logo
‘Not my car': Elite school grad's callous statement after fatal crash that killed grandmother, 72

‘Not my car': Elite school grad's callous statement after fatal crash that killed grandmother, 72

News.com.au21-07-2025
A former elite private school graduate whose 'reprehensible' driving killed a beloved grandmother in a horrific crash made a bizarre statement to witnesses before fleeing to hide in a muddy drain.
Andrew Julian Stewart-Smith, 29, was behind the wheel of a Holden Commodore when he killed Yrsa Christoffersen, 72, after ploughing into her Suzuki Swift in Kippa Ring, north of Brisbane, in September 2023.
Devastated members of the Christoffersen family packed out Brisbane Supreme Court on Monday as Stewart-Smith – a former graduate of the elite Nudgee College in Boondall – learnt his fate.
In a heartbreaking statement, Ms Christoffersen's daughter Maria remembered her mother as the 'kindest person' she had ever known and the morning of her death was meant to be a normal morning 'like any other'.
'The next thing I knew, I woke up in a hospital bed, feeling pain like I had never known,' she said.
'I remember asking where my mum was, and they wouldn't tell me.
'The way they looked at me though, I knew. I could see it on their faces.'
Maria said she felt like her 'world had been shattered' upon learning her mother had died.
The court was told her recovery in hospital was difficult and she was left unable to chew food for weeks due to her fractured jaw.
'I still feel the effects today, some days I can't move the way I used to,' Maria said.
'Mum's death was sudden, violent and unexpected.
'I will always miss her. I'm trying to move forward, but it's hard. It's a daily struggle.'
She questioned whether Stewart-Smith would ever take responsibility for his actions or continue to cause 'more pain' – to which the 29-year-old did not react.
The court was told Stewart-Smith was seen driving erratically – at times swerving between cars and failing to give way – while reaching speeds of more than 100km/h on the morning of September 22, 2023.
At one point, he pulled over on the side of the road and stole number plates to attach to the Holden.
Ms Christoffersen was driving her daughter Maria to work and turning at the intersection of Anzac Ave and Oleander St in Kippa Ring.
Crown prosecutor Jordan Daniels said Stewart-Smith braked but collided with the Suzuki at up to 114km/h, throwing it into the air.
He fled the scene while telling bystanders: 'You don't understand, it's not my car.'
Ms Christoffersen was declared deceased at the scene, while Maria was taken to hospital with serious injuries.
Police located Stewart-Smith several hours later in a storm drain, covered in mud in a bid to conceal himself.
When searched, police located clip-seal bags containing methylamphetamine and texts on his phone indicating he supplied the drugs a week before.
More than 300 animated child exploitation images were also found on his phone.
The court was told Maria would have been left with lifelong issues with her jaw – which left her unable to properly eat for weeks – without surgery.
Justice Tom Sullivan said Stewart-Smith's conduct was 'reprehensible' and made worse by his traffic history, which was littered with speeding offences.
Stewart-Smith pleaded guilty in March to charges of dangerous operation of a vehicle causing death and grievous bodily harm while excessively speeding and leaving the scene of a crash without obtaining help, supplying and possessing dangerous drugs and possessing child exploitation material.
He also pleaded guilty to other charges of stealing, unlawful use of motor vehicles and failing to remain at the scene of an incident and render assistance as a driver.
Stewart-Smith expressed remorse to the family in a letter and was experiencing 'nightmares' of what happened that day while in custody.
Defence barrister Angus Edwards said his client had 'tried to make amends' through courses, isolating himself from anti-social prisoners
'He is ashamed of what he did that day,' Mr Edwards said.
'He wasn't out to hurt anybody that day, but he did.
'He's out to change.'
The court was told Stewart-Smith had developed a drug problem after his substance use as a teenager.
Mr Edwards explained his client was drug-affected when he downloaded the images subject to the child exploitation material charge.
Justice Sullivan will sentence Stewart-Smith later in the afternoon.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Former AFL player reportedly tested positive to performance enhancing substance
Former AFL player reportedly tested positive to performance enhancing substance

