logo
Spending Review: How much did schools, transport and the NHS get?

Spending Review: How much did schools, transport and the NHS get?

BBC Newsa day ago

Chancellor Rachel Reeves has announced the government's Spending Review, which outlines the day-to-day budgets for departments over the next three years.The review affects funding for public services such as the NHS, schools, housing, prisons and policing, as well as other areas, including transport and infrastructure.Here BBC correspondents analyse how key services have fared and what the decisions may mean for you.
Money for schools, but lots to pay for
There is money for England's schools - especially crumbling ones - as well as for training and upskilling. Those key takeaways are nestled among rehashed pledges like expanding free school meals and introducing free breakfast clubs.The core schools budget will rise by £2bn in real terms by 2029, the Department for Education says, but much of it will go on those previous commitments. Falling pupil numbers means the department can make some savings, but that money still has to pay for an awful lot.The government is staring down the barrel of ever-growing demand for special educational needs and disabilities (SEND) support. The Spending Review does not seem to address deficits racked up by councils supporting those children, but it does appear to have set aside around £700m to reform the system.Leaky schools on the government's rebuilding programme - many still waiting for builders - will also be wondering if a £2.4bn annual cash injection will suffice.
Will funding for NHS be enough?
The 3% annual real-terms increase in NHS spending announced by the chancellor will look generous to departments with low or no increases.That number covers day-to-day spending by the NHS, for example staff pay and the costs of medicines and patients care. The overall annual increase for the Department of Health is 2.8%, which includes other areas like medicines regulation and pandemic preparedness, as well as the NHS.It is worth pointing out that the health service needs real-term spending growth every year to cope with an increasing and ageing population alongside rising bills for medicines and new treatments. The long-term trend for annual UK health spending in recent decades has been around 3.5%.Aside from day-to-day funding there is also capital spending, which covers investment in buildings and equipment. The new allocation will be just 1% in real-terms per year. The big question is whether that will be enough to enable staff to deliver more operations and procedures.One of Labour's pledges is to ensure more than 90% of patients in England start treatment within 18 weeks of referral. Currently it is less than 60%. Hitting that target is a big ask with all the other claims on spending.
Transport upgrades won't come quickly
"We are happy bunnies" is how someone from the Department for Transport reacted to the Spending Review.Long-term investment in transport infrastructure is clearly central to Labour's plan for "national renewal", so a good chunk of the chancellor's speech was devoted to various upgrades. Some we already knew about, some we didn't.They include a new Liverpool to Manchester rail line, a freeze on the £3 cap on bus fares in England until March 2027 and more than £15.6bn on new trams, trains and buses outside of London.The Conservatives say a lot of this is just rehashing of old announcements with little detail attached. The government says it will lay some meat on the bones of these plans next week in its so-called "infrastructure week".Apart from bus fares, which is a continuation of an existing policy, Reeves' plans are in keeping with the general theme of this Spending Review: ambitious but ultimately not materialising for quite some time - until the 2030s at the earliest.
Seven ways the Spending Review affects youWhat has the chancellor has announced? The key pointsWatch: Where the money is being spent
'Game changer' for social housing
You could almost hear the sigh of relief from social landlords when £39bn was announced for social and affordable housing. Many had warned that without significant funding and certainty, the government would never reach its target of building 1.5 million homes over this parliament.But they've called Wednesday's announcement a "game changer". Guaranteeing how much social landlords will receive in rents over the next 10 years means that housing associations can plan how much they have to invest in building.Housing charity Shelter called the investment a "watershed moment". The charity's head of policy, Charlie Trew, said the amount was 70% more than the previous government invested but it was still not enough to end homelessness for good. The charity called for a "clear target" for exactly how many social rent homes are planned.
Police and border questions remain
A 2.3% real terms yearly funding increase for policing in England and Wales is slightly better than senior officers had feared, but forces are already warning of "some ruthless prioritisation", arguing that most of the money will be "swallowed up" by police pay rises.The chancellor stressed that an increase of "more than £2bn" will mean government pledges on cutting crime and increasing police numbers can be kept.On immigration, there is more money for the Border Security Command, rising to £280m extra a year, with promises of new kit including an army of drones to improve surveillance. Reeves also promised that the use of hotels for asylum seekers would end by 2029.But with overall Home Office spending being cut by 1.7% a year, there are knotted eyebrows at how this is all going to add up and be achieved while managing a sizeable squeeze to the department's budget.
Prison money shows severity of crisis
Just recently we were told that offenders recalled to prison would be let out earlier due to overcrowding. We know the government is planning on building three more prisons to deal with the capacity crisis.The chancellor said £7bn would be spent on that building project - that's more than we were told earlier this month, when the figure stood at £4.7bn.The increase in funding indicates the severity and urgency of the problem. But building more prisons will take years.Also announced was £700m to reform the probation service - that cash will fund further recruitment on top of the 1,300 officers the government had already said it will employ this year.Several probation officers welcomed the investment but raised concerns about their "increasing workload" and when the new hires will be functional.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Women's Prize for Fiction ‘greatest honour' as an intersex woman, says winner
Women's Prize for Fiction ‘greatest honour' as an intersex woman, says winner

