Involvement in US strikes on Iran could make Australia a target, experts warn as government tight-lipped on Pine Gap
The International Coalition Against Nuclear Weapons (ICan), an Australian-founded organisation that won the 2017 Nobel peace prize, has warned Australia should not facilitate the attacks, 'directly or indirectly', and that 'by assisting the US we risk becoming a target'.
Anthony Albanese was asked repeatedly on Monday about Australia's level of involvement in the strikes. 'We are upfront, but we don't talk about intelligence,' the prime minister told reporters.
'We've made very clear this was unilateral action taken by the United States.'
The department of defence, and the defence minister, Richard Marles, declined to comment. The foreign affairs minister, Penny Wong, said there had been no request from the US for Australia to become 'more involved' in the conflict, and that she 'wouldn't speculate' on Australia's response if such a request came.
Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email
Last October, Australia supported the American bombardment of Houthi targets in Yemen 'through access and overflight for US aircraft in northern Australia'. That attack was seen as a warning to the Iranian regime, for which the Houthi insurgency acts as a proxy.
ICan argued Australia was not a bystander to the recent US airstrikes, and that the joint US-Australian surveillance base at Pine Gap was integral to US nuclear targeting and war-fighting capabilities. Contribution to the attacks by Pine Gap could make Australia complicit and a target, Ican said.
'We call on the Australian government to immediately rule out any logistical support for these operations, including by denying permission for US B-2 stealth or B-52 bombers attacking Iran to transit or refuel in Australia, as occurred recently during a US mission to attack Yemen,' Gem Romuld, director of ICan Australia, said.
'Australia must not facilitate, assist or enable these attacks — directly or indirectly. We cannot bomb a path to peace.'
Dr Margaret Beavis, Australian co-chair of Ican, said any Australian support for the US strikes would 'actively undermine the global rules-based order'.
'We risk accelerating nuclear proliferation, we risk Pine Gap becoming a target, Tindal Air base [both in the Northern Territory] becoming a target.'
Senior research associate at the Nautilus Institute, Prof Richard Tanter, said it was a 'realistic assessment' that the Pine Gap joint defence facility near Alice Springs might be involved in some capacity in Sunday's bombardment of three Iranian nuclear facilities.
Pine Gap, Tanter said, is a ground station for two types of intelligence satellites in geosynchronous orbits: signals intelligence satellites, and early warning infra-red satellites, some of which are stationed over the Middle-East.
Data from the early warning satellites runs directly to the US through Pine Gap, without Australian intervention, Tanter said, adding that Australia was increasingly casting itself 'as an enabler of American strategic projection'.
'It is very implausible to believe that Australia has any effective control over the tasking of those satellites, particularly the level of a veto [such as]: 'We do not want you to do that'.'
Former Labor senator and union leader Doug Cameron strongly criticised the government's support for the 'illegal' strikes.
Speaking as national patron for Labor Against War, Cameron said if the government was committed to the rules-based order it would condemn the US strikes on Iranian nuclear sites, which some international law experts described as unlawful under the UN charter.
'We condemn the Australian government's support for the aggression that Trump is using against Iran. We believe it is illegal, and we believe it's inconsistent with the long-held Labor Party's support for the United Nations charters,' the former NSW senator told Guardian Australia.
Cameron said it was 'inconceivable' the Labor government would support the Trump-ordered bombings had it not signed up to controversial Aukus security pact that he said 'subjugated' Australian foreign policy to US interests.
The former left-faction heavyweight also criticised his own wing of the Labor Party for being 'mute' on the issue.
'It's about time voices for peace once again dominated the Labor Party … not this appeasement of the US and Israel,' he said.
Dr Sue Wareham, Australian national president of the Medical Association for Prevention of War (MAPW), argued Australia was 'totally conflicted' in its support for the US strikes, agreeing the government was 'really trying to appease the aggressors'.
MAPW, noting that the US, with over 5,000 nuclear weapons, and Israel, with approximately 90 – were attacking Iran, which has zero, said Western double standards over nuclear weapons were in 'overdrive'.
Wareham said Iran's potential development of nuclear weapons was a serious global concern, but argued that 'the military [response] option rules out the diplomatic ones'.
Given Pine Gap's critical role in US intelligence and targeting, it would be 'fairly naive to think that Australia is not involved to that extent [of intelligence contribution],' Wareham said.
'As to whether we're more involved, the government needs to be upfront about this, about all of its involvement with, and support, for the US military … we know that some of the American B-52s are nuclear armed, we don't know if the B-52s at Tindal are, because the US won't tell us, and the Australian government won't ask.'
