UAE: Why electric vehicle insurance costs are now 72% higher than petrol cars
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
Rising insurance costs reflect repair complexities and market transition
The average annual insurance premium for electric vehicles in the UAE has reached approximately AED 4,992, compared to AED 2,895 for petrol or diesel cars. This 72% gap is primarily due to higher repair costs, particularly for specialised components like batteries, which often require international sourcing and limited local repair expertise.
Speaking to
The National
, Hitesh Motwani, deputy CEO of insurancemarket.ae, explained that specialised components such as EV batteries often require international shipping, and the limited number of repair centres in the UAE is driving up claim expenses.
The April 2024 floods exacerbated these issues, causing widespread battery failures and adding further pressure on insurers. As the EV sector matures, insurance pricing is expected to evolve, with data-driven models that consider factors like battery condition, charging habits, and vehicle technology. Insurers are also beginning to work more closely with authorised repair networks to streamline claims and reduce long-term costs.
EV adoption and infrastructure expansion
The UAE has emerged as a regional leader in EV adoption, with electric vehicles accounting for 13% of all new car sales in 2023 up from just 0.7% in 2021. This represents between 28,000 and 33,000 new EVs, including plug-in hybrids, entering the market within a single year.
A growing range of affordable electric vehicle models and rapid expansion of charging infrastructure are key drivers behind the UAE's rising EV adoption.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
Market data shows a clear shift in consumer preference, supported by improved accessibility, enhanced battery technology, and ongoing government and private sector investments in clean mobility.
Notably, Abu Dhabi's joint venture between Adnoc and Taqa aims to install 70,000 EV chargers by 2030. Battery advancements now enable many EVs to travel over 400km on a single charge, with some premium models exceeding 600km, helping address range anxiety.
Used EV market and battery confidence support market expansion
The UAE's used EV market is also growing rapidly, bolstered by increased supply, improved affordability, and wider consumer acceptance. Online platforms are reporting a rise in demand for pre-owned electric vehicles, with a diverse range of options including both budget friendly Chinese brands and premium European models.
Buyers are now more focused on battery health, warranty status, and charging compatibility.
Longterm battery warranties, typically covering up 8 to 10 years, have helped ease concerns about degradation. New battery certification tools are also boosting transparency and buyer confidence in the secondary market.
Industry optimism and long-term market outlook
Despite current challenges, industry experts view high insurance premiums as a temporary issue. Greater availability of vehicle data and closer collaboration between insurers, regulators, and manufacturers are expected to help stabilise costs over time.
Electric vehicle manufacturers continue to focus on innovation in range, design, and user experience. For instance, premium models now offer certified driving ranges above 600km, with real world usability often between 500 to 550km per charge.
As charging infrastructure expands and resale values stabilise, luxury EVs like the Porsche Taycan retain 80 to 82% of value after three years electric vehicle ownership is becoming increasingly viable. These developments align with the UAE government's goal of having 50% of vehicles on the road be electric by 2050.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
18 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Record-breaking $27.7 tariff haul in July has Trump celebrating, but will it last?
