logo
Indiana crackdown on ‘predatory' towing to take effect in July

Indiana crackdown on ‘predatory' towing to take effect in July

Yahoo09-05-2025
Revamped towing regulations tripped Indiana lawmakers up for nearly four months but survived a chaotic legislative session.
Indiana is getting tougher on 'predatory' vehicle towing.
Revamped regulations tripped Indiana lawmakers up for nearly four months but emerged from a chaotic legislative session within House Enrolled Act 1390, the Bureau of Motor Vehicles' (BMV) annual package. They're set to take effect next month after a zig-zagging path through the Statehouse.
'Indiana is the No. 1 predatory towing state in the nation,' author Rep. Jim Pressel, R-Rolling Prairie, said in a statement to the Capital Chronicle. '… Our towing practices exploit and harm trucking companies in their time of need.'
Surveyed commercial carriers logged the most 'predatory' towing incidents relative to mileage in Indiana between 2021 and 2023, according to a report by the American Transportation Research Institute. The state also had few of the personal vehicle owner towing protections identified in a 2021 report from the Public Interest Research Group's Consumer Watchdog team.
'House Enrolled Act 1390 holds towing providers accountable, requiring transparency, capping fees and ensuring access to personal belongings, while penalizing bad actors who are taking advantage of a bad situation,' Pressel said.
That research sparked a Hoosier campaign for reform.
'The great majority of the towers … are responsible businesspeople and are not the problem, but there's a small percentage that have taken advantage of the industry, and those are the ones that we're focused on,' Indiana Motor Truck Association President and CEO Gary Langston said.
After learning of the commercial tow findings, Langston began asking around — and was 'bombarded with invoices' from in-state and out-of-state carriers.
Indiana law already mandates itemized receipts, but that doesn't mean all charges are legitimate.
Langston recalled one invoice for an 18-mile tow that featured a fuel surcharge of more than $7,000. He also described seeing overstated hourly labor costs and various 'hidden' fees in the miscellaneous and administrative columns on the invoices.
Commercial vehicle interests additionally sought greater recourse for recovering vehicles and the client loads inside while disputing such charges.
In committee hearings, Indiana Towing & Wrecker Association President Karrie Driscol expressed openness to additional regulations but similarly blamed the complaints on a handful of bad actors. Her organization declined comment to the Indiana Capital Chronicle.
Several chunks of incoming Indiana code tackle what Langston dubbed 'egregious' overcharging.
Towing companies on the Indiana State Police (ISP) rotation will only be able to charge the rates they've already filed when ISP calls them for emergency tows. When their services are requested by local law enforcement agencies, the restrictions shift.
If there are set rates, that's what'll get charged. If not, a company could charge its ISP rates. If the company isn't on the ISP rotation, it will charge, at most, what's in the ISP district's agreements.
The legislation also requires law enforcement agencies to include a lengthy list of provisions in written policies or contracts entered into, amended or renewed after June 30: contract lengths, service and storage rates, allowable administrative fees, a prohibition on charging unlisted fees, a provision allowing the agencies to suspend or remove violator companies, and more.
When private property owners request tows, companies will charge whatever rates are in the agreements they already have with the owners, according to the legislation. If there's no preexisting agreement, a company must charge a rate applicable under the legislation's local law enforcement agency provisions.
The state's itemized invoice requirement also got tweaks.
Come July 1, invoices must include the number of miles the vehicle was towed, a 'good faith estimate' of where and how long invoiced items were used, and an attestation that all invoiced items were 'used and necessary in the ordinary course of business.'
Fees must also be accompanied by 'full' descriptions of the services provided. Towing companies and storage facilities are barred from charging inspection fees but could charge for retrieval.
Another piece of the legislation lets commercial carriers file complaints with the Indiana Attorney General's Office if they believe the charges are 'unreasonable.' A towing company or storage facility will have to release the impounded vehicle and its cargo within 24 hours of receiving payment for 75% of the invoice, proof of a bond for the remaining 25%, and a copy of the complaint.
Legislators also cracked down on towing company compensation offers for referrals. They're banned unless there is a prior contract in play.
Towing changes encountered hefty opposition throughout several rounds of changes.
House lawmakers briefly considered giving the Secretary of State's Office oversight and requiring that towing companies obtain licenses from the office, but the language ultimately wasn't added to House Enrolled Act 1382 before it left the chamber.
Also in the session's first half, procedural deadlines felled two towing-focused proposals. Pressel's committee didn't put one on its hearing agenda; the other advanced to the House floor but languished on the chamber's agenda for eight straight session meetings and died.
One Senate committee resurrected that language during its turn to consider the annual BMV agency bill — the same place it was re-inserted more than two weeks later.
In between, another panel removed the provisions, prompting Pressel to cram them into a utility trailers sales bill. At the time, Driscol pressed lawmakers for a 'pause' this session.
'May 1, are you available?' she quipped, in a March 31 committee hearing. '… I think that even if this does go, and passes, Chairman Pressel and I will be talking over the summer, because there are still tons of issues that need to be resolved.'
She's not alone.
Rep. Bob Morris, R-Fort Wayne, was a vocal opponent. He told the Capital Chronicle that he's looking forward to continued work with Pressel and others on the topic. He wants to make sure good towing companies don't get caught up in the new regulatory structure.
'I think it's workable, but it actually kind of contradicts itself as well,' Rep. Bob Morris, R-Fort Wayne, said of the final version. 'There were so many different versions done on the language, trying to get it right.'
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Rivian sues to sell its EVs directly in Ohio
Rivian sues to sell its EVs directly in Ohio

