Westmere helipad appeal disappoints rich-listers Ali Williams and Anna Mowbray
'They have confirmed the grant of consent of helicopter use for residential access is permitted under the Auckland Unitary Plan, subject to strict conditions.
'Our proposal fully complies with all applicable standards and CAA regulations and includes additional voluntary conditions to minimise any impact on the community.
'These voluntary conditions reflect a compromised position following years of meaningful engagement and a genuine effort to balance the needs of our neighbours,' the couple said.
They said the appeal is against Auckland Council and not them, saying the cost of the appeal would fall on ratepayers, money that could be better spent on core priorities like infrastructure or community services.
'It's unfortunate to see public resources being required to defend a decision that has already been thoroughly evaluated. We hope QSW will reconsider their position,' the statement said.
Quiet Sky secretary Elena Keith told the Herald: 'We don't intend to reconsider our position.'
She said yesterday that Quiet Sky disagreed with the June decision of the hearings panel approving private helicopter operations in Westmere.
'Their radical ruling reflects an unanticipated interpretation of the Auckland Unitary Plan (AUP) and goes against overwhelming public sentiment to oppose private helicopters in residential areas,' said Keith.
Elena Keith at the hearing for the proposed helipad.
She said the legal action was not just for Westmere, but for Auckland.
'If this decision isn't challenged, the floodgates for helicopters in backyards will open. We simply can't let this terrible decision stand.'
Keith said the commissioners decided that helicopters were 'inherently residential'.
'Therefore, they say that using a helicopter is a permitted activity, like using a bike or a car. In our opinion, that is absurd.'
After six days of public hearings in May, the commissioners concluded that operating a helicopter in residential zones was a 'permitted activity' and inherently associated with residential land use.
In their decision, the commissioners dismissed concerns about helicopter noise, including concerns about privately operated helicopters coming and going in nearby Herne Bay.
They said there was nothing untoward, unacceptable, or significantly out of character with helicopter noise in an urban residential environment per se.
The panel acknowledged numerous submitters would be disappointed with the decision, but said their interpretation of the council's Unitary Plan and legal precedents led to the application's approval.
Sign up to The Daily H, a free newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
6 hours ago
- RNZ News
Auckland councillors agree on desired helicopter saga outcome - but not how to get there
Waitematā and Gulf Ward councillor Mike Lee has filed two motions of notice calling for the prohibition of private helicopters in residential neighbourhoods. Photo: RNZ / Cole Eastham-Farrelly A motion to block helicopters from Auckland's residential areas has become ensnared in a web of bureaucracy. Councillors gathered on Thursday to discuss Waitematā and Gulf Ward councillor Mike Lee's two motions of notice calling for the prohibition of private helicopters in residential neighbourhoods. It comes after Auckland rich-listers Anna Mowbray and Ali Williams were approved to build a helipad at their Westmere home , a decision now being challenged in the Environment Court . Councillor Lee's first motion urged the council to change the city's Unitary Plan to make private helipads in residential areas a prohibited activity city-wide. The second motion called for the same change, but only for the Hauraki Gulf Islands section of the council's District Plan. The second motion was passed by the council, though it would still need to be approved by the central government. However, the motion to change Auckland's Unitary Plan proved to be much more complicated. Council advisory staff said a city-wide ban would be too difficult to implement. It would require the council to seek permission from the Minister Responsible for RMA Reform Chris Bishop, a request many councillors believed he would decline. Councillor Richard Hills, chairing the meeting, instead proposed an amendment to Lee's motion requesting the council seek a declaration from the Environment Court to strengthen its case before approaching the Minister. "What I'm trying to do here is give us a chance," he told councillors. "You can bet when we have to go and beg to the minister to put through a plan change ... If we said we don't have staff backing and we don't think we have experts, there is no way the minister would say yes to that." Councillor Richard Hills proposed an amendment to one of the motions. Photo: Alexia Russell Councillor Lee described the amendment as an ambush. "There have been ample breaks in this meeting today and this obviously didn't fall out of the air, I would have appreciated the courtesy of some consultation," Lee said. "This outcome-by-ambush approach with no forewarning whatsoever is not going to help the reputation of the council." Speaking after the meeting, Hills said he felt proceeding without the amendment would have only led to disappointment. "We would be giving false hope to people if we went ahead, against advice, over a two year period and spent millions of dollars for an outcome that everything points to we wouldn't have had," he said. "It might make us feel good in the moment, but actually we have to try and get the best, clearest, strongest [outcome] as quick as possible." Councillor Shane Henderson said he voted in favour of the amendment because it was more likely to be approved by the minister. "We were kind of worried it would fail at the end of the day and we would be in a very difficult position," he said. "So we wanted to get something that was more practical and workable over the line." Lee disagreed with the others councillors' assertion that the minister would block the change. "The minister's intention is to stop councils spending a fortune on 10-year reviews of their district and regional plans, I don't think the minister would attempt to block plan changes which correct or modify the existing plan." He believed prohibiting helipads in residential areas was an obvious move and would bring Auckland more in line with its international counterparts. "Internationally, Auckland is an outlier. Just about all the major international cities strictly control or prohibit private use of helipads in residential areas." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
19 hours ago
- RNZ News
Auckland Council votes in favour of amendment to helipad ban Notice of Motion
