logo
Biden accused of giving $27BN to firms with 'questionable ties'

Biden accused of giving $27BN to firms with 'questionable ties'

Daily Mail​3 days ago

Republicans in Congress are investigating ties between a Biden-era $27 billion green fund at the Environmental Protection Agency and former Democratic staffers. The EPA's Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund (GGRF), created in 2023 after Joe Biden 's Inflation Reduction Act passed, was responsible for doling out the billions to nonprofit organizations to help them champion climate causes. From start to finish the application process for the $27 billion in taxpayer-backed fund only lasted months. Many of the nonprofits that received billions in funding had been established after the application process was announced, according to Republican lawmakers.
Reports indicate that up to $20 billion of the GGRF was obligated after Donald Trump won the 2024 election but before he was sworn in on January 20. A former Biden EPA official likened the fund to 'tossing gold bars off the Titanic' - a mad dash to hand out federal dollars to anyone that would accept them. President Donald Trump's EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin has ordered an internal investigation into the matter , and the Justice Department is also probing the GGRF. Republican lawmakers claim firms that were incorporated after the GGRF application process opened - and which employed staff with ties to Democrats - were granted billions without proper oversight.
'The Biden Administration's EPA rushed through $27 billion in grants with little transparency, minimal vetting, and troubling political ties,' Chairman Brian Babin of the House Science, Space, and Technology Committee claims in a letter to Zeldin about the GGRF exclusively obtained by the Daily Mail. 'The American people deserve fairness and accountability in how their money is spent — especially at this scale,' he wrote in the letter sent to Zeldin on Tuesday. 'We're demanding answers and pushing for real reforms to ensure this never happens again.' Georgia Republican Rep. Rich McCormick, who also signed the letter, claimed the grants were given to organizations with 'questionable ties.'
'I'm deeply concerned that the EPA's Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund has prioritized speed and political favoritism over competitive merit and fiscal responsibility,' he wrote. 'This $27 billion program has bypassed critical oversight safeguards, awarding massive grants to organizations with limited experience and questionable ties.' Most of the cash went to eight main grant recipients that were then responsible for giving out smaller loans to other nonprofits, according to the letter to Zeldin about the GGRF.
PFC reported just $100 in revenue in its first four months of operation before receiving the billions, according to nonprofit tracker Influence Watch. A spokesperson for PFC told the Daily Mail the 'group formed in 2023 to apply for the Inflation Reduction Act's clean energy funding.' Stacey Abrams, a former Democratic Georgia gubernatorial candidate, was later brought on to nonprofit Rewiring America, a firm that was allocated $490 million under the Biden-era GGRF program. 'Abrams, an attorney, joined Rewiring America, one of the coalition's members, in March 2023 as a senior counsel,' a spokesperson said. 'Abrams did not have a role at Power Forward Communities beyond her position at Rewiring America.' She left Rewiring America at the end of 2024.
'Hope Enterprise Corp., awarded approximately $94 million, is led by CEO William Bynum, who served on the Biden-Harris Presidential Transition Team and was later appointed to the Department of the Treasury's Racial Equity Advisory Committee,' the Republicans wrote in their letter to Zeldin. In a statement to the Daily Mail, HOPE President Ed Sivak responded: 'The $94 million award will be used to support increased access to solar power in Arkansas. In Arkansas, HOPE was one of two applicants and the only statewide applicant.' The effort is projected to save money for Arkansans, Sivak claimed, though it is not yet up and running.
'Groundswell, Inc., recipient of $156 million, is led by CEO Michelle Moore, who served as President Obama's Chief Sustainability Officer and a Biden-appointed board member for the Tennessee Valley Authority,' the lawmakers wrote. The Republican lawmakers' letter went on: 'These improper relationships between federal agencies and grant recipients reinforce concerns that considerations other than merit influenced the selection process.' The EPA is now working to claw back cash given out in the last days of the Democrat administration, but since the officials sent billions out of federal coffers to a Citibank account, it is already out the door.
Zeldin and his team are currently litigating the matter. The case is before a federal appeals court after a judge ruled that EPA must allow the obligated funds to flow to the grant recipients. 'The agency's inability to ensure regulatory compliance further underscores the structural problems surrounding the GGRF,' the letter continues. 'The EPA's accelerated $27 billion grant process appears to have bypassed many of these critical safeguards.'
The Republican lawmakers requested a meeting to discuss with Zeldin how to prevent grants being awarded in such a manner again. Earlier this year, the EPA administrator shared he is prepared to take the case to the Supreme Court. 'The Supreme Court is the highest court in the land, so if a district court judge makes a decision, we are not going to assume that the United States Supreme Court is going to agree with that district court,' he testified before the Senate. Groundswell did not immediately return the Daily Mail's request for comment.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Oscar winner reveals his friends 'canceled' him for voting for Trump
Oscar winner reveals his friends 'canceled' him for voting for Trump

