logo
Freed: The King, the Donald and the future of Quebec

Freed: The King, the Donald and the future of Quebec

The big surprise about our visit from the 'King of Canada' was that Quebecers didn't care.
Sure, the usual nationalist suspects went on about the 'insult to democracy.'
But most Quebecers yawned and shrugged.
In short, they acted like Canadians, 83 per cent of whom said they 'didn't care' about King Charles's visit (while Quebecers polled 90 per cent).
In fact, most Canadians would like to dump the monarchy.
But for that we'd have to reopen the dreaded Constitution: a Pandora's box that would quickly have every province demanding something in exchange.
Alberta would want a pipeline in every home, Quebec the exclusive world rights to the words 'distinct' and 'special.'
Ontario would demand recognition as the official 'centre of the universe' and B.C. a guarantee it can keep complaining about housing prices, while sipping $8 lattes.
Negotiations would continue until shortly after the death of the universe.
So instead of going there, we all just shrugged at the King's visit. But the francophone shrug seems part of a larger recent shrug about Quebec nationalism in general.
How? Let's connect some dots.
First dot: In the recent election, Quebecers single-handedly saved the Liberals. They saw the only election issue as TrumpAmerica, with a Carney-united strong Canada as their best defence.
That's why Quebec originally joined Canada. As Father-of-Confederation George-Étienne Cartier put it, 'Quebec must join' Confederation 'or be absorbed' by America.
For proof Cartier was right, visit New England, where you'll see names like Lavoy (formerly Lavoie), Wallet (Ouellet) and Packet (Paquette).
Their owners often don't know their names were once French.
As Quebecers grow closer to Canada, it's a bad time to promise a Quebec referendum, as PQ Leader Paul St-Pierre Plamondon keeps doing.
In a recent poll, even one-third of PQ voters said they were 'not in favour' of Quebec sovereignty.
Let alone young Quebecers. In another recent poll, 80 per cent of francophones under 35 were 'proud to live in Canada,' while young people in English Canada polled 74 per cent.
Young Quebecers are now bigger Canadian nationalists than young English Canadians.
The only place separatism is rising is Alberta. Will young Québécois someday fly en masse to Calgary, waving maple leafs and begging Albertans to stay in Canada?
So what's behind these changes?
Second dot: Recent generations of Quebecers have lived different experiences than their nationalist elders.
Their parents and grandparents felt kept down by English Canada and some may still hold a grudge, including our premier.
But younger Quebecers have grown up with francophones running Quebec (while we anglos feel like a threatened minority).
These young francophones have no personal resentment pushing them toward independence. They don't even have any interest in it.
Many travel and work in Canada, especially out West, and feel as comfortable there as I did at their age.
Like young people everywhere, they also love the English-dominated internet, video games and Taylor Swift, but they also love popular French Quebec shows like La Voix.
You can see how older nationalists might worry about this dual attachment. As a woman at a French book launch told me:
'I'm much less nationalist than when I was young, but my three kids — forget it! If I even say the word independence, they think I'm a fossil.'
I sometimes wonder if the urgency some older nationalists feel for sovereignty is because they don't trust their kids to follow.
It's easier for cabinet ministers to beat up on English guitar-string labels than tell their kids to stop speaking English. Like kids everywhere, they'd probably just do the opposite.
Third dot: Recent generations of francophones have gone to school with the whole planet.
When I grew up, most immigrants went to English schools because they couldn't get into French Catholic ones. So francophones were rarely exposed to them.
But today's post-Bill 101 francophones have shared classes with the world — including students in turbans and hijabs — and you see them all socializing together on The Main at night.
Quebec will always have periodic waves of nationalism to protect its language, but currently French is doing well, despite its doomsayers.
So younger francophones seem confident about themselves and their language, within Canada.
Last dot: All of the above is partly why Quebec Liberals are neck-and-neck with the PQ in polls and way ahead of Legault's CAQ.
Quebec sometimes moves in giant swerves, or quiet revolutions — and we may be on the cusp of one, set off bizarrely by, yes, Donald Trump.
Still, you can never predict long-term politics (see America), so I'm not making promises.
Perhaps an unpopular Legault will quit and be replaced by someone more appealing? Or the PQ will drop its referendum pledge and risk a sovereignist hardliner rebellion?
Maybe Trump will suddenly outlaw french fries, french toast and french kisses in America, provoking a new wave of French Quebec nationalism.
Who can say, but for now the ground is ripe for another Quebec swerve, perhaps away from independence.
Trump has already changed the arc of current Canadian history.
He may yet do the same for Quebec, ending an era of 'Le Québec aux Québécois!' and starting one of 'Le Québec pour un Canada Uni!'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

LILLEY: First ministers meeting chance for Carney to turn page on Trudeau era
LILLEY: First ministers meeting chance for Carney to turn page on Trudeau era