Auckland richlisters Anna Mowbray and Ali Williams' newly built house on Rawene Avenue. Photo: RNZ/Maia Ingoe Auckland Council have voted in favour of an amendment to councillor Mike Lee's Notice of Motion to ban the private use of helipads in residential areas. The amendment requests staff seek a determination through the Environment Court through the Resource Consent Appeal Process or a declaration from the Environment Court on the activity status of private helipads. The amendment was put forward by councillor Richard Hills and labelled as a "stitch up" and "ambush" by councillor Lee. This in relation to the Auckland Unitary Plan. Councillors are yet to decide on the Hauraki Gulf Islands Section of the Auckland Council District Plan. The meeting has been ongoing since 10am on Wednesday. It comes after Waiheke locals said Auckland Council was ignoring the wants of the communities by allowing a proliferation of private helipads. Last month, independent hearing commissioners appointed by the council approved rich-listers Anna Mowbray and Ali Williams's request for a private helipad at their Westmere property, despite overwhelming public opposition . At the council's Policy and Planning Committee on Thursday morning, Kim Whitaker from Quiet Sky Waiheke was one of several speakers calling on the council to decline private helicopter resource consents in residential areas. He said the constant flow of helicopters was incredibly frustrating and disruptive for residents. "You can demonstrate that this committee is made up of people who believe in democratic principles and are not going to enable a small minority of people to literally fly roughshod over a majority." He said there were nearly 70 private helipads on Waiheke. RNZ contacted Ali Williams and Anna Mowbray's lawyer for comment ahead of the motion of notice and the appeal in the Environment Court. While there was no response, the couple have said in the media that they were deeply disappointed with the legal challenge and the cost to public resources it will use. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
a day ago
- RNZ News
Auckland councillor tries again to ban helicopters in residential areas
Auckland richlisters Anna Mowbray and Ali Williams' newly built house on Rawene Avenue. Photo: RNZ/Maia Ingoe Residential helipads will once again be the topic of conversation at Auckland Council. Waitematā and Gulf Ward councillor Mike Lee has confirmed he'll be putting forward a Notice of Motion to ban helicopters in residential areas at Wednesday's Policy and Planning Committee. It follows news this week that Auckland billionaire couple Anna Mowbray and Ali Williams' approval to build a helipad at their Westmere home, will be challenged at the Environment Court. This is the second time Lee has tried to prohibit helipads in residential areas, his motion last year losing by two votes. "Well, it'll be a close-run thing, and so who knows what the outcome really will be." "In some ways, the odds are rather stacked against getting any change, because not only will we have to persuade the elected members, the members of the governing body, the councillors, to agree with us. "Unfortunately, we'll be having to deal with the senior planning staff who are opposed to any change to the system, particularly adverse to the idea of making helipads in residential areas a prohibited activity. "So we're going to have our work cut out for us, but we have the community, the overwhelming majority of the community, supporting this," Lee said. But he said "staff advice" would be the biggest obstacle in getting his motion across the line. "The biggest challenge will be the council officers, the council planners, who seem to have a philosophic opposition to prohibited activity. "Prohibited activity for certain activities are in the Auckland Unitary Plan. Helipads, for instance, in Sydney are a prohibited activity in all residential zones and business zones. Prohibited activity is in the Resource Management Act, it's been there since 1991. "Despite all the reforms, upteam reforms of RMA, that virtually every government since 1991 has undertaken, prohibited activity, Section 87D, remains in the Act for very good reason." He said all three local boards in his ward (Waitematā, Waiheke Island and the Aotea, Great Barrier Island local board areas) backed the move. Lee will also have the support of Whau councillor Kerrin Leoni who said she believed public sentiment from Aucklanders was predominately in their corner. For example, according to Auckland Council, of 1397 written submissions made on the helipad application by Auckland richlisters Anna Mowbray and Ali Williams, most - 1227, or 87 percent - opposed the helipad on Rawene Avenue in Westmere. One-hundred-and-eight were supportive, and 12 were neutral. "I think we need to make a strong stance on that and I'm definitely supporting Mike Lee's notice of motion," Leoni said. "Rich people that are coming into our city and treating it like it's a playground. I mean, it's just unacceptable. "We just can't let our city be seen as a playground for the rich listers to come in and do as they please, there should be some rules around that. "Apparently there are public helipads within 15 minutes or I think half an hour at least from everyone's address across the city. So why can't we use those instead of everyone having to have private ones? "I know there's definitely a lot of support and I'm sure there'll be a lot of people there to support the notice of motion and in the galleries as well." Among them will be members from Quiet Sky Waitematā who this week filed an appeal to the Environment Court in an attempt to block Anna Mowbray and Ali Williams from flying a private helicopter from their multi-million-dollar Westmere property. That's despite independent hearing commissioners appointed by Auckland Council approving the couple's controversial resource consent application for a private helipad in June. "We will have representatives from Quiet Sky who will be presenting a petition of over 4100 signatures to the councillors, letting them know about how Auckland feels about banning private use helicopters in residential areas," said spokesperson Elena Keith. "Paris, Los Angeles, New York, Sydney, Melbourne, none of them allow private helicopters in the city. "This is a very backward move. It's not the city that we want. I don't think it's a city that Auckland ratepayers want," Keith said. RNZ contacted Ali Williams and Anna Mowbray's lawyer for comment ahead of the motion of notice and the appeal in the Environment Court. While there was no response, the couple have said in the media that they were deeply disappointed with the legal challenge and the cost to public resources it will use. Lee said part of the reason behind his motion was to provide more certainty for people like them. "Under the law, the way it is now, they have every right to apply for a helipad and obviously they've spent a lot of money through this process. "Clearly they're extremely disappointed that the local residents are going to appeal. They're disappointed, but they shouldn't be surprised."