The US has a policy of strategic ambiguity around its B-52 fleet, a large part of which is capable of carrying a nuclear warhead, and Australia does not request that the US disclose whether it is landing nuclear-armed bombers on Australian territory.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
6 hours ago
- The Guardian
Young Australians may endure worse lives than their parents, ‘worried' productivity chief warns
Young Australians may endure worse lives than their parents, the nation's productivity chief has warned. Danielle Wood, chair of the productivity commission, said young people are facing a future of lower wages, increased costs and the impacts of climate breakdown without major government action to tackle major economic challenges. Wood also urged the government to not put new regulations on AI, claiming existing rules on fraud, safety and discrimination are already sufficient – an argument running counter to human rights experts and unions calling for greater protections against abuse and for workers. On the eve of the Albanese government's economic reform summit, with its key focus on productivity, Wood will address the National Press Club in Canberra on Monday. She said Australia must adopt a 'growth mindset' and boost productivity to solve looming problems for future generations, saying it was 'the only way to sustainably lift wages and opportunities over time'. 'Overwhelmingly, young people today believe they won't live better lives than their parents did. As chair of the Productivity Commission, I'm worried too,' Wood will tell the Press Club, according to a speech notes released ahead of the address. Sign up: AU Breaking News email Wood's speech blames recent Australian governments for key challenges facing young people, pointing to 'policy choices' for house prices growing faster than incomes, and claiming politicians have 'for so long avoided the lowest cost policy choices' in dealing with climate change. Wood will say that productivity comes from better skills and training, new technologies, and policy settings making it easier to switch jobs or run a business. The commission has, in the lead up to the roundtable, released several major reports suggesting changes to tax settings, workforce issues and training, and technology among others. Amid criticism of the summit before it had even been held, the treasurer, Jim Chalmers, maintained the exercise had already been a success, claiming it had helped focus Australians' attention on productivity and the economic challenges faced by the government. A YouGov survey of 1,500 people, conducted for community organisation Amplify, last week found 73% of Australians either did not know or were unsure about the summit, and only 29% were confident it would lead to meaningful change. Around two-thirds of people surveyed believed productivity increases would mean people had to work harder, with the benefits going to bosses, but the same percentage believed it would lead to more job opportunities. 'We've focused the country on the productivity challenge. We've gotten people accustomed to dealing with the economic and fiscal trade‑offs that governments deal with every day,' Chalmers said on Sunday. Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion Among the key issues to be discussed through the roundtable is AI. Business and tech groups have urged the government to embrace a light-touch approach to legislating it, saying over-regulation could stunt the productivity benefits associated with the new technology. The government is still debating how best to respond to AI, with a diversity of views among Labor voices. The former industry minister Ed Husic had set out plans for a standalone AI act to regulate the field, while the new minister, Tim Ayres, has spoken about regulation and legislation among plans still to be decided. It is unclear what Labor will settle on. The commission has set out proposals for how tech, including AI, could be regulated and treated in Australia, suggesting it could add up to $116bn to Australia's GDP. However, the commission was strongly criticised last week for suggesting big tech companies be allowed to mine Australian copyright content – including music, literature, art and journalism – to train their AI models, an idea advanced by the Tech Council of Australia and its chair, the Atlassian co-founder Scott Farquharson. The Tech Council on Monday released its submission to the roundtable, where it again called for 'copyright reform' including 'narrowly tailored text‑and‑data‑mining exceptions and increased access to high‑quality Australian datasets' to help train AI models. 'Australia's current copyright frameworks are restricting frontier AI innovation. Training foundation models depends on text and data mining,' the submission read. Wood's speech notes contain no repeat of the PC's controversial suggestion for a copyright carveout, but she will again call on the government to not over-regulate AI. 'While managing the risks is important, we do not think that a new and overarching regulatory framework for AI is the way to go. That's because the risks posed by AI are mainly existing risks,' she will say. 'AI may make it cheaper, easier and faster for bad actors to create harms, but most of these harms – from product safety, to discrimination, to fraud – are already covered by regulatory frameworks.'
The Guardian
6 hours ago
- The Guardian
The roundtable is a test of Labor's courage and vision. Will it rise to the occasion?
