
Making America healthier or cutting food stamps? MAHA and RFK's targeting of SNAP is more complicated than meets the eye
A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday.
Enter Email
Sign Up
But those who use and defend the
current SNAP structure say the issue is more complex than portrayed by MAHA and fear Kennedy's push is a
rebranded effort to cut SNAP, which serves nearly 42 million Americans and has a more than $110 billion yearly budget. Paired with other moves by the administration to end programs that helped low-income Americans access fresh produce, they question the government's core commitment to improving American diets.
Advertisement
'There are so many other ways they could try to 'make America healthy again,'' said Janin Otero, 46, a SNAP recipient who works part time as a food service worker and works with Project Bread, a local antihunger nonprofit. She supports promoting healthy eating, but with high food prices, families' practical needs, and the limited SNAP benefit, she worries further restrictions would only make life harder for those on the program.
Advertisement
'I want to believe that there are good intentions behind it, but ... there's a punishing effect to it,' she said. 'It's just way too nuanced to just be like, yeah let's just make everything healthy.'
The concept is not exclusive to MAHA. An effort by officials in New York state to restrict 'sugar-sweetened beverages' from SNAP benefits
The most recent changes proposed by Republicans in the House and Senate, the
In the meantime, Kennedy is urging states to request federal
waivers to restrict soda and more from SNAP purchases, and has been visiting states already moving to do so, including West Virginia, Utah, and Arizona.
'Every American who wants to eat a doughnut ought to be able to eat it, or drink a Coke, but the federal taxpayers should not be paying to poison our children,' Kennedy told reporters at a recent press conference. 'We're going to end that.'
Advertisement
Calley Means, a health care entrepreneur and
argued
reorienting SNAP will solve for many of ills of the food industry,
including lowering the cost of healthy food and increasing
grocery store access. SNAP accounts for about 10 percent of US food and beverage sales,
'The SNAP program ... causes massive distortions in overall food prices,' Means said. 'When you have a $120 billion program and the majority of that program through lobbying in the food industry goes to ultra-processed food and sugary food … that is a subsidy for that food and creates food deserts.'
Means said the arguments against banning soda from SNAP originate from soda lobbyists, and that antihunger groups are just a front for the food industry (some, but not all, antihunger groups do receive funding from the food industry).
'Anyone who suggests that the government should fund soda is deliberately or un-deliberately engaged in evil, because our kids have a metabolic health crisis,' Means said.
But SNAP beneficiaries and antihunger advocates argue that healthy food is pricier and harder to prepare for low-income families who face other obstacles, such inadequate transportation and access to grocery stores.
And even just banning certain beverages such as soda, they say, could cause difficulties for retailers and users to navigate: It could potentially lead to to lower participation in the program by both, as well as result in the policing of eating habits of low income people more than other Americans, without increasing their resources for healthier options.
The
Advertisement
'The reality is it is more expensive to be able to follow a healthy diet in this country,' said US Representative Jim McGovern of Worcester, a longtime antihunger advocate. 'We should do everything we can to encourage people to move in that direction, but to not acknowledge that resources play a role in this is just ridiculous.'
Carolyn Barnes, a University of Chicago researcher who interviews SNAP recipients, called the MAHA push an 'elite-driven, in some ways a paternalistic discussion.'
'We're policing what low-income moms feed their kids with the assumption that they don't know,' Barnes said. 'People [in poverty] buy food the way that everyone else does, they just ration.'
Barnes' said her research has shown that when SNAP recipients receive large benefits, they buy healthier food. And when programs are more complicated to navigate, she said, participation tends to plummet.
Those who use SNAP in Massachusetts agree. Alexandra Mello, 49, a mom from Northampton who works with Project Bread and uses SNAP, said she remembers the difficulty of using the more-restrictive Women, Infant, and Children (WIC) program benefits when her children were young.
'It would cause more stigma, more stress for people to be able to already on a budget try to go and navigate the grocery store, and that's if the stores even stock the products their family would eat,' Mello said.
Advertisement
Massachusetts pioneered the Healthy Incentives Program (HIP), which gives SNAP users more money for buying produce from local farmers. The program
Despite Kennedy's focus on healthy food,
the Trump administration has
Meg Bantle, 32, runs an organic produce and flower farm in Adams and is also a SNAP recipient. Bantle's business has boomed with the Masachusetts healthy foods program, which has helped it sell CSAs and produce at farmers markets to SNAP users.
'They never turn down the opportunity to fill their basket with that much money worth of food,' Bantle said of shoppers finding out about their HIP benefits.
