logo
Victory for Trump in US Supreme Court, his tariffs allowed to stay amid legal challenges over trade powers

Victory for Trump in US Supreme Court, his tariffs allowed to stay amid legal challenges over trade powers

First Post4 hours ago

The US Supreme Court refused to fast-track lawsuits challenging Trump's tariffs, allowing them to remain in effect for now. The court said that it will wait for the appeal court's order read more
US President Donald Trump delivered remarks on tariffs, in the Rose Garden at the White House in Washington. A federal appeals court reinstated the most sweeping of President Donald Trump's tariffs. File image/Reuters
The US Supreme Court handed President Donald Trump a major legal victory after it refused to put a challenge to his sweeping reciprocal tariffs on the fast track. On Friday, the Supreme Court justices rejected a scheduling request from two family-owned businesses seeking to invalidate many of Trump's import taxes .
The rejection means that the Trump administration would have the normal 30 days to file a response to the case. The Tuesday court filing stated that the companies involved in the case were seeking a quick response from the Trump administration, a request which has now been rejected by the country's apex court.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
According to Bloomberg, the two family-owned businesses wanted the court to take the unusual step of considering the case without waiting for a federal appeals court to rule on the matter. Meanwhile, the Trump administration argued that the Supreme Court should let the normal appellate process play out.
Trump's tariff went to the Supreme Court for the first time
It is pertinent to note that this is the first time the challenge to Trump's reciprocal tariffs came to the US Supreme Court. As of now, the legal cases over tariffs are limited to district and federal courts.
Meanwhile, a federal district judge agreed with educational toy makers Learning Resources Inc. and Hand2Mind Inc., the two companies involved in the Supreme Court case, that the POTUS lacked the authority under the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act to issue sweeping reciprocal tariffs.
In a separate case, a federal appeals court ruled that the tariffs could stay in effect at least until that panel hears arguments on July 31. Both courts are dealing with Trump's April 2 'Liberation Day' tariffs, which combine a universal baseline levy of 10 per cent with potentially higher rates for various trading partners.
It is pertinent to note that each of these suits also concerns at least some of Trump's separate import taxes over fentanyl trafficking. The case that went to the Supreme Court is titled 'Learning Resources v. Trump'.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘Don't know how we can trust US anymore': Iran on conflict with Israel
‘Don't know how we can trust US anymore': Iran on conflict with Israel

Hindustan Times

time29 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

‘Don't know how we can trust US anymore': Iran on conflict with Israel

With tensions escalating between Israel and Iran, Iranian foreign minister Abbas Araghchi expressed uncertainty over whether Tehran can trust the United States in diplomatic talks over the country's nuclear programme. Iranian foreign minister Abbas Araghchi suggested that the US's interest in diplomacy might just as well have been a "cover" for Israel's airstrikes on Iran.(AP) Araghchi told NBC News in an exclusive interview that he was not sure whether Iran can trust the US after the Israeli attacks on Tehran. Follow Iran Israel war live updates The Iranian foreign minister said that it was up to the Trump administration "to show their determination for going for a negotiated solution" amid the ongoing conflict with Israel. He also suggested that Washington's interest in diplomacy might just as well have been a "cover" for Israel's airstrikes on Iran. On Thursday, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt had read out a message from US President Donald Trump, wherein he hinted at substantial chances of negotiations with Iran and said that he will make his decision on US military action within "the next two weeks". Israel's attack on Iran last week took place just a day before the sixth round of negotiations between American and Iranian officials over Tehran's nuclear programme. Araghchi said, "So they had perhaps this plan in their mind, and they just needed negotiations perhaps to cover it up," adding that, "We don't know how we can trust them anymore. What they did was, in fact, a betrayal of diplomacy." ALSO READ | Israel warns of 'prolonged war' with Iran as conflict enters ninth day; Donald Trump says Iran only wants US talks Araghchi expressed Iran's readiness to negotiate after talks with top European diplomats in Geneva, provided, he said, Israel pauses its strikes on Iran first. "We are not prepared to negotiate with them anymore, as long as the aggression continues," he told NBC News. Further, the Iranian foreign minister reiterated that Iran would not give up uranium enrichment as per Trump's demands, adding that he clarified the same to US special envoy Steve Witkoff as well. "I told him several times that zero enrichment is impossible," Aragchi said, adding that every country has a right to enrich uranium for peaceful purposes. He expressed disappointment at Witkoff not being able to deliver on his words. "I think he is a gentleman, somebody you can work with, but unfortunately, he changed his words every time we met. So maybe that was because he couldn't deliver what he promised to us," he said. Iran's warning if the US joins Israeli strikes The Iranian foreign minister said that while he is exchanging some direct and indirect messages with Trump's special envoy, it does not imply "negotiation". "They have asked us to negotiate, but we negotiate only when it is negotiation and not dictation," Araghchi told NBC News. ALSO READ | Donald Trump hints at Israel-Iran ceasefire, warns Iran has 'maximum' two weeks Araghchi also sternly warned that if Trump decides to strike Iran, then Tehran's government also reserves the right to retaliate. "When there is a war, both sides attack each other. That's quite understandable. And self-defence is a legitimate right of every country," he said. "If the US joins Israel in these attacks, we will do the same," he added. He also reacted to Trump's remark on the US knowing Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei's whereabouts and that it won't kill him, "at least for now". Araghchi said he considers the remark not as a threat but "more as an insult". "And I'm amazed how the president of the so-called superpower can talk like this. We have always talked about President Trump respectfully," he told the news outlet. The Iranian foreign minister said all that is needed to revive negotiations between Iran and the US is a call from Washington, telling Israel to "stop everything". 'They can stop this process very quickly, and then we will consider diplomacy once again," Araghchi stated.

