logo
Film claims to name killer of slain journalist Shireen Abu Akleh

Film claims to name killer of slain journalist Shireen Abu Akleh

eNCA11-05-2025

NEW YORK - A new documentary purports to name the Israeli soldier who killed Al Jazeera reporter Shireen Abu Akleh, who was gunned down in the West Bank while reporting in 2022.
Abu Akleh, a Palestinian-American journalist known for her coverage of the Arab-Israeli conflict, was shot dead in Jenin in the north of the occupied West Bank while she worked, wearing a bulletproof vest marked "press."
Al Jazeera and witnesses immediately blamed the Israeli army. Then Israeli Prime Minister Naftali Bennett said it was probable the shots had come from Palestinian militants.
In the weeks that followed, several journalistic investigations pointed the blame at Israeli gunfire.
Months later, Israel released an internal investigation that found a "high probability" that Abu Akleh was accidentally shot by the Israeli army, which claimed it was targeting armed Palestinians.
Produced by independent news site Zeteo, the documentary "Who killed Shireen?" names for the first time the suspect as Alon Scaggio, an elite soldier.
"Israel did everything it could to conceal the soldier's identity, they wouldn't provide the US with any information. They wouldn't let the US interview him. They wouldn't give the US his statement. And they wouldn't give his name," said Dion Nissenbaum, a journalist who worked on the film.
Assisted by producer Conor Powell and reporter Fatima AbdulKarim -- who worked for The New York Times in the West Bank -- Nissenbaum, a former Wall Street Journal correspondent, consulted testimony from two Israeli soldiers present in Jenin on May 11, 2022 as well as top US officials.
The documentary alleges that Scaggio, then 20, had completed training for the elite Duvdevan unit just three months prior.
"He shot her intentionally. There's no question about that. The question is did he know she was a journalist and did he know she was Shireen Abu Akleh? Was it an order from above?" Nissenbaum told AFP.
"Personally, I don't think it was an order. I don't think he knew it was Shireen. Nobody ever has indicated that he could tell that it was Shireen. But she was wearing the blue flak-jacket with the word 'press' on it."
HANDOUT/AFP/File | -
"The evidence (suggests)... it was an intentional killing of Shireen Abu Akleh. Whether or not they knew it was her or not can very well be debated, but they would have absolutely known that it was a media person or a non-combatant at a minimum," said a senior official from the administration of then-US president Joe Biden, speaking in the film anonymously.
Washington did not exert significant pressure on the issue, the documentary claims, for fear of antagonising its ally.
Democratic Senator Chris Van Hollen said he called on Biden to declassify documents about the killing -- but went unanswered.
The Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ) said "it is the first time that a potential suspect has been named in connection with an Israeli killing of a journalist" according to its records dating back to 1992.
Impunity in the case "has effectively given Israel permission to silence hundreds more" journalists, the CPJ said.
Reporters Without Borders estimates around 200 journalists were killed in the past 18 months of Israeli strikes on Gaza.
An Israeli army spokesman condemned the unauthorized disclosure of the suspect's name despite no "definitive determination" of who shot Abu Akleh.
The soldier in question "fell during an operational activity," the army added.
Nissenbaum had initially thought Scaggio died in Gaza, but ultimately concluded he was killed in Jenin on June 27, 2024 almost two years after Abu Akleh.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

From besties to frenemies: Donald Trump and Elon Musk
From besties to frenemies: Donald Trump and Elon Musk

