Scientists recover ice dating back over a million years
The ice core — drilled from a depth of 2,800 metres in the East Antarctic Peninsula — is expected to hold a climate record stretching back over 1.5 million years.
The recovery nearly doubles the current 800,000-year ice core record.
"So this is a really exciting project to work on because we really are exploring a completely unknown time in our history, and what we're hoping is we're going to unlock all these amazing secrets," Liz Thomas, head of the Ice Cores team at the British Antarctic Survey (BAS) in Cambridge, said.
The ice core will undergo analysis over the coming years at BAS and other European laboratories.
Scientists aim to unlock insights into Earth's climate evolution, focusing on greenhouse gas concentrations, atmospheric temperatures, wind patterns, and sea ice extent.
A key objective is to understand why Earth's glacial-interglacial cycles shifted from 41,000 to 100,000 years about 1 million years ago.
This gives scientists context for predicting future climate responses to rising greenhouse gas levels.
Ice cores capture direct evidence of past atmospheric conditions through trapped air bubbles, which will be analysed as they are released from the ice as it is slowly melted in a process called Continuous Flow Analysis.
The findings will shed light on the link between atmospheric CO2 and climate during a previously uncharted period.
Funded by the European Commission, Beyond EPICA involves 12 institutions across 10 European countries.
Reuters
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Courier-Mail
an hour ago
- Courier-Mail
Tides could help predict when huge icebergs break loose: study
Don't miss out on the headlines from Breaking News. Followed categories will be added to My News. Ocean tides can trigger city-sized icebergs to break off from Antarctic ice shelves, scientists said on Thursday, offering a potential way to predict these dramatic events in the future. It is not normally possible to forecast when icebergs break free, or calve, although the timing is important because these behemoths change the shape of ice sheets and affect global sea levels. Yet when a chunk of ice the size of Greater London suddenly broke off the Brunt Ice Shelf in 2023 and started drifting away, glaciologist Oliver Marsh was not surprised. Marsh told AFP he had predicted that a huge iceberg breaking off was "imminent within the next weeks to months". The British Antarctic Survey researcher had spent years studying the huge crack that would create the 550-square-kilometre (210-square-mile) iceberg named A81. As Marsh had anticipated, the calving occurred at the peak of spring tide, when there is the biggest difference between the ocean's high and low tide. New research led by Marsh, published in the journal Nature Communications on Thursday, used modelling to show that the calving was triggered by the tide, along with high winds and stress on the ice. After A81 broke off, Marsh visited the ice shelf to see how open water had replaced what had previously been "ice as far as you could see". "It was sad to see it go, in a way," he said. A81 is currently drifting up the eastern side of the Antarctica Peninsula towards the Weddell Sea. It remains to be seen whether it will come close to South Georgia island, which is an important breeding ground for penguins, seals and other animals. - 'Out of balance' - The world's biggest iceberg, A23a, ran aground not too far from South Georgia earlier this year but is not thought to pose a threat to wildlife. Now that A23a is exposed to the waves of the Southern Ocean, its "days are numbered", Marsh said. He emphasised that iceberg calving is a natural process which balances out the massive amount of snow that falls on Antarctica every year. However, "now we're out of balance", Marsh added. Antarctica loses ice in two ways -- icebergs calving and ice sheets melting. And ice sheets are melting at a rapidly increasing rate as oceans warm due to human-driven climate change, scientists have warned. "We don't know whether calving rates have gone up" because they happen relatively infrequently, Marsh said. A81 was the second of three mammoth icebergs that have broken free of the Brunt Ice Shelf since 2021. "We are expecting a very large calving event at some point from this area" in the future, Marsh said. But he could not give a timeframe. "Whilst we're saying we are a step closer to being able to predict these events... it is still difficult to predict." dl/gil Originally published as Tides could help predict when huge icebergs break loose: study

News.com.au
3 hours ago
- News.com.au
Tides could help predict when huge icebergs break loose: study
Ocean tides can trigger city-sized icebergs to break off from Antarctic ice shelves, scientists said on Thursday, offering a potential way to predict these dramatic events in the future. It is not normally possible to forecast when icebergs break free, or calve, although the timing is important because these behemoths change the shape of ice sheets and affect global sea levels. Yet when a chunk of ice the size of Greater London suddenly broke off the Brunt Ice Shelf in 2023 and started drifting away, glaciologist Oliver Marsh was not surprised. Marsh told AFP he had predicted that a huge iceberg breaking off was "imminent within the next weeks to months". The British Antarctic Survey researcher had spent years studying the huge crack that would create the 550-square-kilometre (210-square-mile) iceberg named A81. As Marsh had anticipated, the calving occurred at the peak of spring tide, when there is the biggest difference between the ocean's high and low tide. New research led by Marsh, published in the journal Nature Communications on Thursday, used modelling to show that the calving was triggered by the tide, along with high winds and stress on the ice. After A81 broke off, Marsh visited the ice shelf to see how open water had replaced what had previously been "ice as far as you could see". "It was sad to see it go, in a way," he said. A81 is currently drifting up the eastern side of the Antarctica Peninsula towards the Weddell Sea. It remains to be seen whether it will come close to South Georgia island, which is an important breeding ground for penguins, seals and other animals. - 'Out of balance' - The world's biggest