News.com.au

time6 hours ago

  • News.com.au

Former AFL player reportedly tested positive to performance enhancing substance

A former AFL player reportedly tested positive for a performance-enhancing substance while playing in a lower-level competition following the end of his professional career. The player, who finished his AFL career in 2023, has this year been placed under provisional suspension, per Code Sports. It's understood the player tested positive while playing in a lower-level league last year, and despite having put an end to his professional career by that stage, could still be tested under the AFL's Anti-Doping Code within 12 months of his AFL exit. FOX FOOTY, available on Kayo Sports, is the only place to watch every match of every round in the 2025 Toyota AFL Premiership Season LIVE in 4K, with no ad-breaks during play. New to Kayo? Get your first month for just $1. Limited-time offer. The report elected not to name the player in question. The player's test was undertaken by Sport Integrity Australia; the governing body, formerly known as ASADA, which aims to preserve fairness at all levels of Australian sport. Under the AFL Anti-Doping Code, if a player intentionally takes a prohibited substance to gain an advantage, they are subject to a maximum ban of four years. Local leagues, including the state competitions, are held to the same rules. In late 2024, ex-Melbourne player Joel Smith was suspended four years by SIA for cocaine use and trafficking after turning up a positive result on a matchday test in August 2023. But unlike Smith's circumstances, Niall reports the unnamed player in question's alleged breach was 'for a substance that is banned both in and outside the competition'. He noted also that positive results for performance-enhancing drugs were 'extremely rare' in the AFL, as cases of positive tests for illicit substances are more common. Then-Collingwood players Josh Thomas and Lachie Keeffe copped two-year bans in 2015 after testing positive for performance-enhancing drugs. The 'Essendon 34' that were banned for the 2016 season after four years' worth of investigation did not return positive tests for a banned substance but rather were suspended on circumstantial evidence they were administered with a banned substance.

Court's stunning apology to South Australian MP over blackmail charges
Court's stunning apology to South Australian MP over blackmail charges

News.com.au

time7 hours ago

  • News.com.au

Court's stunning apology to South Australian MP over blackmail charges

A South Australian court has apologised for a system error which logged a guilty finding against an ex-MP who was accused of blackmailing Premier Peter Malinauskas. Annabel Digance is suing Mr Malinauskas for damages, claiming he orchestrated a 'malicious prosecution' against her to further his own political ambitions and crush a parliamentary inquiry into alleged bullying in the Labor Party. During a hearing in the South Australian Supreme Court in late July, Justice Graham Dart told the court that Ms Digance and her husband Greg had been found guilty of blackmailing Mr Malinauskas. The court was told their charges were later dropped, according to court records. Ms Digance and her husband Greg were charged with blackmailing Mr Malinauskas in 2021. The SA Courts Administration Authority (CAA) said in a statement on Tuesday that neither Ms or Mr Digance had been found guilty. The court said that in April 2023 a nolle prosequi order was made, meaning the prosecution was abandoned. 'There were no orders made which involved a finding of guilt against either of the defendants,' the court said in a statement. The court said that a document which stated that a finding of guilt had been made was 'generated in error and is incorrect'. 'The CAA unreservedly apologises to the parties for this error,' the court said in a statement. 'The CAA will review all court matters with orders made in the same circumstances to ensure that court records are accurate. 'The CAA will also commission an external assurance review into this matter.' In Ms Digance's statement of claim in her civil lawsuit, she argued that her arrest and prosecution caused 'injury, loss, damage and harm' and that Mr Malinauskas conspired with the SA Police to pursue her. She is suing both the premier and the State of South Australia and is seeking $2.3m in damages. The matter is scheduled to return to court in September.

Cop's courtroom grope dismissed as ‘joke'
Cop's courtroom grope dismissed as ‘joke'

News.com.au

time8 hours ago

  • News.com.au

Cop's courtroom grope dismissed as ‘joke'

EXCLUSIVE A police prosecutor who was found to have harassed a female court officer while working inside a courtroom has been cleared of all charges, on the basis that the act could have been 'a joke'. SA Police officer Greg Hill, 62, was charged with aggravated indecent assault after he was reported for 'tickling' the left buttock of the court officer after she called him into a courtroom in 2022. The woman was working as a court officer, which ensures the smooth running of the court and includes letting lawyers know when they are required in the courtroom. The woman told police she was holding the door open for Mr Hill when he 'touched her left buttock'. She described the touch as 'feeling his fingers move in a tickling movement'. 'It made her angry as he had no permission to touch her,' the court heard. She told police she said to him: 'I wouldn't be doing anything like that to me if I were you' to which Mr Hill 'stepped back and laughed'. She then said: 'I'm serious, I'll have you for sexual harassment' before Mr Hill replied: 'I don't know whether to take you seriously or not'. The incident was captured on CCTV and showed that Mr Hill had his fingers 'curled' and that 'movement of his fingers was consistent with a tickling motion'. The magistrate was 'satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt' that Mr Hill 'deliberately tickled [the woman's] left buttock, it could not be proven that he did so for 'sexual gratification or [to] cause sexual humiliation.' The magistrate said that while the 'harassing, unacceptable and disrespectful' act amounted to 'unwanted touching' - the element of indecency could not be proven. 'It was just as likely the action was a joke or ill-conceived gesture,' the magistrate said. 'There was no suggestion of any flirting behaviour by the defendant. The touch was not accompanied by any comment or other behaviour.' He was found not guilty and acquitted of the charge. The matter was put before the SA Supreme Court last week after the Commissioner of Police appealed against the acquittal. Supreme Court Justice Laura Stein dismissed the appeal on Thursday, finding the magistrate did not err in finding a 'failure to establish sexual intention'. 'Regardless of that conclusion, I reiterate the Magistrate's comments that the behaviour was harassing, unacceptable, inappropriate and should not have occurred,' Justice Stein said in her decision.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store