State agencies launch new Arkansas outdoor education program
The governor announced on Wednesday the creation of a new outdoor education pilot program that will accept up to 30 Arkansas school districts that apply to participate.
A partnership between the Arkansas Department of Education and the Arkansas Game and Fish Commission, the program will help equip students for a career in outdoor recreation, according to a press release from the governor's office.
During Wednesday's announcement at AGFC's Witt Stephens Jr. Central Arkansas Nature Center in Little Rock, Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders said if the pilot is successful, the program could be expanded to schools across the state and provide a model for the entire country. Getting kids outdoors will help improve their education, health and quality of life, Sanders said.
'Starting today, districts across our state can apply to be one of 30 schools to offer outdoor education built around the standards taught in core and elective content areas, experiences in outdoor learning engagement and projects that empower students to think critically and solve problems about the world around them,' she said.
Doug Schoenrock, who was named AGFC's 20th director in April, said the 'truly unique' pilot program will bring the outdoors into the classroom and vice versa.
'And most importantly, this program will bring outdoors to the hearts and minds of our students, and build a connection with the Natural State, which we as Arkansans hold so dear,' Schoenrock said.
The new initiative combines several of the governor's priorities, including education, workforce development and outdoor recreation. The pilot program responds to a recommendation made by the Natural State Initiative Advisory Council in its 2023 report to expand outdoor recreation programs to schools.
Sanders launched the Natural State Initiative in an effort to expand Arkansas' outdoor economy, and its advisory council is chaired by her husband, Bryan.
Tourism is the state's second largest industry behind agriculture. In the most recent year for which data is available, Arkansas welcomed more than 50 million visitors who spent nearly $10 billion, much of which went to outdoor recreation, according to the press release.
Applications for the outdoor education pilot program are available on AGFC's website.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
7 hours ago
- USA Today
Bankruptcy case still looms large for Buccaneers rookie safety Shilo Sanders
Tampa Bay Buccaneers rookie safety Shilo Sanders might be a close call to make the team's 53-man roster when the deadline comes to cut players next week. Tampa Bay coach Todd Bowles recently said that Sanders is a "very hungry" player but that this week would be "very important" in determining who makes the cut, including a preseason game Aug. 23 against Buffalo. In the meantime, perhaps nobody else has a bigger financial stake right now in what happens to Sanders than the man Sanders owes more than $11 million. That man is John Darjean, a former security guard at Sanders' school in Dallas when Sanders was 15 years old. Sanders, son of Colorado coach Deion Sanders, is still trying to get that debt erased in bankruptcy court after filing for Chapter 7 bankruptcy in 2023. If Shilo Sanders succeeds in court, he can start over financially, free from that debt and with minimal damage to his bank account. But if Darjean succeeds in court instead, Sanders will not be discharged of his debt to him. Darjean then could pursue debt collection against him after the case is over, including by having his wages garnished with the Buccaneers, according to experts contacted by USA TODAY Sports. In that case, Darjean would want Sanders "to make as much money as possible – or at least enough to pay (Darjean's) claim,' said Angela Littwin, a law professor and bankruptcy expert at the University of Texas. Darjean therefore has a rooting interest in Sanders making the team even though the two are longtime adversaries in court. NFL teams must cut down their rosters to 53 active players on Aug. 26. A bankruptcy judge later will make the call on Sanders' $11 million debt, possibly by the end of the year. Sanders, 25, went undrafted by NFL teams in April but signed a three-year contract with Tampa Bay for nearly $3 million. Darjean declined comment on Sanders' future prospects. Why Shilo Sanders is going through bankruptcy The debt stems from an incident that happened between Sanders and Darjean in September 2015. Darjean said in court documents previously that Sanders assaulted him with his elbow and fist when he was trying to confiscate his phone at school that day in 2015, resulting in permanent and severe injuries, including ongoing pain and incontinence. Records show he had to be transported to the hospital that day and then underwent spinal surgery a few days later. Darjean sued Sanders in 2016, seeking damages for the injuries. In response, Sanders claimed self-defense and filed counterclaims. But the case dragged on during the pandemic and when it finally went to trial in 2022, Sanders didn't show up for it. In 2020, Sanders let go of his attorneys in the case, who otherwise would