Mbalula slams DA charges against Nkabane as 'opportunistic'
Image: X/ANC
ANC secretary-general Fikile Mbalula has dismissed the Democratic Alliance's (DA) criminal charges against Higher Education Minister Dr Nobuhle Nkabane as 'opportunistic,' saying she acted within her rights in appointing members to SETA boards.
Speaking at a media briefing in Johannesburg on Monday, Mbalula said the DA's move lacked legal grounding and amounted to 'performative politics.'
'The minister — did she lie? We say no, she didn't lie. She went to Parliament and gave the information,' said Mbalula.
He maintained that in terms of the Skills Development Act of 1998, the minister is legally empowered to appoint members, including chairpersons, to the accounting authority of the SETAs.
'The law is very clear on this matter. If others say ministers have not admitted errors or apologised - that person is a liar,' Mbalula added.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
Ad loading
The DA laid criminal charges against Nkabane last week, alleging that she lied to Parliament about the appointment of ANC-linked individuals to SETA boards.
DA MP Karabo Khakhau claimed that Nkabane misled Parliament by stating an 'independent' panel had made the appointments. Khakhau said this was false, citing a chairperson who confirmed he was not involved in the process.
'She falsely claimed an independent panel made the appointments — including a chair who confirmed he wasn't involved,' said Khakhau.
The DA has vowed to vote against the department's budget and other budgets 'led by corrupt ANC ministers.'
Mbalula accused the DA of attempting to 'collapse the government.'
Meanwhile, the Hawks have confirmed they are investigating the charges against Nkabane following the DA's complaint.
kamogelo.moichela@iol.co.za
IOL Politics
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Citizen
29 minutes ago
- The Citizen
Ramaphosa-Mbeki feud reignites as foundations withdraw from National Dialogue
Analysts say the roots of the tension lie in ANC negotiations of the early 1990s, when Mbeki was replaced as chief negotiator by Ramaphosa. The renewed feud between President Cyril Ramaphosa and former president Thabo Mbeki dates back to before 1994 and their disagreement over preparations for the upcoming national convention has opened old wounds, experts say. Political analyst Sandile Swana and University of South Africa political scientist Prof Dirk Kotzé said the tension between the two leaders started during negotiations in 1990s for the new democratic dispensation. Foundations withdraw from dialogue preparations They were reacting to the decisions by six legacy foundations – the Thabo Mbeki Foundation, Steve Biko Foundation, FW de Klerk Foundation, Chief Albert Luthuli Foundation, Oliver & Adelaide Tambo Foundation and Desmond & Leah Tutu Legacy Foundation – to withdraw from the National Dialogue preparations. The foundations said the convention has deviated from the plan to have the process led by civil society, or citizens. Instead, matters were being rushed without proper consultation by the government, which had centralised the process. Ramaphosa said this week's convention would go ahead as planned, implying it would move on without the foundations' participation. Roots of the rivalry in the 1990s negotiations The experts said the tension between Mbeki and Ramaphosa was exacerbated when Mbeki, as the ANC's first chief negotiator assisted by Jacob Zuma, were removed and replaced with Ramaphosa, who was assisted by Mohammed Valli Moosa. ANC insiders at the time saw this as a snub for Mbeki and Zuma and an embrace of Ramaphosa, whom they claimed emerged from nowhere into Nelson Mandela's inner circle after his release from jail. ALSO READ: National Dialogue will go ahead despite withdrawal of foundations, Ramaphosa says Ramaphosa was subsequently elected ANC secretary-general at the party's 48th national conference in 1991, succeeding Alfred Nzo. Mandela wanted Ramaphosa as his deputy and successor as president, but the ANC old guard wanted Mbeki, who was Oliver Tambo's right-hand man in exile. Mandela gave in to the majority within the party and was further convinced by Kenneth Kaunda and other Southern African Development Community leaders that Mbeki was the right candidate to succeed him, as that was part of Tambo's plan. Role of the ANC's left wing and SACP Kotzé said Mbeki's removal as ANC chief negotiator was engineered by the left within the ANC, especially Joe Slovo and other senior SA Communist Party (SACP) leaders. The left saw Mbeki as unreliable because, as a then SACP politburo member in exile, he acted against the party's position for a total insurrection against apartheid when he held secret talks with Afrikaner delegations for a negotiated settlement. Possible reasons for Mbeki's recent withdrawal Kotzé said Mbeki was fully involved in the dialogue with Afrikaners and the National Intelligence Service before 1990, but this was opposed by the SACP leadership, of which Mbeki was part. Subsequently, Mbeki did not continue his SACP membership. 'Because of that history, the SACP, particularly Joe Slovo, made it impossible for him to be the chief negotiator of the ANC. 'Instead, they got Ramaphosa in as ANC chief negotiator. From a Mbeki perspective, those things he would never forget. I don't want to suggest there is open hostility; at the same time, there is no close friendship,' he said. ALSO READ: National Dialogue must be place for 'women to raise their voices', Ramaphosa says Kotzé said, he could only speculate that Mbeki's decision to pull out of the National Dialogue process was because he saw himself as an initiator of it. 'He is almost a father figure of this. My impression is that the foundations were initially very prominent in the preparations and very recently, the government took over. 'This is exactly what the foundations, the Mbeki Foundation specifically or Mbeki himself, do not like.'