With the recent cuts to
the Massachusetts and federal
low-income produce programs, Bantle fears what's ahead for their business
and
the impacts to people reliant on the program.
'We are on the front lines of seeing how these cuts affect people in our community,' Bantle said. 'I get emotional thinking about these programs getting cut, because ... it's not state legislators and it's not people in MAHA who have to turn people away who are trying to buy food for their household — it's me.'
Tal Kopan can be reached at

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Boston Globe
11 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Ukraine tries to understand why Trump suddenly abandoned idea of cease-fire
Trump called on social media for a direct peace agreement without securing a cease-fire first, claiming that Zelenskyy and European leaders had agreed on the point. His statement was a stark shift from the 'principles' agreed upon earlier in the week by Trump, Zelenskyy and his European allies, which called for refusing to discuss peace terms until a cease-fire was in place. Advertisement Russia has long pushed for a direct peace deal that would address a broad range of issues and impose onerous demands on Ukraine, including territorial concessions. Avoiding a cease-fire would allow Russia to continue pressing its advantage on the battlefield in the meantime. Advertisement An official briefed on the call between Trump and Zelenskyy said the Ukrainian leader's trip to Washington would aim to seek clarity from Trump. Kyiv does not understand why the American president suddenly dropped the demand that a cease-fire precede negotiations. In a statement, Zelenskyy seemed to tread carefully, trying not to openly contradict Trump. 'We need to achieve a real peace that will be lasting, not just another pause between Russian invasions,' Zelenskyy said. But he added that 'the killings must stop as soon as possible, and the fire must cease both on the battlefield and in the air, as well as against our port infrastructure,' suggesting that he was still prioritizing a cease-fire. In statements of their own, European leaders made no mention of having agreed to abandon their demand for a cease-fire. At the same time, the fact that the statements did not include a demand for a cease-fire, as in previous remarks, suggests at the very least an attempt not to antagonize Trump. Trump's move to aim for a direct peace deal could bring to failure a week of frantic diplomacy in which Kyiv, with European support, had lobbied the U.S. administration to insist that a cease-fire should come first and that Ukraine should not be undercut in the negotiations. Trump's social media post caused a feeling of whiplash among some Ukrainians, who quickly reversed their early assessments of the Alaska summit. Oleksandr Merezhko, chair of the foreign affairs committee in the Ukrainian parliament, had initially expressed some relief, saying that 'the situation could have been worse' if Trump and Putin had struck a deal behind Ukraine's back. Advertisement He said that a scenario in which 'Trump and Putin started together to pressure Ukraine into surrender' could not have been ruled out given Trump's history of deference to Putin. But after Trump's post on Truth Social, Merezhko changed his view. 'In fact, Putin and Trump are starting to force us into surrender,' he said. Trump also proposed security guarantees for Ukraine inspired by the collective defense agreement between NATO member countries, which states that any attack on a member is an attack against all, according to Giorgia Meloni, Italy's prime minister. Under such guarantees, Ukraine's NATO allies would be 'ready to take action' if Russia attacked again. But Merezhko and other Ukrainian allies said such a formulation was too vague. 'Which countries will agree to consider an attack against Ukraine as an attack against themselves?' Merezhko asked. 'I'd like to believe that we will find such countries, but I'm not sure.' Trump, in an interview with Fox News after the meeting with Putin, also addressed the idea of territorial swaps, saying they were among the points 'that we largely have agreed on.' Trump had said several times over the past week that territorial concessions would be part of a peace agreement, drawing pushback from Zelenskyy. Zelensky, however, has not entirely ruled out possible land swaps, telling reporters this past week that this is 'a very complex issue that cannot be separated from security guarantees for Ukraine.' Merezhko, who like many Ukrainian officials was left on tenterhooks by the Alaska meeting, watched the post-meeting news conference live from Kyiv at around 2 a.m. local time. As both Trump and Putin offered only vague statements, Merezhko said it had become clear that no concrete deal had been reached. Advertisement He noted that Putin had again said that any end to the fighting must address the 'root causes' of the war, which is Kremlin parlance for a range of issues that include the existence of Ukraine as a fully independent and sovereign nation aligned with the West. 'I think it's a failure because Putin was again talking about security concerns and used his usual rhetoric,' Merezhko said as the press conference came to an end. 