logo
Maryland Democratic senator travels to El Salvador in push for Abrego Garcia's return

Maryland Democratic senator travels to El Salvador in push for Abrego Garcia's return

CNN02-05-2025

US Sen. Chris Van Hollen told reporters in El Salvador Wednesday that he was unable to visit Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia in the maximum-security mega-prison where he is being held.
Instead, the Democrat announced he met with the Salvadoran vice president and vowed to 'keep pressing' for answers and the man's release.
'There will be more members of Congress coming,' Van Hollen said in an emotional media availability. 'This is an unsustainable and unjust moment, so it cannot continue.'
The March deportation of Abrego Garcia, a Salvadoran national and Maryland resident, has become a flashpoint in the fight over the Trump administration's hardline deportation push. The administration conceded in court filings that it had mistakenly deported the father of three to El Salvador last month as part of its recent deportation flights to the Central American nation, which are now at the center of a fraught legal battle.
Van Hollen said he specifically asked Salvadoran Vice President Felix Ulloa if he could meet with Abrego Garcia or at least speak with him over the phone or via video conferencing. Again, Van Hollen said the request was denied.
Pressed on whether he had concerns about the man's health, Van Hollen said: 'I don't know about his health status which is why I wanted to meet with him directly.'
The senator's trip swiftly drew the ire of the White House.
Communications director Steven Cheung called Van Hollen 'a complete disgrace' and the Office of Communications accused the senator in a statement of a lack of concern regarding crimes they say were committed by undocumented immigrants against his constituents. Abrego Garcia has not been charged with any crimes in the United States, according to his lawyers.
While Abrego Garcia had not been legally in the US prior to his deportation, a 2019 court order said he could not be returned to El Salvador and the Trump administration admitted in court documents he was deported there due to a clerical error.
In recent days, however, Trump administration officials have denied that he was mistakenly deported. US officials have alleged he is a member of the MS-13 gang, which the administration has designated as a foreign terrorist organization – a claim his attorneys dispute and at least one federal judge has voiced skepticism toward.
The Wednesday meeting, Van Hollen said, started with a 'point of agreement' that the countries should work together to 'crack down' on gangs like MS-13. However, he said the case of Abrego Garcia 'does not have to do with MS-13.'
Despite a Supreme Court ruling that the US must 'facilitate' Abrego Garcia's return, White House officials have argued it's up to El Salvador whether to do so. The Trump administration and Salvadoran President Nayib Bukele made clear during an Oval Office meeting earlier this week that the Maryland man wouldn't be returned to the US.
Bukele said during the meeting that while he has the power to release Abrego Garcia, he wasn't willing to do so.
Officials in the Oval Office meeting, including President Donald Trump, made no effort to ask for his cooperation in the matter.
Van Hollen said Wednesday that the Salvadoran vice president had echoed comments made by Bukele at the White House that El Salvador 'can't smuggle' Abrego Garcia to the US.
'I said I am not asking him to smuggle Mr. Abrego Garcia into the United States, I am simply asking him to open the door of CECOT and let this innocent man walk out,' the senator said.
Bukele has no plans to meet with the Democratic senator currently visiting the country, a high-level source close to Bukele told CNN.
According to the source CNN spoke with, a tour of the maximum security prison Cecot may be arranged for US lawmakers, but they are not expected to be granted access to Abrego Garcia himself — as El Salvador does not permit individual visits with inmates at the facility.
This story has been updated with additional developments.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Federal judge questions constitutionality of Trump sending National Guard to LA riots: ‘President is, of course, limited'
Federal judge questions constitutionality of Trump sending National Guard to LA riots: ‘President is, of course, limited'

New York Post

time39 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Federal judge questions constitutionality of Trump sending National Guard to LA riots: ‘President is, of course, limited'

