logo
Councillor Anthony Hunt on working with not against staff

Councillor Anthony Hunt on working with not against staff

In our NHS looking after patients. In our emergency services responding to calls. In our schools helping our young people learn. In social care helping keep young and old people in need of care safe and well. Collecting our bins, looking after our local environment, running vital community services like libraries, and so much more.
As a leader, my firm belief is that you get the best services by working with these dedicated staff, not against them. By helping equip them to deliver better services, not by grinding them down. Which is why I was so alarmed by the language coming out of Reform's Nigel Farage and Richard Tice recently.
After they took control of some English councils in May, Farage said staff working from home, on climate change or diversity initiatives should start 'seeking alternative careers very, very quickly'. Then his deputy, Richard Tice, announced that new employees at councils controlled by Reform UK will get less generous pensions, and called defined benefit pension schemes 'an outrage'.
Now, I get that many people in other jobs have had it tough recently. Pay hasn't kept up with rising costs, so people feel the pinch. But dividing private and public sector workers won't help anyone.
To start with, the idea that local government staff have had it easy just doesn't ring true. They've seen their pay eroded by 20 per cent in real terms in the past 15 years, and each of them is having to do more work thanks to cuts and rising demand. Several areas are encountering recruitment difficulties. These people are not bureaucrats and pen pushers – they're people who work hands-on in our communities, keeping vital local services afloat.
An 'X' site called 'DOGE Wales' has been set up, which seeks to further these attacks – as if the ineffective and destructive policies of Trump and Musk are a good example for us to emulate.
This took aim at one of our staff in Torfaen – someone who works in our schools with Gypsy Traveller children to help them engage and achieve. It asked if the cost of this work was value for money. I'd say that staff member is worth their weight in gold, just like other members of staff in our schools who help children, from the high achievers to those with disabilities or additional needs. We need more of these local stars in our communities, not less.
So I reject these divisive attacks – they may grab cheap attention, but they are no way to run sustainable local services. We need to build our public services and back those who work in them, not attack them.
Councillor Anthony Hunt is leader of Torfaen County Borough Council.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Readers' Letters: You're on to a loser looking for substance in a Swinney speech
Readers' Letters: You're on to a loser looking for substance in a Swinney speech

