Telangana HC orders treatment, security to pregnant woman held captive by in-laws
The judge was hearing a writ petition filed by Pravallika's parents, Sure Srinivas Rao and Vasavi, who alleged that their daughter was being confined at home by her husband, L Venkata Chalapati Rao, and was not allowed to move freely due to his alleged psychopathic behaviour. They claimed Pravallika, currently eight months pregnant, was in poor health and denied medical attention.
Earlier, the court had directed the High Court Legal Services Committee (HCLSC) to visit her residence. The HCLSC report stated that Pravallika appeared extremely weak and pale, suffering from severe varicose veins and anaemia. It also noted that the couple's child looked malnourished and underdeveloped, showing 'zero growth' until the age of nine months.
Citing Article 21 of the Constitution, Justice Kumar observed that the unborn child also had a right to life. The court directed that Pravallika and her child be admitted to Gandhi Hospital and subjected to a full medical examination, including foetal assessment.
The court further ordered that only her husband be allowed to visit her during the hospital stay, noting that his parents oppose the marriage. The Government Pleader for Home was directed to ensure police security and enforcement of this restriction.
Authorities were directed to submit a detailed medical report on both mother and child before the next hearing.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
a day ago
- The Hindu
Good response to creche centres in Bidar district
The Koosina Mane (creche) initiative launched at Shishu Palana Kendras in gram panchayats by the Women and Child Welfare Department along with the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act Scheme is receiving an overwhelming response in Bidar district. The creche facility aims to cater to the needs of working mothers by providing quality childcare facilities for children in 0-3 age group and to promote their holistic development. The Bidar Zilla Panchayat has set up 158 Koosina Manes (creches) in the gram panchayats of eight taluks across the district. As many as 2,418 children, 1,302 girls and 1,116 boys, are admitted to Koosina Manes in the district. Of the eight taluks in Bidar district, Bhalki taluk has the highest number of Koosina Mane centres at 35 with an enrollment of 540 children, followed by Bidar taluk with 31 centres and 495 children. There are 28 centres in Basavakalyan taluk with an enrollment of 450 children. Aurad taluk has 16 centres with 255 children enrolled, Kamalnagar has 15 centres with 195 children and Humnabad has 14 centres with 166 children. Chitaguppa taluk has 12 centres with 202 children and Hulsoor taluk has seven centres with 115 children enrolled. Caretaker appointed The zilla panchayats have identified eight women in every gram panchayat holding MGNREGA job cards and appointed two of them as caretakers on a rotational basis for each Koosina Mane established in each gram panchayat. The caretaker provides nutritious food to children as mentioned in the week-diet plan chart provided to the centres. In total, 1,264 caretakers have been appointed for 158 Koosina Manes in the district. The taluk-wise caretakers are as follows: Bhalki 280, Bidar 248, Basavakalyan 224, Aurad 128, Kamalnagar 120, Humnabad 112, Chittaguppa 96 and Hulsoor 56. Initially, the State government sanctioned ₹1 lakh to each panchayat for setting up Kosina Mane with basic infrastructure. Further, ₹1.04 lakh will be released quarterly for each creche through MGNREGA and Women and Child Welfare Department for paying wages to caretakers and for providing nutritious food to children enrolled in Koosina Mane. Fruits in menu Infusing care into policy thinking, the Koosina Mane at Janawada Gram Panchayat has started distributing seasonal fruits to children. Extolling the decision, Zilla Panchayat Chief Executive Officer Girish Badole said that the move is aimed at providing additional nutrition to the children. He said that all Koosina Mane centres are functioning properly with good response.