have notified him of the trial and could have helped him avoid the worst-case outcome that happened next. The trial went on without him and ended with a default judgment against Sanders of $11.89 million, to be paid to Darjean. Then when Darjean moved to collect on that debt in 2023, Sanders filed for bankruptcy to try to get it wiped away in a discharge. What's next in Shilo Sanders' bankruptcy case? Debtors generally file for bankruptcy to automatically 'stay' or stop debt collection against them and to discharge their debts. This is allowed under the law and sometimes is used as a tactic. But there are some circumstances in which debt is considered by law to be "nondischargeable," meaning a debtor can't erase it in bankruptcy court. Darjean cited this in two complaints he filed against Sanders in bankruptcy court as part of his effort to get paid what he's owed. One argues that Sanders omitted or concealed assets in his disclosures and therefore should be denied a discharge under the law – an accusation Sanders' attorneys denied. The other complaint argues the debt is nondischargeable because it stems from a 'willful and malicious" injury. The judge must determine in the latter case if it was a 'willful and malicious' injury and not self-defense. That judge is expected to do so after hearing witness testimony and other evidence in a mini-trial about what happened that day 10 years ago. No trial date has been set. Possible outcomes for Shilo Sanders If the judge finds credible evidence that Sanders acted in self-defense, Sanders could get the debt discharged with no further debt collection or future wage garnishments. In this scenario, Darjean would only get a small fraction of what he was owed – all from certain assets owned by Sanders before his bankruptcy filing. But if the judge determines it was not self-defense and was instead 'willful and malicious,' then he could rule the debt is nondischargeable and Sanders would be on the hook to pay the full judgment even after the bankruptcy case is over. 'Nondischargeable debt survives after the bankruptcy, so if the $11 million is deemed nondischargeable, Darjean could continue debt collection once the bankruptcy case is over and the automatic stay is lifted,' said Christopher Hampson, associate law professor and bankruptcy expert at the University of Florida. 'After the bankruptcy, Darjean could try to collect on the $11 million by serving a writ of garnishment on Sanders' employer, the Tampa Bay Buccaneers, directing the Bucs to redirect a portion of Sanders' paycheck to Darjean. In that legal action, Sanders would be protected by federal law, which limits garnishment to 25% of his post-tax income.' It also could be much less than that, depending on the circumstances. State laws could help further restrict what Darjean could garnish from Sanders. What if Shilo Sanders doesn't make the cut in Tampa? He could end up on the team practice squad or he could get a chance with another team. If he doesn't pan out in the NFL, it's not clear what he would do that would pay as well as being a rising star on an active NFL roster. That's why it's in Darjean's interest for Sanders to make the team and perform well in the NFL, building wealth that he could pursue to satisfy that judgment if it's not discharged. But pursuing debt collection and trying to seize personal property to satisfy a judgment can be a cat-and-mouse game if the debtor is not willing to cooperate with the creditor. Sanders could try to thwart debt collection through legal loopholes and lawyers. 'Most people honestly don't have enough personal property to make it worth going after,' said Theresa J. Pulley Radwan, a law professor at Stetson University in Florida. 'The stuff you and I own probably isn't valuable enough to recoup a significant judgment.' It's different if the debtor is wealthy. Future success in the NFL would ensure that. Tampa Bay opens the season Sept. 7 at Atlanta. Sanders previously declined to discuss the case other than telling reporters in 2024 that "at the end of the day everybody is gonna know the truth about everything." Follow reporter Brent Schrotenboer @Schrotenboer. Email: bschrotenb@
Gizmodo
a day ago
- Gizmodo
Bernie Sanders Likes Trump's Plan for Government Taking Ownership in Tech Companies
There aren't many things that Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump agree on. But we may have found one idea where the two men see eye-to-eye. Sanders, an Independent Senator from Vermont who caucuses with the Democrats, told Reuters on Wednesday that he's in favor of the Trump administration's plan to convert federal grants for tech companies like Intel and TSMC into equity stakes in those companies. 'If microchip companies make a profit from the generous grants they receive from the federal government, the taxpayers of America have a right to a reasonable return on that investment,' Sanders reportedly told Reuters. The U.S. government is hoping to get a 10% equity stake in Intel in exchange for federal grants under the CHIPS Act, according to Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, who talked about the plan on Tuesday on CNBC. News broke of the idea last week, but Lutnick's appearance on CNBC was the first time anyone from the Trump regime had started talking about it publicly. 