cent of claimants had previously arrived in the UK on a visa to work, study or visit. The number of people coming to the UK on small boats or other 'irregular' routes, such as lorries, rose by 27 per cent to 49,000 in the year to June 2025. The most common nationalities of those coming to the UK on small boats were Afghans, Eritreans, Iranians and Syrians. More people are coming to the UK per small boat – there were 65 migrants per boat in June 2025, the highest monthly average on record. A total of 6,313 people who arrived on a small boat between 2018 and the year ending June 2025 have been returned from the UK, representing just four per cent of the total of nearly 180,000. There were 2,330 returns of small-boat migrants in the year to June 2025, seven per cent fewer than the previous year. Of the 159,180 small-boat arrivals who have claimed asylum since 2018, just over one third (35 per cent) were refused or their application was withdrawn. Home Office spending on asylum in the UK stood at £4.76bn in 2024/25, down 12 per cent from a record £5.38bn in 2023/24, the figures show. The total covers all Home Office costs related to asylum, including direct cash support and accommodation, plus wider staffing and other migration and borders activity. It does not include costs relating to the interception of migrants who travel to the UK across the English Channel in small boats. The figure for 2024/25, £4.76bn, is more than three times the equivalent amount in 2020/21 (£1.34bn) and is more than 10 times the total a decade ago in 2014/15 (£0.47bn). 'New, stronger approach' Yvette Cooper, the Home Secretary, said:'We inherited a broken immigration and asylum system that the previous government left in chaos. Since coming to office we have strengthened Britain's visa and immigration controls, cut asylum costs and sharply increased enforcement and returns, as today's figures show. 'The action we have taken in the last 12 months – increasing returns of failed asylum seekers by over 30 per cent, cutting asylum costs by 11 per cent, reducing the backlog by 18 per cent and our forthcoming plans to overhaul the failing asylum appeal system – are crucial steps to restoring order, and putting an end to the chaotic use of asylum hotels that we inherited from the previous government. 'At the same time, we are bringing legal migration back under control, with a 48 per cent reduction in work visas this year – and further stronger visa controls and higher skill requirements introduced through our white paper expected to bring those overall numbers down further. 'As we roll out further reforms, including the new pilot with France, new counter-terror powers to strengthen border security, and new asylum reforms later this year (including reforms to speed up the persistent delays in the appeals system), we will continue to take the serious steps required to restore order, control and fairness to the system and to continue building the foundations of a new and stronger approach.' Chris Philp, the shadow home secretary, said: 'This weak Labour Government has allowed in record numbers of illegal immigrants over the Channel, there are more immigrants in hotels than at the time of the election and fewer people are being removed. 'They are failing and need to urgently back the Conservative's Bill that will ensure illegal immigrants and foreign criminals are all removed. This is a migration crisis – the Labour Government has lost control of our borders.' Nigel Farage, the Reform UK leader, said: 'Under Labour we now have record numbers claiming asylum. The vast majority should never qualify and most will cost the taxpayer a huge sum of money. 'Our streets are becoming more dangerous yet this disaster gets worse. The public are right to be very angry with both Labour and the Tories for what they have done to us.' Lisa Smart, the Liberal Democrats home affairs spokesman, said: 'The asylum backlog has been far too large for far too long. The Conservatives trashed our immigration system and let numbers spiral. Now this Labour Government is failing to get a grip on the crisis. 'The Government urgently needs to stop dangerous Channel crossings and speed up asylum processing to bring down the backlog and end hotel use once and for all.'
BBC News
9 minutes ago
- BBC News
Cov Baths demolition won't be blocked by Historic England
Historic England will not stand in the way of Coventry's Grade II listed Olympic-sized swimming pool building being the organisation, responsible for deciding which buildings should be protected with listed status, said whatever replaced it should "preserve or enhance the setting of Coventry Cathedral".The BBC revealed on Tuesday that Coventry City Council plans to bring forward demolition plans before the end of the year for the city centre swimming pool section of the former Coventry Sports and Leisure Centre site, known locally as "Cov Baths", amid spiralling costs. A Historic England spokesperson said: "Historic England is not minded to object to the demolition of the Central Baths, given its condition, the nature and cost of remedial works and the absence of viable proposals to secure its future."The organisation said there appeared to be "no realistic prospect of viable reuse for the building due to the substantial ongoing costs of security and maintenance". They added whatever replaced the 1966 building "should strive to equal the civic ambition displayed in the Central Baths when they first opened." The demolition plans will not affect the adjoining leisure centre section of the building, known locally as the "The Elephant".The council is still optimistic of finding a new occupier for that site, which was recently the subject of a petition to bring it back into council owns the building and granted an exclusivity agreement to Rainier Developments to attract a developer after the leisure centre's 2020 closure. But five years of marketing efforts have failed to attract a buyer. Councillor Jim O'Boyle, Labour cabinet member for regeneration at Coventry City Council, told the BBC he would be sad to see the building go, but he felt it was time with £400,000 a year being spent on mothballing and security costs for the said: "Nobody wanted this to happen, it's with a heavy heart. I'm a Coventrian, I've used the building many, many times, I've got great memories of it and I feel very sad that we've come to this decision."But we have to come to tis decision in the best interests of the city and the best interests of the taxpayers." Follow BBC Coventry & Warwickshire on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram.
Telegraph
9 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Britain is punishing middle-class parents who do the right thing
If you want to understand why Britain's economy and society are so dysfunctional, you could do a lot worse than look at the incentives facing parents. Between taxes, childcare costs, and the benefits system, the optimal strategy in Britain might be to simply check out of the labour force and have the state carry the can for your costs. To illustrate this, let's look at two young families. The parents of the first are solidly Middle England. They went to university, received their degrees and then invested their time and effort into building their careers, working long hours to claw their way up the corporate ladder. One partner has done exceptionally well and earns £100,000 per year. The other is earlier in their career and earns £50,000 with some student loans still to pay off. They believe the secret to success is hard work and that the secret to a better lifestyle is earning more. The parents of the second family belong to what we might call 'Benefits Street'. Rather than holding naive beliefs about Britain as a free-market system, they choose to engage with it as it is: a strange Potemkin economy that actually rewards knowing exactly what you are eligible to claim from the state. Their work has gone into mastering the art of extracting every last penny the benefits system has to offer. They are quite aware that, between benefits withdrawal rates and taxation, employment is a mug's game. Instead, they choose to claim Universal Credit, supplemented by generous Personal Independence Payments (PIP) for their anxiety, non-specific back pain, or whichever one of the conditions with few hard and fast physical markers that made up the bulk of the rise in PIP cases from 2021 to 2024. By doing so, they are exempted from the benefit cap. With one child, the Middle England household shells out a little under £42,000 in tax and National Insurance contributions, along with £2,100 in student loan repayments. They rent an average London two-bed costing £24,000 per year. With one parent earning over £100,000, their child benefit is fully withdrawn, and they are ineligible for government-funded hours in daycare, instead paying the full bill. Estimating London averages, this comes to roughly £22,000 per year, taking their disposable income to £59,000. Costly, but affordable. But what if they decide to have a second?