WASHINGTON — A federal judge expressed skepticism Thursday about the constitutionality of President Trump's order to deploy thousands of National Guard troops to Los Angeles to quell anti-ICE riots. Senior San Francisco US District Judge Charles Breyer heard arguments from attorneys for Trump's Justice Department and California Gov. Gavin Newsom after the Democrat had sued the feds over dispatching roughly 4,000 Guard members to protect officers carrying out immigration enforcement operations. 'We're talking about the president exercising his authority, and the president is, of course, limited,' Breyer, the younger brother of liberal former Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer, said at one point in the hearing. Advertisement 3 AP 'That's the difference between a constitutional government and King George.' Brett Shumate, the head of the DOJ's Civil Division, disputed Breyer's characterization of the president's order throughout the hour-long hearing, arguing that the commander-in-chief had 'delegated' the federalizing of the Guard through California's adjutant general, as legally required. Advertisement Shumate also claimed that Newsom was merely a 'conduit' for that order as it passed through the chain of command from Trump to Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth to the state Guard. 'There's no consultation requirement, pre-approval requirement,' he argued. 'There's one commander-in-chief of the armed forces.' The California attorney general's office countered that allowing Trump's action to stand implied there would be 'no guardrails' for further abuse by the executive branch. 3 Clashes have erupted in LA over the last several days sparked by ICE raids. Barbara Davidson/NYPost Advertisement 3 A demonstrator points his finger towards members of the California National Guard during a protest against federal immigration sweeps in downtown Los Angeles. REUTERS 'The president, by fiat, can federalize the National Guard and deploy it,' an attorney for Newsom said, 'whenever there is disobedience to an order.' While Breyer took issue with the deployment of the National Guard, he appeared more inclined to let stand Trump's order sending around 700 US Marines to the Golden State to assist with the federal immigration crackdown. 'I don't understand how I'm supposed to do anything with the Marines, to tell you the truth,' the judge responded, quibbling with Newsom's legal team over whether their involvement violated the Posse Comitatus Act. Advertisement Breyer did not immediately issue a ruling, but said he hoped to put one out 'very soon.' This is a developing story. Please check back for more information.

Is religious influence increasing in the US? What Americans said in survey
Is religious influence increasing in the US? What Americans said in survey

Miami Herald

timean hour ago

  • Miami Herald

Is religious influence increasing in the US? What Americans said in survey

More Americans said they think the influence of religion is increasing in U.S. society compared to the previous year, a new poll found. Thirty-four percent of U.S. adults said they think religious influence is growing, up 14 percentage points from last year, according to a June 11 Gallup poll. However, a majority of respondents, 59%, still said religion is losing its influence in the country, according to the poll. 'The recent shifts represent a departure from the trend over the past 15 years that has generally seen larger percentages of Americans saying religious influence is decreasing rather than increasing,' researchers said. The survey of 1,003 U.S. adults was taken between May 1-18 and has a margin of error of 4 percentage points. Exact reasons behind the shift in opinions are unclear, but it could be 'a reaction to the Republican sweep of the federal government in last fall's election,' researchers said. President Donald Trump has repeatedly vowed to bring religion back to the country. In February, when Trump announced a new task force to investigate 'anti-Christian bias,' he urged Americans to 'bring religion back,' the Associated Press reported. During the White House Easter Egg Roll on April 21, he said: 'We're bringing religion back in America. We're bringing a lot of things back, but religion is coming back to America.' Researchers said a similar shift was recorded in 1994 when Republicans took over Congress for the first time in four decades, but there were no 'meaningful changes' after GOP victories in the 2000, 2010 and 2016 elections. Other notable shifts The highest recorded spike in Americans who said they think religious influence is increasing happened following the 9/11 terrorist attacks on America, when the number jumped 32 percentage points to 71%, according to the poll. More recently, researchers saw a surge during the COVID-19 pandemic, when 38% of Americans said they saw more religious influence in society, up from 19% pre-pandemic, the poll found. Which groups think religion in America is increasing? More Democrats, 41%, said they think 'religion as a whole is increasing its influence on American life,' compared with 35% of Republicans and 31% of Independents who said the same thing, according to the poll. Individuals associated with no religion said they think religion is growing at slightly higher rates than Protestants and Catholics, 36% compared to 33% and 35%, respectively, the poll found. Younger adults, those between 18 and 29 years old, also said they believe religious influence is increasing at higher rates than the rest of Americans, according to the poll.

