logo
Supreme Court asks Sambhal mosque management to respond to Uttar Pradesh report on disputed well

Supreme Court asks Sambhal mosque management to respond to Uttar Pradesh report on disputed well

The Hindu29-04-2025

The Supreme Court on Tuesday (April 29, 2025) directed the management of the Shahi Jama Masjid at Sambhal to respond to a status report filed by the Uttar Pradesh government that a disputed well stood 'completely outside' the mosque precincts, contrary to what the Muslim side said in the apex court.
Appearing before a Bench of the Chief Justice of India Sanjiv Khanna and Justice Sanjay Kumar, Additional Solicitor General K.M. Nataraj, for the State, said the mosque management had made a 'totally wrong statement' that the well was inside the mosque premises.
Senior advocate Huzefa Ahmadi, appearing for the mosque management, said they had made a 'totally right statement'. Part of the well was inside the mosque. He said the well was covered on the top with cement. The mosque pumped water from the well, a structure which held historical significance. The water was used by the mosque from time immemorial, Mr. Ahmadi said.
Advocate Vishnu Shankar Jain, representing the Hindu side, had argued the well was outside the mosque's purview and its water had been historically used for worship by his side.
The court suggested both parties resolve the issue with talks. 'You (the mosque management) are using the well; let others also use the well,' Chief Justice Khanna remarked at one point.
In November 2024, the apex court had to intervene to instruct the Uttar Pradesh police and the Sambhal district administration to be 'totally, absolutely neutral' and maintain peace after violence broke out following a civil court-ordered survey to verify claims by Hindu plaintiffs that the mosque was built over a destroyed temple in the 16th century.
The top court had then stayed the civil proceedings in the local court and directed the mosque survey report prepared by the Advocate Commissioner to be kept in a sealed cover.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

In German Chancellor's gift to Trump, a story of success that US no longer has room for
In German Chancellor's gift to Trump, a story of success that US no longer has room for

Indian Express

time40 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

In German Chancellor's gift to Trump, a story of success that US no longer has room for

Most people, pushed far enough to defend an absolute moral principle, end up either in hypocrisy or irony and absurdity. Take Immanuel Kant, an extremist when it came to the universality of ethical principles. His categorical imperative would, taken to its logical conclusion, leave no room for any form of lie (even, for example, to protect a person hiding from a murderer) or violence (self-defence). But Kant has nothing on Donald Trump, who can wear, without a qualm, contradictions and hypocrisy on his sleeve. The White House meeting between the US President and German Chancellor Friedrich Merz was warm, unlike those with the Ukrainian and South African presidents. Merz gifted the American President his grandfather, Frederick Trump's, birth certificate. Trump, visibly moved, thanked him profusely. This scene played out as Trump's government imposed travel bans on several Muslim countries, and just before the National Guard was deployed in California to quell protests against the detention of migrants suspected of being 'illegal'. No country can allow completely open borders, and 1885 (when the President's grandfather migrated to the US) is not 2025. But that doesn't mean there is no room for empathy. America, under Trump, is closing its universities and its borders even to those already in. The harsh anti-migrant rhetoric that paints those searching for a better life with the same brush as criminals, and student protesters as security threats, seems to have forgotten that almost every American, except for the marginalised Native Americans, has roots elsewhere. Trump can appreciate his grandfather's journey and has had the advantage of the fortune that Frederick built. He can be sentimental about a birth certificate because it represents a cross-generational ambition for prosperity and success — if only that came with a measure of understanding for those who want to repeat that tale.

Rajya Sabha may form panel to probe hate speech charges against HC judge Shekhar Kumar Yadav
Rajya Sabha may form panel to probe hate speech charges against HC judge Shekhar Kumar Yadav

Indian Express

timean hour ago

  • Indian Express

Rajya Sabha may form panel to probe hate speech charges against HC judge Shekhar Kumar Yadav

