Piedmont power line company heads to court, as landowners refuse access for property surveys
Opponents of the Maryland Piedmont Reliability Project, a proposed power transmission line through Central Maryland, protested last summer in Frederick, outside an unrelated conference on the data center industry. (File photo by Josh Kurtz/Maryland Matters)
More than 100 property owners in Central Maryland have refused to let power company PSEG onto their land to survey for the proposed Piedmont power line project, the company said in a legal filing Tuesday.
In a 53-page filing with the U.S. District Court for Maryland — at least 14 pages of which is a listing of defendants — the New Jersey-based company is seeking an order that would let it access the properties with a minimum of 24 hours notice, and prohibit the property owners from interfering.
In its filing, the company said that despite 'numerous real and bona fide efforts' to obtain consent from landowners, each has refused.
'Despite our efforts to engage with property owners and even offer reasonable compensation, we have been unable to gain voluntary access from a sufficient number of property owners that will allow us to conduct these environmental surveys,' PSEG said in an April 9 public statement, which also warned that lawsuits could be coming.
The company said it had offered financial compensation to landowners who allowed temporary access for the 'noninvasive environmental surveys.' But it said in the filing that an 'organized and funded opposition, led by STOP MPRP, Inc.' has 'urged property owners to refuse the Company access.'
The group was convened last year, after community members first learned of the power line project, known as the Maryland Piedmont Reliability Project — and grew concerned that the 67-mile power transmission line would destroy tracts of rural land in Baltimore, Carroll and Frederick counties.
The all-volunteer organization is funded entirely by donations and membership payments, said Joanne Frederick, a co-founder and president of the board of directors.
As demand for AI rises, so do power-thirsty data centers
'People have the right to say no when someone wants to come on their land,' Frederick said. 'And as an organization, we made people aware of their rights to say no.'
Frederick called Tuesday's court filing from PSEG 'another attack' on local landowners, who were startled to learn of PSEG's plans for the line, and the possibility that it could use eminent domain to acquire land.
'PSEG wants to come onto peoples' properties to do surveys, so they can use that information to strengthen their application to then later come and take our land,' Frederick said. 'Do we, as landowners, have to make it easier for someone to take our land?'
STOP MPRP said Wednesday evening that it had retained legal counsel 'to advise our organization on the best course of action to support our members and affected landowners,' and it urged Gov. Wes Moore (D) to issue a public statement in support of the landowners.
Frederick said distrust for PSEG abounds in the community, and some residents are concerned that the surveys could do damage to their properties — or that the data gathered could be distorted to suit PSEG's needs.
PSEG is completing the surveying — including forest, wetland and sensitive species assessments — as part of its application before the Maryland Public Service Commission for the power line, filed in December. The commission, which regulates utilities in the state, must issue a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity before the project can go forward.
Only after PSC approval could the company seek to use eminent domain. In a prior public statement, the company called it an 'option of last resort,' adding that it would only be used 'to maintain reliable electric infrastructure for all Marylanders.'
The transmission line was commissioned by PJM Interconnection, the electric grid operator serving Maryland and 12 other states, as well as Washington, DC. It would connect a Baltimore Gas & Electric right-of-way in northern Baltimore County to the Doubs Substation in Frederick County.
PJM has said that it commissioned the Piedmont line, along with other transmission projects, to account for increased energy demand, including from power-hungry data centers like the ones in Northern Virginia, and the loss of energy supply thanks to retiring fossil fuel generators.
In its legal filing, PSEG said it is obligated, under an agreement with PJM, to bring the power line into service by June 2027, and to do so, it must begin construction by January 2026.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
If the court does not grant access for the surveying, PSEG would be forced to redraw the power line route, and resubmit its application with the Maryland PSC, the company said. But a different route may not change the outcome, because of the significant community pushback, PSEG said.
'Based on public comments and correspondence the Company has received to date, it is likely that the Company would encounter additional opposition with any alternative proposed line,' reads the lawsuit. 'This, in turn, would likely put the Company in exactly the same position in which it finds itself now: seeking Court intervention.'
So far, PSEG has paid nearly $1.6 million to siting and environmental consultants, and $1.3 million to a real estate firm helping contact relevant property owners, according to the company's lawsuit. Resubmitting an application would likely require the company to incur those fees all over again, and jeopardize the project's timeline, the suit stated.
Frederick said that PSEG is essentially 'asking landowners to either give up and just allow this to happen, or hire what could be very costly attorneys to protect their own land rights,' adding that the impacted property owners include elderly individuals, and some who have never been involved in legal proceedings before.
'We're standing together. People are resolute. I do not believe that this latest foray will suddenly cause people to just give up,' Frederick said.
