What are Reform UK's priorities in Derbyshire?
"Never before has Derbyshire seen such wholesale changes to the political landscape."That is what Alan Graves told the county council's first full meeting in Matlock this week since the local elections saw them sweep to power.With the Conservatives now in opposition and the Labour Party on a historic low of just three seats, local residents are being told to expect a very different kind of leadership than what has come before.Graves has said that 12 months is a fair measurement local residents should judge the party by on whether they have seen visible improvements.
It is early days, but the new leadership have spoken so far about a number of key areas they want to tackle "quickly".
'DOGE'
The new leaders say that this is their "number one priority". DOGE is a reference to the newly-created Department of Government Efficiency in Donald Trump's US administration, with a pledge to cut waste forming a central part of Reform's election campaign.To signify their focus on this area, a new leadership role has been created for "Council Efficiency (DOGE)".It will be a wide-ranging role across all the cabinet portfolios assessing where waste can be eliminated.The leaders in Derbyshire have spoken about the need to do a "full audit" of the council's books to see where money can be saved."The first port of call is to go to [executive directors], find out what the issues are, look at those finances and see where we can make efficiencies," says Graves.He also says the group already have "several ideas" for quick gains.Council job cuts forming part of this drive have not been ruled out."If [council staff] are efficient then they've got nothing to be scared about", he told the BBC.
Bubbling under the surface of the DOGE policy is the very real need to keep the authority's finances on track. One of Reform's newly elected councillors in Derbyshire claimed in a social media post that the authority was "six months from bankruptcy".While the leadership have played this down, the council's books remain riddled with heavy overspends and debt."We won't become bankrupt," Graves told the BBC, while acknowledging "how bad the finances are"."We'll turn that around," he said. "In a year's time, you'll see that we're still operating as a local authority, and we'll balance the budget, and we'll be making savings."He added that Reform would be working to "keep council tax low" - something the previous Conservative leaders also sought to do, but eventually failed amid the scale of the challenges they faced.
The state of Derbyshire's roads has bought the county some unwelcome attention in recent years, with the RAC singling Derbyshire out for the poor conditions motorists face.Alan Graves told the BBC this week that that local residents would see an improvement in the roads within a year.Similarly to the new DOGE role, as a signal of intent, the new cabinet member in charge of Derbyshire's roads had a specific reference to potholes in her title.Councillor Charlotte Hill said at the inaugural meeting in Matlock this week that Reform would be setting out "detailed plans" on fixing potholes once they had assessed the overall picture and available funding.Hill, who also works at National Highways, said the new administration would seek to immediately "accelerate the quantity and improve the quality of the works they are currently doing".
Asylum accommodation
Reform's new cabinet member for Business Services Stephen Reed has said previously the group would "fight" the Home Office if asked to house more asylum seekers in local hotels.The national party is said to be consulting lawyers on how exactly this can be done in counties under its control where this policy continues, although the government has said it wants to bring hotel accommodation to an end.The Home Office is responsible for housing adult asylum seekers and while councils can object, they have little power to stop it.In Derbyshire, excluding the city of Derby, the number of asylum seekers in hotels is relatively small.The figure currently stands at around 170 as of March this year, a reduction from roughly 240 in December 2024.However, it is an issue that sparks fierce debate locally that Reform hope to make clear they are trying to address in some way.
