Bill to help clean up McCook Lake dies in committee
UNION COUNTY, S.D. (KCAU) — South Dakota House Bill 1108 would have created a contingency fund for the restoration of McCook Lake. However, the bill was sent to the 41st day by the House Appropriations Committee, killing the proposal.
McCook Lake is a state-owned lake, and the South Dakota Department of Game, Fish, and Parks (GFP) is in charge of cleaning the lake. GFP hasn't even done an assessment of the damage yet, though, so the cost of restoration isn't known yet.
SD House denies reconsideration of prison funding bill
'The progress in terms of cleaning up McCook Lake has been very slow,' McCook Lake Association President Dirk Lohry said. 'It's been eight months since we had this flood on June 23. The Game, Fish, and Parks, which is now in charge of the lake's restoration has been very slow in terms of getting anything done. Their first step is to get a scope of what it takes to get the clean-up done. Once they get the scope done, which is supposed to be next week, but we're crossing our fingers.'
Once GFP gets done with its assessment of the damage to McCook Lake, they will take bids on the restoration. The concern with the McCook Lake Association is that they don't know how much restoration GFP is going to do and they don't know the cost or if they will need extra money, which HB 1108 would have addressed.
'The importance of this bill is we aren't real sure what their scope is going to be,' Lohry said. 'It could be to bring the lake back to where it was before, or they could just say it kind of looks fine. Having a tree out in the middle of the lake is kind of natural and we don't think we need to do much of anything other than to just surface, types of things. So that has us concerned.'
According to the association, because of the slow progress, one concern is the usability of the lake. Right now, it's not clear if the lake will be usable this summer.
Two baby girls surrendered under Iowa Safe Haven Law in February
'Our problem is this lake drains every year, and we'd like to fill it up again and make the lake usable,' Lohry said. 'All of our house values have dropped because there's not a usable lake here. We would like to have a usable lake this summer.'
According to South Dakota State Representative William Sharma, who represents McCook Lake, the hope is that once GFP finishes its assessment and the cost of restoration is known, if more money is needed, they can try again next year to get the bill passed.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
'We cannot build bananas in America': House Democrat fires back at Commerce Sec. Howard Lutnick on tariffs.
Rep. Madeleine Dean and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick were banana-split on President Donald Trump's tariffs and banana prices during a House hearing Thursday. 'We cannot build bananas in America,' the Pennsylvania Democrat said to the secretary as he testified on the fiscal year 2026 budget request before the House Appropriations Committee. The two had been discussing Trump's tariffs on almost every country and the subsequent levies that would fall onto countries that produce the bananas Americans eat for that good ol' potassium. 'What's the tariff on bananas? Americans, by the way, love bananas,' Dean said to Lutnick. 'We buy billions of them a year. I love bananas.' 'The tariff on bananas would be representative of the countries that produce them,' Lutnick said. Dean: 'And what's that tariff?' Lutnick: 'Generally 10%.' Dean: 'Correct, 10%. Walmart has already increased the cost of bananas by 8%.' Lutnick: 'As countries do deals with us, that will go to zero.' Dean: 'But the cost is on the American consumer now and on the businesses with the confusion now.' Lutnick: 'There's no uncertainty: If you build in America and you produce your product in America, there will be no tariff.' Dean: 'We can't produce bananas in America. We cannot build bananas in America.' Hawaii is the only state with the climate that allows for growing bananas. Most come from overseas.