Remember when governments took bold steps – deregulating the dollar, introducing the GST, freeing up trade and rolling out the NDIS? Not any more, even though the need is greater than ever. Treasury explicitly advised Jim Chalmers in its post-election advice that the budget settings are 'unsustainable', that personal and company tax are too high and that 'indirect taxes' are a solution for reform. Addressing the intergenerational inequity in our tax system requires courage and vision. At this rate, we will be passing on a lower standard of living, diminished health and education outcomes, and a degraded environment to younger Australians. The most recent federal election was defined by embarrassing small-mindedness from the major parties – promises of $7 off your weekly fuel bill or a $5 tax cut. These are not serious solutions to the structural challenges we face. When you combine these small target strategies with the increasing need to show an electoral 'mandate' before tackling any policy issue, how will we ever address the big challenges? Sign up: AU Breaking News email There are two schools of thought about how reform happens: one argues that it requires a strong majority government; the other believes it will take a minority government pushed by a principled crossbench. The fact that overall support for the major parties fell again with 33.6% of voters supporting community independent or minor party candidates demonstrates increasing frustration at the major parties' unwillingness to confront Australia's long-term challenges. The election of independents to the crossbench was driven by two decades of gridlock on economic reform, coupled with a lack of a coherent approach to climate change mitigation. During the 2022 election campaign and immediately after, I spoke of the urgent need for broad tax reform. In the last parliament, I raised this issue in the house 10 times. Allegra Spender spoke about it 21 times. The major parties avoided the topic entirely. I was heartened by the treasurer's decision to expand the agenda for the economic reform roundtable to include tax reform. Could this be the moment when the government finally confronts the structural challenges in our budget and the demographic shifts ahead? It was refreshing to hear the treasurer push back against the 'rule in, rule out' game that has stifled meaningful debate for years. But unfortunately, the prime minister is managing our expectations down to tinkering. The case for tax reform is compelling and GST provides an opportunity. Our current tax system disproportionately burdens younger Australians. Bracket creep – the stealthy tax increase on workers – is our only plan for addressing the deficit. We need to explore alternatives with productivity in mind. The economist Chris Murphy has shown that, per extra dollar of revenue raised, the GST causes the least economic harm, followed by personal income tax, and then company tax. Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion Yet our GST is among the narrowest and lowest in the OECD. It applies to just 7.5% of the economy, compared to an OECD average of over 11%, and its rate is half the OECD average. Broadening the base and increasing the rate could allow us to shift the tax burden from those who work to those who spend. In anticipation of the roundtable, the economist Richard Holden and I revisited our 2023 work and asked the Parliamentary Budget Office to model a 'progressive GST' – a way to relieve pressure on personal income tax while protecting low and middle-income earners. Under our model, the GST rate would increase to 15% and exemptions would be removed. To ensure equity, every Australian adult would receive a $3,300 annual payment, effectively making the first $22,000 of spending GST-free. PBO modelling shows that this could leave the bottom 60% of income earners better off, even before accounting for the personal income tax cuts enabled by the additional $24bn in revenue. This is the test. The Labor government has a 19-seat majority. If a comfortable margin is truly a prerequisite for reform, now is the time to act. If we see no action now and the major parties decide an electoral mandate is required, they are now on notice. The voters are on to you. You have three years to build community support for a bold and viable plan to fix our tax system. Any party that wants to be taken seriously as a contender for government in 2028 must come to the election with a tax plan that is fair, future-focused, and fit for the demographic changes ahead. The small target game is over. Australians are ready for courageous action to secure a prosperous future for our children. Kate Chaney is the independent member for Curtin
Daily Mail
7 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Shock new poll reveals why Aussies see Donald Trump as a bigger threat than 'communist dictator' Xi Jinping
Australians are more afraid of Donald Trump 's tariffs than the increasing Chinese military threat in the Pacific, according to a shocking new poll. The Newspoll, conducted between Monday and Thursday last week, revealed far greater concern among voters about the US President's unpredictable trade penalties than there was about Chinese counterpart Xi Jinping 's westward push. When the two issued were posed to 1283 Australians, 42 per cent of voters said US tariffs were more of a concern, while just 37 per cent stated Beijing 's military build-up in the Indo-Pacific region was the more pressing issue. Voters who were neutral on the two global issues stood at 21 per cent, the poll published in The Australian revealed. However, the polling analysis also showed a partisan effect was at play, with Labor and the Greens viewing Trump's tariffs as the bigger threat, while Coalition and minor party voters saw China as the more dangerous issue. Trumps tariffs triggered 55 per cent of Labor voters and 60 per cent of Greens voters, but just 29 per cent of Coalition and minor party voters. On the other hand, China's military muscle moved 50 per cent of Coalition supporters and 49 per cent of minor party supporters, but just 26 per cent and 22 per cent of Labor and Greens voters respectively. The poll also revealed that, for the first time since September 2023, more Australians are satisfied with Anthony Albanese's performance than not. The primary votes of the Coalition and One Nation improved by one point to 30 and nine per cent, respectively, since last month's first post-election Newspoll. Labor remained at 36 per cent and holds a two-party-preferred vote over the Coalition at 56 to 44 per cent. The Prime Minister's personal popularity has returned to levels not seen since the cost-of-living crisis and voice referendum led to a slump in his approval ratings. Albanese now has a net approval rating of plus-three, with 49 per cent of voters satisfied with the Labor leader's performance and 46 per cent dissatisfied. He has not been in positive territory since September 2023, when he recorded 47 per cent and 44 per cent satisfaction and dissatisfaction ratings. The Prime Minister's current rating is the highest it's been since July 2023, when 52 per cent of voters rated his performance positively. Sussan Ley, who took over as leader of the Coalition following Peter Dutton's departure, has since her performance ratings drop since last month's poll. She had a net approval rating of minus-seven last month, similar to Dutton's levels following the 2022 election. However, Ley has seen the gap widen to minus-nine. After the election, the Coalition experienced its worst result for the Liberal/Nationals parties since Newspoll first compared primary vote levels in November 1985. The first post-election poll had Labor at 36 per cent compared with the Coalition's 29 per cent. Labor won the May 3 election after securing 34.6 per cent of the primary vote. Support for the opposition remains below the 31.8 per cent primary vote won by the Coalition in May. Pauline Hanson's One Nation rose a point to nine per cent while the Greens remained steady at 12 per cent. Others, including independents and minor parties, fell from 15 to 13 per cent.