Record US tariff revenue July 2025: US President Donald Trump is celebrating record tariff revenue, reaching $27.7 billion in July. While Trump hails this as a win, economists caution that American businesses and consumers are primarily bearing the costs. Tariffs constitute less than 10% of total government receipts, and the federal deficit continues to grow. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tariff Collections See Massive Year-Over-Year Growth Donald Trump Hails July Tariff Revenue Surge as a Win Tariffs Still a Small Piece of the Fiscal Puzzle Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Who's Really Paying the Tariffs? US Tariff Rate Heading to Historic High Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads FAQs US president Donald Trump is celebrating a record-breaking month for US tariff revenue due to the billions pouring into federal coffers as revenue supplied by importers hit another monthly record, as per a report. But economists and analysts are warning that the financial boost may be short-lived and that American businesses and consumers are footing most of the bill, as reported by Yahoo data released Tuesday by the Treasury Department shows the US collected $27.7 billion in customs duties in July, a new monthly record and a sharp jump from the $26.6 billion collected in June and $22.2 billion in May, as per the report. Just a year ago, monthly tariff collections hovered around $8 billion, according to Yahoo Finance. Altogether, tariff revenue for the current fiscal year has climbed to roughly $135.7 billion, with two months still to go before the government's fiscal year ends on September 30, as per Yahoo READ: Houthis spare Chinese car ships, but others aren't so lucky - here's the surprising reason In a post on Truth Social, Trump celebrated the milestone, calling the revenue "has been incredible for our Country, its Stock Market, its General Wealth, and just about everything else," as quoted in the report. He also took a swipe at Goldman Sachs, which has raised concerns about the long-term effects of his tariffs and disputed his repeated claim that foreign nations are the ones paying the duties, according to the Yahoo Finance the president's enthusiastic framing, a closer look at the numbers paints a more complicated picture, as per the tariffs brought in $27.7 billion last month, that sum accounted for less than 10% of total government receipts, which topped $338 billion in July, reported Yahoo Finance. The boost in tariff revenue also didn't help reduce the growing budget deficit, which widened by $291 billion last month alone, according to the report. Over the past 10 months, the federal deficit has grown to $1.63 trillion, as per the Yahoo Finance READ: Is it AI or Trump's policies? US sees brutal 140% layoff spike in July, worst surge since early COVID chaos Economists have pointed out that contrary to Trump's claims, it's not foreign governments footing the tariff bill, it's US businesses and, increasingly, American consumers, according to the from Goldman Sachs estimates that as of June, US companies absorbed about 64% of the costs from higher tariffs, while consumers paid about 22%, as reported by Yahoo Finance. But that is shifting, and by October, the investment bank forecasts that consumers could end up covering nearly 67% of tariff costs as businesses pass price hikes down to them, compared to only 8% for US businesses, reported Yahoo Finance. Goldman Sachs also predicted that foreign exporters' share would be around 25%, as per the READ: Giant Wyoming data center to guzzle 5x more power than residents, but the user remains secret However, further tariff increases are on the horizon. Last week, the Trump administration implemented new hikes on imports from key trading partners, including the European Union, Japan, and South Korea, and in the coming weeks, tariffs on some Indian goods are set to climb to 50%, as reported by Yahoo at the Yale Budget Lab estimate that once all of Trump's planned measures are fully implemented, the US average effective tariff rate will soar to 18.6%, the highest level since 1933, according to the READ: 10 must-change iOS 18.6 settings that'll make your iPhone feel like day one again As per economists, mostly US businesses and consumers, not foreign governments, despite Trump's than 10% of total government receipts, which stood at $338 billion.
Hindustan Times
18 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Trump's Tariffs Stymie India's Bid to Steal Manufacturing From China
