Hong Kong's SFC fines Hang Seng Bank US$8.5 million for misconduct
Hong Kong's markets watchdog has fined Hang Seng Bank HK$66.4 million (US$8.5 million) for regulatory failures and overcharging clients.
The Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) said on Monday there were serious regulatory failures on the part of the bank regarding the sale of collective investment schemes (CIS) and derivative products and charging its clients excessive fees between February 2014 and May 2023.
Hang Seng Bank made at least HK$22.4 million in excess fees from these transactions.
Do you have questions about the biggest topics and trends from around the world? Get the answers with SCMP Knowledge, our new platform of curated content with explainers, FAQs, analyses and infographics brought to you by our award-winning team.
"[Hang Seng's] misconduct in these cases was serious and systemic," Christopher Wilson, the SFC's executive director of enforcement, said in a statement. "In particular, clients who declared making investment decisions themselves were in fact repeatedly solicited by [Hang Seng's] relationship managers to engage in frequent and excessive CIS transactions."
The SFC and HKMA led an investigation into Hang Seng Bank. Photo: Shutterstock alt=The SFC and HKMA led an investigation into Hang Seng Bank. Photo: Shutterstock>
The disciplinary action stemmed from a Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) investigation, which revealed a range of concerns regarding Hang Seng's sale of CIS products from June 2016 to November 2017, according to the SFC's statement.
The SFC said that 111 client accounts were found to have executed 100 or more CIS transactions during the period. While most transactions were declared as the client's "own choice", some 46 clients had been influenced by their relationship managers' solicitation or recommendation in their trades, according to the statement.
The excessively frequent transactions with short holding periods contradicted the funds' investment objectives and the clients' preferred investment horizons, which resulted in significant transaction costs borne by the clients, which greatly affected their overall returns, the SFC said.
Hang Seng Bank's internal controls did not adequately supervise and monitor the sale of CIS products to its clients and failed to keep a sufficient audit trail to ensure that transactions were genuinely initiated by clients, according to the SFC.
The bank also failed to put in place sufficient controls to monitor and follow up on potentially problematic transactions after they had been conducted.
A joint investigation by the SFC and HKMA also found that during various periods between 2014 and 2023, Hang Seng Bank had retained monetary benefits from client transactions, charged its clients transaction fees beyond amounts previously communicated to them and failed to adequately disclose trailer fee arrangements to clients trading in investment funds.
"This enforcement outcome is a result of close collaboration between the HKMA and the SFC," said Raymond Chan, an executive director at the HKMA.
"It helps to send a strong message to the industry that they should have in place adequate systems to ensure compliance with applicable regulatory standards," Chan said.
Hang Seng Bank has since compensated impacted clients and has taken remediation steps and enhancement measures to rectify and strengthen its internal controls, according to the statement.
The bank did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
This article originally appeared in the South China Morning Post (SCMP), the most authoritative voice reporting on China and Asia for more than a century. For more SCMP stories, please explore the SCMP app or visit the SCMP's Facebook and Twitter pages. Copyright © 2025 South China Morning Post Publishers Ltd. All rights reserved.
Copyright (c) 2025. South China Morning Post Publishers Ltd. All rights reserved.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Private companies who hold 57% of Newegg Commerce, Inc. (NASDAQ:NEGG) gained 118%, insiders profited as well
Newegg Commerce's significant private companies ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public Hangzhou Lianluo Interactive Information Technology Co.,Ltd owns 57% of the company 31% of Newegg Commerce is held by insiders AI is about to change healthcare. These 20 stocks are working on everything from early diagnostics to drug discovery. The best part - they are all under $10bn in marketcap - there is still time to get in early. A look at the shareholders of Newegg Commerce, Inc. (NASDAQ:NEGG) can tell us which group is most powerful. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are private companies with 57% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn). Private companies gained the most after market cap touched US$101m last week, while insiders who own 31% also benefitted. Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Newegg Commerce. See our latest analysis for Newegg Commerce Small companies that are not very actively traded often lack institutional investors, but it's less common to see large companies without them. There are many reasons why a company might not have any institutions on the share registry. It may be hard for institutions to buy large amounts of shares, if liquidity (the amount of shares traded each day) is low. If the company has not needed to raise capital, institutions might lack the opportunity to build a position. It is also possible that fund managers don't own the stock because they aren't convinced it will perform well. Newegg Commerce's earnings and revenue track record (below) may not be compelling to institutional investors -- or they simply might not have looked at the business closely. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Newegg Commerce. Our data shows that Hangzhou Lianluo Interactive Information Technology Co.,Ltd is the largest shareholder with 57% of shares outstanding. With such a huge stake in the ownership, we infer that they have significant control of the future of the company. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 31% and 0.2%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. Faching Chang, who is the second-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Top Key Executive. Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Our information suggests that there isn't any analyst coverage of the stock, so it is probably little known. While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO. Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances. Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in Newegg Commerce, Inc.. Insiders have a US$31m stake in this US$101m business. We would say this shows alignment with shareholders, but it is worth noting that the company is still quite small; some insiders may have founded the business. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling. With a 11% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Newegg Commerce. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies. We can see that Private Companies own 57%, of the shares on issue. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company. I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Case in point: We've spotted 2 warning signs for Newegg Commerce you should be aware of. Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. So take a peek at this free free list of interesting companies. NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
43 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump's first term shows why markets are cautious on the China trade deal
The stock market was largely unmoved by the trade agreement the US struck with China. Market pros say investors expect the trade war to unfold much as it did during Trump's first term. The US and China made scant progress on key issues in their 2018-2019 trade dispute. The stock market has been encouraged by easing tensions between the US and China in recent weeks, but investors were largely unmoved by the announcement of a trade deal between the superpowers on Tuesday. US stock futures failed to climb on news of the deal late Tuesday evening. While markets are edging higher on Wednesday, that's largely because the consumer price index report for May showed inflation was tamer than expected at 2.4% year-over-year. Here's where major indexes stood at 10:20 a.m. ET: S&P 500: 6,055.26, up 0.28% Dow Jones Industrial Average: 42,997.65, up 0.31% (+130.78 points) Nasdaq Composite: 19,788.36, up 0.37% On the trade front, observers say it's looking more likely that the trade war will shake out like it did during President Donald Trump's first term, with talk of constructive deals even as tensions remain elevated. Simply put, investors see a long and winding path ahead, and knee-jerk reactions to trade announcements have largely subsided since the chaos of "Liberation Day" in April. The framework agreement announced on Tuesday outlines how the two nations will continue trade talks. Importantly, it involves China allowing exports of rare earth minerals, while the US eases up on restrictions for exports of advanced tech to China, like semiconductors. This embedded content is not available in your region. The reaction is far more muted than how the market reacted last month, when stocks popped after the US struck a rough framework deal with China that lowered tariffs between the nations for 90 days. Art Hogan, the chief market strategist at B. Riley Wealth, told Business Insider that markets are reacting to trade talks similarly to when the US-China trade war first kicked off in 2018. He pointed to regular pullbacks in stocks during Trump's first term as traders digested the lack of progress in US-China negotiations. "We still have that muscle memory from Trump 1.0, that dealing with China is difficult and there's a multitude of issues," Hogan said. "I don't think we're going to solve this in short order and likely never solve it in the longer term." He added that markets are likely waiting for a more positive catalyst, pointing to more than 100 nations that have yet to strike a trade deal with the US. Peter Berezin, the chief global strategist at BCA Research, said the framework made only small progress on negotiations with China. "I would say that the 'deal' in London simply restores things to how they were right after Geneva," he told BI in an email. He added that he expected tariffs on China to remain high "for the foreseeable future." Strategists at Deutsche Bank also said that tariff talks appear to mirror the 2018-2019 period, when the US and China didn't make much headway in resolving key issues. Back then, the US said that China had unfair trade practices related to industries like agriculture and manufacturing. It also said China had unfairly transferred technology and stolen intellectual property from the US. Deutsche Bank pointed out that the agreement announced Tuesday skipped over fentanyl-related tariffs that Trump implemented against China earlier this year. "So while the mood music has stayed positive, investors may be wary of the pattern that emerged during the previous US-China trade talks in 2018-19," strategists wrote. "So there's perhaps a little disappointment this morning that we haven't yet got a bigger announcement." The agreement also appeared to lack detail that markets were looking for, David Morrison, a senior market analyst at Trade Nation, wrote in a note. "The big question is what kind of trade deals can the US negotiate that will be good enough to get the indices to fresh records?" he said. US stocks have whipsawed this year amid the turmoil surrounding tariffs and incremental news of trade agreements between the US and other countries. Indexes have erased their steep losses since the April 2 tariff announcements, with major averages now positive year-to-date. Read the original article on Business Insider Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
43 minutes ago
- Yahoo
CEA Chair Miran on Inflation, Tax Bill and China Tariffs
White House Council of Economic Advisers Chair Stephen Miran says inflation has been successfully coming down because of President Donald Trump's policies. Speaking on "Balance of Power," Miran also comments on Trump's tax bill and the state of China-US trade relations. Sign in to access your portfolio