'I don't see any changes.' In Kyiv, some emerged Saturday morning from a sleepless night following the news with the sense that the war was likely to continue unabated. After the Alaska summit wrapped up, the Ukrainian air force said Russia had continued its assault on Ukraine, launching 85 drones and one ballistic missile overnight. These figures could not be independently verified. Tetiana Chamlai, a 66-year-old retiree in Kyiv, said the situation with the war would change only if Ukraine was given more military support, to push Russian forces back enough to force Moscow to the negotiating table. 'That's the only way everything will stop,' she said. 'I personally do not see any other way out.' But Vice President JD Vance made clear this past week that the United States was 'done' funding Ukraine's defense against the Russian invasion. The Trump administration, however, is fine with Ukraine buying American weapons from U.S. companies, and Zelenskyy announced this past week that Kyiv had secured $1.5 billion in European funding to purchase U.S. arms. This article originally appeared in


New York Post
11 minutes ago
- New York Post
These three ‘golden' visa destinations have become hotspots for wealthy Americans
America's elite are increasingly seeking 'golden' visas. Canada-based Mohamed Bennis, an associate vice president at Arton Capital, told Fox News Digital that many are realizing 'true wealth' is measured by 'freedom of movement.' Advertisement 'Many Americans are realizing that a second residency or citizenship is the ultimate insurance policy against uncertainty,' said Bennis. 'It provides them with almost unmatched mobility, flexibility and security in a world that is becoming increasingly unpredictable.' He added, 'Just as gold has historically been a best-in-class investment as a store of value, these visas are also premium assets that provide their holders — and their families — with both tangible and intangible benefits for the long term.' Arton Capital advises high-net-worth individuals on the process of investing in citizenship or residency all around the world. Political divisions, said Bennis, have influenced wealthy Americans to weigh their options. They're not necessarily moving their primary residences — but they might be acquiring the freedom to have another option. Advertisement 4 'Many Americans are realizing that a second residency or citizenship is the ultimate insurance policy against uncertainty,' Mohamed Bennis, associate vice president at Arton Capital, said about people pursuing 'golden' visas. acnaleksy – '[Golden visas] can open doors to privileges that money just can't buy: freedom of movement, security for your family and access to opportunities around the world,' he said. He said that Malta, the United Arab Emirates (UAE) and Portugal are becoming increasingly popular for Americans seeking residency or citizenship through investment. 'Each option offers its own distinct benefits. All three open the door to new cultures, safer environments and the ability to live life on your own terms.' Advertisement 4 'Malta has recently transitioned from a citizenship-by-investment model to a citizenship-by-merit framework,' he said, making visas to this area more accessible. aapsky – 'Malta and Portugal offer access to world-class healthcare and education within the EU, often at lower costs than in the U.S. — while the UAE offers a high standard of living, zero income tax and a thriving international community,' he said. Portugal's investment program requires prospective visa holders to invest about $500,000 in qualifying investment, venture capital funds, and scientific or technological research. 'Approval is granted to applicants based on their skills and innovation.' Advertisement About $250,000 can be invested in cultural heritage preservation, or in creating at least 10 full-time jobs in Portugal, according to the country's site. 4 According to Portugal's website, about $250,000 can be invested in cultural heritage preservation, or in creating at least 10 full-time jobs in the country. SeanPavonePhoto – Bennis said Malta's program enables more people to access the visas by lowering the barriers. 'Malta has recently transitioned from a citizenship-by-investment model to a citizenship-by-merit framework,' he said. 4 Bennis said the United Arab Emirates offers a 'modern crossroads' between the East and the West that draws in the wealthy. marekkijevsky – 'This has meant that approval is granted to applicants based on their skills and innovation, rather than just the size of their economic contribution,' he said. The UAE has remained a top destination for American clients. Bennis said the emirates offer a 'modern crossroads' between the East and the West that's particularly attractive. 'Its golden visa popularized the 'citizenship by merit' trend that countries such as Malta are now adopting,' he said. Advertisement 'It grants long-term residency rights, typically 5 or 10 years, and is available to investors, skilled professionals, entrepreneurs, even outstanding students.' Bennis added, 'The countries with the most smooth and streamlined processes are often the most popular.'


Buzz Feed
11 minutes ago
- Buzz Feed
Best Political Tweets 8-16-2025
American politics — well, frankly, global politics — is chaos right now, but I find it comforting to know I'm not alone in thinking the world has gone bananas. So, here are 27 of the best, most relatable, and sometimes funny political tweets from the last week: Note: The images in the original tweet were replaced due to photo rights. Note: The images in the original tweet were replaced due to photo rights. See you next week!