Daily Mail​

time37 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Oscar winner reveals his friends 'canceled' him for voting for Trump

An Oscar winner revealed that he had been 'canceled' by close friends after revealing he had voted for Donald Trump in the 2024 U.S. presidential election. Producer Brian Grazer, 73 - who is known for working on films such as A Beautiful Mind and Apollo 13 - opened up about the reaction he received for supporting Trump during a Fox Nation docuseries titled Art Of The Surge. The star - who has previously been a donor to the Democratic party - could be seen in the documentary at the Army vs. Navy football game in December 2024 which Trump also attended. At one point, Grazer paused to take a photo with the then-president elect inside a VIP suite at the stadium and informed those nearby that he had cast his vote for Trump, per The New York Times which reported on the docuseries. Brian also recalled telling a few women who he had voted for - and expressed that it had felt like he was 'getting canceled.' The producer added, 'All the women looked in and go, "You mean, you're not voting for Kamala?" And I go, "I just can't do that."' Brian continued, 'And then, one of them leaned in further, and said, "Are you voting for Trump?" And I said, "I am." I swear!' He later further explained the reasoning behind his vote for Trump in the election last year while talking to the New York Times. 'As a centrist, it was because I could feel and see Biden's deterioration and the lack of direction in the Democratic Party at that time,' Grazer stated. The Hollywood producer has supported Kamala Harris in the past - and was one of the contributors to her U.S. Senate campaign back in 2015. Brian also was a producer on the movie Hillbilly Elegy (2020), which notably is based on the memoir written by current vice president JD Vance. The film - which was directed by Ron Howard - garnered mixed reviews upon its release on Netflix, but received two Academy Award nominations. Grazer is known for his decades-long career in the entertainment industry, and has collaborated with Howard on a number of projects. The pair won an Oscar for Best Picture for the 2001 film A Beautiful Mind - which raked in seven additional Academy Award nominations. Aside from A Beautiful Mind, Grazer has been nominated for three other Oscars for the movies Splash (1984), Apollo 13 (1995) and Frost/Nixon (2008). Other projects that Brian has produced over the years include How The Grinch Stole Christmas (2000), 8 Mile (2002), Cinderella Man (2005), and The Da Vinci Code (2006). He has also been involved on a number of TV shows such as Arrested Development, Parenthood and Friday Night Lights. Both Grazer and director Ron Howard also founded the production company Imagine Entertainment together back in 1985. While talking to the Los Angeles Times in 2019, Brian opened up about why both he and Howard decided to adapt JD Vance's memoir Hillbilly Elegy. 'Ron and I like making movies about family. Everybody roots for family,' the producer explained to the outlet. 'We had the slightly dysfunctional extended family in "Parenthood," and we had the highly dysfunctional family in "Arrested Development," and this is another extension of the American family.' He continued, 'Everybody thinks their family is [messed] up. You cherish your family, no matter how [messed] up you think your brother is.' Other Hollywood stars have voiced their public support for Donald Trump - such as actor Zachary Levi. During a recent interview with Variety, the Shazam! star stated that he knows people who also voted for Trump in the 2024 presidential election - but were 'afraid' to go public. 'I know it to be true because I've gotten messages from lots of people who I won't name but who were very grateful to me for taking the stand that I took,' Levi said. 'And also they would tell me, "I want to do that, but I'm so afraid." And I would tell them, "Listen, you're on your journey. I'm on my journey. You've got to keep trusting God."' He added, 'And if you feel compelled to step out in that way, then do it boldly and know that you're going to be OK. And if you don't feel that conviction yet, then don't. It's all good.' In October of last year, Zachary also urged 'closeted conservatives' in Hollywood to publicly speak out for Donald Trump ahead of the election. The actor - who had initially been in support of Robert F. Kennedy Jr. - said on Instagram at the time, 'My cry to all of you out there, you closeted conservatives, closeted Trump voters, y'all, it's now or never, you know what I mean? 'Do whatever you feel like you need to do. If you need to come out publicly and say it, if you feel like you still can't, then don't.' Levi added, 'I would never pressure you to do that, but know that if what you're afraid of is somehow the backlash of an industry that's not going to exist very soon, then don't let that hold you back.' While he admitted to disliking Trump in the past, Zachary stated that he was straying away from voting Democrat due to the 'massive corruption' in the government. Other Hollywood celebrities who have voiced support for the 47th president of the United States also include Vince Vaughn, Mel Gibson and James Woods.