Frederick, who lives on a farm property impacted by the route, said she is one of the landowners who was sued earlier this week. If the power line is constructed, she said that she stands to lose about 5 acres of forest on her property, which contains conservation and forest buffer easements.
She purchased the property in 2020. It was a one-time dairy farm, once owned by her great-grandparents, that was sold out of the family in 2004 and fell into disrepair. For the past five years, Frederick said she has been working to restore the farm and her family's legacy.
But PSEG's project threatens to upend that, she said. That's why she has thrown herself into the opposition effort, she said.
'It has been all-consuming,' Frederick said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNBC
25 minutes ago
- CNBC
Two aerospace stocks are deeply overbought and could be due for a pullback
GE Aerospace and Howmet Aerospace are vulnerable to pullbacks after entering deep overbought territory this week. Each stock climbed more than 3% this week, outperforming the S & P 500 's 1.5% gain in the same period. The stocks have come so far so fast that now GE Aerospace and Howmet have the two highest 14-day relative strength index, or RSI, readings in the S & P 500. CNBC Pro used its stock screener tool available for subscribers to find the most oversold stocks as measured by the 14-day RSI. Stocks that have a 14-day RSI above 70 are viewed as overbought, leaving them susceptible to a decline, while those a 14-day RSI below 30 are often thought of as oversold, suggesting they may see a bounce. GE Aerospace has now risen for nine straight weeks, while Howmet has advanced for seven. GE Aerospace is ahead more than 53% year to date, while Howmet is up more than 60%. While the typical analyst polled by LSEG has buy ratings on both companies, the consensus 12-month price target foresees more than 5% downside for each stock over the next year following these big runs. Here's the full list of S & P 500 stocks with the highest 14-day RSIs, along with what Wall Street thinks of them, according to LSEG data as of Friday morning: At the other extreme, Brown-Forman is the most oversold name in the S & P 500 with a 14-day RSI below 22. Shares of the Jack Daniel's whiskey distiller tumbled nearly 16% this week. Much of the decline came after Brown-Forman posted revenue and net income for its fiscal fourth quarter that missed analysts' consensus forecasts, according to consensus LSEG numbers. The Louisville-based company said it was operating in an "exceptionally challenging macroeconomic environment." The stocks has slumped 37% in the past six months and is on pace to record its fifth consecutive down year. Although Wall Street analysts rate Brown-Forman no more than a collective "hold," the consensus 12-month price target as compiled by LSEG suggests shares may rally 35%. Brown-Forman also has a dividend yield of 3.32%. Here are the other stocks with 14-day RSIs below 30, along with what Wall Street sees for them:
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Newspaper seeks public release of Centennial Park feasibility study
Niagara Falls City Council Chairman Jim Perry has talked with Mayor Robert Restaino about the unreleased feasibility study for the proposed Centennial Park arena and events campus and said he's encouraged by what he's been told about it so far. In response to questions from the Niagara Gazette on Thursday, Perry did not say whether he would support releasing the study to the public in response to a Freedom of Information Law request filed by the newspaper. Instead, Perry said he spoke to city attorney Tom DeBoy who acknowledged receipt of the newspaper's formal request for the document and was assured that the city's legal department is working on it. 'I'm not part of that process, but (DeBoy) assured me it's being done,' Perry said on Thursday. Restaino confirmed in an interview with the members of the local press on May 13 that he received what he described as an incomplete version of the study, which was prepared by the private Florida-based consulting firm Sports Facilities Advisory, LLC at a cost of $140,000, plus expenses. While he has since indicated that the study results support the city building Centennial Park, he has declined to release the contents publicly. In an interview with the Gazette earlier this week, Restaino said he intends to do so by the end of the month after the results are shared with 'stakeholders,' namely representatives from New York's lead economy development agency Empire State Development Corp. and National Grid, the two entities that covered the city's cost for the study. 'One of the things we will do is meet with the stakeholders who paid for the study and show it to them,' Restaino told the Gazette in an interview earlier this week. 'And then we'll release it to the public. This month everything is going to be out in the open.' During an appearance on Monday on 'Your Community Accountability with Sam and Jon,' a Falls-based social media program aired on Facebook and YouTube, Perry said he has had a 'lot of discussions about it' and that it 'looks positive.' On Thursday, Perry told the newspaper he hadn't seen the study but had talked to the mayor about it. 'I can't share everything because this will be up to the mayor to unveil, but this project should be one of the more positive advancements to our local economy I've seen in my 70-plus years here in the city if everything falls into place,' Perry said. On Thursday, the newspaper filed a formal Freedom of Information request with the city's legal department and clerk's office, requesting a copy of the study from Restaino's administration. The newspaper's request cited two opinions from the New York State Committee on Open Government that indicate state law allows public agencies to release documents in their possession even in instances where they are considered to be drafts or incomplete. 