UN rapporteur calls for global action to stop 'genocide' in Gaza
Francesca Albanese spoke to delegates from 30 countries meeting in Colombia's capital to discuss the Israel-Hamas war and ways that nations can try to stop Israel's military offensive in the territory. Many of the participating nations have described the violence as genocide against the Palestinians.
'Each state must immediately review and suspend all ties with the State of Israel ... and ensure its private sector does the same,' Albanese said. 'The Israeli economy is structured to sustain the occupation that has now turned genocidal.'
The two-day conference organized by the governments of Colombia and South Africa is being attended mostly by developing nations, although the governments of Spain, Ireland and China have also sent delegates.
Israel, which was founded in the aftermath of the Holocaust, has adamantly rejected genocide allegations against it as an antisemitic 'blood libel.'
Analysts say it's not clear whether the conference's participating countries have enough leverage over Israel to force it to change its policies in Gaza, where more than 58,000 people have been killed in Israeli military operations following a deadly Hamas attack on Israel in 2023. The death toll comes from the health ministry, which is under Gaza's Hamas government and does not differentiate between civilians and combatants. The U.N. and other international organizations see its figures as the most reliable statistics on war casualties.
'The United States has so far failed to influence Israel's behavior … so it is naive to think that this group of countries can have any influence over (Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin) Netanyahu's behavior or on the government of Israel,' said Sandra Borda, a professor of international relations at Bogota's Los Andes University. She said, however, that the conference will enable some nations of the Global South to clarify their position toward the conflict and have their voices heard.
The conference is co-chaired by the governments of South Africa and Colombia, which last year suspended coal exports to Israeli power plants, and includes the participation of members of The Hague Group, a coalition of eight nations that earlier this year pledged to cut military ties with Israel and to comply with an International Criminal Court arrest warrant against Netanyahu.
For decades, South Africa's ruling African National Congress party has compared Israel's policies in Gaza and the West Bank with its own history of oppression under the harsh apartheid regime of white minority rule, which restricted most Blacks to 'homelands' before ending in 1994. South Africa's current argument is rooted in the sentiment that Palestinians have been oppressed in their homeland as Black South Africans were under apartheid.
The gathering comes as the European Union weighs various measures against Israel that include a ban on imports from Israeli settlements, an arms embargo and individual sanctions against Israeli officials, who are found to be blocking a peaceful solution to the conflict.
Colombia's Vice Minister for Foreign Affairs Mauricio Jaramillo said Monday that the nations participating in the Bogota meeting, which also include Qatar and Turkey, will be discussing diplomatic and judicial measures that can be taken to put more pressure on Israel to cease its attacks.
'This is not just about Palestine' Jaramillo said in a press conference. 'It is about defending international law… and the right to self determination.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
Anti-Israel protester Mahmoud Khalil repeatedly refuses to condemn Hamas in tense CNN interview: ‘It's disingenuous to ask'
Anti-Israel protester Mahmoud Khalil repeatedly refused to denounce Hamas during a tense CNN interview – insisting it was 'disingenuous' for the anchors to demand his position on the terror group. The outspoken Palestinian activist, who was detained for over three months by the Trump administration for his prominent role in often-times violent Columbia University protests, dismissed co-anchor Pamela Brown's repeated grilling over his views on Hamas as both 'absurd' and hypocritical. 'Do you specifically condemn Hamas, a designated terrorist organization in the United States, not just for their actions on October 7?' Brown pressed the 30-year-old who appeared on 'The Situation Room with Wolf Blitzer' Tuesday morning. 4 Mahmoud Khalil in a CNN interview. CNN A tongue-tied Khalil replied that he condemns the killing of 'all civilians, full stop,' but not Hamas. Brown interrupted Khalil and asked again if he would disavow 'Hamas specifically.' Mahmoud Khalil refuses to condemn Hamas because he IS a terrorist sympathizer not because DHS 'painted' him as one. He 'branded' himself as antisemite through his own hateful behavior and rhetoric. It is a privilege to be granted a visa or green card to live and study in the… — Homeland Security (@DHSgov) July 22, 2025 'No, I am very clear with condemning all civilians. I'm very straight in my position in that part,' said Khalil, who was visibly flustered, later blasting the question as 'selective outrage.' 'But it's disingenuous to ask about condemning Hamas while Palestinians are the ones being starved now by Israel. It's not condemning October 6, where 260 Palestinians were killed by Israel before October 7,' he continued. 'So I hate this selective outrage of condemnation because this is not, this wouldn't lead to a constructive conversation. And this is also, like what we want to deal with is the root cause of why that happened. And it's no way anyone can justify the killing of civilians.' 4 Khalil refused to condemn Hamas after being asked about three times during the interview. CNN Brown pushed back on Khalil's claims, arguing that her question was justified after the Trump administration accused him of sympathizing with the Palestinian terrorist group responsible for the deadly Oct. 7, 2023, attacks on Israel, while he was studying at the Ivy League. He replied that he was 'simply' protesting the war in Gaza. 