Musk was Trump's tweeter-in-chief. Now he's using X against him
Musk was Trump's tweeter-in-chief. Now he's using X against him

The Independent

time37 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Musk was Trump's tweeter-in-chief. Now he's using X against him

Elon Musk's X profile is like a window into his psyche: an inescapable stream of consciousness where impulsive tweets reveal his unfiltered thoughts and shifting moods. Musk harnessed his social media platform to propel Donald Trump to the White House, feeding anti-Democrat content and election conspiracy theories to his followers. Now Musk is turning that same platform – home to nearly 600 million monthly users – against him. After posting earlier in the week that Trump's signature budget policy was a 'disgusting abomination' that will 'drive America into debt slavery', the billionaire is openly taunting Trump on X, even calling for his impeachment. An analysis of Musk's tweets by The Independent shows that Musk has undergone a dramatic shift in both the tone and volume of his posts since his initial support of Trump in mid-2024 to when he began distancing himself from his governmental duties earlier this year – weeks before the White House announced his Washington tenure had finished. And now the platform has chronicled the rise and fall of the world's most powerful bromance. Musk began tweeting incessantly after he publicly endorsed Trump in July last year following the first attempt on the president's life in Butler, Pennsylvania. Then, once Musk was tapped in November to lead the Department of Government Efficiency, he emerged as Trump's tweeter-in-chief. Despite his new White House commitments, not to mention running six companies – including SpaceX, Tesla, and X itself – Musk appeared more glued to his keyboard than ever, using the platform as his primary news source, and place to share his views and stir up controversy. The first 50 days of the Trump administration arguably marked Musk's most fervent display of support for the president, both in terms of tweet content and frequency. On February 7, he mused that, 'I love @realDonaldTrump as much as a straight man can love another man.' Take President's Day, February 17, his most prolific 24-hour posting spell to date. Musk posted 262 times, according to The Independent 's analysis, with messages ranging from single emojis to lengthy missives attacking Democrats. All told, the posting spree equated to one message every five-and-a-half minutes, with no breaks. Musk had a busy Q1 — between January 20 and March 10, he posted 6,778 times – averaging more than 135 X posts per day. And he stayed on message, tweeting about his government-slashing force DOGE more than any other topic in that period, quickly followed by 'Trump' and 'president.' Social media analytics firms like Social Blade were forced to stop tracking tweets after X said these businesses had to pay for an Enterprise subscription, at $42,000 to $210,000 a month. The resulting gap has made transparency on X murkier than ever; and is also why The Independent could only analyze Musk's posts until mid-March. In early spring, Musk's public pledges of MAGA allegiance and trollish squibs began to slow down, and the subjects of his posts moved from Trump administration duties to his own commercial interests. Buyers of his electric vehicles protested against his shift to right-wing politics and efforts to dismantle federal departments, with Tesla's stock price plummeting, and a Rome dealership set ablaze. In April, Musk announced plans to significantly reduce his involvement with DOGE, opting to work remotely and allocate more time to Tesla. A month later, Musk's X daily posts at points reached single figures. In hindsight, it might be considered the calm before the storm. By the end of May, Musk came off the platform to deliver a gut punch to the Trump administration. He told NBC News that Trump's showpiece tax bill 'undermines' the work done by DOGE, without directly mentioning the president. Musk landed a heavy blow on Tuesday, blasting the president's 'Big, Beautiful Bill' as an 'outrageous, pork-filled, disgusting abomination.' But it was after a press conference with the German Chancellor where Trump said he was 'disappointed' with Musk's comments, that Musk went on his most destructive X rampage yet — calling Trump ungrateful, calling for his impeachment and saying he's linked to Jeffrey Epstein. And these claims get read and spread by a wide audience: his Thursday post declaring 'Trump would have lost the election' if it weren't for his support garnered nearly 15 million views in a single day. This is more than just a playground spat between the two rich powerful men, because Musk's ownership of X allows him to reach a vast audience, some of whom are skeptical of mainstream media, and control a narrative — and his posts have been known to set off market reactions, media cycles, and political waves. Those who have stuck with X, whether they are one of Musk's 220 million followers or not, have been inundated with his musings and attacks morning, noon, and night. Musk is believed to selectively issue suspensions and use algorithms to throttle foes that are critical of both him and his ventures. According to the tech news site Platformer, the self-styled 'free speech absolutist' directed a team of 80 engineers to amplify his own tweets over others, ensuring they reach vast audiences (he allegedly did the same for Trump in November). Musk has subsequently blurred the line between platform owner, political provocateur and propagandist. How will he next use X to punish the social media-reliant, legacy media-averse president?

