
Op Sindoor: India hit 9 terror targets in 23 mins: Ajit Doval
In what was seen as India's retribution to the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack that left 26 persons dead, none of the intended targets in Pakistan was missed during the military offensive, Doval said while also taking pride in India's capability and technological prowess in neutralising the threats from across the border. The precision was to the point where India knew who was where, and the entire operation lasted hardly 23 minutes past 1 am on May 7, he said.
"Thereafter, they said Pakistan did this and so on. You tell me one image or photograph which shows any damage to India being done. Not even a glass pane was broken," Doval said while speaking at the 62nd convocation ceremony of IIT, Madras. "They (international media) wrote these things and put out things.
The images only showed 13 air bases in Pakistan before and after May 10, whether it was in Sargodha, Rahim Yar Khan, Chaklala. I am only telling you what the foreign media put out on the basis of images. We are capable of doing that (damage to Pakistani air bases)." Addressing the students, Doval also said the link between technology and warfare was very important, and that the country should develop indigenous technology to meet its requirements. Referring to the earlier speaker, Padma Subrahmanyam—Padma Vibhushan awardee and legendary danseuse—congratulating him for the success of Operation Sindoor and evoking thunderous applause from the students and graduates, the NSA said, "I am really proud of it (Operation Sindoor). Much of it was driven by indigenous content." "We are proud of it—that some of our best systems worked, whether it was BrahMos (missiles), the integrated air control and command system, or battlefield surveillance.
We decided on nine terrorist targets, not in the border areas but in the crisscross of Pakistan, and we missed none." No unintended site was struck, and the strike was precise to the point where "we knew who was where. And the entire operation lasted for 23 minutes," he said. In a subtle rebuttal to coverage of international media, including the New York Times, questioning the operation's effectiveness, the NSA said, "They wrote what they wanted. But satellite images tell the real story—that 13 Pakistan airbases, before and after May 10, show exactly what happened."
Earlier, speaking at the convocation, Padma Subrahmanyam said the historic victory of Operation Sindoor was a manifestation of adherence to the valour that the Bhagavad Gita preaches. "As a proud Indian, I have always offered my salutations to our jawans, who are our national guardian angels," she said, congratulating Doval for his role in the operation. At the event, Doval said the country could not afford to lose the technology battle and remain behind or fall decades behind others.
He acknowledged the role of IIT, Madras and the private sector in developing 5G in two-and-a-half years' time, whereas the Chinese took over 12 years and spent 300 billion dollars to develop 5G technology. "Even a screw that deals with anything related to data or security protection must come from a trusted source. It is either made in India or by somebody who is very close to India," he added, emphasising the need to totally insulate our system from the enemy. A total of 3,227 students graduated. As many as 3,661 Degrees (including Joint and Dual Degrees) were awarded to the students on the occasion. A total of 529 PhDs were also awarded, which included PhDs, Joint Degree Ph.Ds with foreign institutions and Dual Degree PhDs, the institute said.
The precision was to the point where India knew who was where, and the entire operation lasted hardly 23 minutes past 1 am on May 7, he said. "Thereafter, they said Pakistan did this and so on. You tell me one image or photograph which shows any damage to India being done. Not even a glass pane was broken," Doval said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Scroll.in
12 minutes ago
- Scroll.in
HC refuses to quash FIR against woman who reacted with laughing emoji to Operation Sindoor post
The Bombay High Court on Tuesday refused to quash a first information report against a Pune woman for allegedly reacting with a laughing emoji to a message praising Operation Sindoor in her housing society's WhatsApp group, Bar and Bench reported. A bench of Justices AS Gadkari and Rajesh Patil dismissed the plea filed by the woman, Farah Deeba, observing that there was a prima facie case against her actions, which also included allegedly posting a WhatsApp status that was deemed offensive to Prime Minister Narendra Modi and the Indian flag. The bench said that her actions would attract provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita pertaining to acts endangering the sovereignty, integrity and unity of India as well as promoting enmity between groups, Live Law reported. It also noted the woman's statement to the complainant that both her paternal and maternal families were from Pakistan due to which she described India as 'makkar', or deceitful. This showed the woman's 'mens rea' or guilty mind, Live Law quoted the bench as saying. The FIR was registered against Deeba based on a complaint filed by another resident of her society. Her posts had reportedly sparked unrest in the area, with residents staging a protest and demanding police action against the woman, Bar and Bench reported. The case was filed under sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita pertaining to acts endangering sovereignty and integrity, promoting enmity between different groups, imputations, assertions prejudicial to national integration, intentional insult to provoke breach of peace and statements conducing to public mischief. Seeking a dismissal of the FIR against her, Deeba had submitted in her petition that she had not been in a stable mental condition when she made the posts. Her counsel said she had apologised and deleted the messages once she realised that they were not well received, Bar and Bench reported. The counsel added that she had already suffered for her actions professionally, having been terminated from her teaching job. The court rejected these arguments. 'The intention of the petitioner becomes an essential ingredient to be judged with the kind of language she has used for India,' Bar and Bench quoted the court as saying. 'More particularly when the whole country was feeling proud of our Army. She could have probably avoided reacting with a laughing emoji.' The court also observed that as a prudent and educated person, she should have considered the repercussions before posting such content. The bench added: 'In such a situation, she subsequently adopting a defence that, she has not realised those messages were controversial and posted them due to her deranged mental condition will not be helpful to her.' Tensions between India and Pakistan escalated on May 7 when the Indian military carried out strikes – codenamed Operation Sindoor – on what it claimed were terrorist camps in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir. The strikes were in response to the terror attack in Jammu and Kashmir's Pahalgam, which killed 26 persons on April 22. The Pakistan Army retaliated to Indian strikes by repeatedly shelling Indian villages along the Line of Control in Jammu and Kashmir. At least 22 Indian civilians and eight defence personnel were killed in the shelling. The sides on May 10 reached an 'understanding' to halt firing


