
Need for a resounding, people-centric Pak-US tie-up
Listen to article
It is always a pleasure to come back to the United States, which is my second home, and a pride to return to Pakistan. I have been a visitor for the last two decades, since my first official State Department-sponsored IV trip in 2003 as a mid-career journalist.
Despite my siblings and mother being American citizens, I neither made it a point to immigrate to laurels of the lone superpower nor was tempted with its silver-linings. Despite being a critic of the state of affairs back home — desperately in need of reforms, supremacy of law and pluralism — I was content in making a profound space for myself in all humility.
This time around as I mulled a trip to the US, there was an ambience of fear, mistrust and a ruthless media campaign. A news-leak said that citizens from Pakistan too are in the line of fire, and the new administration of President Donald Trump is considering a travel ban. It also said that Pakistan has been placed in the 'orange' list of countries whose citizens will be stringently vetted at the airport for their bona-fides, and subject to prerogative admission at the mercy of immigration authorities to the Land of Liberty.
But that was not the case, as I once again found myself, along with my better half, welcome to the dreamland, and it was a smooth walkover. So was the case with fellow citizens queued up at the airport. Perhaps, genuineness pays and all those Pakistanis, or citizens from any other shade, who believe in fair play have little to worry.
My air-dashing luckily also coincided with a firm declaration from the State Department spokesperson, Tammy Bruce, that "there is no such list", and a procedural review of visa issuance to several countries, infected with terrorism and bad governance, is in the pipeline. This should put the matter to rest, and harness a sentiment of goodwill and cordiality.
As far as relations with the US are concerned, Pakistan has stood with the tide of time and been an allied-ally of Washington. Being a nation with a youth bulge, Pakistanis look up to the US in awe and are eager to cement broad-based people-centric ties in the realms of higher education, technology transfer, trade and commerce, as well as to learn from the success stories of big-ticket ventures of immigrants in global leadership.
At the state-level, likewise, there is a genuine desire for a beefed-up counter-terrorism cooperation and buoyed military understanding to ward off security imbalance in the region, to ensure that terrorism is defeated and profound geo-economics flourishes. In doing so, Pakistan should not be seen as a competitor in realpolitik, but rather treated as a country in pursuit of peace and congeniality. The US support in these endeavours is indispensable, and there is no need to jump the gun by secluding Pakistan from the prism of otherness.
Pakistanis, at the same time, value American principles of egalitarianism, rule of law, constitutional triumph and democracy. They too want to see public representation take root and democracy respected, rather than being thrown up for a toss for the sake of strategic exigencies. Erecting an assured civil supremacy mosaic could foment new vistas of genuine cooperation, and that's what is required at this point of time after fallacies of pick and choose in the extra-legal and undiplomatic domains.
Pakistanis, in an era of social media and free flow of information, can neither be silenced nor taken for a ride. They are quite conscious of their civil and political rights, and want to see them realised. Thus, rather than pulling on with the existing decorum of mistrust, it would be advisable to take a break and usher in a new lease of confidence in people's aspirations in bilateralism.
