Journalist Kommineni sent to 14-day remand
Srinivasarao was arrested by Tulluru police in Hyderabad on Monday and brought to Nallapadu police station in Guntur via Vijayawada. Before being produced in court, he underwent a medical check-up at Guntur Government General Hospital (GGH), where doctors diagnosed a urinary tract infection. Other health parameters, including heart and sugar levels, were found to be normal.
The case stems from a controversial television debate where journalist Krishnam Raju described Amaravati as 'a capital of prostitutes' instead of 'a capital of goddesses.' Srinivasarao, rather than denouncing the remarks, reportedly endorsed them by citing similar views and suggesting that such statements attract online abuse, according to the complaint.
The remarks provoked widespread outrage from women's groups, civil society members, and Dalit organisations across Andhra Pradesh, leading to multiple complaints at police stations.
While Srinivasarao was promptly arrested, Krishnam Raju is reportedly absconding, and efforts are underway to trace him.
Given the heightened public emotions, particularly among women and Dalit communities in Amaravati, police arranged tight security during Srinivasarao's court appearance. Escort vehicles were flanked by additional convoy vehicles as a precautionary measure.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
7 hours ago
- Time of India
Man gets death sentence for killing Dalit teen for rejecting advances
Roorkee: A Roorkee court on Thursday sentenced a man to death and another to life imprisonment for the 2021 murder of a 19-year-old Dalit woman, who was killed inside her home by a neighbour infatuated with her, aided by two accomplices, while she was alone. Nidhi alias Hansi, a Class 12 pass-out from Krishna Nagar, Roorkee, was the only sister of two brothers and had taken up running a small provision store at home to support her family after her father's death. Her mother worked as a daily-wage labourer. Following the verdict, the family said they felt justice had been served. Nidhi's brother Dinesh Singh, a cab driver, told TOI, "We are very poor people, but this verdict made us feel that justice is equal for all. We are satisfied with the judgment and thankful to our lawyer, Sanjeev Verma, who didn't charge us even a single rupee." Advocate Verma said Nidhi had been harassed repeatedly by Haider Ali, 25, an electrician living in the same lane, who would call her persistently and ask to meet her alone. When she told her brother about the harassment, he confronted Haider and warned him to stay away. On April 24, 2021, while Nidhi was alone at home, Haider arrived with his associates Shariq and Rehan and attacked her. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Big Changes: Metal Roof Options Now Available for These Local Zip Codes Metal Roof USA Learn More Undo He slit her throat with a knife. Locals rushed in after hearing her screams, caught Haider at the spot, and handed him over to the police, while the other two managed to flee. Nidhi was rushed to hospital but died on the way. Police registered an FIR on the same day under IPC sections 302 (murder) and 34 (act done by many persons with a common intention), based on a complaint by her brother Dinesh Singh. Verma said, "The case was heard in the court of additional district judge (first), Ramesh Singh. On Wednesday, the judge delivered the verdict. Haider was awarded the death sentence, while his accomplice Shariq was given life imprisonment. Rehan, who was a minor at the time of the incident, is still facing trial in the juvenile court." Follow more information on Air India plane crash in Ahmedabad here . Get real-time live updates on rescue operations and check full list of passengers onboard AI 171 .