iceberg, A23a, ran aground not too far from South Georgia earlier this year but is not thought to pose a threat to wildlife. Now that A23a is exposed to the waves of the Southern Ocean, its "days are numbered", Marsh said. He emphasised that iceberg calving is a natural process which balances out the massive amount of snow that falls on Antarctica every year. However, "now we're out of balance", Marsh added. Antarctica loses ice in two ways -- icebergs calving and ice sheets melting. And ice sheets are melting at a rapidly increasing rate as oceans warm due to human-driven climate change, scientists have warned. "We don't know whether calving rates have gone up" because they happen relatively infrequently, Marsh said. A81 was the second of three mammoth icebergs that have broken free of the Brunt Ice Shelf since 2021. "We are expecting a very large calving event at some point from this area" in the future, Marsh said. But he could not give a timeframe. dl/gil

ABC News
a day ago
- ABC News
Triassic reptile's bizarre crest shakes up feather evolution theories
Mammals these days have hair, birds have feathers, and reptiles have neither. But the relative nakedness of today's reptiles may not have been the case 247 million years ago, when at least one reptile species appeared to be quite experimental with its embellishments. That's according to fossils of a creature that lived at the beginning of the Triassic period and sported a curious crest running down its spine. The crest, while feather-like, pre-dates feathers by millions of years. A new study published in Nature has described the crested reptile, which was dubbed Mirasaura grauvogeli. Stephan Spiekman, study lead author and a researcher at the State Museum of Natural History in Stuttgart, Germany, said he was fascinated by the creature's complex appendages — particularly since it didn't belong to the group of animals that eventually grew feathers. "Mirasaura was a type of reptile that was very different from dinosaurs and their close relatives," Dr Spiekman said. Stephen Poropat, a palaeontologist at Curtin University who wasn't involved with the research, called the fossils an "extraordinary" find. The Mirasaura fossils were discovered by French palaeontologist Louis Grauvogel in the 1930s in north-eastern France. He found rocks containing small reptilian skeletons, alongside fan-like depressions made from plumes up to 15 centimetres long. Professor Grauvogel thought the mysterious fans were fish fins or insect wings, and didn't connect them to the reptilian skeletons found in the same fossils. In 2019, decades after his death, Professor Grauvogel's collection was acquired by the museum in nearby Stuttgart, and researchers realised that 80 of the fossils belonged to the same animal. The researchers named the creature Mirasaura grauvogeli, which means "Grauvogel's wondrous reptile". But they couldn't immediately tell what the mysterious crests on the creatures' backs were made of. "It was clear pretty quickly that these appendages were not feathers or hairs in the traditional sense," Dr Spiekman said. The team used a number of techniques, including powerful X-rays and electron microscopes, to reconstruct what the creature looked like and figure out the composition of the crests. They discovered remnants of tiny cells called "melanosomes" preserved in the fossil crests, which make the colours in hair, skin and feathers. The melanosomes were shaped similarly to those found in feathers, Dr Spiekman said. "This could indicate that the tissue that they are composed of is quite similar to that of feathers." But the appendages were clearly different to feathers: they didn't have any of the key branching features feathers develop as they grow. "This shows that the structures grew in a largely different way than feathers," Dr Spiekman said. Anatomical analyses of the reptile's skeleton also showed that it belonged to a different group of reptiles to the one that eventually became the dinosaurs. John Long, a palaeontologist at Flinders University who wasn't involved in the research, said that the existence of Mirasaura has profound implications for understanding how feathers and skin evolved. "Prior to this discovery, it was thought that only birds and dinosaurs evolved feather-like structures, and mammals modified those feather-like structures to develop hair," Professor Long said. "This is a third group of animals yet discovered that actually have feather-like structures as part of their skin." Dr Poropat said the discovery helped explain another highly controversial fossil find from a similar time period, called Longisquama insignis. The extinct Longisquama reptile, which was discovered more than 50 years ago, also had feather-like appendages, but its fossils weren't preserved well enough to identify them properly. This led to fierce debates about whether or not the Longisquama reptile had real feathers. "The finding of Mirasaura demonstrates Longisquama's structures are not feathers, because the Mirasaura reptile's are very similar and they're not feathers either," Dr Poropat said. "I'm quite relieved to see that Longisquama finally has a home." The researchers believe the reptiles used the crest to communicate with each other. "It seems most likely that it was used for signalling to other members of the same species, either to attract a mate, or to warn off a competitor, or both," Dr Spiekman said. Professor Long said that we can only speculate about the crest's function, but he agreed that communication was a likely reason. "Certainly today, visual signalling is incredibly important for birds and for many reptiles," he said. Dr Poropat pointed out the Mirasaura reptile lived a few million years after the catastrophic Permian mass extinction. This may have favoured the evolution of more bizarre behaviours and body structures because there was less competition. "The animals that did survive that extinction event were basically free to experiment with all sorts of different modes of life." While the Mirasaura reptile isn't a precursor to the dinosaurs, its existence suggests that other Triassic creatures could also have had strange features that haven't survived fossilisation. "Because soft tissue is so seldom preserved, we are getting an incomplete picture of the past almost inevitably," Dr Poropat said.