SEND
Special educational needs services in Derbyshire was put under the spotlight following a damning Ofsted report last year that said families were being left in "crisis" by the local authority's "widespread and systemic failings".Derbyshire received close to 2,000 applications for needs assessments in 2024 from local parents, most of which were approved.A special post has been created for SEND and Education and Graves has acknowledged the difficulty of the area.He has pledged that families who have faced lengthy and costly delays from the council in the process of seeking help with their children's needs will "absolutely" see that the process is sped up. But there is also uncertainty around how the service might be impacted by Reform's anti-waste agenda.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Western Telegraph
27 minutes ago
- Western Telegraph
Welsh FM accused of doing ‘nothing' to protect pensioners from winter fuel cut
Darren Millar, leader of the Welsh Conservatives, called for Eluned Morgan to apologise to the pensioners affected by the change last winter, arguing the Welsh Government should have stepped in to support those in need. Speaking during First Minister's Questions on Tuesday, Mr Millar said the cut had forced vulnerable people to choose between heating and eating. Baroness Morgan, leader of the Welsh Labour Government, said she was 'absolutely delighted' that the UK Government had reversed the cut for many. The payment, worth up to £300, will be restored to the vast majority of pensioners, with anyone with an income of under £35,000 a year now getting the payment automatically. The decision last July to restrict the winter fuel payment to the poorest pensioners was intended to save around £1.5 billion a year, with more than nine million people who would have previously been eligible losing out. Rachel Reeves, the Chancellor, announced the partial U-turn on Monday, following significant backlash from charities, opposition MPs and the Government's own backbenchers. Speaking in the Senedd, Mr Millar said: 'Yesterday we saw a screeching U-turn on the winter fuel allowance by Rachel Reeves, after considerable pressure from the Conservative Party. 'You will know that over half a million Welsh pensioners were deprived of their winter fuel payments last year, leaving some very vulnerable people with the unenvious choice of having to choose between heating and eating – it's an absolute disgrace. 'You are meant to stand up for Wales but what did you actually do in terms of this winter fuel allowance? You did absolutely nothing.' Mr Millar argued Baroness Morgan should have implemented a Welsh winter fuel payment or stood up to Sir Keir Starmer and demanded the payment be restored sooner. Baroness Morgan responded that she was 'absolutely delighted' that Sir Keir Starmer had listened to pensioners in Wales and across the country. 'I'm really pleased that because we have made representations to the Prime Minister on this issue that he has changed his mind and that will make a difference to hundreds of thousands of pensioners across Wales this winter, in a country where we do have more older people and housing which is more difficult to heat. 'I don't think that it's bad to listen to people and then to make sure that you respond to them.' Baroness Morgan had previously pushed back against the cut, having called for a 'rethink' in early May, saying it was something 'that comes up time and again'. At the time, the Government said there would 'not be a change to the Government's policy'. On Monday, Ms Reeves suggested that the 'stability we've brought back to the economy' meant the Government was able to change the eligibility threshold for winter fuel payments.
The Independent
27 minutes ago
- The Independent
HMRC failure to notify MPs sooner about £47m phishing scam ‘unacceptable'
HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) has been warned by a committee of MPs that its failure to report details of a breach affecting around 100,000 taxpayers is 'unacceptable'. The Treasury Committee said it was only alerted to the information when a notification was published on the HMRC website on the same day as a live session. On June 4, it emerged that HMRC had lost £47 million after a phishing scam breached tens of thousands of tax accounts. Senior civil servants at HMRC told the Treasury Committee that 100,000 people have been contacted, or are in the process of being contacted, after their accounts were locked down in what they said was an 'organised crime' incident which started last year. On Tuesday, the committee published a letter from the Association of Chartered Certified Accountants (ACCA) stipulating that it had not discussed the phishing incident with HMRC and was not aware of it prior to the hearing on June 4. The committee also published a letter sent via email from its chairwoman Dame Meg Hillier to John-Paul Marks, chief executive, HMRC. The letter said: 'I am alarmed that it was never deemed necessary to inform Parliament about an issue which affected such a vast number of taxpayers and led to the loss of £47 million of public money. 'To discover this information during a session from press reports and without adequate time for the committee to review the information in detail is unacceptable.' The letter said the committee is seeking responses from HMRC as to 'why was Parliament not notified earlier about the loss of £47 million of taxpayers' money, whether through a written ministerial statement and/or public or confidential letters to the Treasury Committee and the Public Accounts Committee?' The committee is also seeking responses over why the update was published on the day of the committee hearing on the work of HMRC and who else in Government was told about the incident and when. It also wants to receive a timeline of how the incident unfolded and find out what measures HMRC has put in place to ensure that such incidents do not happen in future. The letter asked for a reply by June 24 2025. Meanwhile, the letter from Glenn Collins, head of technical and strategic engagement, ACCA, to Dame Meg, dated June 5, said: 'While we regularly engage with HMRC, including earlier in the year about issues relating to agent account access, we have not received any communication from HMRC on the issue of taxpayer account breaches until yesterday. 'We have highlighted to HMRC our frustration that HMRC has not been transparent or timely in its communication over this important issue.'