TimesLIVE

time30 minutes ago

  • TimesLIVE

From besties to frenemies: Donald Trump and Elon Musk

The puzzling rise to presidential fame for Donald Trump has been met with just as much fervour as Elon Musk's ascension in US politics. What seemingly started off as a bromance between like-minded political allies soon turned into a sour feud that spilled out on social media. On the one hand, Musk claimed Trump would never have made his return to the White House without his help. On the other, Trump believes his former political partner is just throwing his toys out of the cot. But what has led to the rise and eventual fallout of America's biggest social players? From Mara-a-Lago playdates to exploding satellites, here's how the political BFFs became IRL enemies. 1990: THE POLITICAL BACHELOR Described by ex-New York mayor Ed Koch as 'a bachelor who lived for politics', Trump's ascension to the White House dates back to the 90s. One of the biggest interviews he gave, suggesting he has been aware of fans calling for him to enter the Oval Office, was with Playboy. Critics at the time also noted that his main focus was on the working class and the bills that affect businesses. 1999: YOU'VE GOT Enamoured by digital entrepreneurship, one of Musk's first ventures into the digital space was co-founding Zip2 with his brother. The business was a digitised version of the Yellow Pages and sold for more than $300m. The windfall would help Musk start X being a letter he would become obsessed with over the years. The site was built to be a digital payment system and would later lead to some of his strongest connections. With three other co-founders, the business would help establish Musk as a force to be reckoned with. During this time, Trump would announce on the Larry King Show that he would be taking politics seriously, announcing the formation of a 'presidential exploratory committee' that would become effective the day after the interview. Much like Musk at the time, his political opinion was liberal, saying he was 'getting much more liberal, on health care and other things. I really say, what's the purpose of a country if you're not going to have defence and health care?' 2000: WHEN PAY MET PAL would eventually merge with Confinity and become PayPal as it is known today. Now working with a new partner, Peter Thiel, the pair would sell PayPal two years later. Musk was on honeymoon when the deal was made and he was removed as CEO, according to The Times. 2002: AMERICAN DREAMS Musk, who has dual South African and Canadian citizenship, started his process of becoming an American citizen in 1996. While no reasons have been published as to why the American dream was calling him, Musk initially had a study visa when he studied at the University of Pennsylvania. This would help him become a naturalised American. This would also be the year Musk became famous for his involvement in SpaceX and its subsidiary satellite business, Starlink. Musk's odd business deals would also come to the fore at this time when he founded The Musk Foundation, which benefited OpenAI, a business he also owned. Several donors admitted to pumping much of their wealth into the foundation. 2004: TESLA AND THE CITY A year after it was founded, Musk's favourite adopted baby, Tesla, landed in his lap. By 2008, he managed to wrangle the CEO position. All thanks to a $6.5m investment. 2011: THE THIEL SINGER PayPal Mafia member Peter Thiel would come back into the spotlight when his future mentee JD Vance would write a sugary OpEd in the Catholic magazine The Lamp where he described meeting Thiel as 'the most siginificant moment of my life'. 2015: AI ACTUALLY Musk's meteoric rise saw with it the growing interest in AI. He would take a lead role at OpenAI with the sentiment that he could help develop 'friendly' AI. Meanwhile, Vance would embrace his first career pivot out of law and join Thiel's company, Mithril Capital. This would also put a spotlight on Vance as a writer when another column of his garnered fame for him and Thiel's business. This would also help him consider a run for office. 2016: LIFE AS WE BLOW IT Musk's growing fame and pursuits would soon see him cross paths with Facebook billionaire Mark Zuckerberg. But the two were not keen on braiding each other's hair, especially after Zuckerberg slighted Musk for his failed SpaceX maiden flight. The feud was ignited by Zuckerberg's Facebook post that claimed the SpaceX flight destroyed one of his satellites, while Musk chose Twitter as his weapon of choice to retort, 'Yeah, my fault for being an idiot. We did give them a free launch to make up for it and I think they had some insurance.' While mean girls like Regina George of Mean Girls relied on a private burn book, Musk continued to throw shade at any rival, including Trump. Musk said he was not confident of his role as an American president because 'he doesn't seem to have the sort of character that reflects well on the US'. Trump would not hit back but remained silent on the criticism. Instead, their bond would be cemented a month into Trump's first month in office that would see Musk join his advisory council. 2017: ALONG CAME CLIMATE CHANGE It wouldn't be long before Musk was back on the Twitter streets to vent his frustrations with Trump. In a tweet, Musk announced he was stepping down from the Oval Office after the US' exit from the Paris Climate Agreement. Musk was still liberal in his political beliefs, even posting support for the LGBTQ+ community, swatting off any homophobes from buying Teslas. Vance would echo the sentiments in his writing that spoke ill of Trump, even comparing him to Hitler. Zuckerberg and Musk would continue to bicker, particularly on the subject of AI. The back and forth would end with a Tweet from Musk stating the Facebook founder's 'understanding of the subject is limited'. 