logo
You scratch my back: Killer whales use seaweed as tools to bond and exfoliate, study finds

You scratch my back: Killer whales use seaweed as tools to bond and exfoliate, study finds

Malay Mail30-06-2025
Whales observed in Salish Sea off western North America
Behaviour is a rare instance of tool use by marine mammals
It may promote skin health and strengthen social bonds
WASHINGTON, July 1 — Killer whales are known for exceptional intelligence, displaying complex social structures and sophisticated communication. New research provides fresh evidence for this, documenting how these marine mammals use stalks of seaweed as tools to groom each other — as in, 'You scratch my back and I'll scratch yours.'
Using drones to observe a population of killer whales in the Salish Sea, part of the Pacific Ocean between Washington state and British Columbia, researchers noticed that these predators engaged in a behaviour they named 'allokelping,' one of the few known examples of tool use by marine mammals.
The killer whales find large stalks of a type of seaweed called bull kelp, either attached to the seabed or floating at the surface. They then bite off the end of the stalk, position it between themselves and another killer whale and roll the kelp between their bodies.
The researchers hypothesise that the behaviour promotes skin health while strengthening social bonds. Other populations of killer whales have been observed rubbing their bodies on smooth stone beaches, possibly to remove dead skin.
'Most examples of tool use in animals involve solving ecological problems, such as gaining access to food. For example, chimpanzees use sticks to fish for termites. What's remarkable about this discovery is that the tool — the kelp — is used not to obtain food but to facilitate social interaction,' said marine biologist Darren Croft of the University of Exeter in England, co-author of the study published this week in the journal Current Biology.
'This kind of socially motivated tool use is extremely rare in non-human animals and has previously only been observed in a small number of primates, usually in captivity,' added Croft, executive director of the Centre for Whale Research, a scientific organisation based in Washington state that has studied this population of killer whales since the 1970s.
A pair of killer whales swim, one of which has kelp in its mouth, as researchers document a behaviour called 'allokelping' in which one killer whale uses kelp to massage the back of another killer whale, in this handout photograph taken near Admiralty Inlet, Washington April 10, 2024. — Centre for Whale Research, NMFS NOAA Permit 27038 handout pic via Reuters
The researchers documented the behaviour among both male and female killer whales of all ages. It likely plays an important role in their social lives, Croft said.
There are some other examples of tool use among marine mammals. Sea otters use rocks and other hard objects to crack open shells to get at the meat inside. And certain dolphins use marine sponges to protect their snouts and stir up the seabed while foraging. The researchers said the behaviour by the killer whales goes one step further because they modify an object for use as a tool.
'While this is not the first documented case of cetacean or marine mammal tool use, it is — as far as we know — the first case of cetacean tool manufacturing with tool use. The whales are not just finding perfect lengths of kelp in the environment, but rather actively modifying larger intact stalks of kelp to create the pieces they are using for allokelping,' said study co-author Rachel John, a University of Exeter graduate student studying killer whale behaviour.
'Another key part of what makes this behaviour so unique is the fact that they are manipulating the kelp cooperatively with a partner without the use of hands or any hand-like appendages. They use their mouth to position the kelp initially, but after that they only use the momentum and pressure of the core of their bodies to maintain contact with each other and the kelp between them,' John added.
The behaviour is known only among this killer whale population.
Two killer whales engage in a behaviour called 'allokelping', which consists in one killer whale using kelp to massage the back of another killer whale, in this handout photograph taken near San Juan Island, Washington June 19, 2024. — Centre for Whale Research, NMFS NOAA Permit 27038 handout pic via Reuters
'We found that individuals with more visible peeling skin were more likely to engage in allokelping, suggesting that the behaviour may serve a skin-care function. Brown seaweeds like kelp are known to have antibacterial properties, so it's plausible that rubbing with kelp helps improve skin health,' Croft said.
'Second, we think this behaviour likely plays a role in maintaining social bonds. Physical contact is known to be important for social cohesion in many species, including humans. Just as we might hug a friend we haven't seen in a while, it's possible that allokelping serves to reinforce social relationships among whales,' Croft added.
This kelp grows in cold and nutrient-rich coastal and intertidal waters and thrives off the western coast of North America, which includes the home range of these killer whales.
This population is at grave risk of extinction, Croft said, with only 73 individuals counted in the latest census. They are highly specialised salmon hunters, particularly reliant on Chinook salmon. As salmon populations have declined, in part due to dam-building on spawning rivers, the whales have struggled to find enough food.
'In short, they are starving,' Croft said. — Reuters
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

