
Top military expert issues dire warning about Australia's defence over fears China is gearing up for huge strategic move on our doorstep
A leading security analyst warned Australia's military bases and critical infrastructure are 'unprotected' from foreign aggressors and called for urgent upgrades.
Malcolm Davis, a senior analyst at the Australian Strategic Policy Institute, claimed the Albanese Government has overlooked serious gaps in Australia's defence network.
In an interview with Sky News on Sunday, Mr Davis highlighted the urgency of drastically increasing the Australian Defence Force's budget in light of instability in the Indo-Pacific region, specifically the 'very clear threat' of China invading Taiwan.
'Right at the moment, all our critical infrastructure in the north of Australia is essentially undefended,' he said.
'The government talks about building integrated air and missile defence systems, and they have developed the command and control system for that, but they don't have any missiles to shoot with.
'The reality is that all that critical infrastructure of the north or the air bases such as RAAF Tindal, ports and other oil facilities and energy facilities are all undefended.'
China has been ramping up its efforts to grow influence over the Indo-Pacific since the 2010s when it began creating armed artificial islands in the South China Sea.
The Chinese Communist Party's intent to shift from a diplomatic player to a strategist became clear in 2019 with Kiribati and the Solomon Islands both switching its policies regarding Taiwan to side with China.
Defence Minister Richard Marles (right) met with US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth (left) last month and heard urgent calls for Australia to increase its military spending
Since then the Chinese People's Liberation Army has extended its presence in international waters, including an excursion down Australia's east coast by three Chinese People's Liberation Army Navy ships.
Analysts now believe China will start an invasion of Taiwan within the next decade.
Australia's military budget was questioned by US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth last month with the American calling for it to be increased to three per cent of GDP.
Labor's existing policies promise just 2.33 per cent of GDP by 2033.
During a meeting with Defence Minister Richard Marles in Singapore, Hegseth said Australia's military spending should be at least 2.5 per cent of GDP as the risk of a conflict on its north border was increasingly likely.
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese dismissed the US' concerns and said Australia would 'determine our defence policy'.
'We've invested an additional $10 billion in defence,' he told a press conference at the time.
'What we'll do is continue to provide for investing in our capability but also investing in our relationships in the region.
Labor's existing policies allow for 2.33 per cent of GDP to be dedicated to the Australian Defence Force by 2033
'Our position with regard to Taiwan is very clear, has been for a long period of time, which is a bipartisan position to support the status quo.'
Mr Davis urged the Albanese Government to reconsider its defence spending and invest in 'resilience against attack'.
'It needs to include sustainability and building sustainability for protracted war that could last months or years in our region and ensure that we can stay in the fight, a high intensity fight, for that period of time,' he said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
40 minutes ago
- The Independent
US and China reach deal to ease rare earth mineral export curbs after talks in London
US and Chinese officials have agreed on a framework to de-escalate trade tensions between the world's two biggest economies after a series of tariff disputes. US commerce secretary Howard Lutnick said the framework put "meat on the bones" of a deal reached last month in Geneva to ease retaliatory tariffs. The two sides had been seeking to find a way to resolve disputes over mineral and technology exports that shook a fragile truce on trade reached after talks in Geneva last month. Both sides made the announcement at the end of two days of talks in London that wrapped up late on Tuesday. Top US and Chinese economic officials were pushing for a deal that would ease duelling export controls that threatened to unravel the Geneva accord that cut tariffs back from triple-digit levels. The officials will now take the framework to their respective presidents for approval. Mr Lutnick said the deal should result in China easing restrictions on rare earth minerals and magnets. 'First, we had to get sort of the negativity out and now we can go forward,' he told reporters after the meeting. He said both sides would move forward with the framework pending its approval by US president Donald Trump and Chinese leader Xi Jinping. 