Time of India
2 days ago
- Time of India
Activists and experts hail Supreme Court focus on mental health
Kolkata: Mental health activists and experts have welcomed the Supreme Court's explicit recognition of mental health as an integral part of the constitutional Right to Life under Article 21. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now They say this broadens the interpretation of the right to life to include psychological well-being, not just physical survival. The SC recognised the right to mental health as an integral component of the right to life under Article 21 while laying down binding guidelines for educational institutions and coaching centres across India. The observation was made in a case related to the death of a 17-year-old student undergoing coaching for the NEET examination. The apex court set aside orders of the Andhra Pradesh HC to allow transfer of the investigation into the death under suspicious circumstances to CBI. Mental health activist Ratnaboli Ray, who is the founder of Anjali, a rights-based organisation, said the order moves mental health from the realm of welfare or charity into the domain of legal and constitutional rights. "This means that the state and institutions are no longer simply encouraged but obligated to ensure mental health protections as part of their duty under the Constitution," said Ray, a psychologist by training. Ray also pointed out that by issuing guidelines for students' welfare in the context of mental health, the court has acknowledged the growing mental health crisis in educational spaces — ranging from anxiety and depression to suicide. This makes schools and universities potentially accountable for creating psychologically safe environments. Advocate Arush Sengupta said embedding mental health under Article 21 makes it justiciable. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now "If someone's right to mental well-being is violated, they can now take legal recourse based on constitutional grounds. This also strengthens the implementation of the Mental Healthcare Act, 2017, which already defines access to mental health services as a right, but until now lacked the direct constitutional force to ensure consistent and widespread enforcement," he said. Psychiatrist Aniruddha Deb felt the ruling has the potential to transform institutional accountability, public funding, and societal attitudes in India. "This is a landmark judgment. Till now, mental illness was perceived as a disability, a dysfunction and looked down upon. People with mental illness were relegated to second-class citizens. They were even denied right to vote. Being of unsound mind precluded them from holding any office. All that will change now," said Deb. Ray added that the moment demands bold, rights-affirming governance, not piecemeal or tokenistic gestures. "The judiciary has spoken. It is now the executive's responsibility to institutionalise this vision into everyday governance so that mental health is not only constitutionally protected, but meaningfully lived," she added.
Time of India
2 days ago
- Time of India
Activists and experts hail Supreme Court verdict on mental health
1 2 Kolkata: Mental health activists and experts have welcomed the Supreme Court's explicit recognition of mental health as an integral part of the constitutional Right to Life under Article 21. They say this broadens the interpretation of the right to life to include psychological well-being, not just physical survival. The SC recognised the right to mental health as an integral component of the right to life under Article 21 while laying down binding guidelines for educational institutions and coaching centres across India. The observation was made in a case related to the death of a 17-year-old student undergoing coaching for the NEET examination. The apex court set aside orders of the Andhra Pradesh HC to allow transfer of the investigation into the death under suspicious circumstances to CBI. Mental health activist Ratnaboli Ray, who is the founder of Anjali, a rights-based organisation, said the order moves mental health from the realm of welfare or charity into the domain of legal and constitutional rights. "This means that the state and institutions are no longer simply encouraged but obligated to ensure mental health protections as part of their duty under the Constitution," said Ray, a psychologist by training. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like This Could Be the Best Time to Trade Gold in 5 Years IC Markets Learn More Undo You Can Also Check: Kolkata AQI | Weather in Kolkata | Bank Holidays in Kolkata | Public Holidays in Kolkata Ray also pointed out that by issuing guidelines for students' welfare in the context of mental health, the court has acknowledged the growing mental health crisis in educational spaces — ranging from anxiety and depression to suicide. This makes schools and universities potentially accountable for creating psychologically safe environments. Advocate Arush Sengupta said embedding mental health under Article 21 makes it justiciable. "If someone's right to mental well-being is violated, they can now take legal recourse based on constitutional grounds. This also strengthens the implementation of the Mental Healthcare Act, 2017, which already defines access to mental health services as a right, but until now lacked the direct constitutional force to ensure consistent and widespread enforcement," he said. Psychiatrist Aniruddha Deb felt the ruling has the potential to transform institutional accountability, public funding, and societal attitudes in India. "This is a landmark judgment. Till now, mental illness was perceived as a disability, a dysfunction and looked down upon. People with mental illness were relegated to second-class citizens. They were even denied right to vote. Being of unsound mind precluded them from holding any office. All that will change now," said Deb. Ray added that the moment demands bold, rights-affirming governance, not piecemeal or tokenistic gestures. "The judiciary has spoken. It is now the executive's responsibility to institutionalise this vision into everyday governance so that mental health is not only constitutionally protected, but meaningfully lived," she added. Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Friendship Day wishes , messages and quotes !
