logo
Stock Trade by Lawmaker's Wife Fuels Insider Information Concerns

Stock Trade by Lawmaker's Wife Fuels Insider Information Concerns

WASHINGTON—Stock purchases made by the wife of Rep. Mike Kelly (R., Pa.) in 2020 raised 'serious concerns' from House Ethics Committee investigators, but they said in a report Friday that they didn't find sufficient evidence to show he engaged in violations of insider-trading laws.
In the report, committee officials said Kelly violated the House's code of conduct 'by failing to meet his duty of candor' as they investigated his wife's decision to buy stock in a company that operated a local steel plant that was at risk of closing. Releasing the details of the report publicly is meant to serve as reproval for those actions, the report said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Judges Continue to Block Trump Policies Following Supreme Court Ruling
Judges Continue to Block Trump Policies Following Supreme Court Ruling

Wall Street Journal

time2 minutes ago

  • Wall Street Journal

Judges Continue to Block Trump Policies Following Supreme Court Ruling

WASHINGTON—When the Supreme Court issued a blockbuster decision in June limiting the authority of federal judges to halt Trump administration policies nationwide, the president was quick to pronounce the universal injunction all but dead. One month later, states, organizations and individuals challenging government actions are finding a number of ways to notch wins against the White House, with judges in a growing list of cases making clear that sweeping relief remains available when they find the government has overstepped its authority.

Could Senator Adam Schiff really go to jail over alleged mortgage fraud?
Could Senator Adam Schiff really go to jail over alleged mortgage fraud?

Fox News

time2 minutes ago

  • Fox News

Could Senator Adam Schiff really go to jail over alleged mortgage fraud?

Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) Director William Pulte sent a criminal referral to Attorney General Pam Bondi in May alleging that California Democrat Sen. Adam Schiff "has, in multiple instances, falsified bank documents and property records to acquire more favorable loan terms, impacting payments from 2003-2019 for a Potomac, Maryland-based property." What is the gist of the complaint? That Schiff, while representing a California district in the House of Representatives, falsely listed his posh Maryland home as his primary residence in order to get more favorable loan terms when, in truth and in fact, his California condo, which he designated as his primary residence in order to qualify for a California homeowner's tax exemption, was his real primary residence. Even worse, according to the referral, Schiff claimed his Burbank condo as his primary/principal residence in California tax filings during the same years he listed his Maryland home as his primary/principal residence on loan applications to finance that home. Schiff's response to the criminal referral and to subsequent Truth Social posts by President Donald Trump was one we often see in white collar cases. Per the senator's office, "the lenders who provided the mortgages for both homes were well aware of then-Representative Schiff's Congressional service and of his intended year-round use of both homes, neither of which were vacation homes." That's not much of a denial, senator. The question is whether you lied on these forms or not. Were your answers accurate or not, and if they were inaccurate, were the answers a mistake or intentional? The devil is always in the details in white-collar cases like this. Which representatives of which particular lenders "were well aware" that Schiff intended to use both homes year-round, and why does that matter? The issue is whether Schiff intentionally lied on federal or state forms to gain a financial advantage. If he falsely listed his Maryland home as his primary residence in order to get a lower interest rate, that matters too. (After all, similar alleged falsehoods by Donald Trump were used by New York Attorney General Letitia James to go after Trump in her massive New York state civil action.) Did Schiff lie on California tax forms to gain an exemption he was not entitled to, and, if so, does it implicate any federal criminal statutes? This is what inquiring minds want to know, and we just don't have enough information at this stage to know all the answers. Based on what we do know, how likely is it that Schiff will be indicted for violating one of several federal bank fraud statutes that potentially cover his conduct? Not very likely. Here are several reasons why: The devil is always in the details in white-collar cases like this. Which representatives of which particular lenders "were well aware" that Schiff intended to use both homes year-round, and why does that matter? This leaves open the possibility of a state of California prosecution for filing false tax returns. Would you care to place any bets on that happening? The bottom line is this: Schiff's alleged conduct may be sleazy and his explanation shifty, but a criminal charge at the federal or state level does not seem to be in the offing.

Today's High-Yield Savings Rates for July 28, 2025: Up to 4.66%
Today's High-Yield Savings Rates for July 28, 2025: Up to 4.66%

Wall Street Journal

time2 minutes ago

  • Wall Street Journal

Today's High-Yield Savings Rates for July 28, 2025: Up to 4.66%

Pay attention to restrictions that sometimes come with HYSAs. For example, some savings accounts limit the number of withdrawals and transactions you can complete in a month. Others might require a minimum deposit to open an account or have limits on your APY based on your balance. How traditional savings accounts work Traditional savings accounts work the same as HYSAs. However, unlike high-yield accounts that are often found online with no brick-and-mortar branches, traditional savings accounts are usually held at banks that have physical branches. In some cases, you can get above-average yields with more traditional accounts held at local credit unions and community banks with physical locations, but often the best savings rates are found with online-only accounts. Traditional savings accounts might have transaction limits, deposit requirements and tiered rates based on your balance. HYSA dependency on Fed rate The Federal Reserve meets eight times a year to announce its benchmark federal-funds rate (sometimes called the Fed rate). This is the rate banks charge each other for short-term lending. High-yield savings accounts are highly dependent on the Fed rate. When the target rate rises, savings yields generally rise as well. For savers, this can mean higher returns for letting their money sit at a bank or credit union. On the other hand, when the Fed cuts its benchmark rate, yields tend to fall. Savings yields can fluctuate regularly, but they are most likely to significantly change when the Federal Reserve announces a cut or increase of its benchmark rate.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store