Labour says council and care firm failed to invest
An opposition councillor said a Norfolk council and its main care home contractor have failed to invest in upgrading facilities.
Steve Morphew, the Labour group leader on Norfolk County Council (NCC), claimed Norse Care homes are under capacity and losing money.
He said a lack of investment in wet room bathrooms meant residents and families were choosing alternative accommodation, which he blamed for Norse Care's decision to announce the closure of four homes since August.
Norfolk County Council and Norse Care, which is a division of Norse - a company wholly-owned by NCC, said they have invested in the care home sector but admitted funding is an ongoing challenge.
Mr Morphew told BBC Radio Norfolk: "My concern is that the relationship between Norse as a wholly-owned company [of NCC] which claims commercial confidentiality as a private company, is talking to NCC behind closed doors.
"So there's no transparency on what we pretty much know and can work out from published documents, is that all of the homes that are run by Norse that are owned by the county council are threatened with closure in the next couple of years as the contract with Norse and the county council runs out.
He added: "Norse might say they have become unviable. The reason they have become unviable is because neither Norse nor the county council have invested in bringing them up to scratch.
"What's happened is they've become unattractive [to residents] as a result of not having modern facilities like wet rooms, so nobody wants to go in there, so they are carrying vacancies which means they are losing money."
Mr Morphew said the council could have borrowed money to invest at low interest rates, and he cited improvements at Norfolk County Hall and the construction of a new car park being carried out on borrowed funds.
He added: "Now, the county council could have borrowed money and lent it to Norse, or Norse could have borrowed or raised the amount that they're getting to do something about it, but they haven't.
"Now these homes are being closed by stealth and it's proving difficult to bring it into the public light so there can be proper scrutiny."
An NCC spokesperson said: "Norfolk County Council has continued to invest into the Care Market in Norfolk, with £76.4 million in fee uplifts over the past three years.
"However, we recognise that the sector is struggling to keep pace with escalating costs and rising demand.
"We've been working alongside Care England, the National Care Association and the Home Care Association to assess and understand the situation and raise our concerns in the right places.
"The National Insurance changes and lack of funding received by Norfolk County Council from central government to support providers with these costs, is an issue for the whole Care Market.
"We have undertaken market analysis to understand the risk to providers and this has identified that small and medium providers are most at risk of ongoing financial viability issues.
"We will continue to lobby Government for fair funding for Norfolk in response to this."
Norse did not directly address Mr Morphew's comments about a lack of investment in facilities, or the expiration of its contract with NCC in 2026.
In a statement, it said: "Norse Care are fully committed to providing high-quality residential care that meets the evolving needs of our communities.
"As care demands change, we are working tirelessly to ensure services remain sustainable, modern, and fit for the future.
"Any decision to close a care home is taken only after careful consideration, with the wellbeing of residents and families at the heart of the process.
"The transformation of care provision is essential to meet rising expectations and provide the best possible environments for those who need them.
"We will continue to work closely with all stakeholders to ensure Norfolk's care services evolve in a way that prioritises dignity, quality, and long-term sustainability."
Follow Norfolk news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
Care homes could close due to fire rules - owner
Council care home closure is fourth in a year
Care home facing £1.2m loss to close down
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Reeves's choices will make Britain poorer
The French statesman Pierre Mendes-France once said that to govern is to choose, and it was a maxim repeated often by the Chancellor in her spending statement to the Commons today. 'I have made my choices. In place of chaos, I choose stability. In place of decline, I choose investment. In place of retreat, I choose national renewal. These are my choices. These are this Government's choices. These are the British people's choices.' This might have sounded like a nice rhetorical flourish – an ironic echo of Mrs Thatcher quoting Francis of Assisi in 1979 – but what does it tell us about the Government's priorities? It is to continue spending money we do not earn and do not have because Labour is unwilling to take the difficult decisions necessary to reform the areas that cost the most to sustain, namely welfare and the NHS. The Treasury ostensibly spent months conducting what is called a zero-based spending review, testing budgets against whether they meet the Government's objectives and priorities. But who decides what they should be? An increase in defence spending has been forced on Labour and will be paid for from raiding the overseas aid budget. In a rare moment of candour the Chancellor admitted the 2.6 per cent of GDP would include spending on intelligence, not just the military. But Nato has asked for core spending of 3.5 per cent plus an additional 1.5 per cent for associated budgets. Labour will be nowhere near the requirement. That is their choice. Another priority is to allocate an extra £30 billion to 'our NHS' on top of the £22 billion already handed over when Labour took office last year. But where are the commensurate reforms that will ensure this is not wasted as so much money has been before? Wes Streeting has yet to unveil his masterplan for the NHS so we don't know; but history tells us to expect little in the way of change. Indeed, a renewed commitment to the nationalised ethos of the NHS, first set out in 1948, was cheered by MPs. That has ensured another decade of decline. Surely, with debt so high, the whole point of examining eye-watering levels of government spending is to try to bring it down, not tinker at the edges of departmental budgets while the overall amount balloons. But that is what we are seeing. The only savings she announced involved the closure of some public buildings, cutting back office costs and other 'efficiencies'. How often have we heard this before? Ms Reeves, who claims to have inherited a broken economy, has within the space of 12 months apparently so transformed its fortunes that she is able to splurge. She still believes that growth will provide