2018: WHAT'S FACEBOOK GOT TO DO WITH IT? Musk and Zuckerberg's relationship worsened. It would eventually push Musk off the platform and see him embrace Twitter as a premier space for communication. When speaking to WhatsApp founder Brian Acton, he would ask 'What's Facebook?' and suggest everyone leave the platform. At this time, Trump was taking a 'very restrained' approach to social media. 2021: A VANCE TO REMEMBER Vance would finally make it into the inner circle thanks to his PayPal Mafia bestie, Thiel. The latter would introduce him to Trump at Mar-a-Lago to repair their difficult relationship. Trump endorsed him a year later during his run as a senator for Ohio. 2022: HOW TO WIN A MUSK IN 10 DAYS Smooth-talking Musk, calling him the greatest genius on a par with Thomas Edison, Trump had his right-hand man back on his side. Six months later, Trump would call Musk 'another bull**** artist' in response to his promise to buy Twitter. Trump's feathers were ruffled by the fact that he was already on a mission to open his own social media business, Truth Social. The clip went viral on Twitter, Musk's preferred playground, so naturally he had a response: 'I don't hate the man, but it's time for Trump to hang up his hat & sail into the sunset.' The back and forth would continue with Trump claiming Musk would come crawling back, to which Musk responded: 'Lmaooo [laughing my *** off].' Much to Trump's surprise, Musk went through with the Twitter acquisition in October. Musk would extend an olive branch by running a poll to reinstate Trump on Twitter after the Twitter ban. The vote was for his return at 51.8%. Shortly after that, he would rename the platform X. 2023: SLEEPLESS IN THE US BORDER A considerable shift in Musk's politics would come up late in the year when he fully backed Trump's US border wall. 'We actually do need a wall and we need to require people to have some shred of evidence to claim asylum to enter, as everyone is doing that ...' Musk wrote. However, nothing was official about his backing of either the Democrats or the Republicans at the time. Elon Musk receives a golden key from Donald Trump in the Oval Office at the White House. Image: REUTERS/Nathan Howard/File Photo 2024: HOW TRUMP GOT HIS MUSK BACK After Trump's shooting incident during a rally, Musk backed him as his official candidate seconds later. There were claims that Musk footed $45m. A month later, the pair went live on X where Musk would shoot his shot at a government efficiency job. Trump would also start to embrace Twitter and AI as a means of communication. They would have their first public appearance in 2024 when Trump returned to the scene of the crime in Pennsylvania calling himself 'dark MAGA' and sporting a black Make America Great Again T-shirt. Other than going viral for his childish antics, Musk announced he would give away $1m to voters in swing states who signed a petition for free speech and the right to bear arms. NOVEMBER 2024: MAMMA MAR-A-LAGO The relationship would be cemented by the very same trip with Vance in Mara-a-Lago. They would spend the night with other Republican supporters to watch the live election results. Trump announced the appointment of Musk and former presidential candidate Vivek Ramaswamy as leaders of Doge (department of government efficiency). The pair would be spotted at a SpaceX launch. It was at this point that Musk called himself 'the first buddy', amid reports he was sitting in on several meetings with international dignitaries. Trump would also hire Thiel and PayPal Mafia member David Sacks, the latter focused on advising the president on AI and cryptocurrencies. DECEMBER 2025: MR & MR PRESIDENT Tensions would rise again when media outlets would start rumours of 'President Musk'. Trump would eventually denounce the rumours of Musk's ascension to the White House. The rumour would be quelled by news of Musk renting out a $2,000 cottage on the premises of Trump's Mar-a-Lago residence. While he did not take it to X this time around, Musk would leave Trump and other Republicans irate over time. Sources told Mediate that Trump was 100% annoyed with Musk's spat with MAGA members about H1B visas (a type of working visa in the US), which they simplified as 'two tigers cannot live on one mountain top'. JANUARY 2025: FAR FROM THE MAGA CROWD After a tour de force of surprise announcements, Trump left the globe in a tailspin. This would also include the unexpected exit of Vivek Ramaswamy from Doge to run for the Ohio governor seat in 2026. With Musk in the driver's seat, critics started to notice he could not deliver on the promises he made. This included 100,000 layoffs that would land the Trump administration in hot water for the job cuts. The Independent reported that things were only getting worse for Musk and Trump's supporters with a West Wing brawl between him and Treasury secretary Scott Bessent making headlines. MAY 2025: IT ENDS WITH DOGE Things would start to fall apart between the pair when it was announced during a cabinet meeting late in April that Musk would be leaving Doge. His last day in the position would be in May. The reasons Musk cited were that Doge would be able to run on its own and that he needed to spend less time in the capital city. Trump would continue business as usual until Musk criticised his 'Big Beautiful Bill'. JUNE 2025: MY BIG FAT BEAUTIFUL BILL Musk would find resolve in expressing his anger on X again as he continued to criticise the Big Beautiful Bill. 'I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it any more. This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination. Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it,' he posted. Musk's qualms with the bill were that it could potentially ramp up US debt. However, during a White House briefing Trump expressed his disappointment with Musk's posts, saying 'he [Musk] had no problem with it' in earlier conversations about the bill. The pair would trade blows on their respective sites, Truth Social and X. Trump made disparaging comments about Tesla and Musk took parting shots in which he suggested the president wouldn't have won the election without him.

