EU ministers approve new 150 billion-euro arms fund
BRUSSELS -The European Union on Tuesday approved the creation of a 150 billion-euro EU arms fund, driven by fears of a Russian attack in the coming years and doubts about U.S. security commitments to the continent.
The approval, by ministers from EU countries meeting in Brussels, was the final legal step in setting up the Security Action for Europe scheme, using joint EU borrowing to give loans to European countries for joint defence projects.
The measure was backed by 26 of the EU's 27 member countries, with Hungary abstaining, diplomats said.
"We adopted SAFE – first large-scale defence investment programme on the EU level," Poland, which holds the EU's rotating presidency, said on X.
"The more we invest in our security, the better we deter those who wish us harm."
The European Commission, the EU's executive body, proposed the fund in March as fears grew among European leaders that they could not be sure that U.S. President Donald Trump's administration would defend them from attack.
Alarmed by Russia's 2022 invasion of Ukraine and fearing they could be Moscow's next target, EU countries have already increased defence spending by more than 30% in the past three years. But EU leaders say that is not enough.
Moscow has condemned the EU's rearmament push as an incitement to war based on an "invented story" of a Russian threat. Such words have not reassured European leaders, as Russia made similar statements before the full-scale invasion of Ukraine.
The EU initiative seeks to break down national barriers by financing joint projects between EU countries and includes a strong "buy European" element as it aims to boost the continent's defence industry.
For a project to qualify for SAFE funding, 65% of its value must come from companies based in the EU, the broader European Economic Area, or Ukraine.
However, companies from countries that have signed a Security and Defence Partnership with the EU can also be eligible, if they meet further conditions.
Britain signed such an agreement with the EU earlier this month, bringing British companies such as BAE Systems a step closer to participation in SAFE projects.
The Commission used a fast-track procedure to launch the legislation, bypassing the European Parliament and only requiring the approval of EU governments.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
15 minutes ago
- Time of India
Judge blocks Trump's move to stop international Harvard students from entering US — Will other universities follow suit?
Judge halts Trump's order barring international Harvard students — what this means for US student visas Judge halts Trump's order on Harvard's international students — what does this mean for the future of student visas? A federal judge has temporarily blocked President Donald Trump's proclamation aimed at preventing international students from entering the US to study at Harvard University. The ruling comes amid an escalating legal battle between the Trump administration and the prestigious institution. US District Judge Allison Burroughs issued a temporary restraining order, stopping the government from enforcing the proclamation, citing concerns that the policy could cause "immediate and irreparable injury," as reported by the ABC News. Judge blocks Trump's proclamation citing potential harm The proclamation, signed by President Trump, invoked the Immigration and Nationality Act to bar foreign nationals from entering the US to study at Harvard for at least six months. It also directed the secretary of state to consider revoking visas of current international students enrolled at Harvard. In her order, Judge Burroughs prohibited the government from "implementing, instituting, maintaining, enforcing, or giving force or effect" to the proclamation. This legal move followed a lawsuit refiled by Harvard challenging the proclamation on grounds that it violates the First Amendment and misuses federal law. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Secure Your Child's Future with Strong English Fluency Planet Spark Learn More Undo Harvard's lawyers argued the president's actions were not taken to protect US interests but instead represented "a government vendetta against Harvard," as reported by the ABC News. They claimed the moves were retaliatory, targeting Harvard for exercising its constitutional rights to reject government control over its governance, curriculum, and faculty ideologies. A continuing feud between Harvard and the Trump administration This ruling builds on a previous decision by the same judge that blocked the Trump administration's attempt to revoke Harvard's ability to enroll international students through the Student and Exchange Visitor Program. Although the Department of Homeland Security initially tried to revoke the program, the court issued a temporary order blocking that move. President Trump justified his proclamation by claiming Harvard refused to provide information about international students, was "extensively entangled with foreign countries," and engaged in discriminatory admissions practices. The proclamation also pointed to rising crime rates and called for investigations into potential misconduct by foreign students. "I have determined that the entry of the class of foreign nationals described above is detrimental to the interests of the United States because, in my judgment, Harvard's conduct has rendered it an unsuitable destination for foreign students and researchers," the proclamation stated, as reported by the ABC News. What does this mean for the future of student visas? The judge's decision protects Harvard's international students for now but raises broader questions about the future of student visa policies in the US. The administration's confrontational stance toward Harvard may signal possible restrictions for other institutions, raising concern across campuses nationwide. Legal experts believe this ruling could set a precedent safeguarding universities from similar government actions. However, the Trump administration has yet to clarify if it will appeal or pursue other measures. With the ongoing legal battles, international students and universities are closely watching the outcome. The decision could have far-reaching implications for immigration policy, academic freedom, and the US's role as a global education leader. As quoted by the ABC News, "This fight is about more than visas. It's about the protection of free speech and institutional autonomy." The case continues to unfold, shaping a critical conversation about immigration and education in the US. Ready to navigate global policies? Secure your overseas future. Get expert guidance now!