Toronto Sun

time7 hours ago

  • Toronto Sun

LILLEY: First ministers meeting chance for Carney to turn page on Trudeau era

Time for PM to deliver after promising new tone, new relationship with provinces to get projects moving Prime Minister Mark Carney attends a meeting with representatives of Canada's energy sector in Calgary, Alta., Sunday, June 1, 2025. Photo by Jeff McIntosh / THE CANADIAN PRESS The meeting Monday in Saskatoon between the prime minister and premiers is Mark Carney's first big test since being elected. He promised a new tone, a new relationship, to get big projects moving fast and now it is time for him to deliver. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Don't have an account? Create Account The symbolism of the meeting taking place in Saskatoon at a time of western alienation and substantial wildfires across Saskatchewan and Manitoba shouldn't be lost on anyone. What Carney needs to bring to this meeting, though, and what premiers need to leave with are concrete actions or the promise thereof. Premiers have sent their wants, needs and — in some cases — demands to Carney ahead of time. Manitoba Premier Wab Kinew is asking for icebreakers and expanded shipping and port facilities along Hudson's Bay. Nova Scotia's Tim Houston wants support for an offshore wind project that he said could see electricity sent West to the rest of the country. Ontario's Doug Ford has asked for the federal government to help him fast-track projects such as the Ring of Fire mining project, believed to be filled with critical minerals, and his plan to build a tunnel under Hwy. 401, the busiest road in the country. Alberta's Danielle Smith is asking Carney and his government to rescind Bill C-69, the West Coast tanker ban and the plan for an emissions cap on oil and gas that the province said amounts to a production cap. Your noon-hour look at what's happening in Toronto and beyond. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. Please try again This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Read More We could see some movement and perhaps some promises or expressions of intent on some of these proposals, but Smith's demands on reversing course on key legislation is a non-starter, according to the government. That said, a leaked document from the Privy Council Office shows the Carney Liberals are willing to go around C-69 for specific projects. Bill C-69, dubbed the 'no more pipelines bill,' is officially known as the Impact Assessment Act and is opposed by every provincial government because of its impact on oil and gas, forestry, mining and basically any other natural resource development. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. The document from the PCO shows the government is willing to bend the rules for projects deemed to be in the national interest. 'Once a project is determined to be in the national interest, federal reviews will shift from 'whether' to build these projects to 'how' to best advance them. It will streamline multiple decision points for federal approval and minimize the risk of not securing project approval following extensive project work,' the document says. This proposal and Carney's response to the requests from provincial governments are expected to be revealed Monday to premiers. One of the promises that Carney has been making is to move to a single environment assessment process rather than duplicating — or at times competing — federal and provincial assessments. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. 'Once determined to be in the national interest, a project would be prioritized and benefit from a seamless single point of contact — the major federal projects office,' the federal document says 'This will include co-ordinating Crown consultation processes and ensuring federal resources are prioritized to the most important projects.' RECOMMENDED VIDEO The question will be whether this is enough not only for Smith — and to a degree Saskatchewan's Scott Moe — but for the other premiers as well. Allowing some projects to skirt C-69 or get federal approval for fast-tracking but not others could cause further tension. Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre, responding to news of the moves by the Carney government, said that while he welcomes projects going forward, this plan doesn't go far enough. 'Even if the government decides to circumvent C-69 on individual projects, there will be dozens of other projects that we might not even know about. Because investors will not come forward as long as they risk having to face the worst approval system in the world,' he said. He's right: This truly will be the government choosing winners and losers, which rarely ends well. Still, it's an improvement over the Trudeau government's stance, which is what Carney is being measured against these days. World Sports Toronto & GTA Editorial Cartoons Canada

Pablo Rodriguez on defensive as Liberals seek way to win back votes in regions
Pablo Rodriguez on defensive as Liberals seek way to win back votes in regions