The Independent

time23 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Women's Prize for Fiction ‘greatest honour' as an intersex woman, says winner

The winner of the Women's Prize for Fiction has said the award is 'the greatest honour of my life as a woman' as she reflected on her experience growing up intersex. Dutch author Yael van der Wouden won the accolade for her debut novel, The Safekeep, and used her winner's speech to champion the trans community, who have 'changed the system' and 'fought for health care'. The book, which explores repressed desire and the unresolved aftermath of the Holocaust in post-Second World War Netherlands, was described as an 'astonishing debut' by the head of the judges. The ceremony, held in central London on Thursday, saw the non-fiction prize awarded to physician Dr Rachel Clarke for The Story Of A Heart, which explores the human experience behind organ donation. In her winner's speech, after thanking the judges, van der Wouden said: 'I was a girl until I turned 13, and then, as I hit puberty, all that was supposed to happen did not quite happen. 'And if it did happen, it happened too much, and all at once my girlhood became an uncertain fact. 'I won't thrill you too much with the specifics, but the long and the short of it is that, hormonally, I'm intersex. 'This little fact defined my life throughout my teens, until I advocated for the health care that I needed. 'The surgery and the hormones that I needed, which not all intersex people need. Not all intersex people feel at odds with their gender presentation. 'I mention the fact that I did, because in the few precious moments here on stage, I am receiving, truly, the greatest honour of my life as a woman, presenting to you as a woman, and accepting this Women's Prize. 'And that is because of every single trans person who's fought for health care, who changed the system, the law, societal standards, themselves. I stand on their shoulders.' The NHS website says intersex, or differences in sex development (DSD), is a group of rare conditions involving genes, hormones and reproductive organs that mean a person's sex development is different to most. In contrast, people who are transgender identify as a gender separate to the sex they were born in and sometimes go through gender-affirming surgery. Van der Wouden's novel follows Isabel, a young woman whose life in solitude is upended when her brother's girlfriend Eva comes to live in their family house in what turns into a summer of obsession, suspicion and desire. The chairwoman of the judges for the fiction prize, writer Kit de Waal, said: 'This astonishing debut is a classic in the making, a story to be loved and appreciated for generations to come. Books like this don't come along every day.' Van der Wouden will receive £30,000 and a limited-edition bronze statuette known as the Bessie, which was created and donated by artist Grizel Niven. The judging panel for the Women's Prize for Fiction included novelist and journalist Diana Evans, author and journalist Bryony Gordon, writer and magazine editor Deborah Joseph, and musician and composer Amelia Warner. Clarke said she has 'literally been a feminist since I was too young to know what that word even meant', as she collected her award. The physician's book recounts two family stories, documenting how medical staff take care of nine-year-old Kiera in her final hours after a car accident, while offering a new life to nine-year-old Max who is suffering from heart failure from a viral infection. Clarke, who is behind the books Breathtaking and Your Life In My Hands: A Junior Doctor's Story, will receive £30,000 and a limited-edition piece of art known as the Charlotte, both gifted by the Charlotte Aitken Trust. The judging panel for the non-fiction prize included writer and broadcaster Dr Leah Broad, whose work focuses on women's cultural history, and novelist and critic Elizabeth Buchan. Previous winners of the fiction prize include Tayari Jones for An American Marriage and Madeline Miller for The Song Of Achilles, while the first non-fiction prize was awarded last year to Naomi Klein for Doppelganger: A Trip Into The Mirror World. The awards were announced by the Women's Prize Trust, a UK charity that aims to 'create equitable opportunities for women in the world of books and beyond'.

France blocking Britain from EU's massive defence fund
France blocking Britain from EU's massive defence fund