Indian Express
10 hours ago
- Indian Express
Beed caste atrocity shows we are still far away from achieving caste equality
Written by Neeraj Bunkar On June 4, a chilling incident in Beed district, Maharashtra, again laid bare the persistent scourge of caste-based violence in India. Vaibhav Khandagale, a Dalit man, was brutally assaulted by a mob of 10–12 'upper caste' Maratha men, some of whom were his classmates and supposedly friends. The attack, driven by casteist hatred, was not just an assault on Vaibhav's body, but also an affront to the principles of equality enshrined in our Constitution. The SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, enacted on September 11, 1989, was designed to protect marginalised communities from caste-based discrimination and violence. It defines atrocities as 'offences' committed against Scheduled Castes (SCs) and Scheduled Tribes (STs) by non-SC/ST individuals, including acts like physical assault, humiliation, and the denial of rights. Section 3(1)(r) of the Act, cited in the FIR registered by Vaibhav in Beed, addresses intentional insults or intimidation meant to humiliate SC/ST members in public view, punishable with imprisonment from six months to five years and a fine. Section 3(1)(s) covers abuses using casteist slurs, while Section 3(2) (va) enhances penalties for offences under the Indian Penal Code (now Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023). The FIR, registered under multiple sections of the BNS, 2023 (Section 119(1) for causing hurt, Section 333 for cheating, and Section 351(2) for criminal force), alongside SC/ST Act provisions, reflects the gravity of the incident. However, the response from local authorities raises serious concerns about the Act's enforcement. Vaibhav's brother, Dhananjay, according to reports, alleges that the police delayed registering the FIR, forcing the family to wait hours at the Shirur Kasar police station. Even after persistent pressure, the police initially resisted including critical BNS sections related to attempted murder. Shockingly, a counter-complaint was reportedly filed by the wife of the main accused, falsely alleging theft and threats by Vaibhav's family. This case mirrors broader trends documented by the National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB). In 2022, India recorded 57,582 cases of atrocities against SCs, up from 50,291 in 2020. Maharashtra alone reported 2,743 cases in 2022, a steady rise from 2,569 in 2020. Uttar Pradesh topped the list with 15,368 cases, followed by Rajasthan (8,752) and Madhya Pradesh (7,733). In Maharashtra, however, the conviction rates for these crimes remain alarmingly low, undermining the Act's purpose. For SCs, the conviction rate was a mere 8.8 per cent in 2018, dipping to 7.2 per cent in 2019, rising slightly to 11.8 per cent in 2020, then falling again to 10.7 per cent in 2021 and 8.9 per cent in 2022. For STs, the rates were similarly dismal: 11.3 per cent in 2018, 11.9 per cent in 2019, 12.5 per cent in 2020, 11.8 per cent in 2021, and 12.8 per cent in 2022. By the end of 2022, 14,504 cases involving crimes against SCs and 4,149 against STs were still pending trial in Maharashtra, reflecting a backlog that delays justice for victims. The Act mandates robust mechanisms like Special Courts and Special Public Prosecutors to ensure speedy trials (Sections 14 and 15). It also prohibits anticipatory bail (Section 18) and mandates state governments to provide legal aid and rehabilitation (Section 21). Yet, Dhananjay's account of delayed police response, insensitive officers, and hospital negligence in initiating a medico-legal case highlights a gap between the law's intent and its execution. The Beed incident also exposes the social and political pressures that undermine justice. The Act's provisions for externment (Section 10) and forfeiture of property (Section 7) could deter such intimidation, but their application remains rare. The collective silence of 200 villagers during the assault further illustrates the social boycott faced by Dalit families. The SC/ST Act remains a vital shield for India's marginalised, but its effectiveness hinges on impartial enforcement and societal change. Without systemic reforms — stronger police accountability, proactive legal aid, and widespread awareness — the Act risks remaining a paper promise, leaving countless Vaibhavs vulnerable to the enduring shadow of caste. The writer is a research scholar at Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, United Kingdom
News18
18 hours ago
- News18
Lucknow Constable Assaulted Inside Station, FIR Names ADG's Son; Police Accused Of Cover-Up
Last Updated: Jai Prakash Singh, Abhishek Chaudhary, and Sumit Kumar were booked for the assault and granted bail on personal bonds directly from the police station A constable was assaulted and his uniform torn inside a police station in Lucknow on May 29, in an incident that has sparked outrage and raised serious questions about police accountability. Allegations have emerged that the Lucknow police are attempting to suppress the case, as sources indicate that the accused is reportedly the son of an Additional Director General (ADG). The force now faces criticism for allegedly shielding a top officer's family member. A case was registered against Jai Prakash Singh, Abhishek Chaudhary, and Sumit Kumar in connection with the assault. All three were granted bail on personal bonds directly from the police station. The incident took place at the police station near KD Singh Babu Stadium, while the FIR was filed by Constable Arjun Chaurasia at the Hazratganj Police Station. Meanwhile, in another incident, an FIR has been registered against a BJP leader in Uttar Pradesh for allegedly threatening a Dalit research scholar from Lucknow University over the phone, police said on Tuesday. The complaint was filed late Monday night by Deepak Kannaujia, a research scholar and resident of Turtipar village, at the Ubhaon police station. According to the complaint, BJP leader and block chief Alok Singh allegedly called Kannaujia on May 21, misbehaved with him, mentally harassed him and threatened to kill him. Singh is reportedly a close relative of Rajya Sabha member Neeraj Shekhar, son of former Prime Minister Chandra Shekhar. The complainant claimed that during the call, Singh said, 'Go ahead and record this conversation if you want. I'm not afraid of the administration or the law and order in Uttar Pradesh."