Montreal Gazette

time9 hours ago

  • Montreal Gazette

Pablo Rodriguez on defensive as Liberals seek way to win back votes in regions

By RIVIÈRE-DU-LOUP — Despite criticism from one of his competitors, Pablo Rodriguez says it would be perfectly legitimate for the next leader of the Quebec Liberals to represent a riding on the island of Montreal. 'What's most important is to have Quebec in your heart, to have the regions in your heart,' Rodriguez said at a news conference. 'It's as if there is something bad in coming from Montreal. 'I grew up in Sherbrooke. What's important is I will be the premier of all Quebecers.' The question of where Rodriguez would run roared to life Sunday during the sixth and final debate before the June 14 election of a new Quebec Liberal Party leader, a replacement for Dominique Anglade. The theme of the debate was the regions. Virtually shut out in ridings off the island of Montreal in the 2022 general election, the party desperately needs to win back francophone voters outside Montreal if it stands any chance of winning the next general election in 2026. It was former Liberal MNA Karl Blackburn, campaigning he is the man to rebuild the Liberals in the regions, who raised the issue of the leader's pedigree in a particularly intense moment of the debate before 150 Liberals gathered at the Hôtel Lévesque here. He told the crowd that in 2022 the Coalition Avenir Québec (CAQ) formed a government with 90 MNAs and only two were from Montreal. 'It shows you can form a government without Montreal, but you can't form a government without the regions of Quebec,' Blackburn said, adding in his mind the ballot box question in this race is who is best equipped to win those votes back. 'Unfortunately, voting for Pablo is to again abandon the landscape of the regions of Quebec and the economy,' Blackburn fired across the stage. At another point of the debate, Blackburn challenged Rodriquez to say where he would run. Blackburn noted he and the three other candidates have pledged to run for seats in the regions: him in Roberval, Charles Milliard in Orford, Marc Bélanger in the Outaouais, and Mario Roy in the Beauce. Rodriguez, who represented the Montreal riding of Honoré-Mercier when he was an MP and is leading the candidates in the polls, has not said where he would run should he become leader. Rodriguez has indicated he is mulling over either running in the Eastern Townships or in Montreal. He has said win or lose the leadership, he will be a candidate for the Liberals in 2026. At his own encounter with the media later, Blackburn did not back down. 'He did not even accept to say where he will run,' Blackburn said. 'For me, Pablo is a double zero. I don't need to find a region to say I come from. I am from Saguenay—Lac-St-Jean. The regions of Quebec have always been my playground. 'It was a great opportunity for him (Rodriguez) to say he will run in the regions.' The other candidates, however, were cautious about wading into the feud, which was not the first one between Rodriguez and Blackburn. 'It was not an anti-Montreal debate,' said Charles Milliard, a pharmacist and former president of the Fédération des chambres de commerce du Québec who lives in North Hatley. 'I sense a certain slippage in this debate; to the effect that if you once lived in Montreal you can't show your face in public.' As for Rodriguez possibly running in Montreal, Milliard said: 'Who am I to judge that? He will make his own decision. We're going to need 125 candidates, I'm going to need 124 amazing candidates and I would be very pleased to have him on my team.' Bélanger, an international trade lawyer, had an answer at the ready. 'Voting Marc Bélanger, that's a good choice for the regions,' he told reporters. Bélanger added 'people can run where they want,' but he has the knowledge of both Montreal and the regions. He is from Matane. The debate was just about the final pitch for votes from the candidates as the clock ticks down to election day. During the debate, all five said they are the best equipped to defeat the CAQ and block a comeback by the Parti Québécois, which leads in the polls. But candidate Roy, a 31-year-old economist and farmer from the Beauce who is barely registering in the polls, announced off the top of the debate he would not be rallying or working with the winning candidate no matter who comes out on top because he disagrees with all their positions. Roy also revealed to the crowd he put up $40,000 required to run in the race and now has to fundraise from Liberals to pay it back. To date, his campaign has raised $3,600. If he fails, Roy will be found in violation of the province's electoral laws and barred from seeking public office. 'It's do or die,' Roy said. 'If I am not elected, the party is finished. If I am not elected, the PQ will take power and my province is finished. It's do or die. If I am not elected the PQ and (Donald) Trump have a free hand. My country is finished.' Now that the debates are done, it will soon be time for the Liberals to start voting for their new leader. The process kicks off June 9 and runs to June 14. They can do it by phone, internet or in person at the site of the leadership convention June 14 at the Quebec City convention centre. While all members of the party have a vote, the party is using a weighting formula by riding and by age group. Under this formula, each of Quebec's 125 ridings are allocated 3,000 points. One thousand of those points are in the hands of youth members (25 years old and under). The total number of points awarded is 375,000. To win, a candidate has to obtain a majority of those points, or 187,501. If no candidate obtains a majority in the first round of voting, a second is held between the two candidates with the most votes. At the deadline to become a member to be eligible to vote, the party had 20,495 members. The candidates have one more chance to address Liberals: in speeches the day of the election at the convention. This story was originally published June 1, 2025 at 6:25 PM.

Ontario, Saskatchewan sign agreement to free up trade ahead of meeting with Carney
Ontario, Saskatchewan sign agreement to free up trade ahead of meeting with Carney

Winnipeg Free Press

time10 hours ago

  • Winnipeg Free Press

Ontario, Saskatchewan sign agreement to free up trade ahead of meeting with Carney

SASKATOON – Ontario and Saskatchewan have signed an agreement to remove trade barriers ahead of a meeting with Prime Minister Mark Carney to hash out a plan they hope will supercharge the economy. The memorandum of understanding sees both provinces mutually recognize each other's goods, workers and investment. They are also working to advance measures that would see willing provinces allow the sale of alcohol directly to consumers. Ontario Premier Doug Ford says the move helps grow provincial economies as U.S. President Donald Trump threatens more tariffs on Canadian steel. The premiers are meeting Carney tomorrow to discuss major nation-building projects that could boost the economy. Ford says Carney needs to remove regulations to make it easier to build projects, and Moe says he's hoping for a port-to-port corridor in Western Canada to ship more goods. This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 1, 2025.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store