Yahoo

time11 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Rivian sues to sell its EVs directly in Ohio

Rivian has filed a lawsuit in Ohio to be able sell its electric vehicles directly to consumers in the state — the latest swing in a perpetual fight between up-and-coming American automakers and the entrenched and powerful dealership lobby. The company sued the registrar of Ohio's Bureau of Motor Vehicles (BMV) on Monday in federal court, claiming the state is harming consumers by blocking direct sales. Rivian is currently able to sell EVs directly to consumers in 25 states and in Washington D.C. Ohio's BMV did not immediately respond to a request for comment. 'Ohio's prohibition of Rivian's direct-sales-only business model is irrational in the extreme: it reduces competition, decreases consumer choice, and drives up consumer costs and inconvenience — all of which harm consumers — with literally no countervailing benefit,' lawyers for the company wrote in the complaint. Rivian is asking the court to allow the company to apply for a dealership license so it can sell vehicles directly. Ohio customers have to buy from Rivian vehicles from locations in other states where direct sales are allowed. The cars are then shipped to Rivian service centers within Ohio. Allowing Rivian to sell directly would not be treading new legal ground, the company argues in its complaint. Tesla has had a license to sell in Ohio since 2013 and can sell directly to consumers. What's stopping Rivian is a 2014 law passed by the state's legislature. That law, which Rivian says came after an intense lobbying effort by the Ohio Automobile Dealers Association (OADA), effectively gave Tesla a carve-out and blocked any future manufacturers from acquiring the necessary dealership licenses. (OADA did not immediately return a request for comment.) 'Consumer choice is a bedrock principle of America's economy. Ohio's archaic prohibition against the direct-sales of vehicles is unconstitutional, irrational, and harms Ohioans by reducing competition and choice and driving up costs and inconvenience,' Mike Callahan, Rivian's chief administrative officer, said in a statement. Rivian has won legal fights over direct sales before. In 2021, Rivian and Lucid Motors were granted dealership licenses to sell EVs in the state of Illinois. That state's dealer association sued to try to block Rivian and Lucid from selling directly, but ultimately failed. Lucid Motors, meanwhile, filed a lawsuit of its own in Texas in 2022 in a challenge to that state's direct-sales ban. The court ruled against Lucid earlier this year, but the company has appealed, federal court records show. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Rivian sues to sell its EVs directly in Ohio
Rivian sues to sell its EVs directly in Ohio

