Spending review: Treasury minister Emma Reynolds tells Sky News she is 'not ruling out' tax rises in the autumn
A Treasury minister has refused to rule out tax rises at the budget in the autumn, amid concerns that any global economic instability could mean the government will not have enough money to fund its spending plans.
Speaking to Sky's Politics Hub With Ali Fortescue, Emma Reynolds defended how the economy was being handled, but would not say if more revenue might be needed from taxation.
Asked repeatedly if she was ruling out tax rises, the minister said: "I'm not ruling it in and I'm not ruling it out.
"We have got £9bn of fiscal headroom [money left in the budget], which is significantly more than the Tories had when they were in power, at the end of their time in power.
"We've got a growing economy, and we, as the chancellor did say in the [Commons] chamber, the budget in the autumn last year was a once-in-a-generation budget where we had to do some very tough things, and we're not going to have another budget like that in the future."
"Now we know - tax rises are coming."
3:43
Fiscal rules are non-negotiable
Speaking to Sky's political editor Beth Rigby, the chancellor Rachel Reeves avoided the direct question about potential tax rises, saying: "Before any money goes out the door, we will have a budget in the autumn, and we will show in the round, when the Office for Budget Responsibility update their forecast, how everything is consistent with the fiscal rules that I set out as chancellor last autumn."
She added that they "made the tax changes that were necessary last year to fund the spending that I've set out today".
4:28
Ms Reeves has imposed a set of "iron-clad" fiscal rules, which restrict government borrowing in order to ensure economic stability and reduce the UK's national debt, Labour says.
These rules mean the amount of money she has available to spend on the day-to-day running of public services is limited to only what the government takes in tax revenue.
'A miniscule margin'
But as Paul Johnson from the non-partisan Institute for Fiscal Studies told our presenter Jayne Secker, the chancellor has left herself very little room for manoeuvre.
He said: "She set the fiscal rules and she's also meeting them by the most miniscule margin imaginable.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
37 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Do house prices really double every 10 years? Why where you live has made a big difference
The old adage that house prices double roughly every 10 years may be broken, according to new analysis by Zoopla. It revealed that on average, prices have failed to double - even over the last two decades. House prices across Britain have increased by an average of 74 per cent over the last 20 years, according to the property portal, rising from £154,300 to £268,200. Consumer prices inflation has been about 76 per cent over the same period, while retail prices inflation has been 107.5 per cent, our inflation calculator shows. Zoopla says the ratio between house prices and earnings has also stayed broadly the same during that time, with the average home costing 6.4 times the typical annual salary. This would suggest that house prices are no less affordable than they were two decades ago. However, this is not entirely true given that house price increases vary significantly across regions. Where have house prices risen most? London has seen the most significant house price increases over the last twenty years, according to Zoopla's data. It says the average home in the capital has risen by 119 per cent since 2005, going from £244,200 to £534,400. House prices in the South East and Eastern England have also seen house prices register greater percentage gains than the national average over the past 20 years. Both regions have seen average property prices increase by 87 per cent during that time. House price to earnings ratios have also increased in both regions, from 7.8 to 8.6 in the South East and 7.1 to 7.7 in Eastern England. Why exactly where you live matters for house prices But even within each given region, there are local areas that have done better than others. Within the South East, the town of Elmbridge in Surrey has seen the biggest average increase in house prices over the last two decades, up from £338,800 to £712,700 - a 110 per cent increase. Despite its high property prices, the area's excellent transport links to London and picturesque countryside make it a highly attractive location for families. However, there are also more affordable areas in the South East, with Southampton in Hampshire registering the lowest average price increases in the region over the last 20 years, up 63 per cent from £138,500 to £225,500. In Eastern England, average house prices in St Albans have seen the most significant increase in the region since 2005, up 108 per cent from £298,600 to £622,100. Just 25 miles away from London, the city is popular with commuters as well as history enthusiasts due to its spectacular cathedral and Roman architecture. However, like the South East, there are more affordable pockets in Eastern England, with the popular coastal town Great Yarmouth seeing the lowest growth in average house price increases in the region over the last 20 years, up 77 per cent from £105,900 to £187,700. The North-South divide: what's happening? What's clear from Zoopla's data is that there is a gap between the North and South of England - but this been closing in recent years. Average house prices have increased by 39 per cent over 20 years in the North East, the smallest rise of any region. House price to earnings ratios have improved the most in the North East compared to the rest of the UK, falling from 5.7 to 4 over the last twenty years. Sunderland has registered the lowest average house price increases in the region, with prices rising from £101,600 to £124,000 - a mere 22 per cent change. Elsewhere, affordability has also improved in the North West and Yorkshire, with house price to earnings ratios falling from 6 to 5.1 in the North West and 5.7 to 5 in Yorkshire. In Blackpool on the North West coast, average house prices have increased by just 26 per cent, with homes now costing £124,300 on average, up from £98,400 in 2005. In Hull, the fourth-largest city in Yorkshire, average house prices have increased by 49 per cent, or £38,100 over the last 20 years. 'The picture is far from uniform across the UK,' said Daniel Copley, consumer expert at Zoopla. 'Our data shows that while some areas have seen dramatic increases, house prices have risen slowly, in line with incomes in northern regions.' For anyone now looking to buy, it means the north will represent much better value for money than in the past. 'If you grew up in north-east England, bought in London and are now returning to your roots, you're in luck,' said Tom Bill, head of UK residential research at Knight Frank. 'You will get significantly more bang for your buck and the equity accumulated means your mortgage could be wiped out altogether. 'The gap between the capital and the rest of the country has narrowed in recent years as more affordable parts of the UK have seen stronger house price growth. 'The squeeze in London means more buyers are looking beyond the M25 and that often includes locations where they have roots, a trend that was accelerated by the pandemic and shifting work patterns.' Best mortgage rates and how to find them Mortgage rates have risen substantially over recent years, meaning that those remortgaging or buying a home face higher costs. That makes it even more important to search out the best possible rate for you and get good mortgage advice, whether you are a first-time buyer, home owner or buy-to-let landlord. Quick mortgage finder links with This is Money's partner L&C > Mortgage rates calculator > Find the right mortgage for you To help our readers find the best mortgage, This is Money has partnered with the UK's leading fee-free broker L&C. This is Money and L&C's mortgage calculator can let you compare deals to see which ones suit your home's value and level of deposit. You can compare fixed rate lengths, from two-year fixes, to five-year fixes and ten-year fixes. If you're ready to find your next mortgage, why not use This is Money and L&C's online Mortgage Finder. It will search 1,000's of deals from more than 90 different lenders to discover the best deal for you.
