Chancellor Rachel Reeves addresses tearful PMQs, saying 'When I'm having a tough day, it's on the telly'
Rachel Reeves told broadcasters: "Clearly I was upset yesterday and everyone could see that. It was a personal issue and I'm not going to go into the details of that.
"My job as chancellor at 12 o'clock on a Wednesday is to be at PMQs next to the prime minister, supporting the government, and that's what I tried to do.
"I guess the thing that maybe is a bit different between my job and many of your viewers' is that when I'm having a tough day it's on the telly and most people don't have to deal with that."
Politics latest: PM sets out 10-year NHS plan
She declined to give a reason behind the tears, saying "it was a personal issue" and "it wouldn't be right" to divulge it.
"People saw I was upset, but that was yesterday. Today's a new day and I'm just cracking on with the job," she added.
The chancellor's comments come after the prime minister told Sky News' political editor Beth Rigby that he "didn't appreciate" that she was crying behind him at Prime Minister's Questions yesterday because the weekly sessions are "pretty wild", which is why he did not offer her any support while in the chamber.
He added: "It wasn't just yesterday - no prime minister ever has had side conversations during PMQs. It does happen in other debates when there's a bit more time, but in PMQs, it is bang, bang, bang. That's what it was yesterday.
"And therefore, I was probably the last to appreciate anything else going on in the chamber, and that's just a straightforward human explanation, common sense explanation."
This breaking news story is being updated and more details will be published shortly.
Please refresh the page for the fullest version.
You can receive breaking news alerts on a smartphone or tablet via the Sky News app. You can also follow us on WhatsApp and subscribe to our YouTube channel to keep up with the latest news.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Judgment due in Palestine Action court bid for temporary block on terror ban
A High Court judge will give a decision on whether to grant a temporary block on banning Palestine Action as a terror group on Friday. Huda Ammori, the co-founder of Palestine Action, is asking the court to temporarily block the Government from banning the group as a terrorist organisation before a potential legal challenge against the decision to proscribe it under the Terrorism Act 2000. The move is to come into force at midnight after being approved by both the House of Commons and the House of Lords earlier this week, and would make membership and support for the direct action group a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison. The Home Office is opposing bids to delay the ban from becoming law, and the potential launch of a legal challenge against the decision. At the end of a hearing on Friday, Mr Justice Chamberlain said he 'realistically' planned to give his decision after 5.30pm. Lawyers for Ms Ammori said that if the temporary block was not granted, a bid to appeal against that decision could be made on Friday evening. During the hearing, Raza Husain KC, for Ms Ammori, told the London court that this would be the first time a 'direct action civil disobedience group, which does not advocate for violence, has been sought to be proscribed as terrorists'. He added that his client had been 'inspired' by a long history of direct action in the UK, 'from the suffragettes to anti-apartheid activists, to Iraq war activists'. Quoting Ms Ammori, the barrister said that the group had 'never encouraged harm to any person at all' and that its goal 'is to put ourselves in the way of the military machine'. He continued: 'We ask you, in the first instance, to suspend until July 21 what we say is an ill-considered, discriminatory and authoritarian abuse of statutory power which is alien to the basic tradition of the common law and is contrary to the Human Rights Act.' The hearing later in July is expected to deal with whether Ms Ammori can bring a High Court challenge over the planned proscription. Mr Husain later said that to proscribe an organisation, the Home Secretary 'has got to believe that the organisation is concerned in terrorism'. Some 81 organisations are already proscribed under the 2000 Act, including Hamas, al Qaida and National Action. Blinne Ni Ghralaigh KC, also representing Ms Ammori, told the court that if the ban came into effect the harm would be 'far-reaching', could cause 'irreparable harm to large numbers of members of the public', including causing some to 'self-censor'. The barrister named Normal People author Sally Rooney, who lives abroad and 'fears the ramifications for her, for her work, for her books, for her programmes' if she shows support for Palestine Action. 'Is the Prime Minister going to denounce her, an Irish artist, as a supporter of a proscribed organisation?' 'Will that have ramifications for her with the BBC, etc?' Ms Ni Ghralaigh asked. Ben Watson KC, for the Home Office, told the High Court there was an 'insuperable hurdle' in the bid to temporarily block the ban of Palestine Action. The barrister also said that if a temporary block was granted, it would be a 'serious disfigurement of the statutory regime'. He said Palestine Action could challenge the Home Secretary's decision at the Proscribed Organisations Appeal Commission, a specialist tribunal, rather than at the High Court. Friday's hearing comes after an estimated £7 million worth of damage was caused to two Voyager planes at RAF Brize Norton on June 20, in an action claimed by Palestine Action. The Home Secretary, Yvette Cooper, announced plans to proscribe Palestine Action on June 23, saying that the vandalism of the two planes was 'disgraceful' and that the group had a 'long history of unacceptable criminal damage'. Mr Justice Chamberlain said that an assessment on whether to ban the group had been made as early as March, and 'preceded' the incident at RAF Brize Norton. Four people were charged in connection with the incident.