Telegraph

time32 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

France blocking Britain from EU's massive defence fund

France is trying to shut out British arms firms from the EU's defence industrial programme despite the post-Brexit reset. A diplomatic source told The Telegraph that Paris was seeking to restrict member states looking to make a purchase under the scheme to weapons made mostly within the bloc. The European Defence Industry Programme (EDIP) is being touted by the European Commission as the largest overhaul of the Continent's industrial base. It will see EU cash pumped into joint procurement projects and the production of weapons, ammunition and other military hardware. EDIP, which has been six months in the making, is part of a wider scramble to spend €800 billion on defence by the end of the decade. French diplomats have insisted the tool should be solely used to boost firms based inside the EU, as well as Norway and Ukraine. This means any member states looking to make a purchase under the scheme will be restricted to technologies with at least 85 per cent of its parts made in the bloc. The demand means that Britain, which recently signed a flagship defence and security agreement with Brussels, will be shut out from the majority of projects being funded by the EU's budget. The UK will also be blocked from joint procurement projects under the EDIP scheme. 'Not even a month ago, we solemnly declared the turning of pages and opening of new chapters in our relationship with the UK,' an EU diplomat told The Telegraph. 'Yet, at the first occasion to turn those words into action, we have slammed the book shut.' There are also fears the hard-line French position will see potential EU funding cut from factories producing Patriot surface-to-air interceptors, because they are a US technology. It comes at a time when Nato's European allies and Canada were warned they would have to increase air defence systems by 400 per cent to protect against the prospect of a Russian attack. 'It seems self-defeating to exclude investments in the one readily available air defence system, simply because it's American,' the diplomat added. Emmanuel Macron, France's president, has consistently pushed for EU defence schemes to be used to boost the Continent's own industry, rather than allowing funds to be invested in foreign firms. Bogged down in red tape Many militaries across the EU, such as the Netherlands, Romania and Greece, have built their defensive strategies around the procurement of American systems, like Patriot air defence batteries. To mitigate concerns, there are discussions over allowing the transfer of technologies from non-EU defence firms to businesses based in the bloc. But insiders have said this mechanism will likely become bogged down in red tape, making it practically impossible to secure funds for.

Captain Kemi needs ‘an army' but business not yet keen to follow her over the top
Captain Kemi needs ‘an army' but business not yet keen to follow her over the top

Telegraph

time33 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Captain Kemi needs ‘an army' but business not yet keen to follow her over the top

There was not much headroom, fiscal or otherwise, as the Tory leader spoke on the economy in the cramped basement of a City hotel. The ceiling was low but Kemi Badenoch's hopes were high as she addressed a conference of bankers who seemed under-enthused by the Chancellor's spending review. Tax Freedom Day, the point of the year when we stop working for the Exchequer, had just dawned, six days later than last year, and there was little sign of relief. The Institute for Fiscal Studies warned that Rachel Reeves was a 'gnat's whisker' away from having to hike taxes and most gnats are asking for the No 1 clippers these days. Add the grim news of GDP falling by 0.3 per cent in April, and the Chancellor's breakfast media round had been like someone trying to sing Good Vibrations to the tune of Beethoven's Funeral March. Speaking from a hospital surrounded by diagnostic equipment (all wisely unplugged to avoid images of flatlining) Reeves insisted she is 'determined' to deliver growth and that GDP is 'volatile'. This is the same Reeves who demanded an emergency Budget in 2022, when GDP fell by 0.1 per cent on the Tory watch. It was not a bad time, therefore, for a Conservative to remind those in the City who their friends are. Badenoch had come to play FTSE with financiers, but she began with a nostra culpa. She admitted the Tories had left a ropey economy – blame Covid, blame Putin, blame the Treasury, don't blame me – 'but it was not this bad'. Productivity, she added, was 'stuck in first gear' and London was experiencing the greatest exodus of wealth of any city save Moscow. She pronounced it the American way to rhyme with cow. Labour don't 'get' business because hardly any of them have a background in it, she added, which may be true but only one of the Beach Boys knew how to surf. Reform, she contended, was running a scam. 'No one is making the argument for business any more except me and my party,' she said. 'Business is a good, in and of itself, and it pays for everything.' Especially, she hoped, at that night's Tory donors' summer party. Their tummies suitably tickled, Badenoch then returned to bashing the Government, saying that borrowing is so high there is a 'significant risk of a death spiral' and that Labour is pessimistically pursuing a path of managed decline, exacerbated by a compliance culture that strangles innovation. So far so punchy, but what would she do better? Badenoch's shirt cuffs were unbuttoned but she had little up her sleeves. Her opposition to VAT on school fees was reprised and she promised to 'reverse changes to APR and BPR' (agricultural and business property relief), thus giving CPR to the economy. Beyond that, she had nothing. It is, to be fair, early in the parliament for policy. What she most wants now are allies ('Quite frankly, we need an army.') 'I'm on your side,' she told them, 'but I need you to be on mine too. You can't sit back and hope that someone else is coming along to fix this. You need to speak up. Don't just wait for other politicians to do it. You need to get on the pitch too.' Building to her conclusion with a plea for ideas, Captain Kemi hit a poetic, if metrically flawed, note. 'Back us, put your name to the cause,' she said, 'for we're not going to turn the country around with quiet applause.' She then left the stage to quiet applause. The pin-striped army liked her tone, but they are not quite ready to follow her over the top.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store