Since President Trump's first term, companies grappling for trade certainty have clung to one guiding principle: move production out of China. But months into the president's global tariff barrage , that doesn't always looking to diversify their supply chains saw India's vast population, its strengthening ties with Washington, and its abundance of engineers and scientists as a good hedge against China. But then Trump—who has been trying to pressure President Vladimir Putin into ending Russia's war on Ukraine—grew angry with India over the country's purchases of Russian oil. In recent weeks, Trump has slapped a 25% tariff on Indian imports and has threatened to double that by the end of this month. In that case, tariffs on India would match the roughly 50% duties the U.S. now charges on Chinese goods. That has left companies that have moved production to India scrambling to respond. 'All the effort that we put up over the last four to five months is suddenly up in the air,' said Rohin Malhotra, the chief technology officer of Posha, a Silicon Valley-based maker of countertop cooking robots that had been working to shift production from China to India. The company, whose robots are programmed to cook meals with prepped ingredients, has now put those plans on hold as it waits to see if the 50% tariff sticks. 'It's just wasted effort to think of an alternative destination for now,' he said. India has worked hard in recent years to attract businesses that decided to diversify away from China—a strategy dubbed 'China Plus One.' Indian authorities have worked to ease the thicket of regulations and modernize the country's infrastructure, both of which have hindered business investment in the past. The push has, in some cases, paid off handsomely, bringing in much-needed investment. For instance, Apple began shifting a large chunk of its iPhone production from China to India about a decade ago. India produced about 14% of Apple's iPhones in 2024, according to technology research firm TechInsights, up from zero nine years earlier. (The Trump administration has exempted iPhones from most tariffs.) But now, uncertainty over U.S. trade policy reigns. Some hope that Trump will lower the India tariffs after he meets with Putin later this week. At the same time, the U.S. and China are still in talks to determine the final level of tariffs. Other countries that have lured businesses away from China, like Vietnam and Malaysia, have been assigned tariff rates of around 20%. It is uncertain whether those tariffs are low enough for companies to justify the disruption of moving supply chains from China. Moreover, Trump intends to charge higher levies on so-called transshipped products, or those assembled in third countries with some Chinese components. However, the exact mechanism of such tariffs is unclear. 'Instead of a smooth 'China+1' diversification, many are now in 'China+None of the Above' mode,' unsatisfied with any of their options, wrote Mark Morgan, president of global commercial operations at Kinaxis, a supply-chain company. Liz Andarcia, co-founder of Rise Collective Consultants, a supply-chain consulting firm that has helped retailers shift production out of China, said some companies are hoping to wait a couple of weeks before making big moves. Still, she is working with one client—whose production is heavily concentrated in India—to shift some sites to Pakistan and Turkey. 'We're just fast-tracking those now, like pedal to the metal,' she said. India's purchase of Russian oil has angered President Trump. It's a difficult period for Serenial Technology, an Indian company setting up a contract manufacturing site in Dharwad, India. Renaud Anjoran, a co-owner, said U.S. clients who were eager to have their electronics products made in Dharwad are now indicating that they'll wait to see what happens with tariff rates before committing. 'It just threw a huge wrench in our plans basically,' he said. Many of his clients will stick with China, he said. All the tariff uncertainty has whipsawed Radhika Patil, the CEO and cofounder of Cradlewise, a Silicon Valley-based maker of cradles that soothe babies back to sleep. Cradlewise only began commercial sales five years ago, but it has already moved manufacturing twice, first from China to Vietnam, and last year from Vietnam to India. The company set up manufacturing in Pune, an industrial hub in western India that has traditionally produced cars. Patil said he was drawn to India because it is a strong base for raw materials, so that she wouldn't be reliant on imported parts. 'We just wanted to build more predictability into the supply chain,' she said. Instead, the tariffs are now forcing her to consider raising U.S. retail prices for her cribs by around $200, a step she has previously avoided out of fear of spooking customers. Moving production to the U.S. would be tricky, she said. Besides higher labor costs, the company would also have to contend with tariffs on imported components. Patil said it has been a stressful time. 'This was a sudden shift,' she said. 'Fifty percent—and overnight—is very difficult to absorb.' Write to Jon Emont at
Mint
43 minutes ago
- Mint
Dani Rodrik: Where's the global resistance to an imperialist America?