Unflinching support for public representation and a suspicious free trade and travel modus operandi is the way to go. Americans cannot afford to lose a resilient and enterprising nation of 245 million for the sake of construed strategic maneuvering. Likewise, Pakistanis see in American liberalism a better and resounding tomorrow.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Express Tribune
2 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Israel may strike Iran without US backing: US media reports
US President Donald Trump (R) meets with Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, DC, on February 4, 2025. PHOTO: AFP Listen to article Israel is considering launching a military strike against Iran in the coming days — even without support from the United States amid faltering diplomatic efforts to curtail Iran's nuclear programme, according to multiple US media reports. Sources told NBC News that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's government has become increasingly serious about acting unilaterally as negotiations between Washington and Tehran move towards a preliminary deal that includes provisions allowing Iran to enrich uranium. According to Sky News' US partner network NBC, a Capitol Hill aide and other sources familiar with the matter confirmed that Israel is weighing military options independent of Washington's support. Read: Iran warns West, Israel over IAEA pressure ahead of new nuclear talks It comes as the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the UN's nuclear watchdog, has formally concluded for the first time in nearly two decades that Iran is not complying with its nuclear obligations. Tehran has denied the claim, insisting it has remained within its safeguarding commitments. Iranian Defence Minister Aziz Nasirzadeh on Wednesday warned that Tehran would target US military bases across the region if a conflict breaks out between the two countries. His statement followed testimony from General Michael Kurilla, commander of US Central Command (CENTCOM), who told Congress on Tuesday that he had presented President Trump with a 'range of options' to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons. In response to the escalating tension, the United States has ordered the evacuation of all non-essential personnel from its embassy in Baghdad. A similar option has been extended to staff and dependents at US missions in Bahrain and Kuwait. US President Donald Trump confirmed the move on Wednesday evening, saying: 'They are being moved out because it could be a dangerous place, and we'll see what happens'. White House spokesperson Anna Kelly said the decision was taken 'as a result of a recent review,' but made no reference to any planned Israeli strike. Despite the evacuation, an Iraqi government source told the state news agency that Baghdad has not observed any security indicators warranting such a move. The US embassy in Baghdad is already operating with limited staffing. The Trump administration remains engaged in efforts to reach a nuclear agreement with Iran. According to Axios, US Special Envoy Steve Witkoff is set to meet Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi in Muscat, Oman, this weekend to discuss Tehran's response to a recent US proposal. Read More: Iran says US travel ban 'violates international law' Talks between the US and Iran aim to curb Iran's nuclear programme in exchange for partial relief from American sanctions. Iran insists its programme is peaceful and within international legal bounds. President Trump, however, expressed doubt about the prospects of reaching a deal. In an interview with the New York Post's 'Pod Force One' podcast, he said he was 'getting more and more less confident' in the negotiations. 'They seem to be delaying, and I think that's a shame,' Trump said. 'Something happened to them.'


Business Recorder
5 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Iran will not compromise on right to enrichment, says official
DUBAI: Iran will not abandon its right to uranium enrichment because of mounting frictions in the region, a senior Iranian official told Reuters on Thursday, adding that a 'friendly' regional country had alerted Tehran over a potential military strike by Israel. The official said the tensions were intended to 'influence Tehran to change its position about its nuclear rights' during talks with the United States on Sunday in Oman. US President Donald Trump said on Wednesday US personnel were being moved out of the Middle East because it could be a 'dangerous place', adding that the United States would not allow Iran to have a nuclear weapon. Tehran and Washington will hold a new round of talks in Oman's capital, Muscat, to resolve a decades-long standoff over Iran's nuclear ambitions. Iran says to submit own nuclear proposal to US soon After five rounds of discussions between Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi and Trump's Middle East envoy, Steve Witkoff, several obstacles remain. Among them are Iran's rejection of a US demand that it commit to scrapping uranium enrichment.


Business Recorder
5 hours ago
- Business Recorder
European shares tumble as trade, geopolitical tensions mount
European shares dropped on Thursday, in their fourth straight session of declines, as trade optimism stemming from U.S.-China trade talks faded, while mounting geopolitical tensions led to the markets being more cautious. The pan-European STOXX 600 was down 0.4% at 549.41 points at 0707 GMT, while most regional bourses were also in the red. U.S. President Donald Trump said on Wednesday that he was willing to extend the deadline for trade talks but it was not likely necessary as the U.S. will send offer letters to countries in a week or so. However, markets were a little concerned about the European Union being able to clinch a deal before Trump's July 8 deadline - when the tariff pause expires. Geopolitical worries added more caution to markets already navigating U.S. tariff-driven uncertainty after trade talks with China did not offer a solution to de-escalate longstanding tensions. European shares slip as markets unfazed by US-China deal U.S. personnel were being moved out of the Middle East because 'it could be a dangerous place' amid rising tensions with Iran, Trump said on Wednesday. In the market, travel and leisure stocks were the worst hit, down 1.7%, while industrial miners fell 1.1%. Among stocks, BE Semiconductor Industries (BESI) jumped 7.7% after raising its long-term financial targets ahead of its investor day. Tesco gained 1.3% after Britain's biggest food retailer's domestic sales growth accelerated in its first quarter.