Scotsman

time2 hours ago

  • Scotsman

Readers' Letters: You're on to a loser looking for substance in a Swinney speech

John Swinney's promise to sort out Scotland sparked scepticism Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Rachel Amery is an optimist (Analysis, 17 June). John Swinney has said he is going to overhaul public services – in much the same way as Nicola Sturgeon said that she would close the attainment gap in schools and establish a publicly-owned, not-for-profit energy company. So I'll believe it when I see it. Ms Amery has to admit 'there was not a lot of specific detail on what will be changing on the back of this reset'. Well, colour me surprised. Her example of possible change in the NHS that Swinney intimated amounts to emulating England's success (shock! horror!) in having had for some years an NHS app that 'makes it easier to manage appointments, make it simple to access test results' and more. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Where Ms Amery is spot on is in writing: 'Despite the lack of clear detail, he made a big deal out of this speech.' Don't SNP leaders always do that? First Minister John Swinney at the Scotland 2050 Conference at Edinburgh's Assembly Rooms yesterday (Picture: Jeff) Jill Stephenson, Edinburgh Not enough John Swinney's promise re: winter fuel payment needs to take account of the different tax rates people pay in Scotland. Those up to £35,000 in England and Wales will have more money left after tax before they get their winter fuel payment. If the First Minister does not want pensioners to have less than their counterparts down south to spend on heating he will need to give the allowance to those up to £37,000. Elizabeth Hands, Armadale, West Lothian Distraction ahoy So John Swinney insists independence is within reach. Really? Or is he simply terrified of former SNP voters, at next year's Holyrood elections, migrating either to independence backing Greens and Alba or to pro-UK Labour or Reform? Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Keir Starmer has made clear that there'll be no referendum during this Westminster parliament, and I can't see any other Westminster party or coalition granting another Scexit vote during the next. The reality is that Swinney doesn't want voters judging the SNP on their shocking mismanagement of Scottish public services in the Sturgeon/Yousaf/Swinney eras and seeks to distract voters with yet another independence campaign. Yet surely the SNP has failed the independence movement, too? It's been 11 years since we voted to remain in the UK and opinion poll trends have shown support primarily for us to continue to do so. Remember that the SNP has continually been in power during this period and has failed to deliver another referendum. The 2026 Holyrood election looks tough for Swinney and I suspect he's going to have to try harder than beating the independence drum again when most of us are more concerned with the management of the NHS, education, housing and roads. Martin Redfern, Melrose, Roxburghshire Share power Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad A lead article by Alexander Brown (16 June) reviews the need for a Mayor plus additional devolved powers for the City of Glasgow. An additional feature from Andrew Carter stated that: 'If Glasgow performed in line with comparable European cities, the Scottish economy would be 4.6 per cent higher'! This failure is due to the refusal of the SNP to honour the pledge given by the 2020 Communities Secretary, Aileen Campbell, that the Scottish Government would implement the Andy Wightman bill to give local councils European-style safeguards following the May 2021 election. Not a single SNP first minister has honoured that pledge to the people of Scotland over the past four years. However, in a speech of 14 May 2024 to mark the 25th anniversary of the Scottish Parliament, Anas Sarwar pledged to push power out of Holyrood and into the regions of Scotland Time, therefore, for all Scots outwith the environs of Edinburgh to give Anas Sarwar and the Scottish Labour Party the opportunity to deliver on a pledge that John Swinney and the SNP have refused to honour! Ian Moir, Castle Douglas, Dumfries & Galloway Still waiting Back in 2007 one of the first things new first minister Alex Salmond promised was a focus on more efficient government and the reform of nine departments of the 'Executive', 27 executive agencies and the 152 quangos. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad He added: 'I'm not sure we need that complexity for a nation of five million. If you're going to have joined-up government you need less bits to join up.' Eighteen years later and one of the relics of that hopeful regime, John Swinney, appeared on stage in a gas-lit fug of smoke and mirrors to swear he's going to finish the job. Where's he getting his inspiration from? The spirit of Alex Salmond or the spectre of Trump, Farage, Reform and DOGE? One thing we can be sure of: it ain't gonna happen on John Swinney's watch. Allan Sutherland, Stonehaven, Aberdeenshire What democracy? I see that without having consulted all the Members of Parliament, whom we, the people, elected to represent our interests, Keir Starmer is sending more jet fighters to the Middle East. In response to questions from the Press, Starmer refused to rule out them being used to protect Israel from Iranian attacks. I wonder if anybody asked if he would rule out them being used to protect Iran, Iraq, Lebanon, Syria, Yemen, Gaza or the West Bank from Israeli air attacks. But we know the answer to that already. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad How blatant do his actions and those of Trump and others have to be before the penny drops for those who still believe we live in a democracy. David J Crawford, Anniesland, Glasgow Just saying... On Monday many of our newspapers carried a large photo of Donald Trump hosting what was said to be the largest US military parade in decades. I quote from Wikipedia's entry on the Nuremberg Rallies: 'The rallies became a national event following Adolf Hitler's rise to power in 1933, and were thereafter held annually. Once the Nazi dictatorship was firmly established, party propagandists began filming the rallies for a national, and international, audience.' Doug Clark, Currie, Midlothian Falling behind The determination of the SNP to retain their unilateral ban on nuclear power, no matter what, is baffling. It did not seem logical when first introduced, now it appears nonsensical. And that was before the climate change alarm and the impoverishing Net Zero commitment. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Now the UK is charging ahead with nuclear, with or without Scotland, and at long last there is a possibility in our time of abundant clean and reliable energy in every weather. An added bonus is that there is enough oil and gas available under our feet to keep us safe and well and warm until the new nuclear plants are up and running. A further plus is the hi-tech jobs and huge investment in our country. Only the SNP wants us to be entirely separate from what is being done the UK, Europe and the entire civilised, progressive world. Alexander McKay, Edinburgh Conspiracy theory Escalating conflict throughout the Middle East, war in mainland Europe. While despot Vladimir Putin, along with his Iranian terrorist-supporting allies, threaten global security and fuel supplies, Frances McKie (Letters, 16 June) resorts to banging the separatist anti-nuclear drum. We're asked to swallow a bizarre conspiracy theory that 'the nuclear lobby' somehow stands 'in the way of necessary research and development' for a theoretical hydrogen solution to our energy needs. What about increasingly desperate shrieks from John Swinney and his party about 'independence' and 'the far right' to an electorate weary after nearly two decades of non-stop failure? Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Nationalists inhabit a make-believe world where ridiculous arrays of Chinese-manufactured wind turbines generate limitless electricity. A Saltire flapping over Edinburgh Castle's highest turret would protect us from external aggression. For the record, we only 'export more energy than we can use' when the wind happens to be blowing at an optimum speed and electricity prices are rock-bottom. The rest of the time it's necessary to rely on non-renewable resources, usually from elsewhere in the UK. Scotland is now on a totally different political, cultural, economic and environmental path to the rest of Great Britain. Thanks to the SNP and Greens, this is the path to self-delusion and stubborn, ideological denial of reality which most of us don't wish to follow. Martin O'Gorman, Edinburgh Well done Bob! In one of the most exciting finishes ever in the US Open at Oakmont last Sunday, Bob MacIntyre came up just short of what would have been an amazing victory. Any one of five players could have been the victor and he was just pipped at the post for a very respectable second. Where Bob MacIntyre didn't fall short was in his admirable sportsmanship. When JJ Spaun, the eventual, and most unlikely, winner, holed a 64ft winning putt, Bob was seen to be applauding. It all made for thrilling television. Beneath Bob's impressive modesty lies a very powerful determination. Coming second, he said, had given him a thirst to win a major. The 'wee man from Oban' is big on talent and, as Martin Dempster wrote, there are 'few doubters' now. Ian Petrie, Edinburgh Write to The Scotsman Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad

A future Liberal vision of Scotland in 2050 - Alex Cole-Hamilton
A future Liberal vision of Scotland in 2050 - Alex Cole-Hamilton

Scotsman

time2 hours ago

  • Scotsman

A future Liberal vision of Scotland in 2050 - Alex Cole-Hamilton

Alex Cole-Hamilton MSP delivers a speech. Picture: Andrew MacColl/Shutterstock What will Scot-land look like in 25 years' time? That's what I was tasked with answering at a conference in Edinburgh yesterday. Sign up to our daily newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to Edinburgh News, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Had the pioneers of devolution been asked to speak at a similar conference about their vision for our time a quarter of a century ago, I doubt very much that they could have anticipated the global shocks and the ferocious rate of change that we have witnessed in these intervening years. I believe that as the first half of this century closes out the renewal of liberalism will continue, with many more liberals in power, getting things done. That's because Liberalism is the antithesis to the politics of blame, to the politics of identity, of cynical politicians who seize on struggles and anxieties. That stifles our progress to the detriment of the people I got into politics to help. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The political oxygen all of this consumes has frustrated attempts to address the humanitarian catastrophe created by our warming planet, the housing crisis or child poverty on the streets of Scotland. The SNP have been in power for 18 years, failing to get the basics right. For too many people it feels like nothing works any more. I want to change that, because we've overcome big challenges before and we can do it again now. People are still finding themselves in the queue at 8am, struggling to get through to their GP surgery to get an appointment. What a difference it would make if you could see a GP and NHS dentist in good time. Local practices deserve staff who can ease the strain and get you seen fast. It means training and recruiting more pharmacists, more physiotherapists, more specialists in mental health to work alongside them. On any given day, 2000 Scots are stuck in hospital, well enough to leave but too frail to do so because the care package or care home that they need isn't available. For the period of their delay, their hospital bed is not a place of treatment; it is simply another waiting room. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad What a difference it would make if we could fix care, make it an attractive career choice, and guarantee that everyone receives high-quality care when they need it. And what a difference it would make if Scotland had a government that looked after your money and believed in working with our neighbours in the rest of the UK and Europe. It would give the economy and businesses the best chance to thrive. With the right platform for growth, ours is a country that has the skills to make things again and lead the world in technologies that today we can barely imagine. I want our economy to be a resilient, thriving mirror image of our potential as a society. To do that, we need a highly skilled, homegrown workforce that can compete on a global stage, and it is why I'm so determined to tackle the huge shortage of teachers in key subjects like maths, chemistry and computing. We don't believe in settling for more of the same, divisive politics. You deserve better. Scotland would be better off if there were more local champions, focused on getting things done, on what really matters, and if there was more decency and respect in our politics.