'The CHIPS Act was just a giveaway to rich companies,' Lutnick said on CNBC. 'I mean, why in the world is the United States of America taking money and giving it to companies like TSMC, which is worth a trillion dollars? I mean, why would we give them money to come to America?' U.S.-based Intel and Taiwan-based TSMC have both been incentivized by the CHIPS Act to invest more in manufacturing in the U.S., but it seems folks across the political spectrum have started to wonder whether it's smart to just hand out money to enormous companies without getting something more substantial in return. News broke Tuesday that Trump didn't just want an equity stake in Intel, but also chipmakers like Micron, TSMC, and Samsung. The idea behind grants for private companies is that they spur further investment in a given community and help create jobs. But the government taking an equity stake would theoretically come with a say in how that company does business, whether it's through employment decisions or any number of other choices. Lutnick insisted to CNBC that the government would not get any governance role at Intel along with its potential 10% stake, but it's hard to imagine that would be true. The government received a 'golden share' on the U.S. Steel deal when Japan-based Nippon Steel purchased the company in June. That allows Trump to appoint a board member in a very unusual arrangement. Under the CHIPS Act, TSMC received $6.6 billion in grants, while Intel has received about $7.9 billion, according to CNBC. Intel has slowed its expansion plans, which has left billions of dollars in funds on the table that haven't been allocated yet. And as the New York Times recently noted, converting $10.86 billion in government grants for Intel into equity would be one of the largest interventions into private industry since U.S. auto companies were bailed out during the Great Recession. Trump has also called for Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan to be fired over his alleged links to China, portrayed by the president as a potential national security concern. But Trump publicly changed his tune after meeting with Tan last week. It's not at all clear what kind of understanding the two men have come to. Needless to say, all of this potential government tinkering makes Wall Street very nervous. An editorial from the Wall Street Journal on Monday explained that details of the Intel deal were vague, 'but you can bet the feds wouldn't be passive investors.' Which brings us to the question of whether Bernie Sanders will actually like any potential arrangement Intel gets with Trump. Sanders may approve of an equity stake on paper, but President Trump's history of bending institutions to his will looks a lot different in practice. Trump has strong-armed universities, corporate media, and now has his sights set on museums and the way they present history. Lefties should be cautious when saying they support any idea from Trump without making it clear that any support comes with caveats. If the past six to eight months of Trumpism are any guide, an equity stake in Intel comes with plenty of strings attached.
Axios
3 days ago
- Axios
Denver layoffs include longtime employee suing city for discrimination
Denver Mayor Mike Johnston's administration on Monday eliminated the job of longtime employee Jessica Calderon, a Latino woman and senior director in the Mayor's Office of Social Equity & Innovation, as part of this week's layoffs, according to a termination notice reviewed by Axios. Why it matters: Calderon has spent more than a year suing the city over alleged sex and national-origin discrimination, political retaliation and First Amendment violations. Her job elimination is intensifying scrutiny of how Johnston's team is handling Denver's first layoffs in more than a decade. Flashback: In 2024, Calderon — a 21-year municipal employee — sued the city, the mayor's office and her boss Ben Sanders, Denver's chief equity officer. She alleges Sanders repeatedly confronted her about her ties to and support for Lisa Calderón (no relation), a community activist and former mayoral candidate. Calderón, who ran in 2023 against Johnston, is also a vocal critic of him. The lawsuit claims she was denied promotions and responsibilities that were given to male colleagues — and that the retaliation has continued. The latest: City rules require layoffs to follow a matrix of four factors: skills, abilities, performance and years of service. Calderon argues those rules weren't applied to her — and says Sanders, her immediate supervisor and a named defendant in the lawsuit, personally eliminated her position. Her attorney, Steven Murray, said in a statement that Calderon is "considering all legal options" to challenge her termination. The other side: Sanders and spokespeople for the mayor did not immediately respond to Axios Denver's requests for comment Monday night. By the numbers: The city is laying off 171 people — about 1.6% of Denver's roughly 11,000-employee workforce — and cutting a total of 928 positions to help close a projected $200 million budget gap in 2026.
