'DA's frequent tantrums quite frankly embarrassing,' says GOOD Party
JOHANNESBURG - The GOOD Party says the Democratic Alliance's (DA) decision to withdraw from the National Dialogue demonstrates that it is participating in the Government of National Unity (GNU) for its own interests, rather than those of South Africans.
At a media briefing on Saturday, the party announced it would boycott the dialogue until ministers facing corruption allegations are removed from office.
READ: DA won't participate in National Dialogue if Ramaphosa doesn't fire corruption-accused ministers - Steenhuisen
The latest dispute was sparked by President Cyril Ramaphosa's dismissal of the DA's Deputy Minister of Trade, Industry and Competition, Andrew Whitfield, over an unauthorised international trip.
GOOD Party's Brett Herron said the DA was choosing to walk away instead of working towards solutions.
"This latest tantrum, triggered by the president's refusal to yield to an artificial 48-hour ultimatum, is not a principled stand - it is political theatre. The DA's ultimatum was exposed as inconsequential, and their frequent tantrums are quite frankly embarrassing.
"South Africa does not need parties walking away from dialogue. It needs leadership that can engage with complexity, manage disagreement maturely, and stay the course. The DA's decision to abandon the national dialogue, while clinging to its GNU positions, exposes the contradiction in its stance."
ALSO READ: Whitfield's axing disproportionate when compared to transgressions of ANC ministers - DA leader John Steenhuisen
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
39 minutes ago
- IOL News
Speak to citizens in their language, officials told at Social Media Summit for Government
City of Tshwane Mayor Dr Nasiphi Moya speaking at the Social Media Summit for Government, which is being hosted by the University of Johannesburg. Image: Supplied City of Tshwane Mayor Dr Nasiphi Moya has called on government officials around the country to speak and communicate with people in a language they understand. Government officials have been accused of malicious compliance in the manner which they consult with citizens for key democratic instruments, including the passing of budgets and consultation for key legislative reforms. Moya was speaking at the Social Media Summit for Government at the University of Johannesburg. She said it was important to note that a lot of people, including the elderly and young graduates with degrees, did not understand how governments worked. 'It is important to deliver messages to people in a language they understand,' she stressed during her address, speaking on the topic of Why Citizen Engagement is the Heart of Governance. 'We table these complex budgets with 200 pages or so, then you take it to the people at a townhall in Ga Rankuwa with these complex tariff structures and very sophisticated terms, and then you explain this 200-page budget in 19 slides and in the room, maybe there were 85 people. 'When those people stand up, they stand up and ask about potholes and their unmet expectations, so you see there is a lot of miscommunication about what is actually happening and everything is happening, it is English all the way…. There is this malicious compliance, we want a government centred around people,' she said. Moya, who has been mayor since October last year, said it was important for government officials to communicate honestly with residents, communicating not only positive updates, but actively responding to burning issues too. She said listening as well was important. Notably, she candidly acknowledged her lack of a strong constituency in Tshwane, explaining that her appointment followed her party's political manoeuvres that removed the former mayor, Cilliers Brink, from the DA. She expressed her desire to lead a people-centred government and urged officials at the summit to prioritise the needs of the citizens. Speaking on a panel discussion around civic tech and government, Dr Sandile Mbatha, the founder and chief solutions officer for SM Digital, said the government was not adequately adopting civic technology because the government was led by people who were bottom feeders, who could not be employed elsewhere. 'This is similar to universities doing research detached from where they are located, then you have a government whose biggest problem in the public service is led by bottom feeders, who are employed because they cannot be employed anywhere else. So when they are presented with problems, it does not become about resolving challenges, it's about ticking boxes,' he said. Mbatha said it was tragic to witness big metros like Joburg and Tshwane dilapidated when they could use civic technology methods to address their problems without having to go through rigid and complex government procurement route, which would end up costing ten times more. Koketso Moeti, the founding executive director for said there was a prevalence of rushing to build apps and tech which did not centre the people. She spoke of a host of public-funded initiatives, such as the launch of a pothole reporting app by the Joburg Roads Agency in May 2014, which was hailed as a first of its kind, but was now defunct, and the issue of potholes had since worsened to epic levels. She also spoke of how over 50 countries launched Covid tracing apps at the peak of the coronavirus, with limited success. 'Very often we aim to solve complex systemic issues, and everywhere I look, we misdiagnose problems,' she said. 'The JRA launched a pothole reporting app, and in less than 3 months, there were major problems with the GPS mapping and other issues, because it was assumed there was a functioning JRA which would administer the app. 'The application was branded a success, a first of its kind, despite there being no measurement on the customer end, and part of the reason we misdiagnose, is because we conflate innovation with invention. 'We rush to build without centring people, we can't just add tech and stir…,' she said, adding also that language was a huge barrier. Future Elect's Wellington Radu leads a panel discussing civic technology at the Social Media Summit for Government, alongside Amandla Mobi's Koketso Moeti, Dr Sandile Mbatha of SM Digital, Kavisha Pillay of CODE and Nkululeko Mthembu of Pista. Image: Supplied
IOL News
an hour ago
- IOL News
Analysts warn DA-led no-confidence vote could topple Ramaphosa
