logo
Republicans worry the Devil is in the details of a Senate amendment

Republicans worry the Devil is in the details of a Senate amendment

Yahoo21-02-2025

Sen. Mike McKay (R-Western Maryland) said cults and fringe religious groups might be recognized by a bill Sen. Cheryl C. Kagan (D-Montgomery) said was merely meant to add gender- and religion-neutral terms to state law. (Photo by Bryan P. Sears/Maryland Matters)
Two Republican senators are worried the Devil is in the details of a bill that makes technical changes to state law, fearing it will open the door to state recognition of Satan, cults, witches, 'weirdo sects' and racists.
The 18-page bill, sponsored by Sen. Cheryl C. Kagan (D-Montgomery), makes technical changes to sections of state law to make them more gender and religion neutral.
Kagan's bill isn't sorcery but it did conjure up controversy after Sens. Mike McKay and Chris West raised concerns about a dozen words included in a committee amendment. Kagan said that language — 'any other religious society or congregation or any sect, order or denomination' — was merely an attempt by the Education, Energy and Environment Committee to more precisely define the term religious institution without using the word to define itself.
West and McKay saw trouble, and delayed a preliminary vote on the bill until Tuesday.
'I am concerned where it says any other religious society or congregation — I'm just going to ask it, is the House of Satan, does that fall into it?' McKay (R-Western Maryland) asked.
'I don't think the House of Satan is in our code,' Kagan said during the exchange on the Senate Floor.
'There are always new religions. There are smaller religions that we may not be familiar with,' said Kagan, the vice chair of the Education, Energy and the Environment Committee. 'So, what we wanted to capture in the definition were the primary religions in the state, without doing a whole laundry list.'
In a later interview, McKay said he misspoke and meant to reference The Satanic Temple.
McKay also expressed concern about potential recognition of 'cult like' groups including the Zizians. Three members of that group, arrested Sunday in Allegany County, have been linked to the shooting of a federal border agent in Vermont.
'I just want to make sure that we're not … yielding to some form of a cult or whatever that may have been in the news that were arrested in Allegany County,' said McKay, who represents the county.
West (R-Baltimore County) said the committee amendment seemed too expansive, and he dismissed concerns that attempts to narrow the language in it might run afoul of First Amendment protection of religion.
'Maybe what you're saying is, anybody who says I'm a church, we ought to give them official state recognition. I'm not sure we have to do that,' West said in an interview after the floor session. 'We're not impairing their right to worship freely, which is what the First Amendment is all about.
'I'm not sure exactly what the code does for churches,' he said. 'I'd have to go back and read the 100 and some references to say the purpose of this is not in any way to impair someone's right to worship freely even if you're really weird, but I'm not sure why the state of Maryland has to give an official recognition.'
But Kagan said the bill merely tries to identify and replace terms like 'clergymen' and others with gender and religiously neutral terms.
'This is really just about making sure that we more accurately reflect the spiritual diversity of our state,' Kagan said on the Senate floor.
The changes touch roughly 20 articles of state law. Kagan said they found 142 separate uses of the word 'church.'
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
'Really we're talking about churches, synagogues, temples, mosques, any place where people gather to pray,' Kagan said. 'And so we changed the definition, clarified the definition, and changed it in all places. We also took care, took out gendered language that said clergy man and just said member of the clergy.'
McKay said his concerns arose in part from an Indiana case involving The Satanic Temple, a group based in Salem, Massachusetts, that was established in 2013 to counter what it saw as an 'intrusion of Christian values in American politics.'
Since its founding, it has filed legal challenges to religious displays such as Nativity scenes on government property, often joined by the American Civil Liberties Union and the Freedom From Religion Foundation.
In 2015, The Satanic Temple sued Franklin County, Indiana, after the government there allowed a Nativity scene on the county courthouse grounds. Its lawsuit sought to allow other groups the opportunity to places displays on the property.
The Satanic Temple was allowed to erect a representation last year of 'Baphomet' — a goat-headed man — in front of the New Hampshire State House. Government officials said they issued the permit to avoid a potential First Amendment lawsuit, according to the Miami Herald.
McKay said he was concerned the committee amendment might open the door to The Satanic Temple or other groups.
'Whether you agree or you disagree about a Christmas Nativity scene being on church property, the [The Satanic Temple] was allowed to then put right next to it, a (Satanic Temple) nativity scene that, in all honesty, I felt mocked Christianity,' he said.
West said he looked up the term 'faith institutions' during floor debate 'and I found some weird organizations.'
'I found, just a quick perusal, the Fellowship of ISIS,' he said. ' I found the Dianic Wicca, which is a witch organization. I found the Assembly of Christian Soldiers, which is a Ku Klux Klan organization. So would this amendment include those in the terms 'other religious society or congregation or any sect, order or denomination'?'
Kagan told West the bill was an update of Maryland law that does not include formal recognition of specific religions.
'But words have meanings,' said West, an attorney.
In an interview after the debate, West restated his concerns about the committee amendment and said he plans to craft his own in time for Tuesday's debate.
'The amendment would talk about churches and synagogues and Hindus and Buddhist, the major denominations, and skip the stuff about any other sect that would be one,' West said.
Another possible amendment, West said, would be to define a sect as a group 'which has at least 500 members in Maryland, which would get rid of the weirdo sects.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Santa Fe college in jeopardy of losing federal funding
Santa Fe college in jeopardy of losing federal funding

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Santa Fe college in jeopardy of losing federal funding

