logo
I review OLED TVs for a living — and this 3-year-old Sony is still one of my favorites I'd buy

I review OLED TVs for a living — and this 3-year-old Sony is still one of my favorites I'd buy

Tom's Guide28-06-2025
There has been no shortage of excellent TVs that've launched in 2025. Specifically when it comes to new OLEDs, the Samsung S95F and LG C5 are among the best TVs ever tested here at Tom's Guide.
But newer doesn't always necessarily mean better. In fact, when it comes to recommending premium TV picks to friends, family and readers, it's a 3-year-old set that's often at the top of my list.
I'm referring to the Sony A95L, a flagship QD-OLED TV originally released back in 2023 that you can still buy brand-new today.
Yes, Sony technically replaced the A95L with the 2025 Bravia 8 II OLED TV. But the successor only comes in 55- and 65-inch configurations. To accommodate those looking for bigger screens, Sony decided to keep the 77-inch A95L in its QD-OLED lineup.
And there are a few reasons I think that was a pretty smart move, especially considering I recently introduced it into my own living room.
When it originally launched, the A95L set a new standard for premium OLED TVs. It combined Samsung's QD-OLED panel technology with Sony's best-in-class Cognitive Processor XR.
The result was a TV with unmatched color volume, excellent peak brightness for HDR content, near-perfect motion handling, and Sony's signature cinematic image tuning.
Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips.
I don't think anyone in the TV community was shocked when it won the Value Electronics annual TV Shootout event, being crowned the 'king of 4K TVs' by a panel of reviewers and display experts. At the time, it felt like this OLED was in league of its own.
The Sony Bravia A95L is a QD-OLED TV that excels with every kind of content, every time. In our Sony Bravia XR A95L QD-OLED TV review we said the Editor's Choice TV offers superlative picture and top-notch sound.
That clear distinction is why I think, a few years later, it remains a great choice. Our lab tests confirmed near-100% coverage of the P3 color gamut and outstanding Rec.2020 performance when it comes to HDR. Simply put, the A95L didn't leave much room for improvement.
Sony A95L
Sony Bravia 8 II
HDR Brightness (10%, in nits)
1215
1584
UHDA-P3 Gamut Coverage
99.95
100
Rec. 2020 Gamut Coverage
89.41
90.55
Input Lag (ms)
16.1
16.3
The new Bravia II did rise to the occasion with a healthy degree of upgrades, but it's not nearly enough to render the A95L irrelevant as we've seen some other TV manufacturers do with the progression of their OLED lineups year over year. As the close test results above show, the A95L doesn't make customers sacrifice quality much for prioritizing a larger screen size.
And if those customers happen to be gamers like me, the A95L offers 4K at 120 Hz, VRR and Auto Low Latency Mode over two HDMI 2.1 ports, plus PlayStation-specific features that optimize HDR and picture modes on the fly. Input lag measures a smooth 16 ms, and for me, the gaming experience has only increased my appreciation for the A95L as my console's monitor.
It's rare to recommend a three-year-old TV, but the A95L is that kind of product. It's a no-compromises display with longevity built in, especially if you're serious about upgrading your home theater space and have an appetite for a big-screen gaming TV.
Sony's TV division has always prioritized picture fidelity over flashy upgrades, and the A95L is a testament to that approach. Even in 2025, it remains one of the most visually stunning displays you can buy. It may not be new, but it's still among the best — as long as 77 inches fits your wall and your budget.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 vs. Honor Magic V5: Which is truly the thinnest foldable phone?
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 vs. Honor Magic V5: Which is truly the thinnest foldable phone?

Tom's Guide

time36 minutes ago

  • Tom's Guide

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 vs. Honor Magic V5: Which is truly the thinnest foldable phone?

