
Projects in Great Nicobar Islands have strategic importance. The government, thus, must address transparency concerns
The HPC has reportedly concluded that the environmental clearances accorded to the project 'adhered to statutory provisions'. The government has, however, not made the panel's report public. Keeping information classified is, of course, necessary at times in matters involving strategic affairs. But in an ecologically fragile region with a vulnerable local population, a project to create a formidable maritime bastion requires engagement with all sections of society. The government's insistence on secrecy will do more harm than good, especially because the lack of transparency around due procedures was a major sticking point with civil society activists. The government has reportedly also wielded the RTI Act's provisions on security and strategic concerns to deny right to information requests about environmental clearances. In March, it used an equally unconvincing argument — the matter is sub judice — to evade a Rajya Sabha question on the red flags raised by the NGT and National Commission for Scheduled Tribes about the project's impact on local communities. Two months later, Union Minister of Tribal Affairs Jual Oram said that the government was examining the concerns raised by tribal communities, but again refused to divulge details. The Andaman and Nicobar Islands Integrated Development Corporation Limited, which is in charge of the infrastructure development activities, claims that its wildlife conservation plan (WCP) is derived from a framework developed by scientists at the Salim Ali Centre for Ornithology. But the WCP, too, is not in the public domain.
Delhi has taken more than 70 years to recognise the strategic importance of the Andaman and Nicobar Islands. It now needs to set the record right on transparency — a project of national importance cannot be clouded with misgivings.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Ludhiana: Residents' body moves NGT against Punjab govt's order
The Public Action Committee (PAC) has approached the National Green Tribunal (NGT) against the Punjab Government's order seeking ₹356 crore from the Forest Department and the Punjab Pollution Control Board (PPCB). The committee said the move violates Supreme Court orders, the Compensatory Afforestation Act 2016, NGT directions, and guidelines of the Union ministry of environment, Forest and climate change (MoEFCC). The dispute arose after a meeting on August 7, chaired by the chief secretary, where various departments were directed to transfer ₹ 1,440 crore to the state's finance department. (HT Photo) The dispute arose after a meeting on August 7, chaired by the chief secretary, where various departments were directed to transfer ₹1,440 crore to the state's finance department. This included ₹84 crore from the Forest Department, ₹44 crore from the sale of fallen trees and ₹40 crore from unused land acquisition funds and ₹250 crore from PPCB's non-NGT funds. The Department of Environment was also asked to deposit ₹22 crore from Mission Tandarust Punjab. PAC members Kuldeep Singh Khaira and Jaskirat Singh said that under the law, Forest Department funds can only be used for activities such as compensatory afforestation, forest protection, wildlife management, and development of forest-related infrastructure. Similarly, PPCB, being an autonomous body, holds funds collected from environmental compensation, National Clean Air Programme grants, and fees from industries for consents, all of which are meant strictly for environmental protection and restoration. Environmental activists Kapil Arora added that diverting such funds for non-environmental purposes undermines sustainable development. They pointed out that environmental challenges in Punjab, including polluted water bodies, mismanaged legacy waste, and worsening air quality already require urgent attention and adequate resources. PAC members Gurpreet Plaha and Vikas Arora alleged that the state government has often sided with polluters and failed to act against violations, prioritising revenue over environmental health. 'Now, by targeting environmental funds, the government is further risking Punjab's ecological future,' they said. The PAC has urged the NGT to quash the order and restrain the Punjab government from making such demands in the future, calling the move 'unwarranted' and harmful to the state's environmental interests.


Time of India
8 hours ago
- Time of India
NGT seeks state's reply on Doon Valley plan change with removed eco safeguards
Dehradun: The (NGT) gas directed the state govt and central agencies to respond to a petition alleging that the May 13, 2025, Doon Valley Notification diluted earlier environmental safeguards and transferred full control over development plans to the state. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The notification amended the original Feb 1, 1989, order, issued under a Supreme Court judgment in Rural Litigation and Entitlement Kendra & Ors v State of UP & Ors. (1988), which had declared Doon Valley an ecologically sensitive area and mandated special protection. The plea, filed by Dev Bhoomi Manav Sansadhan Vikas Samiti, said the 2025 amendment gave the state complete authority over the tourism plan, grazing plan, master plan of development, and land use plan without central govt oversight. "It destroys the very essence of the notification... it allows all the industries to work in the area," the petition said. The 1989 notification required the state to prepare these plans and secure approval from the Union ministry of environment, forests and climate change (MoEFCC). The petition also referred to a plea filed in Uttarakhand high court in June 2025 that described the amendment as a move "failing the original motive of the notification of 1989" by enabling unrestricted industrial activity in the ecologically sensitive zone. NGT also asked the Uttarakhand Pollution Control Board (UKPCB), MoEFCC and Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) to file replies. The petitioner's counsel argued that the amendment effectively removed the safeguards of the 1989 notification, which ensured that tourism, grazing, and land use were regulated according to centrally approved plans. As per the amended notification, all such plans will now be prepared and approved by a competent authority within the state govt. The petition claimed this change went against a Sept 6, 2023, Uttarakhand high court order that criticised the state's "policy to commercialise the hills" and observed there was "very little emphasis on actual preservation and protection of the environment." The court had directed the state to prepare tourism and grazing plans for MoEFCC's approval and maintain strict adherence to centrally vetted plans. The NGT, in its Aug 5, 2025, order, reiterated these concerns and issued notices under environmental statutes, requiring the state, MoEFCC, UKPCB and CPCB to submit their responses by Sept 19, 2025.