'That's my duty as a Palestinian, as a human being right now, is to ask for the stop of the killing in my home country. And that's consistent with who I am,' Khalil said, noting he's a 'firm believer in international law and human rights.' 4 Palestinians celebrating on top of a destroyed Israeli tank. AP 'As I said, disingenuous and absurd to ask such questions…That's why I wouldn't really engage much into such questions on condemnation or not. Because selective condemnations is not, wouldn't get us anywhere. It's just like hypocrite, to be honest.' Blitzer then stepped in and ended the heated back-and-forth. Khalil was arrested by federal immigration authorities on March 8 and spent 104 days at a Louisiana detention center as the Trump administration fought to deport the Syrian-born permanent resident. 4 Khalil was arrested back in March and detained in Louisiana for 104 days. Getty Images The administration said Khalil engaged in activities 'aligned to Hamas.' Khalil, who is now suing the federal government for $20 million over what he claims was false imprisonment and a smear campaign to label him as an antisemite, drew fresh backlash after the interview – with the Department of Homeland Security blasting him as a 'terrorist sympathizer.' 'Mahmoud Khalil refused to condemn Hamas because he IS a terrorist sympathizer not because DHS 'painted' him as one,' DHS wrote in a fiery post on X, arguing that the green card holder 'branded' himself as an antisemite 'through his own hateful behavior and rhetoric.' 'The Trump Administration acted well within its statutory and constitutional authority to detain Khalil, as it does with any alien who advocates for violence, glorifies and supports terrorists, harasses Jews, and damages property.'
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Appeals court won't reinstate AP access to presidential events
The U.S. Court of Appeals on Tuesday denied an appeal by The Associated Press for a hearing on its efforts to restore full access to cover presidential events, not ending its case but allowing the White House to continue its control over access to President Donald Trump. The news outlet wanted the court to overturn a three-judge panel's June 6 ruling not to let AP back into the events until merits of the news organization's lawsuit against Trump was decided. But the court on Tuesday declined to hear that appeal. It all stems from Trump's decision in February to keep AP journalists out of the Oval Office, Air Force One and other events too small for a full press corps, in retaliation for the news outlet's decision not to follow his lead in changing the Gulf of Mexico's name. The AP sued in response. In April, a district court ruled that the administration could not exclude journalists based on their opinions. The Trump administration immediately turned to the U.S. Court of Appeals to successfully delay implementation of the ruling before the court could consider the full merits of the case. Next up: This fall, the appeals court considers those full merits. 'We are disappointed by today's procedural decision but remain focused on the strong district court opinion in support of free speech as we have our case heard,' said Patrick Maks, an AP spokesman. 'As we've said throughout, the press and the public have a fundamental right to speak freely without government retaliation.' The White House did not immediately return a request for comment. Since the start of the case, the White House has instituted new rules for access to the limited-space events. AP photographers have been regularly permitted back, but its reporters only occasionally. On Monday, the White House said it would not allow a reporter from The Wall Street Journal onto Air Force One to cover Trump's weekend trip to Scotland because of the outlet's 'fake and defamatory conduct' in a story about the president and late financier Jeffrey Epstein.
San Francisco Chronicle
an hour ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Appeals court won't reinstate AP access to presidential events
The U.S. Court of Appeals on Tuesday denied an appeal by The Associated Press for a hearing on its efforts to restore full access to cover presidential events, not ending its case but allowing the White House to continue its control over access to President Donald Trump. The news outlet wanted the court to overturn a three-judge panel's June 6 ruling not to let AP back into the events until merits of the news organization's lawsuit against Trump was decided. But the court on Tuesday declined to hear that appeal. It all stems from Trump's decision in February to keep AP journalists out of the Oval Office, Air Force One and other events too small for a full press corps, in retaliation for the news outlet's decision not to follow his lead in changing the Gulf of Mexico's name. The AP sued in response. In April, a district court ruled that the administration could not exclude journalists based on their opinions. The Trump administration immediately turned to the U.S. Court of Appeals to successfully delay implementation of the ruling before the court could consider the full merits of the case. Next up: This fall, the appeals court considers those full merits. 'We are disappointed by today's procedural decision but remain focused on the strong district court opinion in support of free speech as we have our case heard,' said Patrick Maks, an AP spokesman. 'As we've said throughout, the press and the public have a fundamental right to speak freely without government retaliation.' Since the start of the case, the White House has instituted new rules for access to the limited-space events. AP photographers have been regularly permitted back, but its reporters only occasionally. On Monday, the White House said it would not allow a reporter from The Wall Street Journal onto Air Force One to cover Trump's weekend trip to Scotland because of the outlet's 'fake and defamatory conduct' in a story about the president and late financier Jeffrey Epstein. ___