What a waste this SNP Government has proved itself to be
What a waste this SNP Government has proved itself to be

The Herald Scotland

time2 hours ago

  • The Herald Scotland

What a waste this SNP Government has proved itself to be

Here we are less than six months away from the start of the ban and yet again we are seeing the SNP modus operandi. Make a big announcement of some grand idea, claim to be virtuous by saving the planet, yet don't put the effort in to actually put all the systems in place. It's just like the ferries all over again, although this time it's not the islanders who will be impacted but the English. As Scotland will not have enough incinerators for the next two years according to Ms Martin, 80-100 lorries every day will be heading south to England to go into their landfill. Imagine the impact on the roads, the environment and the cost at doing this, all because the SNP did not make sure that the structures were in place. I can't picture 600,000 tonnes of waste which is how much this will be annually. What I do know is that suddenly our neighbour is of use to the divisive SNP. The minister actually said in the interview that the 'landfill ban is a good thing in terms of reducing emissions, particularly potent methane emissions'. Does she believe that having a landfill ban in Scotland, sending our waste to England to their landfills reduces emissions? Is she really expecting us to believe that? Apparently she also believes the 'positive environmental impact of stopping landfill far outweighs any impact of temporary measures' (ie sending lorries to England). Her spin doctors were working hard when they came up with that line. We will have heavy lorries on the roads, Scottish waste going to landfill in England polluting the environment and the cost of this to the Scottish taxpayer, which she does not mention, all because the SNP has not done the hard graft to get enough capacity to deal with our waste. It's had 14 years to get this right and failed. Jane Lax, Aberlour. • Plans to send waste to England for disposal remind me of the old car sticker that said: 'Keep Scotland tidy, dump your rubbish in England'. This is an area in which we have some considerable skill, in offshoring manufacturing industry to exclude the emissions from our own statistics. Scott Simpson, Bearsden. Read more letters Another problem is looming Despite the fact it has taken the BBC some time to appreciate and understand the effects of the Scottish Parliament's (already-postponed) ban on the landfill of untreated municipal waste at the end of this year, the Disclosure programme on Monday (June 16) highlighted the nub of the problem: in January 2026, Scotland will be generating 600,000-700,000 tonnes of waste that will have to be trucked to England (or further) for disposal. We won't have enough Energy from Waste (EFW) plants to cope, and the prospects of increasing our recycling rates (that have stagnated since 2012) are pretty poor. It was disappointing that the programme makers didn't do some further research into the reasons for this inertia. The options are either to thole umpteen trucks taking Scottish waste to England (or the ports), or postpone the implementation date for the ban (again). If the latter, is that fair on the companies who are currently investing (or have already have invested) heavily in EFW technology in anticipation of the ban? It's yet another example of policy being made up on the hoof with either the waste industry not being consulted or (if it was) its advice being ignored. But there's another problem looming. The Westminster Government is presently consulting on a proposal to unify landfill tax by 2030 by removing the lower rate for inert wastes (soil, rubble etc) that's currently less than 4% of the higher rate (£126.15/tonne). If that happens and Scotland doesn't follow suit, it would create a situation where it could be economically viable to establish new landfills just north of the border for English waste being trucked up here. Cynics might welcome the idea on the grounds that the trucks hauling Scottish municipal waste to England for disposal would then have the opportunity to backload inert waste for the return journey. John Crawford, Preston. Priorities are all mixed up You report that a Treasury Minister, Emma Reynolds, was unable to give either the precise location or the total cost of yet another project in the south-east of England, a dual tunnel under the Thames linking Essex and Kent ("Minister struggles when questioned over new Thames crossing as costs mount", The Herald, June 17). The cost, it seems, will be between £9.2 billion and £10.2bn. This is a cost being borne by all of us, on top of HS2 (now stopping at Birmingham, not Edinburgh), the incredibly expensive nuclear power stations being built in the south, the aircraft carriers and more. Yet, as a nation, we struggle to keep people warm, people housed and children born into families on benefits fed and clothed. We have certainly gone wrong somewhere. Patricia Fort, Glasgow. This pledge is not believable Back in 2007 one of the first things new First Minister Alex Salmond promised was a focus on more efficient government and reform of nine departments of the "executive", 27 executive agencies and the 152 quangos. He added: "I'm not sure we need that complexity for a nation of five million. If you're going to have joined-up government you need less bits to join up." Eighteen years later and one of the relics, or should I say ruins, of that hopeful regime, John Swinney appeared on stage in a gaslit fug of smoke and mirrors to swear he's going to finish the job ("Ministers in plan to save £1bn a year by cutbacks on 'waste'", The Herald, June 17). Where's he getting his inspiration from? The spirit of Alex Salmond or the spectre of Trump, Farage, Reform and DOGE? One thing we can be sure of: it ain't gonna happen on John Swinney's watch. Allan Sutherland, Stonehaven. • I was almost amused to read that, after 18 years in power, the SNP has decided to save £1 billion a year by cutbacks on "waste". A picture of John Swinney with a newly-grown centre parting would have been even more believable. Duncan Graham, Stirling. Sir Lindsay Hoyle (Image: PA) It's time for Hoyle to go I read with incredulity the letter (June 16) from Jackie Storer, Press Secretary to Sir Lindsay Hoyle, the Speaker of the House of Commons. Only a lackey on the Speaker's payroll could write such drivel. Your readers would have to be 'soft in the head" to believe that Sir Lindsay Hoyle has any 'soft power' as an international peace-keeper. He cannot even keep order in the House of Commons and is an international embarrassment. During over a quarter of a century's membership of the House of Commons, I experienced five Speakers: Selwyn Lloyd, George Thomas, Bernard Weatherill, Betty Boothroyd and Michael Martin. The best by far was the only woman to have held that high office, the formidable Betty Boothroyd, who managed to keep order and chair debates with an admirable combination of professionalism, firmness and humour, while ensuring that even the most humble backbencher got a fair kick of the ball. The current Speaker has none of these attributes. I have never met Sir Lindsay Hoyle but I literally kent his faither, Douglas, who began his Westminster career as an extreme left-wing MP but later transmogrified into an Establishment Member of the House of Lords, where his son will no doubt follow him. Since my retirement, I have more than occasionally watched Parliamentary debates on TV and read reports of the current Speaker's conduct at home and abroad. I have come to the conclusion that Sir Lindsay Hoyle is not only incompetent. He is pretentious and profligate: a perfect example of someone who has been promoted above his abilities. In short, he is not fit to lace Betty Boothroyd's boots and it is time for him to go. Dennis Canavan, Bannockburn.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store