'Once the presidents approve it, we will then seek to implement it,' Mr Lutnick added. The talks in London followed a phone call between Mr Trump and Mr Xi last week to try to calm the waters after both nations engaged in a dramatic tit-for-tat tariff war earlier this year. Li Chenggang, a vice minister of commerce and China's international trade representative, said the two sides had agreed in principle on a framework for implementing the consensus reached on the phone call and at the talks in Geneva. Mr Lutnick hinted at Washington's willingness to ease the US measures imposed in response to Chinese curbs on exports of rare earths once the supplies of the minerals rose. China holds a near-monopoly on rare earth magnets, a crucial component in electric vehicle motors, and its decision in April to suspend exports of a wide range of critical minerals and magnets upended global supply chains and sparked alarm in boardrooms and factory floors around the world. "Also, there were a number of measures the United States of America put on when those rare earths were not coming," Mr Lutnick said. "You should expect those to come off, sort of as president Trump said, in a balanced way." The two countries announced on 12 May that they had agreed to a 90-day suspension of most of the 100 per cent-plus tariffs imposed on each other in an escalating trade war that had sparked fears of a recession. Since the Geneva talks, the US and China have exchanged angry words over advanced semiconductors that power artificial intelligence, visas for Chinese students at US universities and rare earth minerals vital to carmakers and other industries. Customs data published on Monday showed that China's exports to the US plunged 34.5 per cent in May, the sharpest drop since the Covid pandemic. Wendy Cutler, a former US trade negotiator, said the disputes had frittered away 30 of the 90 days the two sides had to try to resolve their disputes. 'The US and China lost valuable time in restoring their Geneva agreements,' said Ms Cutler, now vice president at the Asia Society Policy Institute. 'Now, only sixty days remain to address issues of concern, including unfair trade practices, excess capacity, transshipment and fentanyl.' China's commerce minister Wang Wentao was part of the delegation in London headed by vice premier He Lifeng. They met with Mr Lutnick, treasury secretary Scott Bessent and trade representative Jamieson Greer at Lancaster House. Asian stock markets rose on Wednesday after the agreement was announced.


Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
US Secretary of State Rubio presses to open sanctions investigation into Harvard, NYT reports
June 11 (Reuters) - U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio is pushing to investigate whether Harvard University violated federal sanctions, The New York Times reported on Wednesday, citing people familiar with the matter and documents reviewed by the newspaper. Rubio is pushing to investigate if Harvard violated sanctions by collaborating on a health insurance conference in China that may have included officials blacklisted by the U.S., the report said. Reuters could not immediately confirm the report.


Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Huawei launches Pura 80 smartphone series in next step of China comeback
BEIJING, June 11 (Reuters) - Chinese tech giant Huawei ( launched its Pura 80 smartphone series on Wednesday, as the company seeks to cement its comeback in China's premium smartphone market following years of U.S. sanctions. Huawei's latest flagship launch demonstrates the Chinese tech giant's continued efforts to reclaim the top spot in its home market despite ongoing U.S. sanctions. Each new phone release is closely watched as a barometer of the company's technological capabilities and market resilience following years of restrictions that severely impacted its smartphone business. Huawei's resurgence has intensified pressure on Apple (AAPL.O), opens new tab, which has seen its market share in China steadily decline and has increasingly relied on price discounts to stimulate sales. Huawei unveiled the Pura 80 series through a livestream event, with consumer business unit head Yu Chengdong focusing heavily on camera capabilities and AI features while staying silent about the chips powering the devices. The series includes four models: Pura 80, Pura 80 Pro, Pura 80 Pro+, and Pura 80 Ultra. Pricing starts at 6,499 yuan ($905) for the Pro series launching June 14, with the Pro+ also launching June 14 at 7,999 yuan and the Ultra at 9,999 yuan on June 26. The base model launches in July. The cameras use XMAGE technology and feature ultra-wide-angle and macro telephoto lenses with embedded AI that can identify objects and provide information like tourist guides. Huawei phone launches generate significant interest as many view them as the company defying U.S. sanctions. On Chinese microblogging platform Weibo, three of the top ten trending topics on Wednesday were Pura 80-related. User reactions were mixed, with many praising the camera capabilities and sleek design while others complained the prices were too high and not worth the cost.