Acting on a notice to impeach Justice Shekhar Kumar Yadav of the Allahabad High Court, Rajya Sabha Chairman Jagdeep Dhankhar is likely to form an inquiry committee to look into the alleged hate speech made by the judge at a VHP event in December last year, The Indian Express has learnt. It is learnt that six months after Opposition MPs submitted a representation with 55 signatures to bring an impeachment motion against the judge to Dhankhar, the process of verifying the signatures is underway. To start impeachment proceedings, at least 50 MPs in Rajya Sabha or at least 100 in Lok Sabha have to sign the resolution, according to the Judges Inquiry Act. Speaking in the Rajya Sabha on March 21, Dhankhar had said that two mails had been sent to the MPs asking them to verify their signatures. 'Of the 55 members who signed the representation, a member's signature appears on two occasions and the member concerned has denied his signature. Now I do not wish to get into this act which may graduate to culpability to a higher level. If the number is above 50, I will proceed accordingly. Therefore, most of the members have cooperated. Those members who have not done so far, may please do it in response to the second mail sent to them,' he had said. Sources in the Opposition told The Indian Express that the signature duplication happened due to some misunderstanding during the signing of the papers. Three sets of representation were prepared for submission, they said. The sources said the requisite number of signatures were there to proceed with the impeachment proceedings, even if one signature is declared invalid. The Opposition has been pushing the Rajya Sabha to initiate the process against Justice Yadav for his controversial speech. Speaking at the VHP event on December 8 last year, Justice Yadav had said: 'I have no hesitation in saying that this is Hindustan… and the country will run according to the majority who live in Hindustan.' Supporting a Uniform Civil Code, he referred to the Muslim community, and said: 'You have a misconception that if a law [UCC] is brought in, it will be against your Shariyat, your Islam and your Quran… But I want to say one more thing… Whether it is your personal law, our Hindu law, your Quran or whether it is our Gita, as I said we have addressed the ills [buraaiyan] in our practices.' He said untouchability, sati, jauhar and female foeticide had been addressed. 'Then why are you not doing away with… that while your first wife is there… you can have three wives… without her consent… that is not acceptable.' On December 13, accusing Justice Yadav of engaging in hate speech, a delegation of Opposition members in the Rajya Sabha submitted a notice seeking his impeachment. Addressing the House on February 13, Dhankhar said he had received an undated notice for motion to remove Justice Yadav under Article 124 (3) of the Constitution. 'The obligation for the stated subject matter constitutionally rests with the Chairman, Rajya Sabha, and in eventuality with Parliament and the honourable President. Taking note of public domain information and inputs available, it is appropriate that the Secretary General, Rajya Sabha shares this, for information, with the Secretary General, Supreme Court of India,' he had said. It is learnt that Dhankhar was referring to media reports that the Supreme Court had taken note of the incident and asked Allahabad High Court Chief Justice Arun Bhansali for a report. Sources said Rajya Sabha Secretary General P C Mody informed the Supreme Court that Parliament was already seized of the matter as an impeachment notice was pending. Following this communication, it is learnt that the Supreme Court decided not to proceed any further in the matter. During a meeting with floor leaders on March 25, the matter of the pending impeachment notice is learnt to have been brought up. Sources said once the signatures are verified, action can be taken whether the House is in session or not. The Monsoon Session of Parliament begins on July 21. According to Article 124 (4) of the Constitution, a Supreme Court judge can be removed by Parliament on grounds of 'proved misbehavior' and 'incapacity', following the laid-down procedure. As per Article 218, the same applies to judges of High Courts. Damini Nath is an Assistant Editor with the national bureau of The Indian Express. She covers the housing and urban affairs and Election Commission beats. She has 11 years of experience as a reporter and sub-editor. Before joining The Indian Express in 2022, she was a reporter with The Hindu's national bureau covering culture, social justice, housing and urban affairs and the Election Commission. ... Read More Have been in journalism covering national politics for 23 years. Have covered six consecutive Lok Sabha elections and assembly polls in almost all the states. Currently writes on ruling BJP. Always loves to understand what's cooking in the national politics (And ventures into the act only in kitchen at home). ... Read More

11 years : 11 achievements
11 years : 11 achievements

Hans India

timean hour ago

  • Hans India

11 years : 11 achievements

4th largest economy India has become the world's fourth-largest economy during the PM Modi government. Ram Mandir The Ram Mandir in Ayodhya is one of the key achievements of the Modi govt. This temple is a significant and the main sanctum was consecrated in January 2024. Article 370 In August 2019, Modi took a visionary decision to abrogate Article 370, which allowed J&K to have its own constitution, flag, and control over most internal affairs. Triple Talaq Triple Talaq was an instant divorce practice where a Muslim man could divorce his wife by uttering "talaq" three times. India's Supreme Court declared it unconstitutional in 2017. Jan Dhan The Modi government launched the Pradhan Mantri Jan Dhan Yojana (PMJDY) on August 28, 2014, as a national mission for financial inclusion. GST The Modi government implemented GST in 2017, unifying India's fragmented indirect tax system into "One Nation, One Tax." New Parliament India's new Parliament was inaugurated in 2023 to boost the seating capacity for both the Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha. Railways In the railway sector, many developments took place, including the introduction of Vande Bharat to the renovation of many of the old railway stations in a modern way. Airports Under the Modi government, India observed a significant boost in airport development under the UDAN scheme, which was launched on October 21, 2016. Highways The Modi government significantly boosted highway development, expanding the national highway network since 2014. Defence Exports Under Modi government, defence exports have surged to a record high of Rs 23,622 crore in the Financial Year (FY) 2024-25.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store