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
A banana a day to keep the tariffs away? Howard Lutnick mocked during congressional hearing over plan to make more products in America
Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick was ridiculed in the House of Representatives over his proposed solution if Donald Trump's tariffs hit banana imports. Lutnick, one of the loudest cheerleaders for Trump's aggressive trade strategy, was testifying before the House Appropriations Committee when he found himself up against Pennsylvania Democratic Rep. Madeleine Dean. The congresswoman put it to Lutnick that the Trump administration lacked a fundamental understanding of how a trade deficit works, pointing out that the last time the United States had a trade surplus was during the Great Depression of the 1930s, a return to which is 'a direction none of us wants to go,' she said. Dean rebuked the secretary over the chaotic implementation of Trump's tariff policy after the president was forced to row back his imposition of steep levies on 100 countries on 'Liberation Day' (April 2) when they spooked the stock markets, forcing him to swiftly introduce a 90-day pause to allow for dealmaking. 'We are in the midst of negotiations with dozens of countries,' Lutnick raced to reassure her. 'We could sign deals but they're only going to get better as we negotiate them.' Dean then pivoted to her true subject, the cost of living, saying that residents of her suburban Philadelphia district were facing $2,000 a year increases to their grocery bills as a result of inflation, noting that Walmart, for one, had already raised the price of bananas by eight percent. 'Mr Trump promised to bring down the cost of goods, day one. And what he has done through his trade deficit fixation and his tariff chaos has nakedly increased the cost of goods,' she said. Brandishing a banana, Dean asked the secretary: 'What's the tariff on bananas? Americans, by the way, love bananas. We buy billions of them a year. I love bananas. What's the tariff on bananas?' 'The tariff on bananas would be representative of the countries that produce them,' Lutnick answered, estimating the rate at 10 percent when pushed. 'But the cost is on the American consumer now and on the businesses with the confusion now,' she hit back. 'Mr Secretary, I believe you know better. I believe you recognize that a trade deficit is not something to fear. I believe you know that predictability, stability is essential for businesses. I wish you would show that truth to this administration.' When Dean yielded her time, Lutnick asked for permission to respond to her and said: 'There's no uncertainty if you build in America and you produce your product in America. There will be no tariff.' 'We can't produce bananas in America,' she responded, incredulously. 'The concept of building in America and paying no tariffs is very, very clear,' said Lutnick. 'We cannot build bananas in America,' Dean repeated. 'Fighting for imports is not the same,' the secretary tried again. 'We cannot build bananas in America,' the representative repeated. While it is true that the United States cannot 'build' its own bananas and most are imported from Central American nations like Guatemala, Ecuador and Costa Rica, southern states like California, Florida, Arizona, Louisiana and Texas have the necessary climate to grow them but currently only do so in small quantities. Hawaii also grows bananas, as do the American territories of Puerto Rico, Guam, American Samoa, the U.S. Virgin Islands and the Northern Mariana Islands but, again, not currently on a scale sufficient to meet domestic demand.
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
Rep. Madeleine Dean's Banana Burn Against Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick Goes Viral
President Donald Trump's Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick got burned badly by Rep. Madeleine Dean (D-Pa.) ― with a banana, no less. It happened during a meeting of the House Appropriations Committee on Thursday, where the former stockbroker insisted the major effect of the president's controversial tariff proposals would be teaching self-reliance to American businesses. But then the congresswoman asked Lutnick about the tariff on bananas, adding, 'Americans, by the way, loooove bananas. We buy billions of them a year. I love bananas. What's the tariff on bananas?' Lutnick responded that the tariff on that fruit 'would be representative of the countries that produce them,' which he said was 'generally 10%.' Dean then pointed out that Walmart has already increased the cost of bananas by 8%. Lutnick claimed prices would go back down as countries continue to make new deals with the U.S. However, Dean was focused on the very real present and not Lutnick's nebulous future predictions. ″But the cost is on the American consumer now, and on the businesses with the confusion now,' she said. 'Mr. Secretary, I believe you know better. I believe you recognize that a trade deficit is not something to fear. I believe you know that predictability, stability, is essential for businesses. I wish you would show that truth to this administration.' Lutnick then added one more point: 'There's no uncertainty that if you build in America and produce your product in America, there will be no tariff.' Dean then held up a banana and noted to Lutnick: 'We cannot build bananas in America.' Although bananas can be grown in parts of the country such as Hawaii and southern Florida, the current domestic crop isn't nearly enough to satisfy the cravings of Americans, who eat an average of 26 pounds of the fruit each year. You can see the complete exchange below. Dean later commented on the exchange on her X account, expressing surprise that 'as a former writing professor, I would be giving economic lessons to the Commerce Secretary, but here we are.' She followed up with a post noting that 'not everything can be produced in the U.S.' Other people also went bananas over Dean's exchange with Lutnick. Jasmine Crockett Slams Trump Tariffs And Explains The 1 Difference Between Parties Appeals Court Reinstates Most Of Trump's Tariffs For Now Ex-Obama Adviser Spots Exactly How Trump Caught A Big Break With Tariff Decision White House Lashes Out At Judges After Court Blocks Trump's Tariffs