SpaceX launches US military's secretive X-37B space drone on eighth mission
SpaceX launches US military's secretive X-37B space drone on eighth mission

Malay Mail

timean hour ago

  • Malay Mail

SpaceX launches US military's secretive X-37B space drone on eighth mission

WASHINGTON, Aug 22 — A SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket will blast into space yesterday night carrying the US military's secretive X-37B drone on its eighth mission. The rocket is due to launch at 11:50 pm (0450 GMT on Friday), according to SpaceX, which said a backup window is available at the same time the following day. The US Space Force has said the drone's mission will include 'a wide range of test and experimentation objectives.' 'These operational demonstrations and experiments comprise of next-generation technologies including laser communications and the highest performing quantum inertial sensor ever tested in space,' the service said in a statement last month. 'Mission 8 will contribute to improving the resilience, efficiency and security of U.S. space based communications architectures,' it added. About the size of a small bus, the X-37B US space drone looks like a mini version of the manned space shuttles retired in 2011. On previous missions, the X-37B has carried out tests for US space agency NASA. In operation since 2010, the X-37B Orbital Test Vehicle was designed for the Air Force by United Launch Alliance by Boeing. It is 30 feet (nine meters) long, has a 15-foot wingspan and is powered by solar panels. — AFP

Tourism boom fuels rising pollution in fragile Antarctica, scientists warn
Tourism boom fuels rising pollution in fragile Antarctica, scientists warn

Malay Mail

time13 hours ago

  • Malay Mail

Tourism boom fuels rising pollution in fragile Antarctica, scientists warn

SANTIAGO, Aug 21 — Soaring numbers of tourists and expanding research projects are increasingly polluting Antarctica, scientists warned yesterday, a fresh blow for one of Earth's most pristine environments already threatened by human-driven climate change. In Antarctic areas where humans have been active, the concentration of fine particles containing heavy metals is 10 times higher than it was 40 years ago, the international team of researchers said in a new study. That change has come as the number of annual tourists visiting the white continent has risen from 20,000 to 120,000 over the last two decades, according to the International Association of Antarctica Tour Operators. 'The increasing human presence in Antarctica raises concerns about pollutants from fossil fuel combustion, including those from ships, aircraft, vehicles and supporting infrastructure,' the study in the journal Nature Sustainability said. Ships carrying tourists are powered by dirty fossil fuels, which are the source of fine particles containing things like nickel, copper, zinc and lead. 'Snow melts faster in Antarctica due to the presence of polluting particles in areas frequented by tourists,' study co-author Raul Cordero told AFP. 'A single tourist can contribute to accelerating the melting of around 100 tons of snow,' said the scientist at the University of Groningen in the Netherlands. The researchers — from countries including Chile and Germany — spent four years traveling 2,000km in Antarctica to measure the contamination. The presence of heavy metals has also increased due to scientific expeditions. Research projects that stay for an extended time can have up to 10 times more of an impact than a single tourist, Cordero said. The study acknowledged there have been 'meaningful steps forward' in attempts to protect Antarctica, such as a ban on highly polluting heavy fuel oil and the tourism industry embracing electric-hybrid ships. 'Nevertheless, our results show that more remains to be done to reduce the burdens of human activities in Antarctica,' including speeding up the transition to renewable energy and slashing fossil fuel use, the study said. A different Nature study also published yesterday warned that potentially irreversible changes in Antarctica driven by climate change could lift global oceans by meters and lead to 'catastrophic consequences for generations.' — AFP

T. rex wins the jaw wars, but rivals found other ways to kill dinner
T. rex wins the jaw wars, but rivals found other ways to kill dinner