Fact Check: No, Karoline Leavitt did not say 'America cannot function' if Trump has to deal with 'co-equal branches of government'
Fact Check: No, Karoline Leavitt did not say 'America cannot function' if Trump has to deal with 'co-equal branches of government'

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Fact Check: No, Karoline Leavitt did not say 'America cannot function' if Trump has to deal with 'co-equal branches of government'

Claim: White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said: "America cannot function if President Trump has to deal with co-equal branches of government having the ability to check his power." Rating: In early June 2025, a claim spread online that White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said, "America cannot function if President Trump has to deal with co-equal branches of government having the ability to check his power." Social media users on X, Threads and Facebook attributed the above quote to Leavitt; Snopes readers also wrote in to ask if the quote above was accurate. View on Threads However, while Leavitt began multiple statements with "America cannot function" during a May 29, 2025, news briefing, she did not go on to say the rest of the aforementioned quote. Thus, we rate this claim as an incorrect attribution. A Google search for the exact quote online users attributed to Leavitt returned no results from reputable news outlets, nor did searches for specific phrases used in the purported quote alongside Leavitt's name. If Leavitt had said that checks on executive power were impeding the country's functioning, news outlets would certainly have covered the statement. Some Threads users claimed that while Leavitt did not say the exact quote, the statement correctly paraphrases what she actually said. However, that is a matter of opinion, not fact. Leavitt's actual statement argued that a decision by a federal trade court unanimously ruling against U.S. President Donald Trump's sweeping "Liberation Day" global tariff policy represented judicial overreach. Here is the full statement from Leavitt, starting at 1:09 (emphasis ours): President Trump correctly believes that America cannot function safely long-term if we are unable to scale advanced domestic manufacturing capacity, however, our own secure critical supply chains and our defense industrial base is dependent on foreign adversaries. Three judges of the U.S. Court of International Trade disagreed and brazenly abused their judicial power to usurp the authority of President Trump, to stop him from carrying out the mandate that the American people gave him. These judges failed to acknowledge that the president of the United States has core foreign affairs powers and authority given to him by Congress to protect the United States' economy and national security. Congress had created the National Emergency Act to provide the congressional framework to strike down improper IEPA use. And any questions over whether President Trump improperly imposed these IEPA tariffs were already adjudicated in Congress following "Liberation Day." Congress firmly rejected an effort led by Sen. Rand Paul and Democrats to terminate the president's reciprocal tariffs. The courts should have no role here. There is a troubling and dangerous trend of unelected judges inserting themselves into the presidential decision-making process. America cannot function if President Trump, or any other president for that matter, has their sensitive diplomatic or trade negotiations railroaded by activist judges. This wasn't the first quote misattributed to Leavitt we've investigated. We also looked into false claims the press secretary said, "avoid woke things like math, and you'll love the tariffs." "Google Search: 'America Cannot Function If President Trump Has to Deal with Co-Equal Branches of Government Having the Ability to Check His Power.'" Google, Accessed 12 June 2025. "Google Search: Karoline Leavitt 'Co-Equal Branches of Government.'" Google, Accessed 12 June 2025. "Google Search: Karoline Leavitt 'Having the Ability to Check His Power.'" Google, Accessed 12 June 2025. Panel. V.O.S. SELECTIONS, INC.; PLASTIC SERVICES and PRODUCTS, LLC D/B/a GENOVA PIPE; MICROKITS, LLC; FISHUSA INC.; and TERRY PRECISION CYCLING LLC; Plaintiffs, v. the UNITED STATES of AMERICA; UNITED STATES CUSTOMS and BORDER PROTECTION; PETE R. FLORES in His Official Capacity as Acting Commissioner for United States Customs and Border Protection; JAMIESON GREER, in His Official Capacity as United States Trade Representative; OFFICE of the UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE; and HOWARD LUTNICK, in His Official Capacity as Secretary of Commerce; 28 May 2025, Accessed 12 June 2025. PBS News. "WATCH LIVE: Trump Announces Broad Tariffs at 'Liberation Day' White House Event." PBS News, 2 Apr. 2025, Accessed 12 June 2025. Rascouët-Paz, Anna. "Tracking Trump's Tariffs." Snopes, 27 Mar. 2025, Accessed 12 June 2025. The White House. "Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt Briefs Members of the Media, May 29, 2025." YouTube, 29 May 2025, Accessed 2 June 2025.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store