BBC News
31 minutes ago
- BBC News
Family visa income threshold should be lower, review says
The minimum income threshold for family visas should be relaxed, a government-commissioned review has recommended.A report by the Migration Advisory Committee (MAC) has suggested a reduction from the current level of £29, warned against previous proposals to raise the threshold to the same level as for skilled workers - £38,700 a year - saying it could breach the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR).The Conservatives said that the UK should leave the ECHR if it "stops us from setting our own visa rules". Article 8 of the ECHR enshrines the right to family threshold is the minimum income a British citizen or settled resident must earn to bring their partner to join them in the UK. If the partner is already in the UK on a valid visa, their income also counts towards the minimum applications are made by people not already living in the UK. The MAC suggested a range of possible new thresholds. It said a level between £23,000 to £25,000 would enable families to support themselves.A threshold of between £24,000 to £28,000 meanwhile would put more emphasis on economic wellbeing - both of the families themselves and for said it did "not understand the rationale" for setting the family visa threshold at the £38,700 level for skilled workers, as the two visas have "completely different objective[s]".A £38,700 level would be the "most likely to conflict with international law and obligations".It is the government's decision whether to accept any of the MAC's recommendations. Prof Brian Bell, chairman of the MAC, said that balancing family life and economic wellbeing was a "real trade-off"."There is a cost to the UK economy and UK taxpayers of having this route, and we should just be honest about that and say there is a trade-off," he said."But similarly, on the other side, people who say 'we should set it at very high numbers to make sure that we don't lose any money' ignore the massive impact that has on families and the destruction of some relationships and the harm it causes to children." A higher threshold would also have a "negative impact on the family life of a larger number of people", the MAC said. It noted many families with lower incomes still earn enough to support themselves even if they do not make a net positive fiscal impact on the said an adult would need to earn £27,800 to have a neutral impact on the public finances - and £40,400 for a couple to have no impact in the first year a spouse arrived in the MAC did not recommend a higher threshold for families with children, saying the impacts on family life for them would be "particularly significant". In 2023 the previous Conservative government announced plans to raise the salary threshold to £38,700, as part of plans to cut the level of they backed down following criticism that this would keep families apart, settling on a £29,000 threshold with plans to gradually increase it did not implement those further rises when the party came into government and asked the MAC to review the committee said the threshold of £29,000 was already high compared to other high-income countries it had looked at. The MAC said it "was not possible to predict with any confidence" the impact different thresholds would have on the level of net migration - the difference between those entering and leaving the did suggest lowering the threshold from £29,000 to roughly £24,000 may increase net migration by up to 8,000 migration in 2024 was an estimated 431,000 people, down almost 50% on the previous followed record high levels in recent years, with the government under political pressure to get numbers down further. The MAC also criticised the Home Office for its data collection, saying insufficient data "greatly hindered" their review.A Home Office spokesperson said the government was considering the review's findings and would respond in due course. Conservative shadow home secretary Chris Philp said migration figures remain too high and that the government "must urgently re-instate the Conservative plan to further increase the salary threshold"."If the ECHR stops us from setting our own visa rules, from deporting foreign criminals or from putting Britain's interests first, then we should leave the ECHR," he ECHR, which was established in 1950, sets out the rights and freedoms people are entitled to in the 46 signatory countries and is a central part of UK human rights month, the government said it would bring forward legislation to clarify how aspects of the ECHR should apply in immigration cases.