The Hindu
16 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Trump, Musk to speak after alliance descends into public feud: reports
White House aides scheduled a call between Donald Trump and Elon Musk for Friday (June 6, 2025), Politico reported, after a huge public spat that saw threats fly over government contracts and ended with the world's richest man suggesting the U.S. president should be impeached. The reported call could ease the feuding after an extraordinary day of hostilities — largely conducted over social media — that marked a stark end to a close alliance. Shares in Mr. Musk's Tesla closed down over 14% on Thursday, losing about $150 billion in market value in the largest single-day decline in value in its history. In pre-market European trading on Friday, they pared some of those losses, rising 5% after the Politico report that the two men were scheduled to speak. Mr. Musk had bankrolled a large part of Mr. Trump's presidential campaign and was then brought in as one of the president's most visible advisers, heading up a sweeping and controversial effort to downsize the federal workforce and slash spending. The verbal punches erupted on Thursday (June 5, 2025) after Mr. Trump criticised Mr. Musk in the Oval Office and the pair then traded barbs on their social media platforms: Mr. Trump's Truth Social and Mr. Musk's X. The falling-out had begun brewing days ago when Mr. Musk, who left his role as head of the Department of Government Efficiency a week ago, denounced Mr. Trump's sweeping tax-cut and spending bill. The president initially stayed quiet while Mr. Musk campaigned to torpedo the bill, saying it would add too much to the nation's $36.2 trillion in debt. Mr. Trump broke his silence on Thursday, telling reporters he was "very disappointed" in Mr. Musk. Back and forth "Look, Elon and I had a great relationship. I don't know if we will anymore," Mr. Trump said. As Mr. Trump spoke, Mr. Musk responded on X. "Without me, Trump would have lost the election," wrote Mr. Musk, who spent nearly $300 million backing Trump and other Republicans in last year's election. In another post, Mr. Musk asserted that Trump's signature import tariffs would push the U.S. into a recession later this year. "The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts," Mr. Trump posted. Minutes after the closing bell, Mr. Musk replied, "Yes," to a post on X saying Trump should be impeached, something that would be highly unlikely given Mr. Trump's Republicans hold majorities in both chambers of Congress. Mr. Musk's businesses also include rocket company and government contractor SpaceX and its satellite unit Starlink. Mr. Musk, whose space business plays a critical role in the U.S. government's space program, said that as a result of Trump's threats he would begin decommissioning SpaceX's Dragon spacecraft. Dragon is the only U.S. spacecraft capable of sending astronauts to the International Space Station. Late on Thursday, Mr. Musk backed off the threat. In another sign of a possible detente to come, Mr. Musk subsequently wrote: "You're not wrong," in response to billionaire investor Bill Ackman saying Mr. Trump and Mr. Musk should make peace.
Mint
17 minutes ago
- Mint
'US no longer a safe nation for investment': Why Carmignac chief economist thinks Trump's 'revenge tax' will backfire
Raphael Gallardo, chief economist at French asset manager Carmignac. warned that the United States is no longer a secure destination for foreign investors because of risks stemming from President Donald Trump's tax and spending bill, as reported by Bloomberg. Gallardo is the latest market commentator to speak about the deep concerns over Section 899 of the bill, a provision that would increase tax rates for individuals and companies from countries whose tax policies the US considers 'discriminatory'. Some have dubbed the measure a 'revenge tax'. During a briefing on the outlook for the second half of the year, Gallardo said, 'The United States is no longer a safe nation for investment.' Carmignac, which had about $39 billion under management at the end of 2024, titled its presentation ''From America First' to Global Financial Anarchy'. Gallardo believes that Trump's unpredictable decisions on trade, along with the concerns around his foreign policy and the rule of law are all prompting traditional allies of the US to reduce their dependence and ties to the world's biggest economy. 'Why de-risk? Because the United States has become a totally unreliable military ally and so, one has to secure supply chains, find new markets,' as reported by Bloomberg. According to Bloomberg data, the Wall Street consensus is that the tax provision would further decrease investors' confidence in US assets, which are already shaken by Trump's trade policies and America's deteriorating fiscal accounts. The tax provision could trigger a 5 per cent fall in the dollar and a 10 per cent selloff across equities, according to Allianz SE chief investment officer Ludovic Subran. Carmignac is diversifying asset allocations from the US to Europe, where Germany's historic fiscal reforms have given a boost to economic growth, reported Bloomberg. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz has taken a series of measures to add weight to the country's military capacity, accelerate infrastructure spending and revive the economy through comprehensive corporate tax breaks. 'Trump managed to achieve what no one had managed before, and that's to make the Germans start to spend,' Gallardo said. Bloomberg reported that European equities have emerged as clear winners worldwide this year as concerns over the Trump administration's trade policies encourage investors to reduce holdings of US assets. At the end of May, eight of the world's 10 best-performing stock indexes were European. Carmignac handles a range of funds across equity, fixed income, diversified and alternative asset classes with different geographical focuses and target outcomes. It was among asset managers who predicted the rally in global shares last year, dismissing talk of a bubble in equity markets, as per Bloomberg