France opens 'complicity in genocide' probes over blocked Gaza aid
France opens 'complicity in genocide' probes over blocked Gaza aid

eNCA

time41 minutes ago

  • eNCA

France opens 'complicity in genocide' probes over blocked Gaza aid

PARIS - French anti-terror prosecutors have opened probes into "complicity in genocide" and "incitement to genocide" after French-Israelis allegedly blocked aid intended for war-torn Gaza last year, they said on Friday. The two investigations, opened after legal complaints, were also to look into possible "complicity in crimes against humanity" between January and May 2024, the anti-terror prosecutor's office (PNAT) said. They are the first known probes in France to be looking into alleged violations of international law in Gaza, several sources with knowledge of the cases told AFP. In a separate case made public on the same day, the grandmother of two children with French nationality who were killed in an Israeli strike in Gaza has filed a legal complaint in Paris, accusing Israel of "genocide" and "murder", her lawyer said. The French judiciary has jurisdiction when French citizens are involved in such cases. Rights groups, lawyers and some Israeli historians have described the Gaza war as "genocide". Israel, created in the aftermath of the Nazi Holocaust of Jews during World War II, vehemently rejects the accusation. The French probes were opened after two separate legal complaints. In the first, the Jewish French Union for Peace (UFJP) and a French-Palestinian victim filed a complaint in November targeting alleged French members of hardline pro-Israel groups "Israel is forever" and "Tzav-9". It accused them of "physically" preventing the passage of trucks at border checkpoints controlled by the Israeli army. Lawyers for the plaintiffs, Damia Taharraoui and Marion Lafouge, told AFP they were happy a probe had been launched into the events in January 2024 -- "a time when no-one wanted to hear anything about genocide". A source close to the case said prosecutors last month urged the investigation in relation to events at the Nitzana crossing point between Egypt and Israel, and the Kerem Shalom crossing from Israel into Gaza. Around that time, hardline Israeli protesters -- including friends and relatives of hostages held in Gaza -- blocked aid lorries from entering the occupied Palestinian territory and forced them to turn back at Kerem Shalom. A second complaint from a group called the Lawyers for Justice in the Middle East (CAPJO) accused members of "Israel is forever" of having blocked aid trucks. It used photos, videos and public statements to back up its complaint. - 'Genocide' complaint - No court has so far concluded that the ongoing conflict is a genocide. But in rulings in January, March and May 2024, the International Court of Justice (ICJ), the United Nations' highest judicial organ, told Israel to do everything possible to "prevent" acts of genocide during its military operations in Gaza, including through allowing in urgently needed aid. In the separate case, Jacqueline Rivault, the grandmother of six- and nine-year-old children killed in an Israeli strike, filed her complaint accusing Israel of "genocide" and "murder" with the crimes against humanity section of the Court of Paris, lawyer Arie Alimi said. Though formally against unnamed parties, the complaint explicitly targets Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, the Israeli government and the military. The complaint states that an Israeli missile strike killed Janna, six, and Abderrahim Abudaher, nine, in northern Gaza on 24 October, 2023. "We believe these children are dead as part of a deliberate organised policy targeting the whole of Gaza's population with a possible genocidal intent," Alimi said. The children's brother Omar, now five, was severely wounded but still lives in Gaza with their mother, identified as Yasmine Z., the complaint said. A French court in 2019 convicted Yasmine Z. in absentia of having funded a "terrorist" group over giving money in Gaza to members of Palestinian militant groups Hamas and the Islamic Jihad. - Famine warnings - Israel said last month it was easing the complete blockade of Gaza it imposed on 2 March but on 30 May the United Nations said the territory's entire population of more than two million people remained at risk of famine. AFP | - A US-backed aid group last week began distributions but reports that the Israeli military shot dead dozens of Palestinians trying to collect food has sparked widespread condemnation. The UN and major aid organisations have refused to cooperate with the US-backed Gaza Humanitarian Fund, citing concerns that it was designed to cater to Israeli military objectives. Hamas fighters launched an attack on Israel on 7 October 2023. A total of 1,218 people died, mostly civilians, according to an AFP tally based on official Israeli figures. The militants abducted 251 hostages, 55 of whom remain in Gaza, including 32 the Israeli military says are dead. Israel's retaliatory war on Hamas-run Gaza has killed 54,677 people, mostly civilians, according to the health ministry there, figures the United Nations deems reliable. The International Criminal Court has issued arrest warrants against Netanyahu and former Israeli defence minister Yoav Gallant for alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity in Gaza. It also issued an arrest warrant for Hamas military chief Mohammed Deif over similar allegations linked to the 7 October attack but the case against him was dropped in February after confirmation Israel had killed him. By Julia Pavesi, Guillaume Daudin And Alice Hackman