the revenues even though her policies are inimical to economic expansion. Figures this week show the number of people in jobs has slumped at the fastest rate since 2014 directly as a result of the Chancellor's increase in employer National Insurance which took effect in the spring. How has that helped boost the economy? Ms Reeves made much of giving the go-ahead to extra investment in national infrastructure, such as roads, regional airports and local transport, which is undoubtedly needed, even though day to day spending will fall. All her hopes for growth rest on kick-starting major projects, including a swathe of social housebuilding schemes underpinned by a £39 billion investment over 10 years and reforms to planning laws to limit the scope for objections. But the industry says a serious shortage of skilled workers makes such promises impossible to fulfil. Moreover, will 'affordable housing' be filled by illegal immigrants ejected from hotels? The biggest issue is how to rein in spending on programmes that are spiralling out of control. Reforms of personal independence payments (PIPs) are in the pipeline but will they really go ahead? Labour Left-winger Richard Burgon said during Prime Minister's Questions that party backbenchers will not support the £5 billion cuts in a vote expected later this month. Scores of Labour MPs have signalled opposition and while Sir Keir Starmer stuck to his guns, this week's U-turn on the winter fuel allowance shows how he can buckle under pressure. The biggest problem facing the country is unsustainable debt, now around 100 per cent of GDP and record levels of taxation. Just paying the interest costs more than the defence budget and yet borrowing continues to grow. Nothing the Chancellor announced will reduce debt and everyone knows that she will have to raise taxes in the autumn or risk a market backlash. She keeps saying this is all being done to help 'working people' but they seem not to include the people who pay most tax, many of whom are already leaving the country. Net emigration among higher earners has reached its highest level since the financial crash. Like Labour chancellors of yore, she is spending money she does not have and will need to take more from wealth creators to fund it. Another French statesman, Jean-Baptiste Colbert, once said: 'The art of taxation consists in so plucking the goose as to obtain the largest possible amount of feathers with the smallest possible amount of hissing.' The Chancellor has made her choice – not to pluck the goose that lays the golden egg, but to kill it. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Government of Canada announces next steps in Alexandra Bridge replacement project
GATINEAU, QC, June 11, 2025 /CNW/ - The Government of Canada continues to invest in improvements to transportation and mobility in the National Capital Region and is making progress on its commitment to replace the Alexandra Bridge. Today, the Honourable Joël Lightbound, Minister of Government Transformation, Public Works and Procurement, announced that the following 3 qualified teams will be invited to participate in the Request for Proposal (RFP) stage for the Alexandra Bridge replacement project: Epoch Pathway Ontario-Québec Partners: Peter Kiewit Sons ULC: Heritage Link Group: These teams were selected through a Request for Qualifications that was launched in October 2024. They will now be invited to submit formal proposals in October 2025. The successful bidder will work in partnership with the integrated project team to finalize the design, deconstruct the existing structure and build the new bridge. The contract for planning and design is expected to be awarded in winter 2026. The contract for deconstruction and construction is expected to follow in 2027, with work beginning in 2028. The new bridge is expected to be in use by 2032. The National Capital Commission (NCC) recently unveiled the updated preferred design concept for the bridge, which responds to feedback received through public consultations. For more information, please visit the NCC's Alexandra Bridge replacement web page. Quotes "Today's announcement is an important milestone in the Alexandra Bridge replacement project and underscores the Government of Canada's commitment to expedite nation-building projects that will connect and transform our country. This project will enhance transportation and mobility in the National Capital Region for decades to come." The Honourable Joël LightboundMinister of Government Transformation, Public Works and Procurement Quick facts The current Alexandra Bridge is over 120 years old and has reached the end of its useful life. The replacement project is being advanced using a progressive design-build approach, which will allow for early collaboration between designers and builders, leading to faster delivery, better cost control and higher-quality results. Following the RFP process, the successful bidder will work with the integrated project team to complete the design in accordance with the project requirements. The integrated project team consists of representatives from Public Services and Procurement Canada, the NCC and Arup Canada Inc., the technical advisor. Consultations with Indigenous communities, the public and stakeholders will continue throughout the project. Associated links Alexandra Bridge: Replacement project Follow us on X (Twitter)Follow us on Facebook SOURCE Public Services and Procurement Canada View original content: Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
PCC says police spending increase not enough
A police and crime commissioner (PCC) has said the increase in police funding announced in the chancellor's Spending Review would not be enough to prevent cuts. The government said the "spending power" of police forces would go up by an average 2.3% per year in real terms by 2029, assuming local taxes go up too. But John Campion, the Conservative PCC for West Mercia, said policing had been "short-changed". He said financial pressures were likely to lead to police officers having to fill in for office-based staff. Yesterday, Mr Campion said the force and his office were looking to cut staffing costs to reduce their budgets. That could mean staff working fewer hours or choosing to leave their jobs in return for a payout. Speaking after the spending announcements by Rachel Reeves, he said: "Whilst more money is available, it's simply not enough at a time when pressure on the police has never been greater as we balance inflation, pay rises, National Insurance contributions and demand." He also said West Mercia Police did not "receive its fair share of government funding". Follow BBC Shropshire on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram. Key points at a glance from the Spending Review Seven ways the Spending Review will affect you Police force looks to make staff cuts to save money West Mercia Police and Crime Commissioner