America's critics have always depicted it as a selfish country that throws its weight around with little regard for others' well-being. But President Donald Trump's trade policies have been so misguided, erratic and self-defeating as to make even the most cartoonish such descriptions seem flattering. Still, in a twisted way, his trade follies have laid bare other countries' failures as well, by forcing them to consider what their responses say about their own intentions and capabilities. One's true character is revealed in the face of adversity, it's said, and the same goes for countries and their political systems. Trump's frontal assault on the world economy was a shock to everyone, but it also gave Europe, China and various middle powers an opportunity to make a statement about what they stand for. It was an invitation to articulate a vision of a new world order that could overcome the imbalances, inequities and unsustainability of the old one, and that would not depend on the leadership—for better or worse—of a single powerful nation. But few rose to the challenge. Also Read: Dani Rodrik: How ideology sometimes trumps material interests In this respect, the EU has perhaps been the greatest disappointment. In terms of purchasing power, it is almost as large as the US, accounting for 14.1% of the world economy, compared to 14.8% for the US and 19.7% for China. Moreover, despite the recent rise of the far right, most European countries have avoided sliding into authoritarianism. As a collection of democratic nation-states whose geopolitical ambitions do not threaten others, Europe has both the power and moral authority to provide global leadership. Instead, it submitted to the US. Europe's ambitions were always narrowly parochial; but in folding to Trump, it is not even clear that it served its own immediate interests. The July handshake deal between Trump and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen leaves 50% tariffs on European exports of steel and aluminium, places 15% tariffs on most other exports, and commits Europe to ridiculously high levels of energy imports from the US. Rarely has the EU's structural weakness as a confederation of countries without a collective sense of identity been on starker display. Also Read: Dani Rodrik: Mercantilism isn't always bad but Trump's trade policy is China has played a tougher game, retaliating forcefully with its own tariffs and restricting exports of critical minerals to the US. Trump's self-defeating foreign policy has helped China extend its influence and enhance its credibility as a reliable partner for the developing world. But the Chinese leadership has also failed to articulate a practical model for a post-neoliberal global economic order. Notably, China has shown little interest in addressing the two global imbalances that it has caused with its own large external surplus and excess of domestic savings over investment. Smaller countries and middle powers have mostly played a quiet game, pursuing independent bargains with Trump and hoping to limit the damage to their own economies. An exception is Brazil, whose president, Luiz Inácio Lula Da Silva, has emerged as the rare exemplary leader who refuses to grovel at Trump's feet. Despite facing punitive 50% tariffs and pointed personal attacks, he has proudly defended his country's sovereignty, democracy and independent judiciary. As the New York Times puts it, 'There is perhaps no world leader defying President Trump as strongly as Mr. Lula." Also Read: Trump's tariff drama is playing out as a tragicomedy in five acts Such leadership has been sorely lacking around the world. In India, political commentator Pratap Bhanu Mehta points out that many business and political elites are searching for ways to accommodate Trump. But in doing so, Mehta argues, they are misreading him and the world he's creating. At any other time in recent history, the Trump administration's behaviour would immediately be called out for what it is: imperialism, plain and simple. Imperialism must always be challenged and that requires both power and purpose. Of course, America has held the reins of the world economy for a very long time. The dollar is firmly entrenched and the US market remains singularly important. But these advantages are not as strong as they used to be. It would defy political logic and the laws of economic gravity if a country controlling only 15% of the world economy (in terms of purchasing power parity) could dictate the rules of the game to everyone else. Though the rest of the world remains divided, surely everyone has a common interest in repelling Trumpian imperialism and thus in uniting to resist his demands. Also Read: Nouriel Roubini: The US economy could thrive in spite of Trump's disastrous policies Finding common purpose is perhaps the bigger challenge. If Trump 'wins,' it will be because other large economies were unable (or unwilling) to articulate an alternative framework for the global economy. Pining after traditional multilateralism and global cooperation, as many targets of Trump's ire have done, is of little use. It also signals weakness. The world needs new ideas and principles for avoiding both the instabilities and inequities of hyper-globalization and the destructive effects of beggar-thy-neighbour policies. It is not realistic to expect a new Bretton Woods agreement. Nevertheless, middle powers and large economies can still model such principles by putting them to work in their own policies. Trump's actions have held up a mirror to others and most should recognize that their reflection is not pretty. Fortunately, their apparent helplessness is self-imposed. It is not too late to choose self-confidence over humiliation. ©2025/Project Syndicate The author is a professor of international political economy at Harvard Kennedy School, and the author of 'Straight Talk on Trade: Ideas for a Sane World Economy'.