President Cyril Ramaphosa's future could hang by a balance if the Democratic Alliance (DA), party og GNU, continues with the motion of no-confidence against him. Image: IOL Graphic If the Democratic Alliance (DA) proceeds with a motion of no confidence against President Cyril Ramaphosa, it could mark the end of his presidency. That's according to political analysts. Speaking with IOL News, Professor Bheki Mngomezulu said Ramaphosa previously survived parliamentary votes in the sixth administration because the African National Congress (ANC) held a majority in Parliament. However, the party will no longer have the May 2024 national elections. 'Anything is possible with the DA, because they don't seem to know what they are doing,' Mngomezulu said. 'Both the ANC and the DA are suffering from an identity crisis. The ANC behaves as though it is still the sole governing party, while the DA continues acting as the official opposition. But the reality is that they are now part of a coalition government and should be pulling in the same direction.' He said the DA often second-guesses and 'checkmates' the ANC, creating confusion about its intentions within the Government of National Unity (GNU). Mngomezulu said two main reasons are preventing the DA from leaving the coalition - is the receipt of ministerial and deputy ministerial positions, and its desire to prevent the MK Party and the Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) from joining the GNU. His remarks come amid heightened tensions following Ramaphosa's dismissal of Deputy Trade and Industry Minister Andrew Whitfield, a senior DA member, over an unauthorised international trip. The blue party responded by withdrawing from the National Dialogue process, which is a key platform for inter-party consultation. But, the party has not ruled out tabling a motion of no confidence against Ramaphosa. Speaking over the weekend at the OR Tambo regional conference in the Eastern Cape, ANC secretary-general Fikile Mbalula rubbished DA's threats. 'The DA can pack their things and leave, but on their way out, they will meet others coming in,' Mbalula said. 'Even if the DA walks away, the GNU will not collapse. Other parties are already knocking at the door to join. The GNU is powerful - it finishes you without you realising.' Mbalula warned that any attempt to propose a motion of no confidence would result in the DA's expulsion from the GNU. He confirmed that the ANC's National Working Committee (NWC) would meet Monday afternoon to discuss the matter. Meanwhile, Mngomezulu said if the DA were to proceed with the motion, it would likely find support from smaller parties, including the MK Party, the EFF, and the African Transformation Movement (ATM). 'Even if ActionSA, which also has an identity crisis, were to vote against it, the rest could constitute the two-thirds majority needed, which would mean the end of Ramaphosa,' he said. 'But I don't think it will come to that, because the ANC and DA do discuss issues behind closed doors.' He called on the ANC to address the DA's repeated challenges to its policies, including the Basic Education Laws Amendment (BELA) Bill, the Land Expropriation Bill, and its stances on foreign policy. 'They must also discuss the DA's threats to oppose all budget speeches by ministers they disagree with, and the possibility of invoking Section 89 of the Constitution,' Mngomezulu said. 'They must assess what the DA's exit would mean in terms of parliamentary numbers. That is critical.' The ANC's NWC is also expected to address the fate of Higher Education Minister Nobuhle Nkabane, who is facing criticism over the controversial appointment of the Services Sector Education and Training Authority (SETA) board. In addition, Independent political analyst Goodenough Mashego echoed Mngomezulu's remarks. 'If the DA were to bring a motion of no confidence against the president, it will definitely succeed,' Mashego said. 'It will succeed because it will have shifted the DA toward the MK and the EFF, because they need MK and EFF for the motion to succeed.' However, he said the DA is unlikely to bring the motion unless it is certain it will pass. 'They wouldn't want to embarrass themselves by bringing a motion that's going to fail, thus spilling the end of their coalition with the ANC while they go out and they've got nothing to show for it,' he said. Mashego said negotiating with the EFF and MK would be difficult, especially because it would require agreement on who would become president if Ramaphosa were removed. 'There is no scenario whereby the MK Party or EFF are going to allow the DA to appoint a president,' he said. 'If the DA also agrees with MK to appoint an MK president, there is no way an MK president will have the DA in Cabinet.' Mashego expressed that the motion is unlikely to happen. 'They might talk about it as a bargaining tool, but they're not going to do it,' he said. 'The recent DA stance is for optics. No South African is looking forward to the national dialogue, so withdrawing from it doesn't change anything.'
Eyewitness News
2 hours ago
- Eyewitness News
'Don't test us': Zille warns Ramaphosa that tabling no-confidence motion in him not an idle threat
CAPE TOWN – Democratic Alliance (DA) federal chair Helen Zille said that tabling a motion of no confidence in President Cyril Ramaphosa was not an idle threat. She said that by not acting against corruption-accused within the African National Congress (ANC)'s ranks, Ramaphosa was proving not to be any different from them. On Saturday, the DA dug in its heels, saying that it would not be withdrawing from the Government of National Unity (GNU) despite its outrage at the firing of its Eastern Cape leader, Andrew Whitfield, as a deputy minister. Ramaphosa cancelled his travel to Spain over the weekend to manage the fallout. Groupings, both within the DA and the ANC, want the parties to terminate their working relationship within the GNU. But the DA remains adamant that it won't leave on a whim. However, Zille said Ramaphosa must not test her party. "I like to live by the three strikes, and you are out, maxim. So, this is the second big strike, and believe me, we discussed at length about a motion of no confidence in the president." Despite the DA's federal executive opting not to go this route in response to what the party believes has been a disproportionate sanction for Whitfield, Zille said that a motion of no confidence in Ramaphosa was not off the table. "If the president shows that he's indistinguishable from the corrupt radical economic transformation faction in his party, well then, there's no point in being in a coalition with him at all. So, we are saying, don't test us because we are prepared to use the nuclear option." For now, the party has chosen to withdraw from the National Dialogue, a move that could see the president's wrath shift to other DA ministers. ALSO READ: 'Even if DA walks away, GNU will not collapse' - ANC's Mbalula