Daily Mail
43 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
What's the first thing you'd do if you won the EuroMillions? Our poll reveals number one priority…
EuroMillions fever is in full swing, with the record £208million jackpot still up for grabs in tonight's triple rollover. Those who are in it to win it are likely to daydream and do the mental spend of such an unfeasibly large sum… even if the odds are completely stacked against them. But if you did defy the extreme odds and win a life-changing sum of cash, what is the very first thing you'd do? That's a question we put to This is Money and Mail Online readers, with 23,405 votes cast, asking: If you won the lottery what would you do first? The options were pay off mortgage, buy a house, save/invest, travel and help family/friends. While it is likely all five of those categories will be on the agenda for the winner of a plus-£200million lottery win, the poll revealed that helping family and friends was the priority, with 35 per cent of people giving that answer. Pay off mortgage and buy a house both received 21 per cent of the vote, travel received 15 per cent and save/invest was bottom of the pile at 9 per cent. But while family and friends are top priority, gifting large sums of money should be considered carefully, warns Matt Swatton of wealth management firm Cannacord Wealth. He is a wealth planning director who has advised lottery winners on the unexpected challenges winners face and how they can navigate them in the past. He said: 'Many winners want to share their good fortune with family and friends. 'While gifting can be incredibly rewarding, it also comes with emotional and financial implications. 'A large gift can change the recipient's life - and your relationship with them. 'You also need to consider affordability - make sure you can afford the gift without compromising your own future.' Winners who are gifting money to friends and family will also need to think about the tax implications of gifting. In the UK, gifts are generally free from inheritance tax if you live for seven years after making them 'If someone is gifting and they survive for seven years - happy days,' says financial planner Graham Dixon of wealth management firm Evelyn Partners where he also advises lottery winners on how to manage their fortunes. 'But for gifts that don't fall within the donor's nil rate band - should the donor die, the individual could be liable for tax if the lottery winner dies and the gift made was over £325,000,' he adds. To get around this, the winner could set aside money to make a provision for any tax bill the recipient may face if the donor dies within seven years. They could also set up a trust or take out an insurance policy that directly matches the tax liability as it reduces over seven years. It is insured on the life of the lottery winner and recipients can used this to pay for any inheritance tax bill if the donor dies. Dixon adds: 'When it comes to gifting, many winners naturally wish to make provision for younger members of their family, typically children or grandchildren. 'It's important to consider the order that gifts are made, especially if earmarking money for your children's future using a trust in order to avoid unnecessary tax charges.' On top of the £208million jackpot, the EuroMillions draw this Friday will also have 13 guaranteed £1million prizes in the UK as part of the raffle element, with this Friday being the 'unlucky' 13th.
Reuters
43 minutes ago
- Reuters
UK hiring slows again in May but downturn might be easing, recruiters say
LONDON, June 13 (Reuters) - British businesses hired staff at a slower pace in May as demand for staff fell for an eighth consecutive month, but there were some signs that the downturn was beginning to bottom out, a survey of recruiters showed on Friday. The Recruitment and Employment Confederation said its members reported a further big fall in hiring for permanent jobs but spending on temporary staff fell by the least in six months. "More encouraging signs in temp billings, vacancies and stabilising private-sector demand offer a measure of optimism as we head into the second half of the year," REC Chief Executive Neil Carberry said. Britain's labour market is facing headwinds including weak economic growth, a sharp rise in employers' social security contributions and a near-7% rise in the minimum wage which took effect in April. Tax data showed that the number of employees on company payrolls dropped by the most in five years last month, while the unemployment rate for the three months to April rose to its highest in nearly four years at 4.6%. REC said its members reported that the number of candidates seeking work had increased at the fastest pace since December 2020 last month "amid reports of redundancies and fewer job opportunities". The Bank of England - which is expected to keep interest rates on hold next week - has said that developments in the labour market will be key to determining how fast it lowers interest rates. Private-sector regular pay growth slowed to 5.1% in the three months to April from 5.5% in the first quarter of 2025 but still remains well above levels the BoE views as consistent with getting inflation back to its 2% target. REC said starting salaries for permanent staff had picked up in May to rise at the quickest pace since August 2024 and that wages for temporary staff rose by the most in a year. But - unlike the official wage data - REC said its measures of pay growth remained below their long-run averages.