Why did Donald Trump and Elon Musk fall out? Feud explained
Why did Donald Trump and Elon Musk fall out? Feud explained

Metro

timean hour ago

  • Metro

Why did Donald Trump and Elon Musk fall out? Feud explained

To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video 'The girls are fighting, aren't they?' This is how US congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez summarised the fallout between Donald Trump and Elon Musk. It would be funny if it were not two of the most powerful men in the world. Yes, their bromance has imploded in full public view, complete with snarky swipes, tantrums and accusations that could have huge legal implications. The first major cracks in their relationship showed at the end of last month on what turned out to be Musk's last day in the White House. The Tesla CEO had become bolder in expressing his dissent over Trump's budget and tax cut bill currently making its way through Congress. Asked about Musk's disapproval of his 'Big, Beautiful Bill', the US president told reporters last night: 'Elon and I had a great relationship. I don't know if we will any more.' Musk responded, lashing out further overnight, branding it a 'disgusting abomination' that will explode federal budget deficits. 'Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it,' he wrote on X. The criticism quickly escalated into an all-out brawl between the pair, each on their own social media sites Truth Social and X, or in press conferences. Trump threatened to pull back billions of dollars in government contracts for Musk's companies, while the billionaire bit back, suggesting that Trump would have lost the election without him. It was Musk's tweet – linking Trump with the disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein – that caused the most controversy. He alleged that the Republican leader is featured in the secret government files on rich and powerful former associates of thesex offender, reigniting long-running conspiracy theories. Musk posted: 'Time to drop the really big bomb: (Trump) is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public.' He later reposted a video from 1992 of Trump partying with Epstein and memes about their feud – amplifying them to his 220 million followers on X. Supporters on the conspiratorial end of Trump's base allege that Epstein's associates had their roles in his crimes covered up by government officials and others. They point the finger at Democrats and Hollywood celebrities, however, not at Trump himself. No official source has ever confirmed that the president appears in any of the material. Musk did not reveal which files he was talking about, and offered no actual evidence for his claim. White House spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt on Thursday called Musk's behavior 'an unfortunate episode' adding the tycoon is 'unhappy with the One Big Beautiful Bill because it does not include the policies he wanted.' But the allegation prompted fresh demands for a release of the material – this time from Democrats keen on turning a MAGA conspiracy theory back on its proponents. The breakup could reshape both men's futures. For Musk, the stakes are potentially even higher. More Trending This was already evident minutes into the online feud as Tesla's stock price plunged 14%. The break risks intensified scrutiny of his business practices that could jeopardize government contracts and invite regulatory probes, which might threaten his companies' profits. For Trump, losing Musk's backing threatens his growing influence among tech donors, social media audiences, and younger male voters – all key groups that may now be harder to reach. It could also complicate fundraising ahead of next year's midterm elections. Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: The Dark MAGA conspiracy about Trump, Musk and a new world order MORE: Zelensky refutes Trump's take on war and calls Putin 'murderer who came to kill the kids' MORE: Urgent recall of 1,700,000 air conditioners over fears they harbour mold

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store