Eyewitness News
31 minutes ago
- Eyewitness News
After withdrawing from National Dialogue, FF Plus leader Mulder suggests parallel event without ANC
CAPE TOWN - Freedom Front Plus leader, Corné Mulder, is suggesting a parallel National Dialogue that does not include the African National Congress (ANC). He said that as long as the ANC was uncompromising in its policy positions, it had no place in such a conversation. The party on Tuesday withdrew from the National Dialogue, accusing the ANC of being an obstructive roleplayer. ALSO READ: • AfriForum accuses Ramaphosa of capturing National Dialogue, turning it into ANC monologue • AfriForum, Solidarity join legacy foundations in boycotting national convention • Steenhuisen: Withdrawal of legacy foundations from National Dialogue proves DA assertion initiative poorly planned • Presidency compares upcoming National Dialogue to CODESA The dialogue will be preceded by a two-day national convention, which starts on Friday. The Freedom Front Plus' former leader and minister of correctional services, Pieter Groenewald, has been part of the inter-ministerial committee planning for the National Dialogue. But the party's new leader, Mulder, said the ANC was being an obstructive roleplayer and the FF Plus did not join the Government of National Unity (GNU) to bend to the ANC's will. "We are not in the GNU to be co-opted. We are not in the GNU to be used. We are not in the GNU to make it possible for the ANC to govern as if they still have a majority. That's not why we are there." Mulder suggested that the dialogue organisers go back to the drawing board and start the process afresh. "That process should be led by civil society and not by the government, not by the Presidency, not by the deputy president. It should be completely out of their hands." Mulder said the dialogue had presented the ANC with an opportunity to acknowledge that its policy directions were outdated.
IOL News
2 hours ago
- IOL News
R700m National Dialogue under fire over funding, exclusions, and ‘elite capture'
Concerns mount over South Africa's National Dialogue funding and inclusivity Image: Supplied The National Dialogue, projected to unfold across communities in the coming months, arrives amid a volley of concerns from independent analysts, the withdrawal of several foundational organisations, and questions about how the process will be funded and what it can realistically achieve. Public attention has fixated on the plan's price tag with more than an estimated R700 million. Critics argue that such a large outlay is out of step with a fiscus already pressed by competing demands, especially when many parties have withdrawn. This has triggered concerns about the dialogue's potential if broad civil society participation is constrained. Dr Metjie Makgoba, an independent political analyst and senior lecturer at the University of Limpopo, warned that rushing the dialogue may replicate past missteps. In his view, the desperation to proceed discounts the need to address deeper structural issues. 'South Africa has historical problems,' and unless those are tackled - especially the persistent race- and class-based inequalities, the dialogue could be more symbolic than substantive. 'It's impossible to practice democracy in a society that remains divided along race, class, and gender lines,' he said, stressing that any genuine dialogue would require structural remedies before consensus-building can even begin. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading Makgoba's broader point is that a process driven by a diversified, multi-stakeholder agenda is inherently challenging to converge on a familiar path forward. He suggested that the state's current trajectory, seen by some as pursuing a liberal, market-led project, complicates efforts to frame a dialogue all sectors can buy into. 'The key factor is that the government is pushing a capitalist, liberal project, and the dialogue becomes a symbolic gesture that signals care without delivering on the underlying inequalities.' Parliament's eye on money raised further questions about accountability. Mmusi Maimane, chair of Parliament's Standing Committee on Appropriations, has written to Finance Minister Enoch Godongwana to clarify funding sources and governance for the National Dialogue. 'Where is the money coming from?' he asked during an interview on SABC on Tuesday, insisting that public money must be accountable and allocated only through an act of Parliament. He pressed for details on a quoted R700 million budget line, asking why the item was not specified in the budget and where those funds would be redirected. 'Any money used for the public must be accounted for,' Maimane said, highlighting the need for parliamentary oversight of the process. Political analyst Sandile Swana sharply criticised the National Dialogue's inclusivity and legitimacy. He argued that several organisations have been excluded because their participation could challenge the current economic status quo. Swana framed this as a broader 'elite capture' concern, suggesting that a document produced by the ruling elites might fail to reflect the needs of ordinary South Africans. 'If the National Dialogue were to expose a 'grave train' of entrenched interests and incompetence, those affected could feel compelled to seek drastic remedies, including questions about the vitality and direction of governance itself,' said Swana. Despite concerns, organisers have pressed ahead, highlighting the need for broad participation and the long-term aim of national coherence. Boichoko Ditlhake, chairperson of the National Convention organising committee, told reporters on Monday that the dialogue will proceed while acknowledging the controversy. In addition to the convening, public dialogues will be rolled out across communities and sectors in the months ahead, intended to invite input from diverse stakeholders. The controversy surrounding the withdrawals from several high-profile foundations, including the Steve Biko Foundation, Thabo Mbeki Foundation, Chief Albert Luthuli Foundation, Desmond and Leah Tutu Foundation, FW de Klerk Foundation, Oliver and Adelaide Tambo Foundation, and the Strategic Dialogue Group, has cast a pall over what many had hoped would be a more inclusive process.