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
10 hours ago
- First Post
National Sports Governance Bill 2025: BCCI escaping RTI Act and other key takeaways from landmark act
Union Sports Minister Mansukh Mandaviya hailed the National Sports Governance Bill 2025 and National Anti-Doping (Amendment) Bill 2025 as the 'single biggest reform in Indian sports since independence', with both getting passed in the Lok Sabha on Monday. read more Union Sports Minister Mansukh Mandaviya passed the National Sports Governance Bill 2025 as well as the National Anti-Doping (Amendment) Bill, 2025 in the Lok Sabha on Monday, 11 August. PTI In a landmark moment for Indian sport, the National Sports Governance Bill was passed in the Lok Sabha on Monday, nearly three weeks after it was introduced in the lower house of the Parliament. The law was hailed as the 'single biggest reform in Indian sports since independence' by Union Sports Minister Mansukh Mandaviya amid protests from the Opposition over the revision of electoral rolls in Bihar. Also introduced on the same day was the National Anti-Doping (Amendment) Bill, 2025, after the Lok Sabha reassembled at 2 pm after an early adjournment due to the protests. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD So what exactly are the two sports bills passed in Monday all about? Here's are some of the key features: BCCI remains immune to RTI Act The spotlight was firmly on the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI), which is the weathiest cricket board in the world and sports organisation in India, when the National Sports Governance Bill was introduced in the Lok Sabha last month. The big question at the time was whether the BCCI would finally come under the ambit of the RTI Act in order to become more transparent and accountable. Though the BCCI's functioning will be monitored by the National Sports Board, the wealth Mumbai-based board will continue to remain out of the RTI Act's reach. Reuters The cricket board had vehemently opposed its inclusion in the RTI Act and has since got its way, with the Sports Ministry amending the bill to ensure that only those organisations that receive government funding or support will come under the act. National Sports Board to oversee functioning of individual federations The Bill also seeks to form a National Sports Board (NSB) in order to create a stringent system of accountability. Going forward, all National Sports Federations (NSFs) will have to attain the NSB's recognition if they are to receive funds from the central government. The NSB will have the power to de-recognise a national federation if they fail to hold elections for its Executive Committee or have committed 'gross irregularities in the election procedures', or have failed to publish annual audited accounts or have 'misused, misapplied or misappropriated public funds'. While the BCCI has avoided the RTI Act for now, it will come under the NSB's ambit for a change. And in a departure from the National Sports Code that had set an age cap of 70 years, administrators can contest elections in NSFs up to the age of 75 if the international bodies' statutes and bylaws allow for it. National Sports Tribunal to settle disputes The National Sports Tribunal (NST) will be separate from the National Sports Board. While the latter will be setup to monitor the functioning of the individual sports federations, the NST will be setup exclusively to solve sporting disputes in the country. The Tribunal will have the powers of a civil court and will decide disputes ranging from athlete selection to federation elections. Once setup, the NST's decisions will only be challenged at the Supreme Court. The NST thus could be viewed as India's equivalent of the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS), the Lausanne-based body solving sporting disputes at a global level. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD WADA's suggestions to be implemented through anti-doping bill The National Anti-Doping (Amendment) Bill 2025 seeks to incorporate changes sought by the World Anti-Doping Agency after the Montreal-based global governing body had earlier objected to 'government interference' in the National Anti-Doping Agency (NADA). The World Anti-Doping Agency had objected to the institution of a National Board for Anti-Doping in Sports in 2022, especially with due to its ability to issue directions to the National Anti-Doping Agency. Reuters The Act had originally been passed in 2022 but was put on hold after WADA objected to the institution of a National Board for Anti-Doping in Sports – which would have had the power to make recommendations to the government on anti-doping regulations and even issue directions to NADA. The Board has since been retained in the amended bill, but without the power to oversee NADA or its advisory role to the government, citing 'operational independence' for the latter.