ECI Rejects Rahul Gandhis CCTV Footage Demand, Cites Voter Privacy Concerns
ECI Rejects Rahul Gandhis CCTV Footage Demand, Cites Voter Privacy Concerns

India.com

time36 minutes ago

  • India.com

ECI Rejects Rahul Gandhis CCTV Footage Demand, Cites Voter Privacy Concerns

New Delhi: The Election Commission of India (ECI), Saturday responded to Congress leader Rahul Gandhi's demand for releasing CCTV footage of polling booths in the Maharashtra assembly election, calling it a "politically motivated" move. ECI sources believe that publicly releasing such footage could be intended to harass or profile voters, particularly in booths where a party performs poorly. Safeguarding the privacy and security of voters is non-negotiable, and video footage of voting cannot be shared with political parties or any petitioner unless ordered by a competent court. The ECI's clarification on CCTV footage sharing comes amid Rahul Gandhi's allegations of "fixed elections" and claims of being denied access to information about voter lists and election footage. In a point-by-point rebuttal of LoP Rahul Gandhi's concerns, ECI sources explained the logic behind destroying CCTV footage of a poll after 45 days and the importance of protecting the right of secrecy of electors by not sharing video footage. An ECI insider said, 'Maintaining privacy and secrecy of the elector is non-negotiable and the ECI has, never in the past, compromised on this essential tenet which is laid down in the law as well upheld by the Supreme Court.' The ECI sources also cited a Supreme Court observation which said: 'Giving right to a voter not to vote for any candidate while protecting his right of secrecy is extremely important in a democracy'. Clarifying that violation of secrecy of voting is punishable up to three months' imprisonment, ECI sources said that the poll panel is legally bound and committed to protecting the privacy of the electors and the secrecy of voting. 'So, video footage from the polling station cannot be given to any person, candidate or NGO or any third party without the express consent of the elector(s),' said a source. On LoP Rahul Gandhi's latest grudge about the destruction of CCTV footage after just 45 days instead of one year, an ECI source said the poll panel was under no obligation to retain the footage for more than 45 days in case of an unchallenged election. An ECI source said, 'The Election Commission retains the CCTV footage, which is purely an internal management tool and not a mandatory requirement, for a period of 45 days, which aligns with the period laid down for filing an Election Petition (EP).' The ECI insider said that since no election can be challenged beyond 45 days of the declaration of the result, retaining this footage beyond this period makes it susceptible to misuse of the content by non-contestants for spreading misinformation and malicious narratives. In case an Election Petition is filed within 45 days, the CCTV footage is not destroyed and made available to the competent court when asked for, he said.

Iran's Ayatollah Ali Khamenei picks possible successors amid Israel's assassination threats, son not among them: Report
Iran's Ayatollah Ali Khamenei picks possible successors amid Israel's assassination threats, son not among them: Report

Hindustan Times

time36 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

Iran's Ayatollah Ali Khamenei picks possible successors amid Israel's assassination threats, son not among them: Report

Jun 21, 2025 05:44 PM IST Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has reportedly named three clerics as possible successors while taking shelter in a bunker amid assassination threats from Israel during the ongoing conflict. A demonstrator holds a picture of Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei as people gather for a rally in solidarity with Iran after Friday prayers, amid the Iran-Israel conflict, in Beirut's southern suburbs, Lebanon.(REUTERS) The New York Times, citing three Iranian officials familiar with the development, reported that Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has begun appointing replacements for top military commanders who were killed in Israeli strikes. Interestingly, contrary to earlier reports, the officials said Ali Khamenei's son, Mojtaba, is not among the clerics shortlisted to succeed him – despite previous claims that he was being groomed for the role. This is a developing story. More details are awaited.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store