'Draft records are subject to FOIL,' said Paul Wolf, a Williamsville attorney and founder of the government transparency group, the New York Coalition for Open Government. The city clerk's office acknowledged the newspaper's request on Thursday afternoon. Under state law, public agencies are allowed up to 20 business days to either grant or deny requests for information. In its initial response, the city clerk's office indicated that should 'circumstances arise' that prevent the delivery of a response within 20 business, the newspaper would be contacted with a 'new response date.' 'Examples of circumstances that may lead to extended response times include staff shortages, requests for a large volume of records and requests that require significant document redaction and/or seek documents that are not maintained electronically,' the response from the clerk's office notes. The results of the feasibility study are expected to more clearly define elements of the Centennial Park project and shed light on whether it would, as proposed, be viable in the Falls. A previous arena study, commissioned by Niagara County in 2017, concluded that the city lacked a sufficient number of hotel rooms needed to support such a project at that time. City officials, including Restaino and Perry, are seeking to acquire, using the city's power of eminent domain, 10 acres of land currently owned by the private firm Niagara Falls Redevelopment for the purposes of building Centennial Park. The courts have sided with the city's argument that it has the right to forcibly acquire the property — located off John B. Daly Boulevard at the intersection of 10th and Falls streets — for the purposes of developing the 'park.' The city is currently engaged in litigation, arguing that 5 of those 10 acres are actually still owned by the city as NFR failed, more than a decade ago, to properly obtain permission from the state to annex what was at the time public parkland formerly known as 10th Street park. NFR is disputing the city's position in court. The company also insists it intends to use the 10 acres for the first phase of a project of its own, a proposed $1.5 billion data center it says it intends to build in partnership with the Canadian firm, Urbacon. During his interview on Sam Archie's social media program on Monday, Perry backed the city's position that the city, not NFR, owns the 5 acres because it was formerly public parkland that was never properly acquired by the company. He said he agrees with the city's position based on maps and other documents that show the area in question was a public park dating back to the 1940s. 'A park is a park forever until you get that it is no longer parkland by permission from the state,' he said. 'When it was transferred over, those papers were never filed,' he added. 'You can argue all you want, that is still a park. Unless it's done legally, there is no claim to it.' As to NFR — a company owned by the Milstein family of real estate developers in New York City — Perry said the city has heard 30 years of promises and stories from the company with no tangible results. He also said there 'is no two solutions,' a reference to what some residents and officials have suggested could be a compromise that would allow both projects to happen. 'The convention center is real,' Perry said, referring to Centennial Park, 'and I know that because I've been working on issues and I've been talking to people. The data center, to me, is another pie in the sky.' 'If we gave this fight up tomorrow, (and said), 'OK, you guys can have the park, we'll do the paperwork and turn it over to you.' Let them have it, turn it over to NFR, all the stuff, you know what's going to happen? They are going to say, 'Well, you took so long Urbacon's not interested in it anymore' because that's the M.O.' Perry did concede in his interview with show host Sam Archie that, if the city is successful in its claim for the 5 acres, it may be required to reimburse NFR for taxes paid on the property in the past. 'I would assume that is correct,' Perry said.
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
State Thruway Authority OKs added funds for firm handling Seneca Nation lawsuit
ALBANY — New York State Thruway Authority officials have agreed to increase by $1 million the payment cap on a contract with the Buffalo-based law firm that is representing the public agency in an ongoing legal dispute with the Seneca Nation of Indians. During a meeting on Tuesday, members of the authority's board of directors unanimously authorized an amendment to an existing contract with Nixon Peabody that will raise the maximum amount payable to the law firm to $1.8 million. The authority's original 2022 agreement capped the amount to be paid to Nixon Peabody at $800,000. The resolution supporting the move notes that Nixon Peabody has provided 'substantial services' pertaining to ongoing litigation involving the Seneca Nation. Seneca leaders filed a lawsuit in 2018 claiming that the state agency failed to obtain the necessary federal approvals for an easement that has allowed the thruway to run through the tribe's Cattaraugus territory for decades. The Nation's lawsuit seeks to compel the state authority to obtain a new easement or compensate the Nation for tolls collected from motorists using the authority on reservation land. It also seeks to end toll collection along the roughly 3-mile section of the thruway, which is about 30 miles south of Buffalo. In 2023, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second District allowed the lawsuit to continue after it rejected an attempt by the state to have it dismissed. The decision upheld a 2020 U.S. District Court ruling. The resolution supporting the pay increase for Nixon Peabody notes that the law firm has provided 'substantial services' pertaining to the litigation over the easement while also serving as bond counsel for authority debt transactions that are reimbursable by the state. The resolution describes the Seneca litigation as 'complex' while indicating that there is also a 'continued need for support' with the authority's state debt transactions.