Malay Mail

time6 days ago

  • Malay Mail

T. rex wins the jaw wars, but rivals found other ways to kill dinner

Tyrannosaurus possessed the highest estimated bite force Evolutionary flexibility' seen in meat-eating dinosaurs WASHINGTON, Aug 16 — Tyrannosaurus subdued prey with raw power, using bone-crushing bite force. But other meat-eating dinosaurs that rivaled T. rex in size used different approaches. Giganotosaurus relied more on slashing and ripping flesh. And the long and narrow snout of Spinosaurus was well-adapted for catching fish. Researchers have documented the feeding biomechanics of meat-eating dinosaurs in a comprehensive analysis of the skull design and bite force of 17 species that prowled the landscape at various times from the dawn to the twilight of the age of dinosaurs. The study found that Tyrannosaurus possessed by far the highest estimated bite force, with a heavily reinforced skull and massive jaw muscles. But it showed that other dinosaur predators evolved successful approaches to bringing down prey even without matching the T. rex chomp. 'We found that large predatory dinosaurs didn't all evolve the same kind of skull to deal with the challenges of feeding at massive size,' said vertebrate paleontologist Andre Rowe of the University of Bristol in England, lead author of the study published this month in the journal Current Biology. 'Some, like T. rex, reinforced the skull to tolerate extremely high bite forces and the associated skull stresses. Others, like Allosaurus or Spinosaurus, went with lighter or possibly flexible builds that spread out stress in different ways. There's no single 'correct' way to be a giant meat-eater, and that's the point,' Rowe added. The study focused on species within the group, or clade, called theropods that includes the meat-eating dinosaurs. They ran from Herrerasaurus, which lived in Argentina about 230 million years ago and is one of the earliest-known dinosaurs, all the way to T. rex, which was present in western North America when an asteroid struck Earth 66 million years ago and ended the age of dinosaurs. The researchers used three-dimensional models of the skulls of the 17 species, including two different specimens of Tyrannosaurus, and applied a method for simulating how structures respond to physical stress. They estimated muscle forces using digital muscle reconstructions based on living relatives of the dinosaurs – birds and crocodiles – then applied those forces to the skull models to simulate bites. 'Our focus wasn't raw bite force. We were testing how the skulls distributed that force under load, and how these distributions varied by each lineage of carnivores,' Rowe said. The early theropods examined in the study such as Herrerasaurus, which lived during the middle of the Triassic Period, and Dilophosaurus, which lived early in the Jurassic Period, exhibited much lower stress resistance than their later counterparts. They were lightly built dinosaurs and not well adapted to high bite forces, Rowe said. The increase in bite force and skull strength unfolded gradually over time, reaching its apex with Tyrannosaurus and its close relatives in a lineage called tyrannosaurs such as Daspletosaurus and Albertosaurus, which like T. rex appeared late in the Cretaceous Period. 'In tyrannosaurs, there's a big jump in skull strength and bite mechanics, coinciding with deeper skulls, more robust bone architecture and changes in jaw muscle attachment. So the ramp-up wasn't immediate. It evolved over time and in certain lineages more than others,' Rowe said. People take pictures near animatronic dinosaurs, Brachiosaurus, as they attend 'Jurassic World: The Experience' an immersive experience inspired by the Hollywood movie Jurassic World, set at Asiatique The Riverfront, in Bangkok, Thailand. — Reuters pic Tyrannosaurus, Giganotosaurus and Spinosaurus were three of the largest theropods, but their skulls were quite different. Perhaps the largest-known Tyrannosaurus is a specimen named Sue at the Field Museum in Chicago, at 40-1/2 feet (12.3 meters) long. Giganotosaurus and Spinosaurus rivaled T. rex in size. Giganotosaurus lived in Argentina in the middle of the Cretaceous, while Spinosaurus inhabited North Africa at around the same time, both predating Tyrannosaurus by roughly 30 million years. 'Giganotosaurus was large, but its skull wasn't built for the same kind of high-force feeding as T. rex. Spinosaurus had a long, narrow snout, which is consistent with a diet focused on fishing, though we have fossilized evidence that it ate other animals, such as pterosaurs,' Rowe said, referring to the flying reptiles that were cousins of the dinosaurs. One of the key takeaway messages, Rowe said, is that giant body size did not funnel all theropods toward the same design. Stronger bite force was one strategy, but not the only one, Rowe added. 'Some animals win with raw power, others by striking quickly or repeatedly. What we're seeing here is a spectrum of ecological adaptations. These animals weren't all trying to be T. rex clones. They were solving the same problem in different ways,' Rowe added. 'That kind of evolutionary flexibility,' Rowe added, 'probably helped them dominate ecosystems for so long.' — Reuters

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store