When the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 launched, there were plenty of changes to admire in the company's vastly upgraded device and one of the best foldable phones. But it's arrival also changed something else — people's perception of a rival foldable that had been claiming to be the thinnest of the two. Earlier in July, the Honor Magic V5 launched, proclaiming that it was the world's thinnest foldable phone. The Galaxy Z Fold 7 then launched later in the month, officially measuring slightly thicker and thus allowing Honor to keep the title. But then, users like tech leaker Ice Universe got their hands on both phones and started measuring. And they found different numbers to the published ones, numbers that seemed to prove the Galaxy Z Fold 7 is actually the thinner phone. With Honor trying to reassert its claim, and Samsung happily accepting that it's accidentally made the world's thinnest foldable phone, it's hard to know what to believe. So in the interest of trying to settle the matter, I've spoken to both Honor and Samsung, and taken my own measurements with my own samples of the two phones in question. As a baseline, let's look at the official claims for the thickness of these two phones when folded. The unfolded measurements are not under dispute here, and are arguably less important anyway since you won't be carrying a foldable around while unfolded the vast majority of the time. Also note that these measurements revolve around specifically the Ivory White Magic V5. The other colors of the Magic V5 are thicker due to slightly different back panel designs. Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 Honor Magic V5 (White) Official thickness when folded 8.9mm 8.8mm Ice Universe's measurements 8.79mm 8.95mm Compare those to Ice Universe's measurements in the same table: the Magic V5 is 0.15mm thicker according to his calipers, while the Galaxy Z Fold 7 is 0.11mm thinner than claimed. Obviously, something is amiss here, and Honor was quick to respond with possible explanations. As part of its statement to me and other tech outlets, Honor noted that even mass-produced products like smartphones can have small manufacturing variances. But this isn't a unique problem to Honor, and could even work in its favor as well as against it. So let's instead focus on the two other reasons why the official numbers and Ice Universe's may not match. The first is that Honor's official measurements come from a Magic V5 device with no screen protector. The Magic V5, like all of Honor's phones, ships with a pre-applied plastic film on its outer screen. This courtesy puts Honor at a thickness disadvantage compared to the Galaxy Z Fold 7, which has no pre-applied protector. It's hard to see in IU's images if the Magic V5 has a screen protector on or not, but I made sure to take the film off of my device before measuring. The second issue is the precise way in which Honor took its measurement. In documentation I've seen, the recommended measurement method involves placing the calipers over the phone from the hinged side to cover the Honor logo, and with 'appropriate thumb pressure' on the bottom jaw. I don't know if there's some secret advantage gained by measuring at this point, but having a nice flat canvas for the calipers to grip is certainly helpful. What's more confusing is how the images Honor has published of its lab testing do not show this method being used. So with those facts in mind, I got measuring. I'll state up front that my calipers, while from the reputable brand iFixit, are perhaps not as accurate as more expensive models, such as the ones phone companies like Honor use for their official specs measurements. Nonetheless, from other measurements I've made with these calipers, I am confident that they are at least 99% accurate, and are at the very least capable of showing a size difference between our two foldables. I measured the two phones with the method given by Honor — it's only fair, after all. The Galaxy Z Fold 7 doesn't have a logo on the back to help judge its midpoint, but I made the best approximation I could, given its similar height and width to the Magic V5. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 Honor Magic V5 TG's measurement of thickness when folded 8.88mm 9.3mm My numbers are 0.08mm off the official figures for Samsung, and 0.5mm off for the Honor, making the Galaxy Z Fold 7 the thinner phone. I don't know what "appropriate thumb pressure" means precisely in Honor's statement, but it's an important detail. Putting pressure on the calipers allows you to get a smaller measurement as the object you're measuring flexes slightly, which applies all the more with foldable phones as there are two halves of the phone, plus the hinge, that can be squeezed tighter. Honor's official images of its size test don't appear to show the calipers under strain, with them only being held by one hand from the bottom of the ruler section. But given that calipers can be locked into place with the small screw on top of the display, we can't know for certain if there was any squeezing or not pre-photo. Annoyingly, I don't have any method of measuring or double-checking how much force I placed on the calipers to get the following measurements. The best I can do is describe the amount of force I applied, which I would call a press firm enough to leave a clean fingerprint in a thin piece of putty, or push open a door with just one thumb. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 Honor Magic V5 TG's measurement of thickness when folded (with pressure) 8.6mm 8.78mm Here, we finally hit Honor's promised 8.8mm figure, with a final last-minute measurement in fact going past the promised figure (though sadly off-camera). But any celebrations that Honor may now be planning will be cut short, as doing the same on the Samsung makes it sleeker yet again, a whole 0.3mm thinner than the official specs and 0.18mm thinner than the Magic V5. As we discussed before, these results could be due purely to the construction of the Magic V5 unit I had, but I suspect if it's happened to both my and Ice Universe's devices, it'll happen to many others. Before putting the phones away, I contacted Samsung, both to ask for its stance on the situation and for its official measuring standards for its devices, so we might compare the two foldables' size on its terms too. The company declined to comment. Despite the apparently conclusive evidence that the Magic V5 is not actually the thinnest book-style folding phone around, Honor seems to be sticking to its guns, and its official measurements. But now that I've seen the proof for myself that this claim is either inaccurate or comes with big caveats, I don't know why Honor's trying to power through like this. A device's thinness is an impressive and easy-to-grasp number, so I get why companies of all kinds like to talk about it in their marketing. But we are talking about the difference of about 40 micrometers - literally a couple hairs' thickness. There is so much more that Honor could sell the Magic V5 to people with beyond thinness. For instance, the V5's higher-res 50MP main and ultrawide cameras, its 64MP 3x telephoto camera, its huge 5,580 mAh battery or the faster 66W wired and 50W wireless charging standards. And if we're talking about deal breakers, the fact Honor doesn't sell in countries like the U.S. is going to be much more of a problem than its possibly imprecise measurements. As the global launch of the Magic V5 approaches, and we get closer to being able to fully review the phone, my anticipation isn't diminished by seeing it's slightly larger than the equivalent Samsung. As long as Honor doesn't make any other uncertain claims about the Magic V5's capabilities, it still stands a chance of making one of the best foldable phones around, and in ways that a rival phone maker can't just replicate or better immediately after. Follow Tom's Guide on Google News to get our up-to-date news, how-tos, and reviews in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button.