TechCrunch

time12 hours ago

  • TechCrunch

Rivian sues to sell its EVs directly in Ohio

Rivian has filed a lawsuit in Ohio to be able sell its electric vehicles directly to consumers in the state — the latest swing in a perpetual fight between up-and-coming American automakers and the entrenched and powerful dealership lobby. The company sued the registrar of Ohio's Bureau of Motor Vehicles (BMV) on Monday in federal court, claiming the state is harming consumers by blocking direct sales. Rivian is currently able to sell EVs directly to consumers in 25 states and in Washington D.C. Ohio's BMV did not immediately respond to a request for comment. 'Ohio's prohibition of Rivian's direct-sales-only business model is irrational in the extreme: it reduces competition, decreases consumer choice, and drives up consumer costs and inconvenience — all of which harm consumers — with literally no countervailing benefit,' lawyers for the company wrote in the complaint. Rivian is asking the court to allow the company to apply for a dealership license so it can sell vehicles directly. Ohio customers have to buy from Rivian vehicles from locations in other states where direct sales are allowed. The cars are then shipped to Rivian service centers within Ohio. Allowing Rivian to sell directly would not be treading new legal ground, the company argues in its complaint. Tesla has had a license to sell in Ohio since 2013 and can sell directly to consumers. What's stopping Rivian is a 2014 law passed by the state's legislature. That law, which Rivian says came after an intense lobbying effort by the Ohio Automobile Dealers Association (OADA), effectively gave Tesla a carve-out and blocked any future manufacturers from acquiring the necessary dealership licenses. (OADA did not immediately return a request for comment.) 'Consumer choice is a bedrock principle of America's economy. Ohio's archaic prohibition against the direct-sales of vehicles is unconstitutional, irrational, and harms Ohioans by reducing competition and choice and driving up costs and inconvenience,' Mike Callahan, Rivian's chief administrative officer, said in a statement. Techcrunch event Tech and VC heavyweights join the Disrupt 2025 agenda Netflix, ElevenLabs, Wayve, Sequoia Capital — just a few of the heavy hitters joining the Disrupt 2025 agenda. They're here to deliver the insights that fuel startup growth and sharpen your edge. Don't miss the 20th anniversary of TechCrunch Disrupt, and a chance to learn from the top voices in tech — grab your ticket now and save up to $675 before prices rise. Tech and VC heavyweights join the Disrupt 2025 agenda Netflix, ElevenLabs, Wayve, Sequoia Capital — just a few of the heavy hitters joining the Disrupt 2025 agenda. They're here to deliver the insights that fuel startup growth and sharpen your edge. Don't miss the 20th anniversary of TechCrunch Disrupt, and a chance to learn from the top voices in tech — grab your ticket now and save up to $675 before prices rise. San Francisco | REGISTER NOW Rivian has won legal fights over direct sales before. In 2021, Rivian and Lucid Motors were granted dealership licenses to sell EVs in the state of Illinois. That state's dealer association sued to try to block Rivian and Lucid from selling directly, but ultimately failed. Lucid Motors, meanwhile, filed a lawsuit of its own in Texas in 2022 in a challenge to that state's direct-sales ban. The court ruled against Lucid earlier this year, but the company has appealed, federal court records show.

Lowering energy bills in Indiana should be bipartisan
Lowering energy bills in Indiana should be bipartisan

Indianapolis Star

time5 days ago

  • Indianapolis Star

Lowering energy bills in Indiana should be bipartisan

When elected officials play politics with utilities, consumers pay the price. Indiana residents have seen their energy bills rise by 9% and 17%, respectively, over the past two years, but there are proven, common-sense solutions to this problem public servants need to consider at the federal, state and local levels, regardless of political party. At the federal level, public servants should expand, reform and promote the Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program so more households qualify and receive help before reaching the point of crisis. Here in Terre Haute, I have asked faith-based leaders, social services, our communications team and other elected officials to spread the word. Help is out there; we just need to connect people with resources. Opinion: Data centers are inevitable, but why should Indiana pay for their energy demand? Public servants should also advocate to protect funding for grid modernization and rebates to help families upgrade insulation, HVAC and appliances through the Inflation Reduction Act. We need to stop framing energy as an either-or question. Investing in energy diversity does not mean abandoning Indiana's coal communities. We can preserve Indiana's legacy industries while creating new opportunities in advanced manufacturing, hydrogen and battery storage. We should also prioritize union labor in every clean energy project, ensuring that Indiana workers and not out-of-state contractors build the next generation of our energy economy. With the right federal support, we can protect paychecks, create local jobs and deliver lower bills for Hoosier families. At the state level, Indiana has work to do. Our electricity prices rose more than 33% over the past decade, far outpacing the national average. This month, customers of Indiana's five investor-owned utilities paid nearly 17.5% more than July of last year, with NIPSCO customers seeing hikes close to $50 a month. This is a direct hit to Hoosier wallets. Indiana law requires regulators to consider affordability, but the current system is not delivering. Opinion: Braun's smart IEDC picks must now tackle Indiana's development spending mess We need stronger oversight of the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission, reforms that prevent utilities from charging customers for projects before they're approved and more transparency in how utility commissioners are appointed. States like Texas have created bipartisan energy waste advisory committees projected to save ratepayers billions by cutting inefficiencies in their grid. Many other states are balancing new efficient energy sources like nuclear, solar, and even wind, building an energy grid that is both sustainable in the long term and affordable for customers. At the local level, there are concrete steps cities and counties can take to ease the burden of utility bills. Municipal utilities can implement weatherization and energy efficiency programs, such as those now offered by the Indiana Office of Energy Development. Local governments can also form public-private partnerships to fund energy efficiency upgrades and push for bulk-rate purchasing that benefits residents, not just corporations. Redevelopment commissions and economic development corporations should also consider balance when offering local incentives to companies that will add demand to energy grids already under stress. Building designs and plan review should also include a conversation, not a mandate, about their energy efficiency. Here in Terre Haute, we upgraded several municipal buildings' lighting and windows, saving taxpayers over $150,000 annually on electricity bills. Utility affordability is not a Democratic or a Republican issue. No family should have to choose between keeping the lights on or paying for groceries. It's time we stop treating utilities like a political football and start treating affordability like the kitchen table issue it is, by making smart investments with strong oversight that prioritize people over profits.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store