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
A Major Currency Outpaces Bitcoin With More Possible Momentum Ahead: Macro Markets
Welcome to CoinDesk's weekly macro column, where analyst Omkar Godbole writes about his macro observations and analysis in the broader markets. The views expressed in this column aren't investment advice.A major currency pair, which is barely considered volatile, is now rivaling notoriously explosive bitcoin's price performance—unimaginable, right? Not anymore. In June, EUR/USD, the most liquid FX pair in the world, rose nearly 4% to 1.1786, outperforming bitcoin's (BTC) 2.4% gain. Remarkably, both assets are nearly neck and neck in year-to-date performance, each up over 13%. Some observers believe EUR/USD still has room to run higher, a positive sign for EUR-pegged stablecoins, which have already benefited from the single currency's surge. "EUR/USD could face resistance probably in the 1.22/1.23 area," Marc Ostwald, chief economist and global strategist at ADM Investor Services International, said, explaining that the focus is on Germany loosening its debt brake, which is seen as "growth positive by most people." The term U.S. exceptionalism—the relative attractiveness of dollar assets, underpinned by the fiscal spending of the Biden era—has historically helped the greenback. However, that story is now showing signs of reversal under President Donald Trump's second term. Concerns over widening budget deficits and soaring debt-servicing costs have sparked what some now describe as a budding "fiscal scare." Now, the exceptionalism narrative might be shifting to Germany. That's because early this year, Germany announced a landmark fiscal plan comprising an exemption of defence spending (over 1% of GDP) from the debt brake, a 500 billion euro infrastructure fund to be deployed over 12 years, and 100 billion of which will be immediately routed to the Climate Transition Fund. The remaining amount is for additional infrastructure investments, with 300 billion euros for the federal government and 100 billion euros for state governments. Lastly, the plan will allow state governments to run annual deficits of up to 0.35% of GDP. The fiscal package's direct impact on German GDP is expected to be felt from next year, and it's expected to be sticky beyond 2027, with positive spillover effects for other Eurozone nations. This is now changing the conversation to European assets, rather than U.S. "The initial condition was a huge overweight in USD and assets, but now it looks like portfolio allocation toward European equities, with Germany stepping up defence and infrastructure spending," Marc Chandler, chief market strategist at Bannockburn Capital Markets, said in an email. The focus on growth potential explains why the U.S.-German yield (rate) differential, as an indicator of exchange rate, has fallen to the back burner. The chart below shows that the historical positive correlation between EUR/USD and the two-year German-U.S. bond yield differential has broken down since late March. Moreover, higher yields in the U.S. no longer represent a positive economic outlook but are a necessity to fund deficits. "The dollar can seem to be decoupled from rates, but I think that another way to frame it is that the U.S. needs to offer a higher premium to compensate for the policy uncertainty and seeming desire for a weaker dollar," Chandler noted. A potential shift in the yield differential narrative is putting the euro back in the spotlight. Market participants are bracing for a return to fundamentals—particularly rate spreads—yet the outlook may not bode well for the greenback. "To some extent the rate differential outlook for EUR/USD is not favourable for the USD, if one assumes that the ECB is largely done with rate cuts (perhaps one more), while the Fed could well cut rates up to 125 bps over the next 12-18 months, if U.S. growth continues to be sluggish," ADM's Ostwald said. The European Central Bank (ECB) has delivered eight quarter-point cuts in a year, yet the euro has rallied against the U.S. dollar. From here on, the focus will be on potential Federal Reserve rate cuts. So far, Powell has held rates steady at 4.25% despite President Trump's repeated calls for ultra-low borrowing costs. In other words, the rate differential is likely to widen in favor of the EUR. Historically, the USD has offered a natural hedge to foreign investors in U.S. stocks. So naturally, as the positive correlation between U.S. stocks and the dollar has broken, European pension funds—which account for nearly half of foreign holdings in U.S. equities—and other investors are forced to increase their FX hedging to protect portfolio returns