Hans India
12 minutes ago
- Hans India
Armed encounter breaks out between militants and security forces in Poonch
Poonch breaking news: A confrontation began this Wednesday (July 30 2025) between militants vs security forces in Kasaliyan region in Poonch district. Two suspicious people were identified and pursued by a group of police and security. The militants hiding in the shadows shot at the joint group and the firing was in return. The new encounter took place just two days following the police Poonch encounter the three terror suspects who were responsible in the Pahalgam terror attack in April of this year. The attack killed 26 civilians dead. A security official stated that based on specific information regarding the presence of militants a Jammu and Kashmir encounter was conducted by the police, army and paramilitary forces within the Kanzal Mandu area of Chatroo forest in Kishtwar late in the afternoon. The official said that as an operation to search was underway militants who were hiding in the forest shot at the troops. "The troops fired back, triggering an encounter," the official claimed. Following the exchange of gunfire additional troops were brought to the area in order to tighten the area and stop militants from leaving the area. The security forces used drones and helicopters and other surveillance equipment to monitor the movements of militants in security forces clashes. A security official has said that they believe there are three to four Indian Army operations within the region. "The militants belong to Jaish-e-Mohammad and security forces had been hunting for them for a long time," said the source. The incident took place just minutes before the start of the 38-day Amarnath journey towards the Cave shrine located in the south Kashmir Himalayas starting on Thursday. The security measures across J&K have been strengthened prior to the beginning of the Amarnath yatra that takes place following the 22nd April Pahalgam terror attack, in which 25 tourists along with an oxen wala from the local area were killed. The incident in Kishtwar occurred just a week after a Jaish e-Mohammad Pakistani militant had been killed during an encounter with security forces within the Basantgarh forest region in the neighboring Udhampur district.


Economic Times
12 minutes ago
- Economic Times
India may face tariff heat despite strong US ties: Peter McGuire
"As for Russia, we're all very aware of how secondary sanctions on purchasing Russian crude could play out — not just for China, but for other nations as well," says Peter McGuire, CEO, Australia, ADVERTISEMENT The hottest news right now in both global and Indian markets is the tariff development. A major update came in yesterday, just ahead of the August 1st tariff deadline for India. Donald Trump essentially stated that India might face a significant 20% to 25% tariff. While he acknowledged India as a good friend, he claimed that India is charging higher tariffs than any other country. What are your thoughts on this? Japan has managed to negotiate a 15% tariff, but the situation for India doesn't seem as favorable. Peter McGuire: I'll tell you what — it really caught everyone by surprise. Looking at the structure of the tariff deals — who's getting what and how it's being put together — and the broader context with China, it's clear that this came unexpectedly. The impact is significant, particularly for the Indian economy. Moving forward, we'll have to see if President Trump is open to negotiating something more favorable for India, considering the strategic importance of the U.S.-India relationship. For now, it's a wait-and-watch situation. But yes, I believe Indian manufacturers will feel the pressure and may need to absorb some of the cost increases. I also wanted to get your thoughts on oil prices. We've seen a 3% jump recently. Is this more about Trump's pressure on Russia and efforts to ease trade tensions? Brent and WTI are now at their highest levels since June 20th. Do you think this rally is sustainable, or is it just news-driven? Could you also share your near-term price targets for Brent and WTI? Peter McGuire: Firstly, yes, I think it's largely news-driven. As for Russia, we're all very aware of how secondary sanctions on purchasing Russian crude could play out — not just for China, but for other nations as well. From what I've read, President Trump doesn't seem overly concerned about higher oil prices. He's ready to ramp up domestic production. So, we've seen a bit of a 'hot energy' spike — pardon the pun — pushing prices upward. I expect prices will cap at current levels unless we see something dramatic unfold. I also think the market was a little oversold previously, and now it's correcting. I'm closely following commentary from voices like Howard Lutnick and Scott Bessent to understand where we might be headed. Let's talk specifically about crude. We've seen some wild swings — sub-$70 levels and then sharp rebounds. What levels are you watching closely, especially as we head toward year-end? Where do you expect oil to settle?Peter McGuire: I think crude will remain range-bound unless there are major disruptions — whether geopolitical tensions, further tariffs, supply-side uncertainties, or weather-related outages. If weather conditions stay stable, I expect prices to stay within the $60–$70 range. My forecast is that we'll see a supply glut toward the end of Q3 or the beginning of Q4. Up to that point, there might be some volatility, but overall, I see more downside than upside for prices. By year-end, I believe consumers will be more comfortable with oil prices than they are right now.