SANTA FE, N.M. (KRQE) – Everything from national parks to education is facing significant cuts in federal funding, which includes a New Mexico college that claims these cuts could lead to its closure. Story continues below News: Surveillance video captures crash involving off-duty officer that severely injured man Events: What's happening around New Mexico June 6-12? Albuquerque Pride Parade New Mexico Strange: Holy dirt and healing water: A look at NM's miraculous locations For 63 years, the Institute of American Indian Arts (IAIA) in Santa Fe has been supporting Native American artists and creatives. The institute currently has around 1,000 students and about 140 staff members. However, the president of the college, Robert Martin, stated that President Trump is attempting to erase six decades of progress. 'It is a little disconcerting and stressful, especially for our faculty, staff, and students, to hear that the president of the United States has proposed eliminating our budget,' Martin said. Martin explained that President Trump's 2026 budget proposal suggests cutting all federal funding for IAIA starting in October. 'Our funding is typically between $17 million and $18 million a year, with about $13.5 million coming from core operational funding provided by the federal government. This means that approximately 75% of our budget relies on federal support,' he said. So far, Martin said they have not received an explanation for the proposed cuts, stating, 'They just said they are eliminating funding for the Institute of American Indian Arts, with no justification whatsoever.' He added that if the cuts go through, it could force the institute to shut down. Currently, the institute is seeking support from New Mexico's Congressional delegation. 'We're trying to be strategic and coordinate our efforts in advocating for our budget,' Martin said. For more information about the Institute of American Indian Arts and how you can help, you can follow the link here. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Riot police, anti-ICE protesters square off in Los Angeles after raids
Riot police, anti-ICE protesters square off in Los Angeles after raids

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Riot police, anti-ICE protesters square off in Los Angeles after raids

By Jane Ross and Steve Gorman LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - Helmeted police in riot gear turned out on Friday evening in a tense confrontation with protesters in downtown Los Angeles, after a day of federal immigration raids in which dozens of people across the city were reported to be taken into custody. Live Reuters video showed Los Angeles Police Department officers lined up on a downtown street wielding batons and what appeared to be tear gas rifles, facing off with demonstrators after authorities had ordered crowds of protesters to disperse around nightfall. Early in the standoff, some protesters hurled chunks of broken concrete toward officers, and police responded by firing volleys of tear gas and pepper spray. Police also fired "flash-bang" concussion rounds. It was not clear whether there were any immediate arrests. An LAPD spokesperson, Drake Madison, told Reuters that police on the scene had declared an unlawful assembly, meaning that those who failed to leave the area were subject to arrest. Television news footage earlier in the day showed caravans of unmarked military-style vehicles and vans loaded with uniformed federal agents streaming through Los Angeles streets as part of the immigration enforcement operation. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents targeted several locations, including a Home Depot in the city's Wetlake District, an apparel store in the Fashion District and a clothing warehouse in South Los Angeles, according to the Los Angeles City News Service (CNS). CNS and other local media reported dozens of people were taken into custody during the raids, the latest in a series of such sweeps conducted in a number of cities as part of President Donald Trump's extensive crackdown on illegal immigration. The Republican president has vowed to arrest and deport undocumented migrants in record numbers. The LAPD did not take part in the immigration enforcement action. It was deployed to quell civil unrest after crowds protesting the deportation raids spray-painted anti-ICE slogans on the walls of a federal court building and massed outside a nearby jail where some of the detainees were believed to be held. Impromptu demonstrations had also erupted at some of the raid locations earlier in the day. One organized labor executive, David Huerta, president of the Service Employees International Union of California, was injured and detained by ICE at one site, according to an SEIU statement. The union said Huerta was arrested "while exercising his First Amendment right to observe and document law enforcement activity." No details about the nature or severity of Huerta's injury were given. It was not clear whether he was charged with a crime. ICE did not immediately respond to a request from Reuters for information about its enforcement actions or Huerta's detention. Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass issued a statement condemning the immigration raids, saying, "these tactics sow terror in our communities and disrupt basic principles of safety in our city."

Judge says administration can dismantle the Institute of Museum and Library Services

time2 hours ago

Judge says administration can dismantle the Institute of Museum and Library Services

WASHINGTON -- A federal judge on Friday denied a request by the American Library Association to halt the Trump administration's further dismantling of an agency that funds and promotes libraries across the country, saying that recent court decisions suggested his court lacked jurisdiction to hear the matter. U.S. District Judge Richard Leon had previously agreed to temporarily block the Republican administration, saying that plaintiffs were likely to show that Trump doesn't have the legal authority to unilaterally shutter the Institute of Museum and Library Services, which was created by Congress. But in Friday's ruling, Leon wrote that as much as the 'Court laments the Executive Branch's efforts to cut off this lifeline for libraries and museums,' recent court decisions suggested that the case should be heard in a separate court dedicated to contractual claims. He cited the Supreme Court's decision allowing the administration to cut hundreds of millions of dollars in teacher-training money despite a lower court order barring the cuts, saying that cases seeking reinstatement of federal grants should be heard in the Court of Federal Claims. The American Library Association and the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees filed a lawsuit to stop the administration from gutting the institute after President Donald Trump signed a March 14 executive order that refers to it and several other federal agencies as 'unnecessary.' The agency's appointed acting director then placed many agency staff members on administrative leave, sent termination notices to most of them, began canceling grants and contracts and fired all members of the National Museum and Library Services Board. The institute has roughly 75 employees and issued more than $266 million in grants last year. However, a Rhode Island judge's order prohibiting the government from shutting down the museum and library services institute in a separate case brought by several states remains in place. The administration is appealing that order as well.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store