against dollar weakness. According to market observers, this FX hedging strategy could continue to propel the euro higher in the near term. Let's put the hedging strategy in context. Imagine a European fund with $10,000 worth of investments in the U.S. If the US dollar (USD) gets weaker compared to the euro (EUR), the fund's investment loses value when converted back to euros. To hedge against this currency risk, the fund might consider hedging part of that investment by taking short bets on the dollar via forwards, futures or options, adding to the dollar's bearish momentum. "Using the monthly Danish pension flow data as a European proxy, April saw a spike higher in the FX hedging ratio from 61% in January to 74% in April. We've seen 80% levels before, so there is room for higher and also more consistent FX hedging for all European investors, that will naturally see EUR selloffs on newsflow faded on a day-to-day basis until that flow peaks. We're not there yet, but we're a lot closer," Jordan Rochester, head of FICC strategy at Mizhou, recently explained in a LinkedIn post. According to Financial Analyst Enric A., fewer than 20% of European institutions currently hedge their USD exposure, and they will have to do more to stabilize portfolios, which might lead to further USD bearish momentum. "Higher hedge ratios = more EUR buying, more USD selling," Enric said on LinkedIn. And to top it off, hedging by other regions' funds may have had the same effect. Chandler cited BIS data while highlighting hedging by Asian funds. Bottom line: As macro narratives shift toward potential U.S. Fed easing and hedging dynamics exert pressure on the greenback, EUR/USD may remain buoyant despite eurozone growth in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Egypt says Ethiopia's completed power-generating dam lacks a legally binding agreement
CAIRO (AP) — Egypt said Friday that Ethiopia has consistently lacked the political will to reach a binding agreement on its now-complete dam, an issue that involves Nile River water rights and the interests of Egypt and Sudan. Ethiopia's prime minister said Thursday that the country's power-generating dam, known as the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam, on the Nile is now complete and that the government is 'preparing for its official inauguration' in September. Egypt has long opposed the construction of the dam, because it would reduce the country's share of Nile River waters, which it almost entirely relies on for agriculture and to serve its more than 100 million people. The more than the $4 billion dam on the Blue Nile near the Sudan border began producing power in 2022. It's expected to eventually produce more than 6,000 megawatts of electricity — double Ethiopia's current output. Ethiopia and Egypt have spent years trying to reach an agreement over the dam, which Ethiopia began building in 2011. At one point, tensions ran so high that some feared the dispute would escalate to war. Both countries reached no deal despite negotiations over 13 years, and it remains unclear how much water Ethiopia will release downstream in case of a drought. Egyptian officials, in a statement, called the completion of the dam 'unlawful' and said that it violates international law, reflecting 'an Ethiopian approach driven by an ideology that seeks to impose water hegemony' instead of equal partnership. 'Egypt firmly rejects Ethiopia's continued policy of imposing a fait accompli through unilateral actions concerning the Nile River, which is an international shared watercourse,' Egypt's Ministry of Water Resources and Irrigation said in a statement Friday. Ethiopian Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed, in his address to lawmakers Thursday, said that his country 'remains committed to ensuring that our growth does not come at the expense of our Egyptian and Sudanese brothers and sisters.' 'We believe in shared progress, shared energy, and shared water,' he said. 'Prosperity for one should mean prosperity for all.' However, the Egyptian water ministry said Friday that Ethiopian statements calling for continued negotiations 'are merely superficial attempts to improve its image on the international stage.' 'Ethiopia's positions, marked by evasion and retreat while pursuing unilateralism, are in clear contradiction with its declared willingness to negotiate,' the statement read. However, Egypt is addressing its water needs by expanding agricultural wastewater treatment and improving irrigation systems, according to the ministry, while also bolstering cooperation with Nile Basin countries through backing development and water-related projects. The Associated Press Sign in to access your portfolio