Trump-Musk breakup: Will 49 ‘refugees' return to South Africa?
Trump-Musk breakup: Will 49 ‘refugees' return to South Africa?

The Citizen

time2 hours ago

  • The Citizen

Trump-Musk breakup: Will 49 ‘refugees' return to South Africa?

Trump's relationship with Musk has been described as transactional. The first group of Afrikaners from South Africa to arrive for resettlement listen to remarks from US Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau and US Deputy Secretary of Homeland Security Troy Edgar (both out of frame), after they arrived at Washington Dulles International Airport in Dulles, Virginia, on May 12, 2025. Picture: SAUL LOEB / AFP The future of 49 South Africans who have taken up refugee status in the United States is uncertain, as developments in the White House point towards Donald Trump being disillusioned over the white genocide claims he has made about South Africa. Trump's ally and confidant pastor Mark Burns has been in South Africa for a few days investigating claims of a white genocide. He told a local broadcaster that he would report back to the White House that he had found no evidence of a white genocide. Meanwhile, on Thursday, a public spat broke out between Trump and South African-born billionaire Elon Musk. The two figures even made serious threats against each other on social media. There were claims that Musk was part of a disinformation campaign about South Africa and its 'race-based' laws. Politics in the White House International relations expert Anthoni Van Nieuwkerk told The Citizen the White House is now receiving the correct information about the false claims of a white genocide in South Africa. 'I think Trump is rethinking his belief that there is a white genocide; he might back off from this, and it will lead to egg on the face of those who started this disinformation campaign,' he said. Van Nieuwkerk said a number of exposés by journalists around the world have disproved the information that Trump presented as fact during his meeting with the South African delegation in Washington. 'These developments will allow South Africa and the U.S to reset relations and start over on a stronger basis,' he said. What's next for the 'refugees' Van Nieuwkerk said the 49 refugees were in a precarious situation with the uncertainty of what Trump would do next. 'They will be left with no home, and they might even want to return home, because if the appetite for accommodating Afrikaners goes away and it loses its importance, then those people will be left stranded. 'By the way, it is not automatic that they will have a safe home, jobs, and comfort. They will have to compete with others for the same benefits, some of them might return because politics have now shifted fundamentally. 'This special dispensation for Afrikaners will fade away over time and very quickly. Fewer and fewer Afrikaners will take up this offer because it is very unclear what they will walk into on the other end,' he said. Despite this, Van Nieuwkerk believes that there is no evidence to suggest that Musk was behind the disinformation campaign about South Africa. He also believes that Trump's feud with Musk has no direct implications for South Africa's relationship with the United States. ALSO READ: Trump's latest offer is not just for Afrikaners Was Musk involved? Meanwhile, political analyst Ntsikelelo Breakfast said the fallout between Trump and Musk is beneficial to South Africa. 'It is clear that Trump was indebted to Elon Musk. The question is how he was going to be indebted. Trump was just a mouthpiece. 'The whole white genocide thing did not come from him. It could have had something to do with Elon Musk,' he said. NOW READ: Magwenya: Ramaphosa optimistic after Trump meeting boosts US-SA ties

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store