Samsung TV glitch locks users out of apps worldwide
Samsung TV glitch locks users out of apps worldwide

Android Authority

timean hour ago

  • Android Authority

Samsung TV glitch locks users out of apps worldwide

Samsung TVs seem to be facing a widespread issue where apps won't load properly. The problem appears to be affecting users globally. A Reddit thread with over 700 comments shows that many Samsung TV owners are unable to use any apps on their TVs. According to users, most apps, including popular ones like Netflix, YouTube, and Amazon Prime Video, are visible in the menu but won't open. Instead, they show a '202 error' message, which usually points to an internet issue. However, affected users say their internet connection is working just fine. One user said that after contacting Samsung support, they received the following message: We are aware of a potential disruption of service on your Samsung TV. Our engineers are currently working to restore service as soon as possible. At this time, no additional information can be provided by our representatives. We apologize for this inconvenience. Another user who tried resetting their TV ended up with no apps at all, as the TV couldn't download the terms and conditions due to server maintenance.

The top One UI 8 features that have eased my Samsung Galaxy experience
The top One UI 8 features that have eased my Samsung Galaxy experience

Digital Trends

time3 hours ago

  • Digital Trends

The top One UI 8 features that have eased my Samsung Galaxy experience

Samsung pulled an Apple earlier this year with the launch of its latest smartphone software. Merely weeks after Google introduced Android 16 ahead of its usual annual schedule, Samsung also dished out its next-gen One UI 8 software based on Android 16. At the moment, the software is limited to Samsung's seventh-generation foldable phones. I have been testing it for a couple of weeks now on the Galaxy Z Fold 7, and a few of the changes have stood out for me. Dive in to see what Samsung has fixed and lifted this year. The improved multi-tasking experience When it comes to multi-tasking, the One UI experience has remained one of the best out there historically. But as more form factors, such as foldable, evolved and Google started paying serious attention to large format screens with Android 12L, Samsung's software started to feel stagnant. Recommended Videos The likes of OnePlus surprised us with the handy Open Canvas system for split-screen multitasking on foldable phones, while Vivo delivered what appears to be a Stage Manager-like approach on its latest foldable phone. With One UI 8, Samsung is finally catching up. The change in question is a 90:10 split-screen format, and it's ideal for using two apps simultaneously on the cover screen. Simply put, when you split the screen across the interface of two apps, the secondary app window can be shrunk to such an extent that it only takes up a 10% portion of the screen alongside the top or the bottom edge of the screen. That leaves you with more space and an almost natural view for the foreground app. It is further helped by the fact that the Galaxy Z Fold 7's tall aspect ratio still keeps the slightly shrunk app window feel completely normal, without any weird UI distortion. More importantly, you don't have to adjust the horizontal divider bar every time you want to bring the secondary app into focus. You can simply tap on the bottom or top bar, and it will instantly take the center stage on the phone's screen. It's snappy, more convenient, and thoughtfully executed. I often run into scenarios where I have to reference information in one app and then feed into another. This approach lets me interact with either split-screen app in near full view on the Galaxy Z Fold 7's cover display without any odd cropping or crushed UI elements. A more convenient camera app There's a new trend in the smartphone world these days. Phones are getting slimmer and lighter. However, they are not necessarily getting smaller. The most noticeable downside of the latter trend? Well, to reach for items in the upper half of the screen, you really need to stretch your thumb, use the other hand, or adjust the phone in your hand twice. The situation gets worse with the camera app, which needs as much space for the viewfinder as possible, especially if you are shooting in 9:16 or full-screen view. Now, imagine taking a picture when the phone is unfolded and it's being used in a tablet-like view. Well, Samsung has finally addressed that aching conundrum. So far, flicking on the viewfinder area switches between the front and rear sensor in the camera app. Now, you can customize this flick gesture to open the core camera controls and adjustment tools. Technically, these tools are still located in the upper right corner of the screen, and are still difficult to reach one-handed. But now, you can simply flick on the screen and bring them down as a sliding carousel, right above the shutter button. You can now easily toggle the flash, enable timer, change aspect ratio, adjust the resolution, change exposure settings, pick between photo styles, and do more. Even the Settings section shortcut is pulled down, letting users quickly dig into the hub. File sharing is easier Whether you have experienced the convenience of AirDrop, or not, sharing and receiving files on Android remains a hassle. Over the years, Android's Quick Share has landed some upgrades (and a rebranding, too), but it's nowhere near as seamless as Apple's wireless file sharing system. In One UI 8, Samsung has completely overhauled the user interface for Quick Share. There are now prominent Received and Send buttons at the bottom. The sending page gets a cleaner interface for selecting files. Additionally, devices that you frequently share data with, appear in a dedicated carousel. So, if these devices are nearby, you no longer have to go through the find and scan hassle. Moreover, generating a QR code or URL link is now more easily accessible on the send page, whether it's a single file or a whole bundle. When receiving files, you just have to stay put in the Receive section of the app. When you're on the Receive page, the wireless connection lanes are automatically enabled, and depending on your visibility preference, the device will appear automatically on the sender's phone or tablet. In my experience, it has worked flawlessly atop One UI 8 each time I've attempted file transfer. As usual, if Bluetooth connectivity is not working, you can choose to share the files over the internet, as well, a process that would require Wi-Fi or cellular data. Alternatively, if you want to avoid accidentally sending a large cache of files and eating up your data limits, you can set up sharing to WiFi mode only.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store